METHINKS MANY YANKEES AND CANADIANS ARE CONFUSED BY TRUDEAU THE YOUNGER'S ACTIONS N'ESY PAS?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwqq5MbifkM&ab_channel=Redacted
Trudeau CAUGHT issuing secret orders against citizens | Redacted with Natali and Clayton Morris
55 In special circumstances, in a proceeding, the Court may vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule.
SOR/2004-283, s.CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982
PART I
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
September 2019
In 1982, the Human Rights Law Section (HRLS) of the Department of Justice was created as a center of expertise with a mandate to support the Department as it navigated its way in what was then the “brave new world” of the Charter.
Much of the Section’s work since then has involved providing legal advice on a wide range of novel and complex Charter issues in relation to specific matters. However, HRLS has also invested considerable energy in developing “knowledge management” tools aimed at helping inform colleagues across the Department about Charter issues and evolutions in the case law.
For over two decades, one of these tools has been the “Charter Checklists”. The Checklists were first published in hard copy in 1991 and went on-line internally at the Department of Justice in 2003. They are the product of longstanding collaboration among lawyers, students, paralegals and support staff in HRLS, the Official Languages Directorate and the Constitutional, Administrative and International Law Section.
More recently, and mindful of efforts to increase openness and transparency both inside and outside government, HRLS started thinking about how the Checklists could be adapted for publication so we could share the work of some of Canada’s leading Charter experts with a broader legal audience, while also continuing to provide a valuable resource for our colleagues.
This is how we landed on our refreshed and renamed tool: “Charterpedia”. What better way to celebrate the Charter’s 35th anniversary in 2017 than to transform decades of collective work into a “Charterpedia” that could be shared with a broader audience?
What will you find in Charterpedia? The entries for each provision of the Charter generally contain the following elements:
- a brief description of similar provisions in international, regional or comparative instruments;
- the purpose of the section;
- the analysis or test developed through case law in respect of the provision; and
- particular considerations related to the section.
Pinpoint cites to relevant authorities are provided and citations to Supreme Court of Canada decisions are hyperlinked wherever possible. The date at the top of each entry reflects the date to which it is current. We will be striving to update the entries every six months.
Each entry has a different author or authors. While we’ve tried to standardize many aspects of the form and content, we have also tried not to let the “perfect be the enemy of the good” in order to facilitate timely publishing and updates. In other words, high quality — not absolute perfection — has been our goal.
And now, a few lawyerly caveats: HRLS’s Charterpedia should not be considered an exhaustive overview of the law. Charterpedia entries are intended to provide legal information. They are not legal advice, nor are they intended to be a substitute for legal advice. Charterpedia entries do not constitute a waiver of solicitor-client privilege, and do not reflect the formal views or legal positions of the Department of Justice.
Our goal has always been to produce a user-friendly tool which draws the reader's attention to the main issues that arise under the various provisions of the Charter and the leading case law on point. The cited case law tends to be that of the Supreme Court of Canada, but also includes appellate and trial level decisions where appropriate. Because it is still intended to be a key resource for Justice counsel and needs to be maintained in both English and French, Justice will continue to update the Charterpedia. In other words, it’s not a fully open and collaborative “wiki”.
Sarah Geh
Director General and Senior General Counsel
Human Rights Law Section
Rule 55 – Default; Default Judgment
(a) Entering a Default. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.
(b) Entering a Default Judgment.
(1) By the Clerk. If the plaintiff’s claim is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by computation, the clerk—on the plaintiff’s request, with an affidavit showing the amount due—must enter judgment for that amount and costs against a defendant who has been defaulted for not appearing and who is neither a minor nor an incompetent person.
(2) By the Court. In all other cases, the party must apply to the court for a default judgment. A default judgment may be entered against a minor or incompetent person only if represented by a general guardian, conservator, or other like fiduciary who has appeared. If the party against whom a default judgment is sought has appeared personally or by a representative, that party or its representative must be served with written notice of the application at least 7 days before the hearing. The court may conduct hearings or make referrals—preserving any federal statutory right to a jury trial—when, to enter or effectuate judgment, it needs to:
(A) conduct an accounting;
(B) determine the amount of damages;
(C) establish the truth of any allegation by evidence; or
(D) investigate any other matter.
(c) Setting Aside a Default or a Default Judgment. The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause, and it may set aside a final default judgment under Rule 60(b).
(d) Judgment Against the United States. A default judgment may be entered against the United States, its officers, or its agencies only if the claimant establishes a claim or right to relief by evidence that satisfies the court.
Trudeau defends vax mandates, Emergencies Act decision, in interview
In a wide-ranging interview with CBC Radio's The House, Trudeau spoke about tough, and divisive, choices
"It was their choice and nobody ever was going to force anyone into doing something they don't want to do," the prime minister said in an interview with CBC Radio's The House airing on Saturday.
"But there are consequences when you don't. You cannot choose to put at risk your co-workers. You cannot choose to put at risk the people sitting beside you on an airplane," Trudeau said before leaving for international summits in Africa and Europe.
Federal vaccine mandates played a major role in last fall's election campaign and proved to be a focus of public anger earlier this year that contributed to the occupation of downtown Ottawa and blockades at border crossings in four provinces.
More protests are planned in the nation's capital over the Canada Day long weekend even though the federal government lifted most of the restrictions this week.
Trudeau spoke at length during The House interview about the unrest, how his government responded to it and whether his own comments referring to the protesters coming to Ottawa as a "small fringe minority" holding "unacceptable views" contributed to the anger.
"No. I will always call out unacceptable rhetoric and hateful language wherever I see it," he said, insisting his remarks in January were never intended for the vaccine hesitant, but for those he believes were deliberately spreading misinformation and disinformation.
"Now, unfortunately, with … our modern social media and communications world, that was picked up and conflated and extended on. And I'm not going to start to say I was taken out of context, but my point was that there are people who are deliberately trying to stir up hate and intolerance and misinformation," he added.
"And we do need to call out those folks even as we continue to do everything we can to reach out in thoughtful, reasonable ways to people who do have worries or concerns and focus on allaying those worries and concerns."
Trudeau on taking divisive positions
There's more than a bit of Pierre Trudeau in Justin Trudeau the longer he's in office. There's no public second guessing and, increasingly, no regrets. Like his father, the younger Trudeau isn't inclined to shrink from a political fight, including over his decision to invoke the Emergencies Act.
The prime minister argued in the interview that using the powers in the act did nothing to block free speech, or peaceful assembly. The line was drawn, he said, when it was clear to the government that this was an illegal occupation.
He compared his decision to end the protests, and the language he used to condemn those advocating illegal actions, to criticism of his decision that every Liberal candidate must endorse a woman's right to choose.
"Well, I got accused of being divisive on that because people who believe deeply in being anti-abortion were therefore excluded from my perspective on this," he said.
"Any time you're going to take a strong position, especially one that is contested in society, there are going to be people who feel that you are strong against them. And what you have to do every step of the time as a leader is figure out whether or not it is worth the division to stand up on something that you know is right, and whether it's women's rights or the freedom of people to be protected during a pandemic."
Chris Hall, CBC's national affairs editor and host of The House on CBC Radio, virtually interviews Prime Minister Justin Trudeau from his home at Rideau Cottage in Ottawa on Monday, June 20. (Philip Ling/CBC)
Formal reviews are now underway into the reasons behind the decision to invoke the Emergencies Act for the first time. And as with the decision itself, these hearings are not without controversy or drama.
Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino told the parliamentary committee in April that the act was invoked on the advice of police. Since then two other cabinet members, Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, told the same committee they didn't hear recommendations from police to enact the Emergencies Act.
"I'm not aware of any recommendation of law enforcement," Blair said.
Trudeau was asked who's right.
"We had a range of advice from Justice. From Public Safety. From various areas," he said. "But if you think about the specific tools, one of the concrete complaints was tow truck drivers weren't willing to send in their rigs at the cost of being outed or harassed by these protesters."
Was that what tipped the balance?
"Well, no.. I said, 'Okay. What are the tools to get tow truck drivers to do that?' And we saw that one of the only tools we had that was going to be effective in the timeframe necessary was to bring in the Emergencies Act."
Opposition MPs are demanding full access to the decision-making process before the act was invoked. But witnesses, including RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki and CSIS Director David Vigneault, have told them they don't have the power to disclose their conversations or advice to cabinet.
"I can't speak specifically to any advice that was done in cabinet," Lucki told the committee last month when pressed whether her force had suggested the act be enforced.
She also deferred when asked if situational reports on what was happening would be publicly released, saying those reports belong to the government.
The prime minister told The House that the government will release those situational reports and what he called "the reality that we were facing across the country."
But demands that he waive the long-standing practice of maintaining cabinet confidentiality will not be met, he said, to ensure ministers have the confidence to speak freely on matters of national importance.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Experts warn of 'giving the devil the benefit of the law'
Law Times By David Gambrill
Expanding the power of criminal law will not stop terrorism, say legal academics, and may instead lead to the permanent imposition of extraordinary emergency measures and concentrated state power.
Quoting a character in the Robert Bolt play, A Man for All Seasons, Oren Gross, a Benjamin Cardoso School of Law professor, issued a general warning against "giving the devil the benefit of the law" in order to make the public feel more secure.
"Extravagent terrorist attacks such as those on Sept. 11 tend to bring about a rush to legislate," Gross told a legal scholars' conference convened to discuss the federal government's new antiterrorism legislation, bill C-36. "The preventative relief [is thought to] be, 'If only we add new powers to police, if only we add to the Criminal Code, if only we revamp and reinvigorate existing offences, then our nation is going to be secure.'"
But such logic tends to lead to a concentration of power at the level of government, he says. Citizens may relinquish their civil liberties out of fear, encouraging the state "do whatever it takes" to make terrorism stop, he says.
"Governments tend to overreact," says Gross. "Terrorism from below may, to some extent, be replaced with terrorism from above." Legal scholars who spoke at the conference echoed Gross' caution. Some worried that Canada is permanently entrenching the temporary emergency powers found in the 1988 Emergencies Act.
"My answer to the question, 'Can emergency powers be normalized?' is yes, they can be," says U of T law professor David Dyzenhais, a South African studying the emergency powers employed by the South African government under apartheid. "But when they are normalized, what we have is a violation of the spirit of the rule of law."
U of T math professor Peter Rosenthal, a lawyer at Roach Schwartz and Associates in Toronto, suggested the federal government should have used its powers under the 1988 Emergencies Act instead of drafting new anti-terrorist legislation.
Enacted by the Mulroney government, the Emergencies Act gives the federal government limited exceptional powers to deal with four types of emergencies: threats to public welfare, threats to public order, international emergencies, and war.
International emergencies, says the act, arise "from acts of intimidation or coercion, or the real or imminent threat of serious force or violence."
For an international emergency, the act can be put into affect for 60 days and must be reviewed by Parliament before the deadline can be extended. It includes powers to limit or restrict travel, ban public assemblies, remove non-citizens from the country, and enter and search premises without a warrant. The powers in the act are explicitly subject to the Charter.
The Emergencies Act replaced the War Measures Act, which the Trudeau government used to arrest and detain 465 Quebeckers in 1970. The federal government invoked the War Measures Act after the FLQ kidnapped Quebec provincial cabinet minister Pierre Laporte, who was found assassinated one day after the act was declared.
The so-called "October Crisis," when the War Measures Act was implemented, started a debate in Canada about when it is appropriate to suspend civil liberties. The Trudeau government came under heavy criticism for employing the act.
U of T constitutional law professor Lorraine Weinrib noted the federal government has studiously avoided using the language of "emergency measures," even though it has incorporated such emergency powers into its anti-terrorist legislation. The same emergency powers are available under the Emergencies Act, she says, albeit for limited periods of time and under strict supervision of Parliament.
"I would say the government did not use the Emergencies Act here in response to the problem of terrorism because it did not want to engage in this type of review process," says Weinrib. "It preferred to continue what has been highly discredited under the War Measures Act experience - namely, the concentration of power in the executive."
For this reason, many scholars at the conference encouraged the courts to review the legislation carefully. Federal government lawyers have called the proposed anti-terrorist legislation"Charter-proof." But that doesn't mean the anti-terrorism legislation should be enacted, says U of T law professor Kent Roach.
"We may too quick to accept . . . what the government's lawyers — or indeed any lawyers — conclude it is permissible to do," he says.
Roach listed several extraordinary police powers found in bill C-36. Most notably, the bill allows police to arrest and detain a person without a warrant, on suspicion the suspect may be carrying out a terrorist activity. It also creates "investigative hearings," in which suspects are compelled to give testimony that might incriminate them.
Roach was particularly critical of the hearing process, the powers of which, he insisted, haven't been around since the English 'Star Chamber' in 1641.
"Compelling a person to talk to the police in an investigation in which he or she may well be implicated offends our traditions of respect for the right of silence during police investigations," he says. "These traditions date back to the abolition of the Star Chamber in 1641."
The Star Chamber, associated with the English Courts, was reviled for its use of torture. As late as 1614, a Somerset clergyman, Edmond Peacham, was interrogated on the rack before the Star Chamber in the presence of the attorney general at the time, Sir Edward Coke.
Roach acknowledged the bill gives detained individuals the right to counsel at such hearings, but such representation provides cold comfort. "It gives people subject to investigative hearing the right to counsel — even though, in many cases, the lawyer will simply have to inform the target that he or she must talk or else face prosecution or continued detention," he says. One danger in forcing people to talk is that they might lie, says Roach. A combination of perjury and prosecutorial zeal could may lead to the kind of wrongful convictions associated with the "Birmingham Six" and "Guilford Four" in England, he says.
In the early 1970s, the IRA bombed pubs in Birmingham and Guilford, England, killing more than 21 people. Under pressure to convict the terrorists, police arrested 10 people in connection with the attacks.
In 1989 and 1991, respectively, a British court of appeal released the Guilford Four and Birmingham Six after finding they had been wrongly convicted.
This article does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action in reliance upon material contained in this article is accepted by the author or Canada Law Book Inc.
(c)Law Times Inc. 2004. All rights reserved.
Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry
Topic
Witnesses
Witness Panel 1
- Mr. Stephen M. Cutler Director - Division of EnforcementSecurities and Exchange Commission
- Mr. Robert Glauber Chairman and CEONational Association of Securities Dealers
- Eliot Spitzer Attorney GeneralState of New York
"LADY JUSTICE" TO WEAR A BURQA
The Statue pictured here behind Attorney General John Ashcroft no longer adorns the Justice Department's Great Hall. Ashcroft has repeatedly voiced objections to posing for pictures before this display of partial nudity.
Initially, Eight thousand dollars of taxpayer money were spent to cover the statue with blue drapes but now, the Ambassador from Saudi Arabia has presented the Justice Department with a gift. "Lady Justice" will be clad in a burqa.
"This is a great day for America," said Ashcroft at a small gathering of reporters. "There is nothing more indecent, or in need of being covered up than the human body. The old statue was obscene and pornographic. It attracted ogling perverts who would stare at her naked breast, and was a major embarrassment at formal functions."
A reporter asked Ashcroft what would be done with the partially nude male statue entitled "Majesty of Law." He told us, "That piece of homosexual pornography will be replaced with a statue of a true American hero, former Attorney General Edwin Meese, whose groundbreaking report on pornography inspired me to fight smut."
The Attorney General was then asked why he considered "Majesty of Law" pornography when its penis is completely covered with a loincloth. He became agitated, and admonished the reporter, saying "Do not swear in the sacred halls of justice, young man! Women and children might hear you saying that dirty word." Another reporter asked why he was so uptight about sex. He became even more upset, saying "You people just don't know when to quit, do you? Sex is everywhere in today's depraved culture, and it makes me sick! It especially upsets me to know that schools are telling innocent children that babies come from people having sex. When children ask where babies come from, they should be told that God plants seeds in a cabbage patch far, far away, and when the babies in the cabbage patch have grown enough, The Lord sends the stork to deliver the babies. If children ask about sex, they should be told that it is something nasty people do."
Ashcroft says that the new "more decent" statues would be unveiled at his next regular press conference. He was also asked what would be done with the draperies that had cost taxpayers eight-thousand dollars. Ashcroft said that they had been auctioned on Ebay, and had gotten the taxpayers back ten dollars.
Cover-Up At Justice Department
The department spent $8,000 on blue drapes that hide the two giant, aluminum art deco statues. For aesthetic reasons the drapes were occasionally hung in front of the statues before formal events. The department used to rent the drapes, but has now purchased them and left them hanging.
Justice Department spokeswoman Barbara Comstock said the decision to install the curtains was made by Attorney General John Ashcroft's aide who handles advance work. "It was done for TV aesthetics," she said.
ABC News reported that Ashcroft ordered the statues covered because he didn't like being photographed in front of them.
Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, Ashcroft has been photographed several times in front of the female statue that represents the Spirit of Justice. The statue has its arms raised and a toga draped over its body, but a single breast is completely exposed,
The other statue, of a man with a cloth covering his midsection, is called the Majesty of Law.
Both statues were installed in the 1930s when the building was finished, according to the Justice Department.
The statues were hidden by curtains on Nov. 20, when President Bush came to the Justice Department to name the building after the assassinated former attorney general,
Robert Kennedy.
Comstock said the Justice Department bought the drapes to avoid having to rent them every time the agency had a formal event. The drapes cost about $2,000 to rent.
She also said Ashcroft was not involved in the decision.
"He did not know this was being done," Comstock said. "The attorney general has more important things to do than worry about what appears in pictures."
The Great Hall is an ornate, two-story room that the department uses for ceremonies and special speeches.
In the past, snagging a photo of the attorney general in front of the statues has been something of a sport for photographers.
When former Attorney General Edwin Meese released a report on pornography in the 1980s, photographers dived to the floor to capture the image of him raising the report in the air, with the partially nude female statue behind him.
Monday, a day with no public events in the Great Hall, the curtains, with the Justice Department emblem in the center, were placed across the stage, concealing the statues.
A former Justice Department official e-mailed a copy of an article about the statues to colleagues, adding the caption, "homeland security?"
White House press secretary Ari Fleischer joked about the controversy to reporters Tuesday. "If anybody has any nude statues, bring them to my office; I'll review them," he said.
© MMII, CBS Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press and Reuters Limited contributed to this reportTuesday, March 15, 2005
Me and Bush
WASHINGTON — No longer will the attorney general be photographed in front of two partially nude statues in the Great Hall of the Department of Justice.
The department spent $8,000 on blue drapes that hide the two giant, aluminum art deco statues, said spokesman Shane Hix. For aesthetic reasons, he said, the drapes were occasionally hung in front of the statues before formal events.
The drapes provide a nice background for television cameras, Hix said. ABC News reported that Attorney General John Ashcroft ordered the statues covered because he didn’t like being photographed In. front of them.
Since the terrorist attacks of Sept.11, Ashcroft has been photographed several times in front of the female statue that represents the Spirit of Justice. The statue has its arms raised and a toga draped over its body, but a single breast is completely exposed.
Albuquerque Journal Wednesday January 30, 2002
Sent by Certified US mail September 28, 2003
Hon. Alberto R. Gonzales H. Marshall Jarrett, Counsel
Counsel to the President Office of Professional Responsibility
The White House 20 Massachusetts Ave. N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20500 Suite 5100
Fax (202) 456-2461 Washington, D.C. 20530 2330
Phone (202) 456-1414 Fax (202) 514-4371
Phone (202) 514-3365
Senator Edward M. Kennedy David D. Aufhauser, General Counsel
317 Russell Senate Office Building, Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20510 1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Fax (202) 224-2417 Washington, D.C. 20220
Phone (202) 224-4543 Fax (202) 622-6415
Phone(202) 622-2000
Attorney General John Ashcroft Inspector General Gregory Sullivan
U.S. Department of Justice One Ashburton Place,
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 1311
Washington, DC 20530-0001 Boston, MA 02108
Fax (202) 307-2825 Fax (617) 723-2334
Phone (202) 353-1555 Phone (617) 727-9140
Re: My Beef with Corruption.
Sirs,
Please find enclosed:
1. A copy of six letters to and from a US Attorney and a District Attorney and one
from Ted Kennedy and one to Bill Delahunt proving the need to expose wiretap taps in an unrelated State Action. Many lawyers now possess a copy of the following wiretap tape. The Fourth Amendment violations cannot be denied. The letter to Bill Delahunt explains why I was compelled to solve the ethical dilemma for you. Tomorrow in a sincere effort to seek justice I tell the world on the public record during the pending hearings in Norfolk Superior Court. The Clerks of Norfolk Superior Court picked the day and time of the showdown in State Court. I however shall pick the place and time to file my next complaint in a federal court.
2. One CD playable on any form of CD player that contains a copy of wiretap tape numbered 139
one of many mentioned to you months ago. Be careful what you do with your copy it is served upon you in confidence as an Officer of the Court in order that it and many others are properly investigated.
3. A copy of the Cinderella Affidavit sold to me by the Carver Police Dept. This was the second
Affidavit. The one read to the Clerk in Wareham was never given to me. The new Affidavit was composed and dated the following day and the cop refused to sign and affirm his own bullshit. Mr. Ashcroft that document is obscene not the last word in the last sentence. I heard how you are so easily offended by nice tits on Statues etc. Trust me, you and I are from different planets the argument between you and I is gonna be hilarious to say the least. My dumb ass is gonna sue your righteous ass and as I told the FBI on October 15th, 2002, I will sue every lawyer who attempts to defend you until you show your face and defend yourself Pro Se against me man to man and before the Bar and heard by a jury of our peers.
If I drop off the face of this planet, I demand that y’all be interrogated in Cuba without counsel and tortured if necessary by Alan Dershowitz. That is what the Agents of the DHS were prepared to do to me on April 1st the same should hold true for you. It is you that has no regard for the Constitution not I. It is you who should suffer first from the offences against the Constitution caused by the Patriot Act. It is only the lady justice with the nice hooters that will make you fall on her sword. Shame on y’all and your little dogs of war too.
4. A copy of what happened on me birthday in Norfolk Probate Court. WOW.
5. A copy of my recent filing in the above stated matter requesting an oral argument with
Robert L. Quinan Jr. I am gonna enjoy the debate to the max.
6. A copy of my recent filing in the above stated matter requesting an oral argument with
Walter M. Lupan. He must be the most nervous lawyer of all.
7. A copy of one of my letters sent to all US Attorneys.
9. A copy of my letter to the elusive lawyers of the DHS.
9. A copy of the Court Order setting the time for my showdown with the Kickham BUDDYS.
(Bunch of Unethical Dandy Dam Yankee Solicitors) Go to http:// briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186 to see all that I wish to reveal. You might as well I have already posted this letter on the web for the world to read.
I figure tomorrow is High noon at the OK Coral and I am gonna face them all alone just like Ol Coop did in the movies. As Ol Ben once said anyone who is willing to trade freedom for safety, deserves neither. The Congress should have considered his words before passing the so-called Patriot Act. That Act is an insult to the word identifying it. As for me the New Hampshire license plate says all that needs to be said. It says it. I live it. I am a simple, sincere and serious man with lots of sand who doesn’t take shit from anyone. I will stand against anyone that offends my Clan and never back down. Can you tell that I am having fun picking a fight? Check me work and your ethics. I dare you to sue me.
Cya’ll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Craig.Chouinard@gnb.ca ; Tim.Porter@gnb.ca ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ; INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ; Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us ; Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ; Daphne.Thompson@gems2.gov.bc.ca ; coulter.osborne@oico.on.ca ; WayneGreen@mail.gov.nl.ca ; gallanpm@gov.ns.ca ; anrobins@vac-acc.gc.ca ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; Brian Mulcahy ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca
Cc: ethics@ic.gc.ca ; gisele.osborne@gnb.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ; thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ; martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ; Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ; geline.williams@state.ma.us
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:24 PM
Subject: Guess who is blogging this email right now
I am very upset that Dr. Ward Dean, a very important witness of mine against the public corruption was scooped off the street in front of his wife by federal agents who would not say who they were or where or why they were taking her husband away. This happened as he was coming home from an Grand Jury hearing against the IRS in Florida. This was an overt act against his Constitutional Rights and clearly done by those acting under the Patriot Act.
I must ask everyone what of my friend and am I next? I have called many people today in Canada and the USA that I have already received signed answers from. All they do is play dumb or deny or defer me to some other bad acting bastard or worse yet laugh at me. Shame on all of you. You may think you are free but just wait the lawyers may have bastards do it to you someday to protect their mask of virtue. At least none of you can ever say you that didn't know.
Why you failed to do anything to protect your own civil rights is way beyond my simple mind to understand. Do you all think you are above the law and the rights of ordinary people ain't worth a tinkers damn? Well guess ain't being took away without a fight? All the bells and whistles are going off like they did the last time they illegally sent me to jail on October 1st. I am staying far away from anyone and am a threat to no one. If they attack me I will die protecting my freedom from the wrongs of lawyers rather than go to jail or Cuba so they can get rid of me there. If the worst happens I want the world to know that my blood can be found on your hands.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bledrew@uOttawa.ca
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 9:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: news@hilltimes.com
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 10:26 AM
Subject: Fw: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me
You folks are so full of shit I can't stand it
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: illuminati_news@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ethics@ic.gc.ca ; gisele.osborne@gnb.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Pelletier, Raymond F. ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ; thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ; martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ; Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ; geline.williams@state.ma.us ; Brian Mulcahy ; madanr@ojp.usdoj.gov ; strategis@ic.gc.ca ; wilson.howie@ic.gc.ca ; cbisson@mccarthy.ca ; lynn.morrison@oico.on.ca
Cc: Governor Office ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ; INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ; Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us ; Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ; Daphne.Thompson@gems2.gov.bc.ca ; coulter.osborne@oico.on.ca ; WayneGreen@mail.gov.nl.ca ; gallanpm@gov.ns.ca ; anrobins@vac-acc.gc.ca ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; Byron Prior
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me
. Senator Joe Day should have given him my material a long long time ago. I thought Howie Wilson still had the job because everything was kinda murky within Strategis at the time and nobody would respond to me. Since my affairs in the USA are beginning to develop in a positive direction, now Joe Day and the others are just starting to pretend that they are ethical? Not on my watch. I have yet to find out who the hell the Ethics Counselor is for the Senate but rest assured I will find out and forward him all that I will send to you. Good luck with your conscience folks. Perhaps someone should call me soon. 506 434-1379
Friday the 13th of August, 2004
Senator Joseph A. Day Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson
14 Everett St. 66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
Hampton, NB Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9
Prime Minister, Paul Martin Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler,
80 Wellington Street 900 Justice Building
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2 Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6
Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS) Philippe Rabot
340 Laurier Avenue West RCMP External Review Committee
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8 P.O. Box 1159, Station B
Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2
RE: Corruption
Hey Joe,
The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me. I just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just another lawyer who couldn’t get elected so you were politically appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget your former employer’s interests and do your job.
It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well. I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all to the other above named government employees and to the Arar Commission in particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a double check on your ethics.
One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad things really are in Canada and the USA. I am not sorry for the delay in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls or answered my email.
I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament. I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any longer for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now want me in court.
The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel in court on the first day of Brad’s new plan to defend the rights of the people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in Henrik’s court that day was more than willing to take me away and under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff’s paycheck? Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip from July 29th to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately informed before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and Brad Green that I wasn’t joking and that I am well within the jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New Hampshire.
If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a complaint against them and several others with the Law Society anyway. I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical lawyer that I can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted ethically in a Pro Se fashion?
My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me about NB politicians. I didn’t believe what he said about Wayne Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing I would want is such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I would see him in court and ended our conversation. He was obviously arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal friends to chum with. For all I know he may have just got back from Larry’s Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue.
I can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr. Richard and Brad Green. I am used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three years ago a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city limits of Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown was quick to inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone everywhere in Canada. If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance of a NB law as I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer employed as a Senator in the federal government, in what court would I appear? What if I served this material upon the cop that had the authority stop me? If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex Provincial Court shouldn’t Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse himself because of his words to me in court on July 29th. Would I not have the right to make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt offense and change the jurisdiction to the USA?
A far better example is what happened on June 24th. A man who claimed represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New Brunswick legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had jurisdiction over me and the right to throw me out of the public building. However when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both suggested, they refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I file a complaint against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a building in NB. Who defends the Crown if not Green?
Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends someone to see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to him the night of his debate on June 21st. Everybody in the churchyard watched that old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman can listen to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22nd on the CBC, As I told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes within that envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for the Arar Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how far the FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know if the priest denies he got them or Hooper won’t give them up, I have several more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have. Hooper can hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I must protect my ass if he won’t, If you look at the photo I have provided, you will see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding Harper in Sussex on June 19th. Now you know what I was talking about to him. What I want to know is that cop’s name. Harper wasn’t long spilling the beans to his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers weren’t long shutting him up on June 24th after Waldman demanded that he testify at the Inquiry. Why is that?
Waldman should have known of me if Arar’s lawyers at CCR in the USA had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as I became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough for him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes.
Mr. Arar’s lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against Ashcroft and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last November. I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed last January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and settle? Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada?
If you don’t believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call Arthur Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a little while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn’t know because I saved his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk with our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent?
I have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan about the Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but lots of time to golf with Clinton and McKenna. I demand to know if the many documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not, why not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to both Customs and Immigration the instant I landed in Canadian jurisdiction. If I am not called to testify, I will never understand. I did manage to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only arguments about jurisdiction as usual.
Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don’t know because as you can see I served his law office this stuff on June 25th the day before he and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After your review of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why Paul Zed and his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb. Paul Zed was elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst others, correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their conscience they should act according to it as well.
I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a lawyer is worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true Progressive Conservatives in Canada. The fact that another lawyer, John Crosbie advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too funny and sad for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and ran for Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper and his buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie did too for awhile anyway. Ain’t it funny how he now sings a different tune? There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a monumental a crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days after the election. He can play well within Mulroney’s league. It was truly sad that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin simply because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country down a garden path and under an evil Bush.
Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help me expose all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I will give this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it is time for the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even though the NDP have only 19 seats in Parliament I believe they have the power to inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election. I think the NDP politicians should think about the following statement a long time then review how they made out in the last election. I did say at the Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to place a vote. However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if they did that their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so they must vote out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on what I had said during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should have one more line on it "None of the above" then I am certain many more Canadians would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree.
Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada Elections office as she worked in support of Herron. Please don’t deny the fact that the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed and applauded at many of my remarks, Everybody heard what I said to Herron in front of Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he thought I was kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends. I spoke to him very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen. It should be interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire for lawyers to defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting a judge but I am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers. Lawyers do have an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you check my work, you should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and the political ones in particular. None of this would have been necessary if just one lawyer had upheld their oath or one public servant had blown the whistle. Why is not the question. The answer is Filthy Lucre.
Today is Friday the 13th. I am expected to stand in court in Boston and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by a lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making an appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I suspect foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA. I have little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to appear in that court. I notified everyone down in Boston that I look forward to trial. Monday will tell the tale.
In closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to finally break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of all places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the reason for my joy. That said, let’s see if I can make the Internet work for me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little behind the times in that regard. Although I do not wear a blue coat, I did give the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed off Candidate) and I tried to do it in a fun fashion so that my efforts would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to check my words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest reporting of the political circus in America can be found on the Canadian comedy shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie Sloan and the Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you read the documents I have provided. Now all I can say is Hooray for Canada and thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am glad that at least one percent understood and agreed with me. Quite likely not one of them was a lawyer. Now I only need one lawyer in the right place in government to do the right thing and things will change for the better. Until that happens I will continue torturing lawyers with dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve. It is just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks and become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my first political speech I am a son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be found in Fundy. Although I have separated myself from that Clan and founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, I will always honour from whence I came. I simply don’t care what lawyers or politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in my forefather’s motto "Veritas Vincit".
So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or against me? Ignoring me just won’t do. Please send your answer to the following address just as Brad Green did. I don’t know where I will be from day to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses to my sad complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if it is to refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee lawyer, David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to hide but you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me in a timely fashion. I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that came to your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my hat for over two months. I demand assistance from the Senator appointed to watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity that is mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me, I am wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue jurisdiction. I am here. What do you think? Should I run for Senator if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr. assist the ex FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan.
If any of the above named parties don’t like anything I have stated, Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not file any sort of motion to dismiss the matter but I will demand a jury. I will call many witnesses in my defense. I think the first one would be Mr. Harper. Wouldn’t it be fun if he was a hostile one?
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Certificate of Service
I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the jurisdiction of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings on Friday the 13th of August, 2004 delivered the above named material to the office of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB. I will also email many people in many places the proof that this was done on this day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the news about the Canadian Postal Service’s political issues with Paul Martin today and it should be obvious why this is necessary for me to do in person.
David R. Amos
September 10th 2004
Paul J.J. Cavalluzzo Jean-Pierre Kingsley
C/o Veena Verma C/o Diane R. Davidson
Cavalluzzo, Hayes, Shilton, McIntyre & Cornish Elections Canada
PO Box 507, Station B 257 Slater Street
Ottawa, ON K1P 5P6 Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4
David Orchard Peter MacKay
C/o Peter Rosenthal C/o Arthur Hamilton
Roach, Schwartz and Associates Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
688 St. Clair Avenue West 2100 Scotia Plaza, 40 King St. W.
Toronto, ON M6C 1B1 Toronto, ON M5H 3C2
RE: Corruption
Hey,
It has been over three months since I returned to Canada and contacted you all. Now that I have returned to the USA I will wait only three more weeks for you to act ethically and uphold the Public Trust. CTV or whatever said Fundy was a riding to watch but nobody mentioned me. I answered openly and honestly to every question put to me in every debate that I was allowed to attend. I had lots to say and now my work speaks for itself as I fall silent. Now I have a few questions. I would appreciate honest answers.
Pursuant to my many contacts and various conversations to you folks or those of your offices, please find enclosed an exact copy of all material sent to Jean Chretien and Brian Mulroney. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon Diane R. Davidson, Veena Verma, Peter Rosenthal, Arthur Hamilton and Peter MacKay in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated by the Arar Commission. May I suggest that Veena Verma solicit the Arar Commisson to demand CSIS to provide them with the six original tapes given to the priest, Bill Elliot and the Sussex Detachment of the RCMP in order that they may be investigated as well.
By the time you read this letter and study the contents hopefully I will have returned to the USA and stood in court once more in order to defend my Clan’s rights and interests. I will be inserting this letter to you folks in the Public Record of many courts in the USA. If you act ethically and quickly I will see no reason to sue you. However I will be calling you all to testify to what you know to be true. Shame on all of you for allowing my country to throw me back into the clutches of Attorney General Ashcroft without any regard for my safety. If I die my blood will be on your hands.
Too many mobsters and crooked FEDS want these god-damned tapes for me to think otherwise. As you can see I have signed statements from both a US Attorney and a District Attorney claiming for over one year now that these tapes are part of our Probate Actions. I will prove that they are not two more times before I complain of every lawyer and law enforcement authority that I have contacted in two countries.
Oct 3rd, 2004, I will count you all amongst the conspirators against me if I do not receive an answer from you that I agree with by that date. Now you know I ain’t joking.
Mr. Rosenthal, I have no doubt that you are a clever fellow. Teaching Math is clean work. I admire that you only choose to practice law when you consider a matter to be of great social importance. After my speaking with David Orchard and studying his actions since that time. I believe David Orchard is all about David Orchard and the Public Trust only interests him when it affects his interests. The minor spit and chew about the demise of his former party is somewhat petty considering the far more important issues that are afoot these days. Would not your services be better placed in assisting me in compelling the governments to uphold the law and the Public Trust? I ask that you study the material I have provided closely and then think about your own words and that of your friends. They are hereto attached for your review. My question is don’t you think it would benefit all Canadians if I complained of Anne McLellan and Wayne Easter in order to make them accountable for their lack of diligence in protecting my dumb ass? Just because I am a pigheaded Canadian layman, it does not follow that Anne or Wayne should allow Ashcroft and his cohorts to try to send me to Cuba without counsel. Many lawyers wish for me to simply disappear or quit so that they could continue to practice law for lucre or malice. I have no doubt many lawyers like Alan Dershowitz and even his adversary Bob Barr would like to see me tortured or beat to death by like H. Pail Rico was. Do you see how easily I predicted his demise. That was a nobrainer. What say you? Do you wish to assist me or not? If not give my friend, Byron Prior a call. Now there is man in great need of a good lawyer with a sense of social conscience and a bit of integrity to boot. Every Canadian should feel offended by T Alex Hickman.
Mr. MacKay thanks for proving to the world what a lawyer’s word is worth even when he signs his hand to it. Your little back stabbing trick with David Orchard proved my point in spades. I really don’t know what Orchard is whining about. Hasn’t he heard a few lawyer jokes in his time on the planet? Much truth is told in jest. Check my work before you call me a liar. From one Maritmer to another if you asked me to step outside I would smile and quit talking and start swinging immediately. I am a much better man than that fat bastard that went to Harvard and you can tell him I said so. My question to you sir, is do you wish to call me a liar and then step outside to settle it or argue me in Court? Better yet, do you and the fat bastard wish to tag team against me or go at me one on one in court or out of it? All that I have said is true. I read where the fat bastard lost a hundred pounds in order to help get reelected. If I did that I would be half the man I am now but I would still have enough sand left to take you both on. The MacKay Clan should be ashamed of you. How is that for picking a fight? EH?
Ms. Davidson, please find enclosed the documents proving I did what was required of me on July 6th in order to get my deposit back. When may I expect the money? Why would your help call me about this stuff without checking with Ms. Chappell first? You always referred me to her. It is not my fault if you lose the records. Right?
Ms. Davidson, I have another couple of very important questions as well. When I appeared at the local Canada Elections Office with my secretary and a witness as required, Ms Chappell would not allow me to begin the process of registering as a Canidate until she received a call from some unnamed lawyer from Ottawa. I know that person must have been you or someone who spoke for you.
Ms. Chappell was waiting for you, Ms. Davidson to decide as to whether or not I could run for Parliament. I can easily prove byway of phone records and emails that I had resolved these issues months ago with the top dogs in your office long before an election was ever called. I then did it once again after the election was called and then again with Ms. Chappell before I returned to Canada and then the day before coming to her office. The deliberate delay was obvious to all and very offensive. What would have Rob Moore or John Herron’s friend David Lutz have done if you had tried such a trick with them, Sue you? Why should I be any different? I do have the same Rights. If you don’t think I would be just as diligent as any lawyer when protecting my rights, you have seriously underestimated me. Call my bluff. I dare ya.
Ms Davidson, you are not a judge nor are you a Member of Parliament. You have no right to make a law or decide on it. If there was some sort of legal question why did you not address it months ago with me? It was my opinion that you were simply delaying me until the clock tolled two o’clock and then I would not be allowed to have my name on the ballot. I truly believe you were acting in the best interest of other lawyers rather that upholding the Public Trust placed in you. When I kept demanding to just know your name or to talk to you, I was denied that right. However I did manage to become a candidate by exactly two o’clock because you knew as sure as I am typing this that I would have complained of you in a heartbeat after two o’clock. What say you Ms. Davidson? Do you disagree with my opinion of what happened on June 7th? If you were not the lawyer attempting to illegally delay me then that person was acting under your authority. Correct? You are the Deputy Chief Electoral Officer and Chief Legal Counsel. I am just the self appointed Chief of my little Clan but as you can see I have no fear of arguing with fancy upper Canadian lawyers. Do you wish to explain or should I summons you to court to get an answer? Again I ask when do I get my money back? My accountant has filed his work quite a while ago as well. What is the reason for the delay now? Ain’t it kinda funny how the Queen would not take my check but I must accept hers?
Ms. Verma, I recall our conversation vividly and can easily prove my following contacts with you. I already know the answer but my only question to you is WHY?
As I continue my legal battles in the USA, I want you all to know that win or lose I was trying to protect your rights too against the bastards that created the DHS etc.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
More laws won't mean less terror
Experts warn of 'giving the devil the benefit of the law'
Law Times By David Gambrill
Expanding the power of criminal law will not stop terrorism, say legal academics, and may instead lead to the permanent imposition of extraordinary emergency measures and concentrated state power.
Quoting a character in the Robert Bolt play, A Man for All Seasons, Oren Gross, a Benjamin Cardoso School of Law professor, issued a general warning against "giving the devil the benefit of the law" in order to make the public feel more secure.
"Extravagent terrorist attacks such as those on Sept. 11 tend to bring about a rush to legislate," Gross told a legal scholars' conference convened to discuss the federal government's new antiterrorism legislation, bill C-36. "The preventative relief [is thought to] be, 'If only we add new powers to police, if only we add to the Criminal Code, if only we revamp and reinvigorate existing offences, then our nation is going to be secure.'"
But such logic tends to lead to a concentration of power at the level of government, he says. Citizens may relinquish their civil liberties out of fear, encouraging the state "do whatever it takes" to make terrorism stop, he says.
"Governments tend to overreact," says Gross. "Terrorism from below may, to some extent, be replaced with terrorism from above." Legal scholars who spoke at the conference echoed Gross' caution. Some worried that Canada is permanently entrenching the temporary emergency powers found in the 1988 Emergencies Act.
"My answer to the question, 'Can emergency powers be normalized?' is yes, they can be," says U of T law professor David Dyzenhais, a South African studying the emergency powers employed by the South African government under apartheid. "But when they are normalized, what we have is a violation of the spirit of the rule of law."
U of T math professor Peter Rosenthal, a lawyer at Roach Schwartz and Associates in Toronto, suggested the federal government should have used its powers under the 1988 Emergencies Act instead of drafting new anti-terrorist legislation.
Enacted by the Mulroney government, the Emergencies Act gives the federal government limited exceptional powers to deal with four types of emergencies: threats to public welfare, threats to public order, international emergencies, and war.
International emergencies, says the act, arise "from acts of intimidation or coercion, or the real or imminent threat of serious force or violence."
For an international emergency, the act can be put into affect for 60 days and must be reviewed by Parliament before the deadline can be extended. It includes powers to limit or restrict travel, ban public assemblies, remove non-citizens from the country, and enter and search premises without a warrant. The powers in the act are explicitly subject to the Charter.
The Emergencies Act replaced the War Measures Act, which the Trudeau government used to arrest and detain 465 Quebeckers in 1970. The federal government invoked the War Measures Act after the FLQ kidnapped Quebec provincial cabinet minister Pierre Laporte, who was found assassinated one day after the act was declared.
The so-called "October Crisis," when the War Measures Act was implemented, started a debate in Canada about when it is appropriate to suspend civil liberties. The Trudeau government came under heavy criticism for employing the act.
U of T constitutional law professor Lorraine Weinrib noted the federal government has studiously avoided using the language of "emergency measures," even though it has incorporated such emergency powers into its anti-terrorist legislation. The same emergency powers are available under the Emergencies Act, she says, albeit for limited periods of time and under strict supervision of Parliament.
"I would say the government did not use the Emergencies Act here in response to the problem of terrorism because it did not want to engage in this type of review process," says Weinrib. "It preferred to continue what has been highly discredited under the War Measures Act experience - namely, the concentration of power in the executive."
For this reason, many scholars at the conference encouraged the courts to review the legislation carefully. Federal government lawyers have called the proposed anti-terrorist legislation"Charter-proof." But that doesn't mean the anti-terrorism legislation should be enacted, says U of T law professor Kent Roach.
"We may too quick to accept . . . what the government's lawyers — or indeed any lawyers — conclude it is permissible to do," he says.
Roach listed several extraordinary police powers found in bill C-36. Most notably, the bill allows police to arrest and detain a person without a warrant, on suspicion the suspect may be carrying out a terrorist activity. It also creates "investigative hearings," in which suspects are compelled to give testimony that might incriminate them.
Roach was particularly critical of the hearing process, the powers of which, he insisted, haven't been around since the English 'Star Chamber' in 1641.
"Compelling a person to talk to the police in an investigation in which he or she may well be implicated offends our traditions of respect for the right of silence during police investigations," he says. "These traditions date back to the abolition of the Star Chamber in 1641."
The Star Chamber, associated with the English Courts, was reviled for its use of torture. As late as 1614, a Somerset clergyman, Edmond Peacham, was interrogated on the rack before the Star Chamber in the presence of the attorney general at the time, Sir Edward Coke.
Roach acknowledged the bill gives detained individuals the right to counsel at such hearings, but such representation provides cold comfort. "It gives people subject to investigative hearing the right to counsel — even though, in many cases, the lawyer will simply have to inform the target that he or she must talk or else face prosecution or continued detention," he says. One danger in forcing people to talk is that they might lie, says Roach. A combination of perjury and prosecutorial zeal could may lead to the kind of wrongful convictions associated with the "Birmingham Six" and "Guilford Four" in England, he says.
In the early 1970s, the IRA bombed pubs in Birmingham and Guilford, England, killing more than 21 people. Under pressure to convict the terrorists, police arrested 10 people in connection with the attacks.
In 1989 and 1991, respectively, a British court of appeal released the Guilford Four and Birmingham Six after finding they had been wrongly convicted.
This article does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action in reliance upon material contained in this article is accepted by the author or Canada Law Book Inc.
(c)Law Times Inc. 2004. All rights reserved.
Really unsure as to what your going on about here? My eyes started to glaze over half way down.
I think it has something to do with the Maher Arar case?
Somehow your implicated or have pertinant info?
If your looking for a public forum maybe some open line shows or the Petter Warren show out in BC.
http://www.peterwarren.ca/
Here are some links to talk radio shows.
http://www.cfra.com/listen/index.asp#
http://www.cknw.com/
http://www.am770chqr.com/home/index.cfm
http://www.cfrb.com/
http://www.vocm.com/
These guys love controversy so they will probably take your subject on.
Sometimes complaining is just like pissing into the wind, right Dave?
Emails with endless recipients and faxes beyond a page or two are deleted and thrown in the trash, unread.
What sound-bite or hook could you get others to buy into your complaints.
A guy yelling on a soapbox endlessly about everything is easily dismissed. I am not being sarcastic, but what is your main beef and with who?
-Steven G. Erickson aka blogger Vikingas
Perhaps you should start listening to your emails soon Stevey Boy
Try reading your shit sometime
Call me sometime after 8pm Atlantic Canada time and I will explain it all night if you wish 506 434 1379 I am using the evidence against the Crown up here ASAP
Dave
Barry Bachrach swears that he sent the wiretap tapes to Arlen Specter. Yet all the Senator's offices and that off Russ Feingold's in particular have denied any knowledge of the wiretap tapes for months. They want to ignore the fact that I did send them all a copy of wiretape # 139 a full six months after the DHS attempted to take me away to Cuba in April of 2003. I have many more wiretap tapes in Canada that I will use in Federal Court as evidence in an ethical effort to impeach your President byway of Canadain Courts . It would be a wonderful world someone in the USA could prove to me ASAP that they understand the meaning of the word integrity.
FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. Specter:
I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
Hey Leroy Armstrong did I burn your arse tonight. It is a full moon after all it is time for the lone wolf in me to howl.
Even though I am in Saint John Harbour I must vote in Belleisle Creek because that is the place I have been hanging around for the past year. Today the incumbent Leroy Armstrong invited the folks in the area to come and discuss many issues with him at the local hall in Belleisle Creek. So after picking up some smokes for the weekend at the local store I dropped into the meeting Hall across the road. I must do my part in assisting democracy being served and question the man who failed to speak on behalf of me let alone return my calls for well over two years.
I proved to Leroy and his supporters that I at least have much better manners than he by not speaking until I was spoken to. Leroy refused to answer my first question because I was as he stated an Independent Candidate in another riding. I explained that although that is true, it is he whom I must not vote for. I have decided to advise anyone that will listen that we should vote for the mysterious Dana Brown not only to bring him down from Fredericton to get a look at him but to aid in the unseating of Leroy. A lot of former liberal voters are dissatisfied with his performance in the defence of Kings East’s interests and don’t care to vote which will only assist Brucy, the newfound PC to win. Methinks it would be better to vote and check the box by the unknown NDP if only to put a blip on the liberal and conservative radar screen.
Leroy is the same man who felt comfortable to heckle Rob Moore while I was debating him for the turncoat John Herron’s seat in Parliament on June 18th 2004. When I asked Leroy if he would debate me that night in 2004 in front of a many people The Kings County Record reported the exchange as follows:
“The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled when Herron spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time, anyplace," Armstrong responded. “
Well tonight when I challenged Leroy to debate with me the very issues he raises in his own pamphlets. he refused. When I pressed the issue he suggested that I sue him along with Bernie Lord about my illegal banishment from the New Brunswick Legislature on the 24th of June 2004. The CBC, the rest of the media and all the MLA's know I was illegally banished long before they reported Charles Leblanc's recent fray with the Sergeant at Arms but they all refrain to even mention my name. The obvious question is why? Furthermore Leblanc’s document is unsigned. Mine most definitely is. The answer is Charles Leblanc is not capable of litigating in a Pro Se fashion in court but lawyers are only capable of dealing with me in an ex parte fashion behind closed doors. We all know why the MLA etc will not mention my name. The simple answer is their words will support my actions against them in court. Thus it is better for them to never mention my name and affirm that I even exist.
Anyone may feel to debate my reasoning but I am gonna vote NDP anyway. I predict that the recent PC convert Brucy Baby will win but at least I will be registering my disgust on the very first ballot that I have ever caste in my life. I told all of this very loudly to one of Leroy’s assistant’s after he asked me to step outside the Meeting Hall. I am certain many a liberal busybody strained their ears to listen in. The best way to get things across the county is fire up the gossip machine. Tomorrow I will attend a proper Pig Roast, watch the balloons float overhead and laugh at the nonsense of it all. It is nice to be home even if everybody is mad at me because I am a rather fierce political animal.
I doubt that the CBC will let this comment stand. Thus I will blog the same text elsewhere before posting it within my own blog. I must at least allow the CBC to try to report matters with a semblance of integrity.
Anyone may feel to debate my reasoning but I am gonna vote NDP anyway. I predict that the recent PC convert Brucy Baby will win but at least I will be registering my disgust on the very first ballot that I have ever caste in my life. I told all of this very loudly to one of Leroy’s assistant’s after he asked me to step outside the Meeting Hall. I am certain many a liberal busybody strained their ears to listen in. The best way to get things across the county is fire up the gossip machine. Tomorrow I will attend a proper Pig Roast, watch the balloons float overhead and laugh at the nonsense of it all. It is nice to be home even if everybody is mad at me because I am a rather fierce political animal.
I doubt that the CBC will let this comment stand. Thus I will blog the same text elsewhere before posting it within my own blog. I must at least allow the CBC to try to report matters with a semblance of integrity.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
“Jan 3rd, 2004
Mr. David R. Amos
143 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan”
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: pm@pm.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Ask yourself why I sent this at this time
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: letters@macleans.ca
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 2:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Ask yourself why I sent this at this time
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: letterstotheeditor@bostonherald.com
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 2:42 AM
Subject: Fw: Ask yourself why I sent this at this time
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: twhite@audaxgroup.com
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 2:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Ask yourself why I sent this at this time
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: editors@cjr.org
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 2:40 AM
Subject: Fw: Ask yourself why I sent this at this time
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: howiecarr@wrko.com
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 2:36 AM
Subject: Ask yourself why I sent this at this time
Hey
Everybody know how crooked lawyers, bankers, priests and politicians are. There is no news there. I told you all that I was writing a story about the press and how crooked it is. Now I just want to see who is a turncoat first. I must admit that you are a tight knit bunch of bastards but you all know that you can't trust each other with the truth. Everybody knows that everybody protects their own interests first and there is no honour amongst thieves. That is one fact that is such a safe thing to bet on no bookie will bet on it. So I can't take anything to the bank that I don't trust anyway. The best that I can do is play the same game as you and write about it but with a twist. I will give my work away and say to hell with the money. The dumb bastard from Forbes thought I was selling him something the other day as I played him like a fiddle. You lazy dudes, the masters of cut and paste are far too predictable.
I will argue the laws with your lawyers later, its time for me to have a little fun. Would you like to wager on who blinks first and sides with me? You know who has read this email before you but you don't know who will read it after you. You also know that I can prove that I told you the truth a long time ago. I will leave it for you to explain to the public why you reported nothing about what you knew to be true. Try to pretend to them that you don't know who I am and watch how fast I prove you a liar.
If you don't like my game, sue me, I dare ya. I promise I won't file a Motion to Dismiss ex parte the plaintiff like the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan did. I love to argue to much for such nonsense. I will only demand a swift trial in front of a jury of my peers. The same folks that you sell your Bullshit to. Ain't the World Wide Web a wonderful thing to let others know the truth without spending a dime. I think it is as revolutionary as the printing press once was long ago and before it fell under the control of the powers that be. You know of whom I speak. It is their puppets that write your pay check. I know what rules your world. Trust me, we must be from different planets. I have fully enjoyed my life on this one. I only wish that the ones to follow me into this world will have an equal chance in the pursuit of happiness.
Shame on all of you. Too many people died protecting your rights and the Freedom of the Press for you to deny it to yourself. I will leave you with a few questions. How long do you thing Clark Kent Irwin has to seek the Truth, Justice and the American Way?
Do you think he understands Title 28 Section 530B? Would you like to know about what I know about the Executive Offices of the US Attorneys and their failure to uphold the Privacy Act? Clark Kent Irwin does and so does Jeffery Bloch and Ted Olson. Watch me, an alien layman, blow the Whistle for them and on them. Methinks that Patrick Purcell, publisher of The Boston Herald, should get former Globe columnist Mike Barnicle to give Timothy J. White of Audax or mean old Rupert Murdoch a call to give him the scoop but I bet they ain't talking either. Even though Purcell knows Timmy controls the purse strings and credited much of his success to Murdoch he knows his following words ain't worth shit. “He (Murdoch) is the smartest, hardest working man you will ever see. He has a wide breadth of his knowledge on a global scale, and he keeps constant communication with companies he owns." and
“people rely on the Herald to get behind the story and uncover it aggressively. When we break stories, we cover them well.”
I laugh at you all. The bullshit is incredible, I made you all well aware that I am the reason the SEC settled with Putnam Investments so quickly. If you didn't believe me, I am certain that you asked Francis Galvin and Eliot Spitzer.
Just for fun you can see that I sent this email first to some college kids that study these things and Howie Carr. He did say "From now on, I'd like everyone to refer to me as the nonfiction columnist at the Boston Herald." This should stress test his ethics. If he emails me back and sends me his phone number I will give him the scoop. If he doesn't, so be it. I won't be surprised I figure that he knows about me anyway. I will leave you all to wonder if that happened or not. Would you believe him if he told ya he didn't? My home work is done . Now I go down to Dixie to jerk young J. Strom Thurmond Jr.'s chain. Now that "A giant oak in the forest of public service has fallen," Senators Hollings and Graham will have to argue with me. Once a federal election is finally called in Canada, I will turn and run up home to hit the campaign trail. Want me to say hey to Belinda for ya up home if you say hi to Hillary down here?
Welcome to the circus with any luck the shit may start hitting the fan on Monday morning but I ain't betting on it. I know that the truth is stranger than fiction and that this stuff is unbelievable. At least I have the rest of the weekend to forward my emails. I know that the other dudes I emailed this stuff to this morning won't print a thing. I am just proving that they had their chance one last time before I tell the world about them. Woodword's words about his new book were to much for me to take and the cries of foul from the fake liberals in the press make me sick.
I truly don't give a shit to the first bunch of people that receive this email. I have crossed their paths and stress tested their ethics many times already. I figure it is time for my book about you all to have an ending. It needs a hero to be a champion for the freedom of the press. I truly hope that it is some student that can't get a job that manages to make his or her mark with honest and diligent investigative reporting. I address the next couple of paragraphs to ones amongst us with the most future ahead of them and little tolerance for things as they are. Some of the young people must be leery and weary of the old school running the show and messing with their future. They should take a chance and take a minute to investigate a little bit. Not everyone is stricken by digital paranoia and the world should not be viewed by the rose colored glasses offered to you by the evil Masters of War byway of their media whores. If they check my work and find me credible they may do with my work what they will as long they are not employed by the media. I know they will have great difficulty finding any forum to display their work or opinions about this stuff. I will leave them to their own devices but rest assured that even though it may take some time I strongly doubt that the media as it now exists will have the scoop on them. I will wager that the word will spread to other ordinary people byway of grassroots type blogs, jokes, gossip and links from friends they trust. I'm just trying to spark something that's all. Howard Dean did it with the internet now all the bastards are trying it. A big difference between them and I is that I don't want money to come into my pocket. I just want the truth out of my mind and into yours. Then I won't have to think about it anymore.
The things I have come to know are pretty hard on the head. The thing I don't understand the most is the lack of conscience in my fellow man's mind. I wonder what happened to the innocent children we once were and what caused us to become this way. I know we are ok though simply because I know I am ok. Plus there are more innocent ethical people born everyday and everyday the miserable evil old bastards are dying. Maybe someday the worm will turn in the good people's favor once the bad ones are out numbered. Day after day I see so many famous flabby faces on the TV saying things that most people want to believe while I have complete knowledge of what I sent them and how they responded and how I easily I could tear off their masks of virtue. You would not believe how many people know what I say is true. Thus after this weekend I stop saying it. Sometimes less is more. My thirteen year old and his friends know more about some things than most adults because of their own inquiring minds surfing the web for info on whatever they choose to know. My greatest fear is that the freedom found on the internet will be soon lost to us. It is the kids like my son that I wish to impress not some old farts that are too chicken to open an attachment inside their new investment that they will be throwing in the trash in a couple of years. By the way that is sorta where I sourced this computer. It wasn't good enough for some Yuppie to brag about anymore but I still do.
I am constantly astounded by what I learn from staring into its old screen as my boy laughs at me. I suppose it is like me trying to imagine the world without motorcycles. He has known of the internet since he entered school and I have ignored it until I was nearly fifty. He has the right to laugh. After all his Papa is 44 years behind the eight ball. However I scare him though because I am getting smarter and meaner everyday. In return he scares me because he is growing bigger everyday and more and more like me. I know how crazy and reckless I can be.
I tried my best to make the legal crap entertaining enough so that ordinary folks would find it entertaining. If nothing else they should giggle at my efforts to defend Martha Stewart while torturing the SEC and her own lawyers. I did that for the gossip factor alone. If Martha is really that dumb she should take a little time off to ponder things. The same holds true for Frank Quattrone. In my opinion they paid their own lawyers to help the FEDS screw them. If they choose to believe their well paid malevlent legal help rather than listen to me and call me as a rebuttal witness against the FEDs prosecuting them, so be it, I tried. If they wish, someone can still give them my work and evidence. The proof of the bank fraud, mail fraud, tax fraud, perjury etc. and the FEDS assistance to the crimes is in the public record for the world to view anyway. If they send me a lawyer I will give them some wiretap tapes to prove my point. For now I offer Martha and Frank the old prayer "God protect me from my friends, I can defend myself from my enemies." Martha should have listened to her brother rather than her fine feathered friends, I really like that guy for the way he conducted himself within the O'Reilly asshole's interview.
If you wish to bother, here is where ya look http://briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186 pretend a strange man landed in your kitchen and allowed you to snoop through his briefcase. They are largely Tiff files like the one attached. They are easily viewed by the old Kodak Imaging program found in most windows. You should be able to surf through them with abandon. Yahoo is strict about uploading viruses into their system. I am sure they scanned them as I have done. It is not a website per se it is simply pro se records of court crap and other letters. The files have strange names and are filed in an odd fashion so I know what they are and where to find them. I ain't selling shit. It is just a record of my experiences in an effort too prove how awful things really are.
At least nobody can never say that I didn't try. I do not know how long the stuff will remain on the web because our credit is now in the toilet and the credit card companies can't take a joke even if it is a legally important one. Louis Freeh now General Counsel to the credit card dudes failed to catch Uncle Willy the Ex FBI agent money laundering when he was director of the FBI but I am certain he will see that we are bankrupted in short order now that he works for bankers. Comcast had no trouble allowing AT&T to purchase their stocks with our interests and then see that they were thrown away but they will have no problem canceling our internet access when we can't pay their next bill. The same goes for my Cingular account they will take our AT&T interests but kill my phone just as quick. Meanwhile Steve Ballmer, one of the Directors of Ancenture, who is also CEO of Microsoft has no trouble ignoring the Code of Ethics of both companies by ignoring what I sent to Brad Smith a long time ago. It is too funny how many calls we have received from India after being late only a couple of days on a credit card payment. If Louis, Steve and Brad had acted ethically I would not have to argue with Providian and tease people in the third world about their association with bad acting Yankees. Do you think I should complain about some poor bastards in India because of their harassment on behalf of criminals in the USA?
If anyone that views my work know of some ethical legal students, tell them about this stuff ask them to contact me if they want a little work and wish to pick up where I leave off. I am tired and am going to take a break from this shit for awhile. If you read all the way down to here, I thank you for your time. I know that it is the most precious thing there is. I already spent too much time writing something I doubt will ever be read in my lifetime and I want to hurry back to being just plain old me.
In case someone is still reading this stuff. I will say when all the legal crap started when the crooks attacked my Clan I was a bored Mr. Mom whose kids were off to school. So I had begun my Tesla type experiments. Everybody thought that I was truly nutty but the quicker I could get myself and mine off the grid and my diesels runninng on home brewed Bio fuel the better I would like it. In truth I want to escape the madness of willful ignorance and apathy that surrounds us. What everybody seemed to forget was where I came from and the fact that I wouldn't trade ten Beantowns for one small town uphome. I only live here because it was the best start on life that my wife and I could give our kids. Trust me, messing with crooked politicians, corrupt justice systems, malevolent priests, greedy bankers and bounty hunting for Whitey Bulger are just minor issues to me. Believe it or not I trying to save the world. to put a finer point I will say the environment in particular. Most of my fellow men can go to hell for all I care. It is mostly kids, old men, mother nature and dogs that I love. Hows that for the terrible truth? What I know about the Haliburton dudes is truly scary and important shit that could get a lot of people hurt and everybody knows it. Brian Mulroney, Belinda's new CEO and a lot of other people uphome know what I am talking about. I imagine that many a crooked newsman know too simply because not everybody can be that dumb nor can that many pretend to be that dumb without a plan. Even Bill Gates' fortunes changed no longer felt the need to move to Canada as soon a Bush got elected and he elected to the dumb and dumber game of see no evil, heard no evil and speak no evil. It seems it is up to me or my ghost to make my newfound knowledge known to the world. Everybody should wonder why Bush needs Cheney to hold his hand under questioning. Even Bush is scared of Cheney's buddies. It appears that I am the only one that isn't. How is that for a hot tip? Anybody want a joke within a riddle for a clue? What did God tell the Newfys? Play dumb til I get back will ya? I know I said a lot of shit in a vague fashion but the people that I am torturing know exactly what I am talking about. Can ya tell I am picking a fight? Guess with whom. Sometimes the smart money bets on the underdog. David pulled a fast one on Goliath. Even Achilles had his heel. Every once in a great while something wickedly wonderful comes along. This time around I think it is called the internet. These may be the last words I say to anyone I don't know very well for a while. If you wish pass them on. my little dog (a Rat Terrior) is showing me the way to the door but she ain't giving me the bum's rush just yet. That little bitch knows more about the way of the world than I ever dreamed. She is just rubbing in the fact that she knows how dumb I am and checking to see if I am paying attention. She knows what is truly important in this old world. Mess with my kids and she will prove it to ya.
Cya'll in Court or hell it the same thing to me.
David R. Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ombudsman@washpost.com
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 10:07 AM
Subject: The Post and Woodword are so full of shit
I can't stand it. He can wait for my book. I know what I sent you by fax email and the US Mail. You know why I am going to sue your lawyer.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: letters@phx.com
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 9:58 AM
Subject: Fw: Your recent editorial is too funny as well
You did ask me what I thought. Well i think it is bullshit, particualrly after I have been fighting for your rights for years alone while you guys knew the truth and ignored me. Now you want to cry about your loss of freedom?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: csavage@globe.com
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 9:48 AM
Subject: RE: Your article on 12/12/03
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/12/12/patriot_act_hearings_sought_by_democrats/
Hey Charlie
Your little bit of news about "Patriot Act hearings sought by Democrats" is too funny considering the fact that you dudes have known the reasons behind it for years. Your problem who else will I forward this email to and what will I have to say about the Globe. Can ya tell I have been saving this shit for awhile? Ask yourself why because I ain't telling. Nobody else is either.
Cya'll in Court:)
David R. Amos
September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson,
I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary to the
Governor General
"Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:32:54 -0500
From: "Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.
*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.
If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:
Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.
You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
That night last December Humpty dumpty reminded us all of the Charter called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."
He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.
To me was a case of the pot calling the kettle black and I laughed at the nonsense of it just and any Mad Hatter should. Read on to see some of the reasons why. Before anyone attempts to label as a crazy man again. Perhaps they should contact three wicked ladies who are no longer Parliamentarians. Elsie Wayne, Landslide Annie and the regal acting bitch Adrienne Clarkson will no doubt tell what a mean nasty awful man I am. When it comes to defending my Clan I do not mince words or pull my punches with crooks who pretend to be so polite. I just get them to show me their fat nasty arses ASAP and then I boot them into court. Life is too short to deal with liars for long ask my wife's Yankke family the Kickham's about my mean nasty awful stlye of ethical litigating. They are stillconfused as to why I will never settle with crooks that have abused my Clan. Yankees will understand the meaning of a Blood Feud but Hillbillies and Maritimers do EH?
Months after Landslide Annie sent me her very dumb letter, her underlings began following suit and showing me their nasty arses, here is just a couple of examples from emails. I have letters signed in hand as well. If one pot my Clan's troubles aside and only looks to the face of this stuff it is truly comical indeed. However false imprisonment and the the theft of our home, property and interests is never a laughing matter. The Queen would never allow such nonsense to happen to her family without a declaration of war. As cheif of my clan why should I behave any differently. Never forget it was the government of the USA that imprisoned me and stole my Clan's assests with the knowlegde and assistance of the Canadian govenmentas well.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Dear Dave,
> >
> > I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> > around here.... I decided to retire because I truly miss my family.
> > It's hard being on the road back and forth by yourself. It gets very
> > lonely.
> >
> > God Bless,
> > Elsie
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos davidamos@comcast.net
> > Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told
> > me you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first
> > politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask
> > around Saint John about me in certain circles I am fairly well
> > known. You may even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid
> > Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was
> > a tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my
> > mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was
> > somewhat of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was
> > chief electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a
> > Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her
> > a call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about
> > you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is
> > always confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and
> > her number is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I
> > would love to see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the
> > plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go
> > back to being just Papa the happier my little Clan will be. I
> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they
> > are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or
> > not.
> > Best
> > Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Thank you for the notice.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos davidamos@comcast.net
> > Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: ethics@harvard.edu
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:06 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what
> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?
> > I am who I say I am and that is as follows:
> > David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Ave,
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> > Phone 617 240-6698
> >
> > Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime
> > Minister and are you a lawyer?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier
> > ministre" dpm@pm.gc.ca To: davidamos@comcast.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> > Subject: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed
> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and
> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing
> > address along with your original e-mail message. All official
> > responses will be sent by regular mail.
> > >
> > > If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister
> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing
> > address:
> > >
> > > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> > > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> > > and Emergency Preparedness
> > > 340 Laurier Avenue West
> > > Ottawa, Ontario
> > > K1A 0P8
> > >
> > > From: David Amos davidamos@comcast.net
> > > To: dwatch@web.net
> > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> > > Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically
> > correct.
> > >
> > > Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of
> > a good
> > > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak
> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.
> > If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight ball.
> > > Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and
> > political
> > > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a
> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the
> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why
> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying
> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a
> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place
> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget
> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about
> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.
> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus had more of
> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about
> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a
> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him
> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I
> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my
> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact
> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters
> > agree with that fact? What say you?
> > > Canadian Corruption
> > >
> > > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> > >
> > > RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> > >
> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
> > >
> > > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and
> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal
> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public
> > myself about this lack of action or justice.
> > > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL
> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your
> > younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what
> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child
> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any
> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All
> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop
> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have
> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would
> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and
> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no
> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or
> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing
> > person.
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:47:56 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Here is the email that should help unseat any incumbent
To: Gordon Earle NDP Campaign gordonearle@ns.aliantzinc.ca
CC: bfarrell@greenparty.ca, margaretsagar@ndp.ca, katie.boudreau@gmail.com,
chpns@rushcomm.ca, alexismacdonald@ndp.ca, hectormorrison@ndp.ca,
alanhill@ndp.ca, johnhughedwards@ndp.ca, mary@votemary.ca,
rhines@greenparty.ca, nwright@greenparty.ca, petermancini@ndp.ca,
ttrappenberg@greenparty.ca, cmilburn@greenparty.ca,
mgranger@greenparty.ca, info@arthurbull.ca, gordonearle@ns.aliantzinc.ca,
info@bradfarquhar.com, Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
I must thank you Judi Milne for your response for two reasons. Your apology with explanation speaks volumes of Mr. Earle's integrity. I truly thought we were getting along but as soon as I tried to enlighten you as to why I was falsely imprisoned in the USA last year, the phone on my end did not go dead. From my end it sounded like you slammed down the phone and it really pissed me off because of what I heard Mr. Earle saying on Cpac yesterday. I stand corrected. There is no need for your apology. I do beleive your explanation. Methinks some of Landslide Annie's loyal underlings may be up to no good because my email is acting very strangely as well and some people have said that they have not received the very same email I sent you.
The second reason I thank you is because of the fact that I did receive at least one response it reaffirms my faith in mankind in that there are some other ethical and concerned Maritimers outside of my wee little room in my long suffering friend's home. It is nice to know this morning that some Proud Maritimers got my message last night because after some other conversations last nigh with some folks in PEI I had given up on everyone and no longer cared to tell anyone anything.? Yet after I have quit a young fella called me and I resolved to keep on trucking today and ethically stress test the rest of our fellow Canadians who seek political office. .
That said. Best of luck to Mr. Earle on Jan 23rd. Please let me know if there is anyway you think I can him unseat his nasty opponent and send someone else from the Maritimes to the Hill. I do not care who gets elected as long as it is not any incumbent in any riding.To put it simply the incumbents can all go to Hell if there is such a thing after all. I can easily prove that that all those who were seated in the notorious 38th Parliament are all corrupt as Hell. Has anyone noticed how many of them quit after having their seat for just over a year? Were they not prepared for a four year term? Ask yourselves or Humpty Dumpty why the other bastards who worked with him and his oh so entitled party did not run again. After the 23rd I will make it my best effort to prove what I say is true in Federal Court in Fredericton by myself. If no one is willing to stand with me it is ok by me. I don't trust strangers these days anyway for very justifiable reasons.However I will tell even the devil the truth about himself and defy him to call me a liar.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Gordon Earle NDP Campaign gordonearle@ns.aliantzinc.ca wrote:
My apologies for the disconnect last evening but all of sudden I had a phone with dead air and I did not hang up.
Judi Milne
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 11:24:46 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: I called the NDP, the Neo Conservative and the Green running against Landslide Annie
To: donna martyn@ndp.ca, dparker@greenparty.ca, info@lauriehawn.ca,
chubbard@liberal2006.ca, news957@rci.rogers.com,
Kim.Keith@rci.rogers.com, EGreenspan@144king.com, Eopsinfo@state.ma.us,
OIG@ftc.gov, frederictonartsalliance@yahoo.ca, Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca,
Desjarlais.B@parl.gc.ca, Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca, events@cpac.ca,
mclaugh@dailygleaner.com, MediaRelations@crtc.gc.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca,
admin@cbcwatch.ca, duffy@ctv.ca, ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com,
info@iamgold.com, gensongillespie@aol.com, jlaskin@torys.com,
jterry@torys.com, lgold.blcanada@b-l.com,
Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US, Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US,
canada@canadianembassy.org, brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca,
Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net,
general.info@thomson.com
CC: mkbraaten@gmail.com, wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, BBACHRACH@bowditch.com,
Kandalaw@mindspring.com, ombud@globe.com, dan@djflynn.com,
adams_sammon@msn.com, tracy.parsons@pcparty.org, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, vote@montesolberg.com, vote4pat@rogers.com,
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, johncarty@ndp.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, graham@grahamsteele.ca,
guyjl@rushcomm.ca, michael.baker@ns.sympatico.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca, pduchastel@gmail.com,
marc.hasbani@npd.qc.ca, Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca,
maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca,
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, dpm@pm.gc.ca,
fbinhct@leo.gov, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca,
info@apex.gc.ca, carp@50plus.com
Hey
I must say in all of my conversations with those out west I was only impressed with Danna Martyn. However after all that I have come to understand and particularly after I heard Humpty Dumpty speak, I am fed up with trying to prove my integrity to corrupt politicians, crooked lawyers or anyone else for that matter. I will simply tell the awful truth and let the cards fall where they may. I don't care much anymore and my work is largely done. It will stand on its own. I do want to argue a bunch of fancy lawyers in Federal Court. I have hard earned that right.
Humpty Dumpty was incredibly funny today as he stuttered and blinked bigtime in order to try to stop his fall. He should never play poker. His discounting the power of the Yankee SEC no doubt pissed his buddy George W. Bush off some more.. I can't wait to hear Humpty Dumpty's cohort Pettigrew speak. Read on and you will see why. I have given up depending on the integrity of strangers. I will debate Andy Scott whenever wherever I can and also help anyone to unseat any incumbent throught the land. Then I will sue the Crown on my own.
You politicians might as well press print on the attached tiff file and talk to your lawyers ASAP. Many other folks will receive this email after you do. I doubt Lanslide Annie will explain to you why she sent me this email in particular after ignoring me and hundreds of other emails for over two years. Methinks Landslide Annie bailed out of Humpty Dumpty's sinking ship once the RCMP started another investigation of her party once it slipped bigtime in the polls. The SEC sent the NDP only a email. Check the letter the General Counsel of the SEC sent me. Explain to me why that lawyer does not understand the US Consitution any better than Humpty Dumpty understands the Charter he swore to uphold. Trust that I don't care if this email is considered spam by some of you. The others should press print on the tiff file, call your lawyers and then if you wish have them call me a liar in writing . In Fact I Double Dog Dare Ya To..
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
"McLellan, Anne - M.P."McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.
Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.
Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.
Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: sos@international.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; davidamos@bsn1.net
Cc: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; dpm@pm.gc.ca ; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca ; adams_sammon@msn.com ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca ; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:55 PM
Subject: Mr. Pettigrew I have contacted your people for the last time Now I sue the Crown and you
Consular Affairs Bureau
Foreign Affairs Canada
125 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
K1A 0G2
Tel.: (613) 996-8885 (call collect where available)
Fax: (613) 943-1054
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Please allow me to remind you of the Charter before I sue you and your cohorts
To: events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org, radionews@mpbc.org,
publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com, kbabin@globaltv.ca,
jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org, info@ccna.ca,
kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Please allow me to remind you of the Charter before I sue you and your cohorts
To: maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca,
josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca,
Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, jbriggs@lawreform.ns.ca,
info@lawreform.ns.ca, canada@canadianembassy.org,
CIV_agent-mandataire-_CIV@justice.gc.ca,
FPS_agent-mandataire_SFP@justice.gc.ca, liaison@justice.gc.ca,
belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca
CC: publiceye@cbs.com, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca,
mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve, veneboston@hotmail.com,
consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org, inquiries@un.org,
clementgroleau@videotron.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca,
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca,
lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca, martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org,
cbarlow@gg.ca, gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca,
ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca,
murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca, mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca,
rricher@scics.gc.ca, crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca, dcb@smtp.gc.ca,
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca,
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca,
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca, renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, smorel@gg.ca,
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
Hey Lady
I very tired of the double talk of mandates etc. that you public servants employ to duck doing your job. Perhaps you should have a long talk with all those within your Dept that assisted the Yankees in my false imprisonment last year. Methinks the right one to start with would be Josie Macguire in Beantown. Don't you?
Legal Rights
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.
9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.
10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention
a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and
c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.
11. Any person charged with an offence has the right
a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
b) to be tried within a reasonable time;
c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence;
d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;
maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca wrote:
Mr. Amos,
thank you for your phone message and several email messages. As the Director of Values and Ethics in the departments of Foreign Affairs Canada and International Trade Canada, my current mandate applies only to internal management issues. For example, establishing a code of conduct for our employees as well as providing advice to staff on conflict of interest and conflict resolution.
As such I don't think I could be in a position to assist you. Please remove my name from your distribution list.
Thanks in advance
Maggie Trudel-Maggiore
A/Director, Values and Ethics
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: September 18, 2005 1:53 PM
To: publiceye@cbs.com; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com; cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca; mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve; veneboston@hotmail.com; consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org; inquiries@un.org; clementgroleau@videotron.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca; anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca; complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca; GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca; Trudel-Maggiore, Maggie -ZVE; jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca; lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca; martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org; cbarlow@gg.ca; gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca; mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca; ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca; justice@gov.nl.ca
Cc: murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca; mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; rricher@scics.gc.ca; crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca; dcb@smtp.gc.ca; charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca; josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca; renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca; rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca; rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; smorel@gg.ca; rraymond@lcc.gc.ca; execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
Subject: I have many documents for Dan Rather to review ask Brian Mulroney or his buddy Bernard Roy
David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: RE: Just so you know
To: publiceye@cbs.com, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, cnwtor@mail.newswire.ca,
mgarcia@venezuelaonu.gob.ve, veneboston@hotmail.com,
consulado.canada@misionvenezuela.org, inquiries@un.org,
clementgroleau@videotron.ca, mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca,
anti-t@sen.parl.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
jacques.dufort@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, ellardm@sirc-csars.gc.ca,
GrandmL@erc-cee.gc.ca, jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca,
lesley.mccoy@justice.gc.ca, martineaup@nafta-sec-alena.org,
cbarlow@gg.ca, gredling@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mary.chaput@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca,
ginette.danis@psc-cfp.gc.ca, justice@gov.nl.ca,
murielle.rivers@chrc-ccdp.ca, mburke@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca,
rricher@scics.gc.ca, crouleau@citttcce.gc.ca, dcb@smtp.gc.ca,
charrette.jocelyne@fcac.gc.ca, AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca,
betty.macphee@crtc.gc.ca, potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca,
josee.touchette@justice.gc.ca, renaudlp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
rdaoust@privcom.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, smorel@gg.ca,
rraymond@lcc.gc.ca, execassistant@nafta-sec-alena.org
CC: caroline.whitby@transfair.ca, pbroder@imaginecanada.ca,
cforcese@uottawa.ca, David.Fewer@uOttawa.ca, Philippa.Lawson@uOttawa.ca,
Stephane.Emard-Chabot@uOttawa.ca, Chantale.Fore@uOttawa.ca,
exec@casis.ca, gkealey@unb.ca, dgollob@cna-acj.ca,
justicepourmohamedharkat@yahoo.ca, mail@ccla.org, info@amnesty.ca,
rocht@iclmg.ca, katiag@ccic.ca, admin@cbanb.com, info@cba.org
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material that everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now forward the other emails that various silly servants got after I had had many talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within the Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult you and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response from you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the US Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139. Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your arse high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot before you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you have integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her too. She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green for way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners and other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know. however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
July 31st, 2005
Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and for Public Complaints against the RCMP
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Canadian Judicial Council Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:
Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Just so you know
Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try again.
SH
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca; rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca; csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca; jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca; linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca; robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know
CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.
"Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then, please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
************************************
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************