Scroll to the bottom to see the email in its entirety
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fine, Sean"<SFine@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 20:54:18 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Lisa Thompson RE Glen Canning and his
cohorts torturing Doug Ford about Sex Ed I just called again from 902
800 0359 and left another voicemail
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
?
There is no justice until late summer.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:54:04 -0400
Subject: Attn Lisa Thompson RE Glen Canning and his cohorts torturing Doug Ford
about Sex Ed I just called again from 902 800 0359 and left another voicemail
To: jrubinoff@therecord.com, ruthfar@vianet.ca, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
news <news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>,
news <news@dailymail.co.uk>, news919 <news919@rogers.com>,
newsdesk <newsdesk@independent.co.uk>, investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>,
nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, jkay <jkay@nationalpost.com>,
sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>,
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
"Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
"Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "robert.frater"<robert.frater@justice.gc.ca>,
"dereck.fildebrandt"<dereck.fildebrandt@assembly.
"jason.kenney"<jason.kenney@assembly.ab.ca>, HAnglin <HAnglin@theccf.ca>,
votejohnw <votejohnw@gmail.com>,
BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
"Karen.Ludwig"<Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca>,
"Alaina.Lockhart"<Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
"len.hoyt"<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:57:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Lisa Thompson RE Glen Canning and his
cohorts torturing Doug Ford about Sex Ed I just called again from 902
800 0359 and left another voicemail
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos58 minutes ago
This is the most disgusting Show I ever heard on CBC Need I say Glen Canning knows I have a huge bone to pick with ever one of these evil people?
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/
Father of bullying victim Rehtaeh Parsons calls Ford's sex-ed repeal 'infuriating'
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:57:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Lisa Thompson RE Glen Canning and his cohorts torturing
Doug Ford about Sex Ed I just called again from 902 800 0359 and left another voicemail
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:57:27 -0400
Subject: Attn Lisa Thompson RE Glen Canning and his cohorts torturing Doug Ford
about Sex Ed I just called again from 902 800 0359 and left another voicemail
To: premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "joel.harden@ontariondp.ca,
lisa.thompsonco@pc.ola.org, caroline"<caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab. ca>, "philip.bryden"<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "bill.sweeney"<bill.sweeney@gov.ab.ca>,
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "
don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, Cindy Bruneau <Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "david.eby.mla"<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "david.eby.mla"<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>,
"blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
"Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca> , eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
"david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>,
themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
"rod.knecht"<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca> , "bill.pentney"<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca >,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
"Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> , glen <glen@glencanning.com>,
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"Matt.DeCourcey"<Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "lisa.macleod"<lisa.macleod@pc.ola.org>, "Hunter.Tootoo"<Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca>, "Kent.Hehr"<Kent.Hehr@parl.gc.ca>,
"Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "bill.clark"<bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca> ,
"Bill.Casey"<Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca>,
"Bill.Casey"<Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca>,
"Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca >,
jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "elizabeth.may"<elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>,
"Elliott-co, Christine"<christine.elliottco@pc.ola. org>,
"Dale.Morgan"<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"dale.drummond"<dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> ,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>,
"randy.mckeen"<randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>,
Kris Wells <kwells@ualberta.ca>, "kris.wells"<kris.wells@ualberta.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
http://davidraymondamos3. blogspot.com/2018/07/this-is- most-disgusting-show-i-ever. html
Thursday, 19 July 2018
This is the most disgusting Show I ever heard on CBC Need I say Glen
Canning knows I have a huge bone to pick with ever one of these evil
people?
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ thehouse/the-house-the- disruptor-in-chief-goes-to- nato-1.4742980
https://podcast-a.akamaihd. net/mp3/podcasts/thehouse- jqYu88pc-20180714.mp3
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 19 July 2018
This is the most disgusting Show I ever heard on CBC Need I say Glen
Canning knows I have a huge bone to pick with ever one of these evil
people?
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/
https://podcast-a.akamaihd.
The House: The Disruptor-in-chief goes to NATO
Listen to the full episode48:30
U.S. President Donald Trump took his confrontational approach to diplomacy to the NATO summit this week, where he sideswiped his fellow alliance leaders with a litany of accusations, questionable demands on spending levels and a sudden threat to pull out of the alliance entirely.
That has left national leaders — Canada's included — asking the same question they've been asking for almost two years now: what can be done to mitigate Trump's tactics?
Not much, says former Conservative defence minister Peter MacKay. His advice? "Keep calm and carry on."
MacKay told The House today that Canada needs to keep its focus on building its military capability, contributing to NATO missions and working toward other alliance goals. Beyond that, he said, there's little anyone outside the U.S. can do to rein in the president's behaviour.
"This is the new normal," MacKay said.
Trump has been pushing for the 29 allied nations that make up NATO to speed up their commitment to increasing defence spending to two per cent of GDP — a goal set in 2014 with a 10-year deadline.
Currently, most NATO nations aren't hitting that target. Trump emerged from the summit claiming he'd pressured the members into meeting his demands — although French President Emmanuel Macron quickly shot that claim down, pointing out that the summit communique only committed the allies to the two per cent target set before Trump was elected.
That has left national leaders — Canada's included — asking the same question they've been asking for almost two years now: what can be done to mitigate Trump's tactics?
Not much, says former Conservative defence minister Peter MacKay. His advice? "Keep calm and carry on."
MacKay told The House today that Canada needs to keep its focus on building its military capability, contributing to NATO missions and working toward other alliance goals. Beyond that, he said, there's little anyone outside the U.S. can do to rein in the president's behaviour.
"This is the new normal," MacKay said.
Trump has been pushing for the 29 allied nations that make up NATO to speed up their commitment to increasing defence spending to two per cent of GDP — a goal set in 2014 with a 10-year deadline.
Currently, most NATO nations aren't hitting that target. Trump emerged from the summit claiming he'd pressured the members into meeting his demands — although French President Emmanuel Macron quickly shot that claim down, pointing out that the summit communique only committed the allies to the two per cent target set before Trump was elected.
The House
Interview - Peter MacKay
00:0008:38
In the middle of the meetings, Trump shifted the goalposts suddenly and argued that the spending benchmark should be increased to four per cent of GDP. Behind closed doors, his rhetoric was apparently alarming enough for NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg to call an emergency session of leaders.
The National
Trump claims NATO victory, Trudeau indirectly disagrees
00:0002:19
Focus on the alliance, not Trump: retired general
It would be "impossible" for Trump to unilaterally pull out of NATO, Ben Hodges, a retired U.S. lieutenant general who led the NATO Allied Land Command, told The House.
But he can still do the alliance a lot of damage, he added.
"Cohesion of the members of the alliance is our centre of gravity," he said. "It's unfortunate when any leader pounds other members."
He added he thinks Trump has no understanding of how NATO works, although his advisers do.
Hodges said Trump has a valid point — that allies should be spending more on defence — but his fixation on the two per cent target is blinding him to the fact that NATO partners make other types of contributions.
Earlier this week, Trudeau announced that, beginning in the fall, Canada will assume command of a NATO training mission in Iraq for its first year, with a commitment of up to 250 troops and four helicopters.
Trump may not count that as a contribution to the GDP goal, Hodges said — but that just shows that spending isn't the only yardstick for measuring the alliance's success.
"This is not about satisfying the American president. This is about allies contributing to their share of the burden."
Matt DeCourcey, Parliamentary secretary to Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland, told The House Canada will continue to remain a "committed contributor" to NATO.
The House
Interview - Matt DeCourcey
00:0006:24
NATO is arguably the most important international organization Canada takes part in, and is "as important now as it ever was," he said.
That emphasis on solidarity will be key heading into Monday's meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"The happiest guy on the planet right now is Vladimir Putin because he's watching the American president swing a wrecking ball towards the alliance," Hodges said.
"We're doing the job that Putin would normally have to do himself."
The House
Interview - Ben Hodges
00:0005:53
Unity vital between premiers as trade battle brews, Gallant says
Tensions between the provinces have been high in the past year — especially out west, where British Columbia and Alberta have been feuding over a thwarted expansion project for the Trans Mountain pipeline. Ottawa ended up buying the pipeline from Kinder Morgan for $4.5 billion.
Gallant, who is hosting next week's annual premiers meeting in New Brunswick, said he fully expects that topic to come up, along with the perennial irritant of interprovincial trade.
No matter what the dividing issues are this year, however, he said he's hoping all premiers keep an open mind.
"I think it's going to be very important as premiers to be as united as possible," he told CBC Radio's The House.
"There's a lot more that binds us together than divides us."
Remaining cohesive is key, given the trade war percolating between Canada and the U.S., Gallant said.
"Trade in all of its aspects will be top of mind next week."
Canada moved forward at the beginning of the month with $16 billion in tariffs against our southern neighbour — retaliation for U.S. tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum imposed a month before.
Gallant is advocating a "quicker" approach to getting an interprovincial free trade agreement up and running and said he expects his counterparts will agree, given the sour atmosphere hanging over trade talks with the U.S.
International and interprovincial trade aren't the only topics that have been causing friction in the federation lately.
The federal government has been under fire recently for renewing the existing equalization formula for another five years despite strong objections from some provinces. The extension kicks in next year.
Equalization, which is based on a highly complex formula, is designed to help poorer provincial governments provide public services that are reasonably comparable to those in other provinces.
Saskatchewan has expressed its displeasure with the federal government's methods for calculating equalization payments and its government has suggested an alternative plan.
Premier Scott Moe made a formal request to add equalization to the meeting's agenda, Gallant said, but that schedule was solidified weeks ago.
He told guest host Katie Simpson he'd invited Moe to bring it up in the open portion of the meeting.
The premiers will be in St. Andrews, N.B., from July 18-20.
The House
Interview - Brian Gallant
00:0013:25
Father of bullying victim Rehtaeh Parsons calls Ford's sex-ed repeal 'infuriating'
On Wednesday, the newly-elected Progressive Conservative government of Premier Doug Ford announced the sex-ed curriculum to be taught to children in the coming school year will be an older version — not the controversial updated program brought in by the previous government.
The curriculum will revert back to the version taught in 1998, excluding recently added topics such as same-sex marriage, masturbation, online bullying and sexting.
"It's infuriating to see them do this," Glen Canning told CBC Radio's The House on Friday, adding that teaching consent in schools might have made all the difference for his daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons.
In November 2011, the Nova Scotia teen attended a party where she said she was sexually assaulted.
An explicit photo was taken during the incident — one that would be spread among the kids at her school and lead to months of online bullying.
Seventeen-year-old Rehtaeh was taken off life support in April 2013 after attempting suicide.
The National
Rehtaeh Parsons' death changed the conversation about sexual assault and consent
00:0004:44
"I think I'd still have my daughter with me right now."
Canning said repealing the curriculum means children and teens in Ontario won't learn about topics that can help them feel safer in school — like consent, LGBT issues and sexual violence.
He accused Ford of scrapping the curriculum to appease his party's socially-conservative voters.
Ford's new education minister, Lisa Thompson, said the government is planning to consult with parents on a new curriculum to replace the one adopted in 2015.
But Canning said too many parents are failing to teach their kids the facts about sex, sexual exploitation and bullying now. If schools and parents fail to address these topics properly, he said, more teens will suffer the way his daughter did.
"What happened to my daughter was preventable ... it was preventable with a good sex education program."
The House
Interview - Glen Canning
00:0006:25
Rehtaeh Parsons’ father: the 2015 sex ed curriculum could have saved my daughter
When the Ontario government introduced its new sex-ed curriculum in 2015, Glen Canning was living several provinces over in Nova Scotia, but decided to take a look anyway.
He wound up reading the entire curriculum — all 239 pages — and when he finished, his thoughts immediately went to his daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons, who died from suicide two years earlier.
He wound up reading the entire curriculum — all 239 pages — and when he finished, his thoughts immediately went to his daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons, who died from suicide two years earlier.
Pandering to far-right minority won't help kids
Doug Ford. (File photo)
The answer to that is easy. It has nothing to do with respecting parents, or teachers or even education and has everything to do with Doug Ford keeping his promise to the far-right evangelical sorts, like Charles McVety or Tanya Granic who, let’s not forget. supported Ford’s candidacy for Conservative leader. Political opportunism at its slimiest.
I’m appalled that Conservatives like Vic Fedeli and Caroline Mulroney, who I thought maybe were thinking people, have gone along with this. Like I said, slimy opportunism.
Where will children learn about consent, setting boundaries, proper names for body parts, who to tell if someone touches those body parts that shouldn’t, inclusivity, gender issues, etc.? Well, according to Conservatives, and anyone else who is against the new curriculum, it will be parents. I would like everyone to put up their hands if their parents told them all about consent, boundaries and the rest. I thought so.
The best thing I read all week was when Glen Canning said, "If every parent isn’t educating their children at home, none of our children are safe.”
Canning is the father of Rehteah Parsons, who took her own life after telling her parents she had been sexually assaulted by four teens at a party in 2011. She had been a victim of cyber bullying and a picture of the incident had been shared on the internet.
He believes that his daughter would be alive today if the updated sex education curriculum had been taught in her school.
Canning is right that the teaching of consent is imperative in public school. If children are not taught how to arm themselves with information to help protect them from predators, cyber bullying, sexting and internet privacy, we are just leaving our kids hanging out there to be victims. It’s a different world now.
Of course, people fell for the lies that were told about the new curriculum. I believe those lies were rooted in homophobia and wanting women to stay as more compliant partners. They told people that the words “anal sex” were part of the gay agenda. None of that was true.
According to what I have seen of the document, its approach to sexual education was appropriate for varying age groups and was only a small part of the whole thing. Much of it focused on health and physical education.
Ford says he will consult with parents in a way that the previous government did not. Hmm … I guess the fact the Liberals had consulted with teachers, experts and 4,000 parents of elementary students wasn’t enough? But hey, why should we pay attention to the truth?
I worry about the kids who are putting up with bullying or touching as they walk down the hallways, or the ones who are being sent threats on the internet. I worry about parents who feel inadequate to deal with all of this stuff. The new curriculum would have helped so many find the tools to help themselves and others.
Given that the new assistant to the education minister is Sam Oosterhoff -- a young, home-schooled MPP who talked of the “sin” of homosexuality on his Facebook page -- I wouldn’t hold my breath for the Cons to move into this century. Has anyone told them that same-sex marriage is legal in Canada now?
Unfortunately, we have a premier and new government catering to a vocal minority. And it’s not going to help anyone, especially not our kids.
Ruth Farquhar is a freelance writer living on Manitoulin Island.
Ontario education minister flip-flops on sex-ed curriculum stance
Shawn Jeffords, The Canadian Press Published Monday, July 16, 2018 3:21PM EDT
TORONTO -- Ontario's education minister went back and forth Monday on just what students will learn while her government scraps the province's modernized sex-ed curriculum.
Ultimately, Lisa Thompson indicated that no decisions had been made on whether concepts like consent, cyber safety and gender identity will be taught in classrooms this fall.
The province's new Progressive Conservative government announced last week that it was reverting to a 1998 version of the curriculum while consultations are carried out to create a new document.
"We know they need to learn about consent," she said at the legislature. "We know they need to learn about cyber safety, we know they need to learn about gender identity and appreciation. But we also know that the former Liberal government's consultation process was completely flawed."
A short time later, Thompson told reporters that only a portion of the curriculum will be rolled back, not the entire document.
"What we'll be looking at is the developing sexual relations," she said. "That's the part in the curriculum that we'll be taking a look at."
Late Monday afternoon, however, Thompson's office released a statement that appeared to contradict her comments from earlier in the day.
"We have made no decisions on what the new curriculum will look like. The final decision on the scope of the new curriculum will be based on what we hear from Ontario parents," the statement said.
"While these consultations occur, we are reverting to the full health and physical education curriculum that was last taught in 2014. This curriculum leaves ample space to discuss current social issues."
Premier Doug Ford repeatedly promised to repeal and replace the sex-ed curriculum during his run for the Tory leadership earlier this year and during the spring election, saying parents had not been adequately consulted.
Critics have said the 1998 version of the curriculum did not include many modern themes that children need to keep themselves safe online and did not address things like same-sex marriage.
The modernized curriculum included warnings about online bullying and sexting that were not in the previous version, and also discussed same-sex marriage, gender identity and masturbation.
NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said Monday's developments make it clear the Tory government does not know what it's doing on the sex-ed file.
"September is coming pretty quick," she said. "It's reprehensible and irresponsible that this government has left everything in such a disarray that educators in our province aren't even aware of what's going to happen come September."
Interim Liberal Leader John Fraser questioned why the government wanted to repeal a curriculum that has been taught in classrooms across the province for three years.
"It's irresponsible to cancel that curriculum," he said. "It's there to protect our children."
Jason Kunin, an English teacher in Toronto, said regardless of what the Tory government does with sex-ed, teachers will address modern issues in class.
"Whether you have it enshrined in the documents or not, you can't simply say we're going to pretend like these things don't exist and expect 60,000 teachers in Ontario to suddenly go along with pretending that it's 1998," said Kunin, who signed on to an online petition condemning the government's scrapping of the modernized health curriculum among other issues.
"You can repeal the curriculum but these conversations are still going to happen."
-- with files from Cassandra Szklarski.
Ultimately, Lisa Thompson indicated that no decisions had been made on whether concepts like consent, cyber safety and gender identity will be taught in classrooms this fall.
The province's new Progressive Conservative government announced last week that it was reverting to a 1998 version of the curriculum while consultations are carried out to create a new document.
Thompson first told the legislature on Monday that not all parts of the modernized sex-ed curriculum -- updated in 2015 by the Liberals -- would be scrapped.
"We know they need to learn about consent," she said at the legislature. "We know they need to learn about cyber safety, we know they need to learn about gender identity and appreciation. But we also know that the former Liberal government's consultation process was completely flawed."
A short time later, Thompson told reporters that only a portion of the curriculum will be rolled back, not the entire document.
"What we'll be looking at is the developing sexual relations," she said. "That's the part in the curriculum that we'll be taking a look at."
Late Monday afternoon, however, Thompson's office released a statement that appeared to contradict her comments from earlier in the day.
"We have made no decisions on what the new curriculum will look like. The final decision on the scope of the new curriculum will be based on what we hear from Ontario parents," the statement said.
"While these consultations occur, we are reverting to the full health and physical education curriculum that was last taught in 2014. This curriculum leaves ample space to discuss current social issues."
Premier Doug Ford repeatedly promised to repeal and replace the sex-ed curriculum during his run for the Tory leadership earlier this year and during the spring election, saying parents had not been adequately consulted.
Critics have said the 1998 version of the curriculum did not include many modern themes that children need to keep themselves safe online and did not address things like same-sex marriage.
The modernized curriculum included warnings about online bullying and sexting that were not in the previous version, and also discussed same-sex marriage, gender identity and masturbation.
NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said Monday's developments make it clear the Tory government does not know what it's doing on the sex-ed file.
"September is coming pretty quick," she said. "It's reprehensible and irresponsible that this government has left everything in such a disarray that educators in our province aren't even aware of what's going to happen come September."
Interim Liberal Leader John Fraser questioned why the government wanted to repeal a curriculum that has been taught in classrooms across the province for three years.
"It's irresponsible to cancel that curriculum," he said. "It's there to protect our children."
Jason Kunin, an English teacher in Toronto, said regardless of what the Tory government does with sex-ed, teachers will address modern issues in class.
"Whether you have it enshrined in the documents or not, you can't simply say we're going to pretend like these things don't exist and expect 60,000 teachers in Ontario to suddenly go along with pretending that it's 1998," said Kunin, who signed on to an online petition condemning the government's scrapping of the modernized health curriculum among other issues.
"You can repeal the curriculum but these conversations are still going to happen."
-- with files from Cassandra Szklarski.
Amid backlash, Ford goes into damage control
Doug Ford’s Ontario is open for business.
And closing its mind to the world around us.
And closing its mind to the world around us.
For it is often forgotten that parents who opposed a modern sex-ed curriculum always had the right to withdraw their children from any lessons. But that wasn’t good enough, for they wanted to impose their own narrow view on everyone else, depriving the majority of students, and their parents, of a modern curriculum that would equip them for the modern world.
Instead of a personal opt-out, they demanded a provincial blow out. In sex-ed as in politics, the squeaky wheels get the lubricant.
In Doug Ford’s Ontario, the tail wags the dog. The premier fears the wrath of so-cons scorned, and so he plays along.
Never mind that the updated curriculum was wildly distorted by opponents. No matter that sexually transmitted infections are climbing rapidly, especially in the U.S. where sex-ed courses are similarly under pressure from evangelical movements promoting abstinence: syphilis rates quadrupled from 2000 to 2016 while chlamydia has doubled; and gonorrhea has jumped 46 per cent since 2010.
Ford’s government has officially rescinded a sex-ed curriculum that taught students the importance of consent, of tolerating difference (notably in sexual orientation and gender identity), of defending against bullying, and, yes, the names of body parts to help safeguard children against sexual abuse (empowering them to speak with greater precision to police when needed).
Victims of sexual abuse or bullying, and their parents, have publicly condemned Ford’s decision, warning it endangers lives. Glen Canning, whose daughter Rehtaeh Parsons committed suicide after an explicit photo of her sexual assault was shared online, described the government as “infuriating.”
Odd that so many pro-life activists would risk the lives of teenagers, and their sexual health, by campaigning against a conventional curriculum that empowers students at various stages in their education to protect themselves clinically, physically, emotionally and socially.
Now, facing a growing backlash, the Tories are belatedly attempting damage control — albeit through obfuscation, not education.
Education Minister Lisa Thompson, who proudly announced last week that the new curriculum had been suspended, claimed petulantly this week people were jumping to conclusions about what’s in and what’s out: “We are reverting to the ... curriculum that was last taught in 2014. This curriculum leaves ample space to discuss current social issues.”
That’s called trying to have it both ways, through mixed messages for teachers, students and parents. Meanwhile, the new curriculum will remain suspended while the government carries out what Thomson calls “fulsome” parental consultations — likely through the miracle of online interactions.
But while the Ford government fights to preserve the innocence (and ignorance) of students now in school, what about that cohort of kids who were exposed to the modernized curriculum introduced in 2015? For three full years, these young minds have been inculcated (indoctrinated?) with what the Tories view as dirty words and filthy smut.
What is to be done? Will Ford conjure up a re-education curriculum to right the wrongs he believes were inflicted on Ontario’s schoolchildren? Will he create mandatory summer courses to deprogram kids before they act on the updated curriculum — Sex-ed Detox for Oversexed Pupils?
As the premier likes to say, “Help is on the way.”
Sex-ed: ’90s nostalgia takes a cynical turn
There are those among us who would like to believe that nothing of substance has changed since 1998 or 1978 or 1958. As a parent of three kids in the public school system, I’m calling B.S. on that one, writes Joel Rubinoff.
Will Ontario’s muddled sex-ed decisions return us to a more innocent age when a sweet and wide-eyed Lindsay Lohan starred in Disney’s innocuous ‘The Parent Trap’? Probably not. - Disney
Are they repealing it? Are they not repealing it?
When it comes to the province's updated sex-ed curriculum, threatened with annihilation by the Tory government in favour of its archaic 1998 predecessor, the waters are suddenly very murky.
First, in deference to social conservatives — a code name for people who view modern society as a Caligula-styled cesspool — they promised they would jump into Doc Brown's time-tripping DeLorean from "Back to the Future" and return to the Chrétien era, when things like social media, sexting and same-sex marriage didn't exist.
Then on Monday, after outrage from educators and parents who don't want their kids held hostage by moral reactionaries from another century, they said they would include bastardized lessons about some of these topics.
Then they reaffirmed, contradictorily, that they will be "rolling back our sex-ed focus," which means what, I don't know.
If they do decide to set the dial back to 1998, I have to admit I'm curious how it will pan out.
After all, the '90s — with their Billy Ray Cyrus mullets and Kurt Cobain flannels — were a more innocent time, as sweetly nostalgic as the world Marty McFly encountered when he travelled back 30 years in the 1985 movie blockbuster.
It was an age before big screen superheroes ruled the multiplexes and adult films like "Shakespeare in Love" could still find a welcome berth at the box office.
An age when water cooler TV hits like "Seinfeld" and "Friends" ruled the network roost and even dorky sitcoms like "Dharma & Greg" could muster decent followings.
An age when Lindsay Lohan, wide-eyed and innocent, starred in Disney's "The Parent Trap," family band Hanson released the bubble gum smash "MMMBop" and — before the internet divided the world into à la carte niches — the world was feeding from the same cultural trough.
When it comes to the province's updated sex-ed curriculum, threatened with annihilation by the Tory government in favour of its archaic 1998 predecessor, the waters are suddenly very murky.
First, in deference to social conservatives — a code name for people who view modern society as a Caligula-styled cesspool — they promised they would jump into Doc Brown's time-tripping DeLorean from "Back to the Future" and return to the Chrétien era, when things like social media, sexting and same-sex marriage didn't exist.
Then on Monday, after outrage from educators and parents who don't want their kids held hostage by moral reactionaries from another century, they said they would include bastardized lessons about some of these topics.
Then they reaffirmed, contradictorily, that they will be "rolling back our sex-ed focus," which means what, I don't know.
If they do decide to set the dial back to 1998, I have to admit I'm curious how it will pan out.
After all, the '90s — with their Billy Ray Cyrus mullets and Kurt Cobain flannels — were a more innocent time, as sweetly nostalgic as the world Marty McFly encountered when he travelled back 30 years in the 1985 movie blockbuster.
It was an age before big screen superheroes ruled the multiplexes and adult films like "Shakespeare in Love" could still find a welcome berth at the box office.
An age when water cooler TV hits like "Seinfeld" and "Friends" ruled the network roost and even dorky sitcoms like "Dharma & Greg" could muster decent followings.
An age when Lindsay Lohan, wide-eyed and innocent, starred in Disney's "The Parent Trap," family band Hanson released the bubble gum smash "MMMBop" and — before the internet divided the world into à la carte niches — the world was feeding from the same cultural trough.
The problem, from a sex-ed point of view, is that Biff Tannen — the megalomaniac bully from "Back to the Future Part II"— is now running our province.
And teaching a sex-ed curriculum that stems from the days when humans were still making tools out of rocks, sexually speaking, is like replacing the cutting edge safety features on modern cars with clunky misfires from an earlier generation.
Consider my life in 1972: my dad blasting down the highway in a station wagon the size of a yacht, a plume of black exhaust behind him, with my baby sister in the front row, no car seat or seatbelt, squashed between my parents.
Hey, at least it wasn't a Ford Pinto, which had the unfortunate habit of bursting into flames during minor fender benders.
Now consider my public school classroom of the '70s, a Darwinian killing field where only the strong survived.
I wasn't a he-man — more the cowering squirt in the corner — but had the self-awareness to stay the hell out of the fray as kids who didn't conform to traditional gender stereotypes were targeted, bullied and called "fag" until they broke down or moved to another school.
Gender identity? Cyberbullying? These were things Mr. Spock might have grappled with on "Star Trek."
Consent? When no didn't really mean no, what would have been the point?
For those of us over 40, 1998 wasn't really that long ago — a drop in the bucket since the 1960s'
"Youthquake" overturned stuffy social mores of the '50s and begat the culture wars of today.
But progress doesn't occur in neatly parcelled-out increments.
And when the internet ramped up in the early 2000s, spawning an era of sexting, cyberbullying and ubiquitous online porn, it changed everything.
There are those among us who would like to believe these things never happened, that nothing of substance has changed since 1998 or 1978 or 1958.
As a parent of three kids in the public school system, I'm calling B.S. on that one.
The perils of social media, the importance of consent, LGBTQ+ rights.
Had the new curriculum been in place a decade ago, a lot of the drama experienced by my stepdaughter's peer group could have been happily avoided.
"The new sex-ed curriculum doesn't just benefit parents who aren't comfortable talking about it," adds my psychologist wife. "It also benefits parents like me who are very comfortable.''
A few weeks before school ended, our 10-year-old son, Max — who has autism — came home troubled by a class discussion about the changes wrought by puberty, a subject my wife had broached previously with zero response.
Kids in the class were uncomfortable. Some had laughed. Max seemed unsure how to react.
"Everyone at that age is uncomfortable and giggles," notes Alicia, insisting it's stuff they need to know. "They're grossed out. It's normal.
"But it led to us having a conversation that opened the door for our autistic child to actually be able to talk about what I think is vital. This was a good thing."
My own opinion is that sex education is no different — and should be treated no differently — than math, science or accounting.
Parents are pivotal, but are they best suited to teach their kids about modern sexual mores and other "difficult" topics?
Are they a substitute for trained teachers and — despite the bogus criticism — a scientifically valid, heavily publicly consulted sex-ed curriculum?
Ha, ha. What is this, "Planet of the Apes"?
"If parents were teaching this at home, then why in 2018 do we have kids who are homophobic and racist and sexist and misogynist?" Glen Canning, father of assault victim turned suicide Rehtaeh Parsons, told The Toronto Star.
"Why do we have that? We have that because they're not teaching kids at home."
"And if you taught them nothing, you have no idea where your child is learning this stuff."
So to corset-bound puritans who figure ignoring modern realities will make them go away, there is only one solution: re-create the gull-winged time machine from "Back to the Future" and have a good trip.
If you can take our Biff Tannen premier with you, so much the better.
jrubinoff@therecord.com , Twitter: @JoelRubinoff
Email: jrubinoff@therecord.comFacebookTwitter
And teaching a sex-ed curriculum that stems from the days when humans were still making tools out of rocks, sexually speaking, is like replacing the cutting edge safety features on modern cars with clunky misfires from an earlier generation.
Consider my life in 1972: my dad blasting down the highway in a station wagon the size of a yacht, a plume of black exhaust behind him, with my baby sister in the front row, no car seat or seatbelt, squashed between my parents.
Hey, at least it wasn't a Ford Pinto, which had the unfortunate habit of bursting into flames during minor fender benders.
Now consider my public school classroom of the '70s, a Darwinian killing field where only the strong survived.
I wasn't a he-man — more the cowering squirt in the corner — but had the self-awareness to stay the hell out of the fray as kids who didn't conform to traditional gender stereotypes were targeted, bullied and called "fag" until they broke down or moved to another school.
Gender identity? Cyberbullying? These were things Mr. Spock might have grappled with on "Star Trek."
Consent? When no didn't really mean no, what would have been the point?
For those of us over 40, 1998 wasn't really that long ago — a drop in the bucket since the 1960s'
"Youthquake" overturned stuffy social mores of the '50s and begat the culture wars of today.
But progress doesn't occur in neatly parcelled-out increments.
And when the internet ramped up in the early 2000s, spawning an era of sexting, cyberbullying and ubiquitous online porn, it changed everything.
There are those among us who would like to believe these things never happened, that nothing of substance has changed since 1998 or 1978 or 1958.
As a parent of three kids in the public school system, I'm calling B.S. on that one.
The perils of social media, the importance of consent, LGBTQ+ rights.
Had the new curriculum been in place a decade ago, a lot of the drama experienced by my stepdaughter's peer group could have been happily avoided.
"The new sex-ed curriculum doesn't just benefit parents who aren't comfortable talking about it," adds my psychologist wife. "It also benefits parents like me who are very comfortable.''
A few weeks before school ended, our 10-year-old son, Max — who has autism — came home troubled by a class discussion about the changes wrought by puberty, a subject my wife had broached previously with zero response.
Kids in the class were uncomfortable. Some had laughed. Max seemed unsure how to react.
"Everyone at that age is uncomfortable and giggles," notes Alicia, insisting it's stuff they need to know. "They're grossed out. It's normal.
"But it led to us having a conversation that opened the door for our autistic child to actually be able to talk about what I think is vital. This was a good thing."
My own opinion is that sex education is no different — and should be treated no differently — than math, science or accounting.
Parents are pivotal, but are they best suited to teach their kids about modern sexual mores and other "difficult" topics?
Are they a substitute for trained teachers and — despite the bogus criticism — a scientifically valid, heavily publicly consulted sex-ed curriculum?
Ha, ha. What is this, "Planet of the Apes"?
"If parents were teaching this at home, then why in 2018 do we have kids who are homophobic and racist and sexist and misogynist?" Glen Canning, father of assault victim turned suicide Rehtaeh Parsons, told The Toronto Star.
"Why do we have that? We have that because they're not teaching kids at home."
"And if you taught them nothing, you have no idea where your child is learning this stuff."
So to corset-bound puritans who figure ignoring modern realities will make them go away, there is only one solution: re-create the gull-winged time machine from "Back to the Future" and have a good trip.
If you can take our Biff Tannen premier with you, so much the better.
jrubinoff@therecord.com , Twitter: @JoelRubinoff
by Joel Rubinoff
Joel Rubinoff is the arts and family columnist at the Waterloo Region Record.Email: jrubinoff@therecord.comFacebookTwitter
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:57:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Lisa Thompson RE Glen Canning and his cohorts torturing
Doug Ford about Sex Ed I just called again from 902 800 0359 and left another voicemail
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:57:27 -0400
Subject: Attn Lisa Thompson RE Glen Canning and his cohorts torturing Doug Ford
about Sex Ed I just called again from 902 800 0359 and left another voicemail
To: premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "joel.harden@ontariondp.ca,
lisa.thompsonco@pc.ola.org, caroline"<caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab. ca>, "philip.bryden"<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "bill.sweeney"<bill.sweeney@gov.ab.ca>,
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "
don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, Cindy Bruneau <Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "david.eby.mla"<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "david.eby.mla"<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>,
"blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
"Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca> , eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
"david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>,
themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
"rod.knecht"<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca> , "bill.pentney"<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca >,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
"Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> , glen <glen@glencanning.com>,
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"Matt.DeCourcey"<Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "lisa.macleod"<lisa.macleod@pc.ola.org>, "Hunter.Tootoo"<Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca>, "Kent.Hehr"<Kent.Hehr@parl.gc.ca>,
"Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "bill.clark"<bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca> ,
"Bill.Casey"<Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca>,
"Bill.Casey"<Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca>,
"Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca >,
jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "elizabeth.may"<elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>,
"Elliott-co, Christine"<christine.elliottco@pc.ola. org>,
"Dale.Morgan"<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"dale.drummond"<dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> ,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>,
"randy.mckeen"<randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>,
Kris Wells <kwells@ualberta.ca>, "kris.wells"<kris.wells@ualberta.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 19 July 2018
This is the most disgusting Show I ever heard on CBC Need I say Glen
Canning knows I have a huge bone to pick with ever one of these evil
people?
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/
https://podcast-a.akamaihd.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:17:29 -0400
Subject: Attn Lisa Thompson and Joel Harden I just called from 902 800
0359 (Harden could not hear me but I heard him just fine That happens
ever time I call him)
To: joel.harden@ontariondp.ca, lisa.thompsonco@pc.ola.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
https://twitter.com/
Joel Harden @JoelHardenONDP Jul 10
Joel Harden Retweeted Fix Our Schools
Like me, @LisaThompsonMPP signed the @Fix_Our_Schools pledge. Why is
she now going back on her word? Our kids and educators deserve much
better than this. #onpoli
https://joelhardenorg.
Email: joel.harden@ontariondp.ca
Phone: 613-869-5952
https://twitter.com/
http://lisathompsonmpp.ca/
408 Queen Street, PO Box 426
Blyth, ON N0M 1H0
Phone: 519-523-4251
Toll Free: 1-800-668-9320
Fax: 226-523-9296
Email: lisa.thompsonco@pc.ola.org
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joel Harden - Ottawa Centre NDP <joel@joelharden.ca>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 16:32:39 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Thank You, Ottawa Centre / Merci Ottawa Centre
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank You
From the bottom of my heart, thank you. Together, we made history as
we turned Ottawa Centre orange with a combination of bold ideas and
local organizing.
This was a true team effort. In total, 1,200 volunteers participated
in our campaign. To everyone who knocked on a door, entered data, put
up a sign, donated a dollar, or convinced family and friends to
support us, my sincere thanks.
We are thrilled to see the election of so many NDP MPPs across
Ontario, but let’s be honest: the reality of a Doug Ford majority
government poses a real threat to the progressive gains made over the
past few years, whether on minimum wage, reproductive justice, or
climate change. Our best defence against Ford’s destructive agenda is
an organized community - and this is what we will continue to build in
Ottawa Centre.
I am humbled to be given the opportunity to serve as your MPP, and to
follow in the footsteps of torchbearers like Michael Cassidy, Evelyn
Gigantes, Ed Broadbent, and Paul Dewar. I’m excited to build on the
movement that we’ve started and to continue to fight together for the
Ontario that we deserve. For the many, not the few.
My very best,
Joel Harden
Merci
Du fonds de mon coeur, merci. Ensemble, nous avons marqué l'histoire
en changeant Ottawa Centre par une combinaison d'idées audacieuses et
d'organisation locale.
C'était un véritable travail d'équipe. Au total, 1 200 bénévoles ont
participé à notre campagne. À tous ceux qui ont cogné aux portes, qui
ont fait de la saisie de données, affichés une pancarte, faits un don,
ou convaincu leurs familles et amis de nous soutenir, je vous remercie
sincèrement.
Nous sommes ravis de voir l'élection de tant de députés NPD partout en
Ontario, mais soyons francs: la réalité d'un gouvernement majoritaire
mené par Doug Ford menace le progrès réalisé au cours des dernières
années, qu'il s’agisse du salaire minimum, des droits reproductifs, ou
du changement climatique. Notre meilleure défense contre le programme
destructif de Ford est une communauté bien mobilisée - et c'est ce que
nous continuerons de faire dans Ottawa Centre.
C'est avec humilité que je deviens votre député provincial et que je
suis les traces de porteurs de flambeau comme Michael Cassidy, Evelyn
Gigantes, Ed Broadbent, et Paul Dewar. C'est avec enthousiasme que
nous poursuivrons le travail amorcé par notre mouvement, pour lutter
ensemble pour l'Ontario qu'on mérite - une province pour le plus grand
nombre, et non pour quelques-uns seulement.
En toute sincérité,
Joel Harden
-=-=-
Joel Harden, ONDP Candidate (Ottawa Centre) - Canada
This email was sent to motomaniac333@gmail.com. To stop receiving
emails: http://www.joelharden.ca/
-=-=-
Created with NationBuilder - http://nationbuilder.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:49:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Caroline Mulroney I am on the phone to
your office right now
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:49:48 -0400
Subject: ATTN Caroline Mulroney I am on the phone to your office right now
To: attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, "serge.rousselle"
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<harvey.cashore@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Ministry of the Attorney General
McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2S9
Telephone 416-326-2220
E-mail attorneygeneral@ontario.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:40:20 -0700
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Yo Doug Ford At least some
computers are far more ethical that their owners N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your email. A member of our team will get back to you as
soon as possible.
Warm regards,
Team Caroline
--
Caroline Mulroney
MPP York-Simcoe
Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Francophone Affairs
Députée pour York-Simcoe
procureure générale et ministre déléguée aux Affaires francophones
www.CarolineMulroney.ca
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/C_Mulroney
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:40:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Doug Ford At least some computers are far
more ethical that their owners N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:40:14 -0400
Subject: Yo Doug Ford At least some computers are far more ethical
that their owners N'esy Pas?
To: caroline <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Communications@usherbrooke.ca, suzie.choquette@usherbrooke.ca
Lisa-Maureen.Birch@capp.
rectrice@ulaval.ca, luc.begin@fp.ulaval.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, yves.boisvert@enap.ca,
Andre.Lacroix@usherbrooke.ca, Lyse.Langlois@rlt.ulaval.ca,
Allison.Marchildon@
Steve.Jacob@pol.ulaval.ca, bruno_leclerc@uqar.ca,
marc.maesschalck@uclouvain.be, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, "david.eby.mla"
<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Kevin.Jackson"<Kevin.Jackson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"Diane.Lebouthillier"<Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Allison Marchildon <Allison.Marchildon@
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:14:53 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : ATTN Sophie D'Amours and Luc Bégin The
woman without a name at (418) 656-2131, poste 11226 told me to contact
your lawyers
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Veuillez noter que je suis en congé pour fins d'études et de recherche
pour l'année 2017. Pendant cette période, je répondrai plus
sporadiquement à mes courriels. Merci de votre compréhension et
patience.
Pour de l'information relative à nos programmes en éthique appliquée,
veuillez visiter le http://www.usherbrooke.ca/
Pour des question plus spécifiques quant à ces programmes, je vous
invite à contacter mon collègue André Lacroix, qui assure la
responsabilité des programmes pendant mon absence :
andre.lacroix@usherbrooke.ca<
encore Suzie Choquette, secrétaire de direction du département:
suzie.choquette@usherbrooke.ca
Bonne journée et au plaisir,
Allison Marchildon
Professeure agrégée
Département de philosophie et d'éthique appliquée |
http://www.usherbrooke.ca/
Université de Sherbrooke | Campus de Longueuil
150, Place Charles-Lemoyne, bureau 12 730 | Longueuil, J4K 0A8
450.463.1835 # 61482 |
allison.marchildon@
[Université de Sherbrooke]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Steve Jacob <Steve.Jacob@pol.ulaval.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:14:51 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : ATTN Sophie D'Amours and Luc Bégin The
woman without a name at (418) 656-2131, poste 11226 told me to contact
your lawyers
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Je suis absent jusqu’au 27 juillet. Je ne lirai pas mes courriels
durant cette période. Je répondrai à votre message dès que possible à
mon retour.
En cas d’urgence, vous pouvez vous adressez à Lisa Birch
(Lisa-Maureen.Birch@capp.
___________________
I am currently out of office, with no email access. I will be away
until July 27. I will respond to your email as soon as possible upon
my return.
If you need immediate assistance during my absence, please contact Lisa Birch
(Lisa-Maureen.Birch@capp.
Steve Jacob
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Luc Bégin <Luc.Begin@fp.ulaval.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:14:52 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : ATTN Sophie D'Amours and Luc Bégin The
woman without a name at (418) 656-2131, poste 11226 told me to contact
your lawyers
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Veuillez prendre note que je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 7 août.
Pendant cette période, je ne prendrai pas connaissance de mes
courriels.
Pour toute correspondance relative à la subvention de recherche
FRQSC-KHEOPS-Action concertée, veuillez contacter M. Félix
Aubé-Beaudoin, coordonnateur du projet, à l'adresse suivante:
felix.aube-beaudoin.1@ulaval.
moi.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:14:50 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Sophie D'Amours and Luc Bégin The woman
without a name at (418) 656-2131, poste 11226 told me to contact your
lawyers
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eby.MLA, David"<David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:14:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Sophie D'Amours and Luc Bégin The woman
without a name at (418) 656-2131, poste 11226 told me to contact your
lawyers
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
received by my community office and will be reviewed as soon as
possible. Please note that constituents of Vancouver-Point Grey have
priority. Please be sure to respond back and include your home address
or postal code to confirm you are a resident of Vancouver-Point Grey.
If you are not a local resident, please contact your MLA's office for
assistance. To find out which MLA represents your neighbourhood, you
can enter your postal code here to get their contact information:
https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-
If you are writing to David Eby regarding his responsibilities as the
Attorney General, or as the Minister Responsible for ICBC, liquor
policy, or BCLC (gaming policy and enforcement) please direct your
correspondence to the Minister at
AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca
expertise on these issues will receive, review, and respond as
required to your correspondence. Our constituency office will not be
responding to emails related to David Eby's work as a Minister.
If you are writing to David with a media request, please direct your
correspondence to Liam Butler: 778-678-1572 or Liam.Butler@gov.bc.ca.
Due to the overwhelming volume of correspondence received and our
limited capacity, we are not able to respond personally to every
inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded items will not
receive a response. Please do not hesitate to contact the office
should you have any questions regarding the status of your query.
Should you have a situation that requires immediate attention, please
call Service BC (www.servicebc.gov.bc.ca), toll-free at
1-800-663-7867
appropriate government ministry.
Thanks again for writing,
Community office of David Eby MLA, Vancouver-Point Grey
2909 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G6
604-660-1297 | www.davidebymla.ca
On 7/12/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.ulaval.ca/en/
>
>
> Pavillon Sciences de l'éducation
> 2320, rue des Bibliothèques
> Local 1656
> Université Laval
>
> Téléphone au bureau : (418) 656-2131 poste 2745
> Courrier électronique : rectrice@ulaval.ca
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC)"PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000
> Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Mr. David Raymond Amos
> motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes,
> and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.
>
> This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way
> the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning,
> tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups
> that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an
> opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main
> strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.
>
> The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system,
> and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive
> tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the
> government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax
> evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of
> offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate
> federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and
> $2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.
>
> More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more
> auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams,
> increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized
> sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations
> and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at
> promoters of abusive tax schemes.
>
> On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve
> its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to
> its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program
> recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance
> Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international
> projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of
> the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
> Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the
> Panama Papers leaks.
>
> These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to
> protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and
> technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax
> arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To
> ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at
> promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased
> audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal
> investigations where warranted, and better communication with
> taxpayers.
>
> To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is
> increasing notifications and warnings through its communications
> products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants,
> and community groups so that they can become informed observers who
> can educate their clients.
>
> The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other
> representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax
> schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can
> lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution,
> court fines, and jail time.
>
> Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal
> investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for
> tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total,
> the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million
> and 734 months of jail time.
>
> When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA
> consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate
> solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming,
> and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts
> owed are considered.
>
> More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance
> scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the
> CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many
> of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The
> CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the
> Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these
> structures.
>
> To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in
> March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG
> and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate
> Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie
> University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in
> relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain
> the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this
> review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA
> had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man
> file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA
> took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was
> concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were
> appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were
> consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The
> report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with
> the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no
> evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA
> employees involved in the case.
>
> Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA
> employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts
> of interests between their current duties and any subsequent
> employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada.
> Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in
> protecting the CRA’s integrity.
>
> The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of
> misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions
> on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in
> disciplinary measures up to dismissal.
>
> All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant
> Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding
> cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which
> coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines
> whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures
> that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that
> compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward
> for tips received.
>
> The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in
> place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who
> provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion
> that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the
> OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible
> informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on
> information the CRA received through the OTIP.
>
> With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and
> internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the
> CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income.
> For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting
> information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of
> $10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a
> proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that
> raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs
> totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800
> taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with
> approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60
> audits.
>
> In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for
> tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for
> aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works
> daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre
> (JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The
> CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the
> working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing
> collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong
> relationships with the international community, which will help it
> refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.
>
> The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of
> success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a
> result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts.
> Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts
> relating to large businesses and multinational companies.
>
> But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and
> investments are underway.
>
> Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who
> choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax
> strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians
> expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on
> this matter at canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/
> statement_from_
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have
> provided is helpful.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
> Minister of National Revenue
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:01:20 -0400
>> Subject: RE IDÉA & my contact with Prof Luc Begin about my concerns
>> dealling with the severe lack of Integrity of the CBC, CRA, Dentons
>> and KPMG etc
>> To: yves.boisvert@enap.ca, Andre.Lacroix@usherbrooke.ca,
>> Lyse.Langlois@rlt.ulaval.ca, Allison.Marchildon@
>> Anne.Chartier@fsa.ulaval.ca, Steve.Jacob@pol.ulaval.ca,
>> bruno_leclerc@uqar.ca, marc.maesschalck@uclouvain.be
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://translate.google.com/
>>
>> Institutionalization and ethical intervention (2014-2018)
>>
>> Granting Agency: Quebec Research Fund - Society and Culture (FRQSC)
>> Principal investigator: Luc Bégin , Laval University
>>
>> Co-Applicant (s):
>> • Yves Boisvert (ENAP-Montreal)
>> • André Lacroix (University of Sherbrooke)
>> • Lyse Langlois (Université Laval)
>> • Allison Marchildon (University of Sherbrooke)
>>
>> Employees of Quebec:
>> • Anne Chartier (Université Laval)
>> • Steve Jacob (Université Laval)
>> • Bruno Leclerc (UQAR)
>> • Dany Rondeau (UQAR)
>>
>> Employees from abroad:
>> • Fabrice Larat (Ecole Nationale d'Administration, Paris)
>> • Marc Maesschalck (Catholic University of Louvain)
>>
>>
>> Institutionalization and ethical intervention (2009-2013)
>> Granting Agency: Quebec Research Fund - Society and Culture (FRQSC)
>> Principal investigator: Luc Bégin , Laval University
>>
>> Co-Applicant (s):
>> • Yves Boisvert , ENAP-Montreal;
>> • Anne Chartier , Laval University;
>> • Steve Jacob , Université Laval;
>> • France Jutras , Unviersity of Sherbrooke;
>> • André Lacroix , Unviersity of Sherbrooke;
>> • Lyse Langlois , Université Laval;
>> • Bruno Leclerc , UQAR;
>> • Lyne Létourneau , Laval University;
>> • Florence Piron , Université Laval;
>> • Dany Rondeau , UQAR;
>> • Diane Girard , ethics consultant.
>>
>> Our research program takes as object questioning the two interrelated
>> phenomena that are institutionalizing ethics and intervention in
>> organizational ethics.
>>
>> We are witnessing for several years in an institutionalization of
>> ethics in various work environments and activities of Quebec society,
>> whether in public administration circles, private companies, unionized
>> or not circles, professional or not, etc. Ethics now occupies a place
>> that is recognized her own alongside other social control devices that
>> are law, employment contracts, codes of conduct and the administrative
>> rule. So, do we increasingly call codes of ethics, value statements,
>> ethics committees, ethics advisors, etc. This phenomenon of
>> institutionalization also gave rise to many ethical response
>> operations in an organizational context, be it advice, coaching, and
>> decision support, training or development of guidelines. These forms
>> of intervention have developed in various practice settings now at the
>> mercy of the demands expressed by these practice settings, sometimes
>> following an obligation imposed by the legislature to introduce ethics
>> by regulating structure.
>>
>> We set as the starting point of our work the following hypothesis:
>> the institutionalization of ethics is a social phenomenon that reveals
>> - at the same time having to participate - a hesitant transformation
>> and poorly understood in our reports to the norm in different
>> workplaces. In this context, the various forms of intervention in
>> organizational ethics are as many answers to the requests for the
>> purposes that are far from always converge.
>>
>> The projects included in our research program aims therefore to
>> contribute a share to a better understanding of the
>> institutionalization of ethics and reports to the norm it implies
>> (line 1) and, secondly, the development and implementation of
>> organizational ethics in intervention practices that are based more
>> effective and (2 axis). These two axes control research where some
>> issues and questions are essential to deepen, especially: what
>> balances draw up organizational mechanisms of regulation by ethics
>> (codes, structures consulting, ethics committees)? What are the
>> obstacles to successful implementation of a regulatory structure by
>> ethics (culture and construction conditions of organizational
>> identity, etc.)? What is the impact of current practices of
>> intervention in organizational ethics (stiffness mismatch between the
>> organization and empowerment of workers conditions of implementation
>> of the learning achieved;? Decreases in behavioral controls etc.)?
>> What practical intervention put in place to foster empowerment of
>> agents and groups while taking into account the implementation of the
>> regulation by the ethical contexts? This is the type of questions we
>> explore in our research projects.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:29:59 -0400
>> Subject: Re: RE My calls emails and the documents I gave to the CRA,
>> the Border Services and the CBC and the sneaky lawyer Duff Conacher in
>> 2004
>> To: IDEA <idea@fp.ulaval.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you very much for informing me.
>>
>> As you can see I contacted him directly yesterday when I got no
>> response from your office.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Dave
>>
>> - Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Luc Bégin <Luc.Begin@fp.ulaval.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:30:15 +0000
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn Prof Luc Begin Re CRA and KPMG etc
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Je serai absent du bureau du 16 avril au 26 avril inclusivement.
>> Pendant cette période, je ne lirai mes courriels qu'occasionnellement.
>>
>>
>> On 4/19/16, IDEA <idea@fp.ulaval.ca> wrote:
>>> Dear Mr Amos,
>>>
>>> Mr. Bégin is in Switzerland for the week. Here is his email address :
>>> luc.begin@fp.ulaval.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> Marie-France Paquette
>>> Professionnelle de recherche
>>> Institut d’éthique appliquée (IDÉA)
>>> Université Laval
>>> Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, local 310
>>> 2325, rue des Bibliothèques
>>> Québec QC G1V 0A6
>>> Téléphone: (418) 656-2131, poste 11226
>>> Site Internet : www.idea.ulaval.ca
>>> Courriel : idea@fp.ulaval.ca
>>> 10e anniversaire de l’IDÉA (2004-2014)
>>> Avis relatif à la confidentialité
>>> http://www.rec.ulaval.ca/lce/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> De : David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
>>> Envoyé : 18 avril 2016 15:38
>>> À : idea@fp.ulaval.ca
>>> Cc : Jean.Chretien@dentons.com; David Amos
>>> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> xuefeng.peng@dentons.cn; jinquan.xiao@dentons.cn
>>> Objet : Fwd: RE My calls emails and the documents I gave to the CRA, the
>>> Border Services and the CBC and the sneaky lawyer Duff Conacher in 2004
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>>>
>>> CBC Investigates
>>> CRA execs treated to soirees at private club amid KPMG probe
>>> Receptions at posh Rideau Club took place while tax agency and KPMG
>>> pursued settlement in offshore case By Harvey Cashore, Kimberly Ivany,
>>> Katie Pedersen, Fréderic Zalac, CBC News Posted: Apr 17, 2016 11:38 PM
>>> ET
>>>
>>> "The sponsors include two Toronto law firms connected to the KPMG
>>> case. Osler, which began hosting events as far back as 2010, took on
>>> KPMG as a client in 2013, defending it against the Canada Revenue
>>> Agency's court action. Another Bay Street firm, Dentons, has sponsored
>>> tailgate parties for each of the last five years and in court
>>> documents is said to have provided legal advice as KPMG set up its
>>> offshore scheme."
>>>
>>> Prof. Luc Bégin, director of the Institute of Applied Ethics at Laval
>>> University in Quebec City, said the private receptions — whose hosts
>>> included KPMG executives — should not have been allowed.
>>>
>>> "If we're talking about accounting firms that the Canada Revenue
>>> Agency is probing, I don't see how you can defend these people being
>>> together in this place," Begin said.
>>>
>>>
>>> Institute of Applied Ethics (IDÉA)
>>> Université Laval
>>> Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard
>>> 2325, rue des Bibliothèques
>>> Suite 310
>>> Québec City (Québec) G1V 0A6
>>>
>>> 418 656-2131, ext. 11226
>>> Fax: 418 656-7267
>>> idea@fp.ulaval.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:29:56 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Prof Luc Begin Re CRA and KPMG etc
>> To: luc.begin@fp.ulaval.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: FP Institut d'éthique appliquée <idea@fp.ulaval.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 19:37:58 +0000
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My calls emails and the documents I
>> gave to the CRA, the Border Services and the CBC and the sneaky lawyer
>> Duff Conacher in 2004
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Je serai absente du bureau le lundi 18 avril.
>>
>> Marie-France Paquette
>> Professionnelle de recherche
>> Institut d’éthique appliquée (IDÉA)
>> Université Laval
>> Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, local 310
>> 2325, rue des Bibliothèques
>> Québec QC G1V 0A6
>> Téléphone: (418) 656-2131, poste 11226
>> Télécopieur: (418) 656-7267
>> Courriel: marie-france.paquette.1@
>> Courriel de l’IDÉA : idea@fp.ulaval.ca
>> Avis relatif à la confidentialité
>> http://www.rec.ulaval.ca/lce/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:18:40 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Robin Benger I just called this is the email again wit
>> some more ifo for you Please say hey to the nervous lawyer Neil Brooks
>> for me will ya?
>> To: rnbb@cogentbenger.com, mail@cogentbenger.com,
>> nbrooks@osgoode.yorku.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> CBC Investigates
>> CRA execs treated to soirees at private club amid KPMG probe
>> Receptions at posh Rideau Club took place while tax agency and KPMG
>> pursued settlement in offshore case
>>
>> By Harvey Cashore, Kimberly Ivany, Katie Pedersen, Fréderic Zalac, CBC
>> News Posted: Apr 17, 2016 11:38 PM ET
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>>
>> "The sponsors include two Toronto law firms connected to the KPMG
>> case. Osler, which began hosting events as far back as 2010, took on
>> KPMG as a client in 2013, defending it against the Canada Revenue
>> Agency's court action. Another Bay Street firm, Dentons, has sponsored
>> tailgate parties for each of the last five years and in court
>> documents is said to have provided legal advice as KPMG set up its
>> offshore scheme.
>>
>> A former Department of Justice lawyer, who now works for an accounting
>> firm, said the presence of government officials at these receptions
>> is a good thing and allows more informal networking than the
>> conference's daytime panels.
>>
>> "If you go to those cocktails, it's not about to talk about files.
>> I've never seen that happen," said the lawyer, who spoke on the
>> condition of anonymity.
>>
>> "It's about meeting maybe somebody that you talked to on the phone but
>> you've never seen. It's just about fostering… good working
>> relationships."
>>
>> Robin Benger, an independent documentary producer who directed The
>> Great Canadian Tax Dodge for TVOntario, investigated the tax industry
>> for more than three years and attended a 2013 Canadian Tax Foundation
>> conference. After listening to speeches by both government and
>> industry tax officials, he said, he vividly recalls the Osler
>> reception at the Royal Conservatory of Music in Toronto.
>>
>> "CRA top people" attended the party, he said. "They were being plied
>> with drinks and getting on roaringly with all the tax lawyers and
>> accountants."
>>
>> Benger says he was "stunned" by the relationship he observed between
>> the tax law companies, the accountants and the CRA. He argues the
>> "rule makers" were too close to "rule twisters."
>>
>> Osler and Dentons both declined to comment to CBC News.
>>
>> Benger also recalled seeing KPMG's head of tax, Elio Luongo, speaking
>> privately to CRA Commissioner Treusch after Treusch gave a speech to
>> the delegates on the last day of the 2013 convention.
>>
>> In a statement, the CRA said that its officials acted with integrity
>> at all times. "CRA officials who attended the receptions did not
>> intervene in the decisionmaking on the KPMG file," the statement
>> reads.
>>
>> For his part, Treusch said he has not had any conversations about the
>> KPMG case with any officials from the firm.
>>
>> "I have never discussed the KPMG litigation, including any
>> negotiations that may have occurred in relation to that litigation,
>> with any representative of KPMG at any time."
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:46:15 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: RE My calls emails and the documents I gave to the CRA,
>> the Border Services and the CBC and the sneaky lawyer Duff Conacher in
>> 2004
>> To: mail@cogentbenger.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Great Canadian Tax Dodge on its way
>> November 27, 2014
>>
>> Cogent/Benger’s latest film, The Great Canadian Tax Dodge, has its
>> first broadcast on TVOntario at 9pm on February 4th, 2015.
>>
>> It is the product of a three-year investigation by director/producer
>> Robin Benger into the extent of tax avoidance by Canadian entities in
>> Canada and abroad, mostly via offshore tax havens in the Caribbean. “I
>> was astonished at the systematic pervasiveness of tax avoidance by
>> most mainstream Canadian companies on a multi-billion-dollar scale
>> with the apparent neglect of several generations of Canadian finance
>> ministers.”
>>
>> The documentary follows the story of a fair-tax campaigner in Ottawa
>> as he struggles to create a national movement; it looks at the views
>> of “the Wayne Gretzky of tax lawyers”, who asserts that legal tax
>> avoidance is a good thing; it examines legal cases that arguably lay
>> the blame on the courts for allowing companies to deprive Canadians of
>> millions of dollars of taxable revenue; and it reports on the seminal
>> Canadian influence in the setting up and running of the Cayman Islands
>> as a tax haven, and how tiny offshore jurisdictions like the Caymans
>> have become the agents of investment in major Canadian economic
>> sectors.
>>
>> Among those interviewed are John Christensen, James Henry and Dennis
>> Howlett from the Tax Justice movement; Antony Travers, one of the
>> masterminds behind the Caymans Islands financial system; Al Meghji,
>> Canada’s most successful tax law trial lawyer; Michael Wilson, former
>> Minister of Finance; and David Dodge, former Governor of the Bank of
>> Canada.
>>
>> “This revealing and brilliant film explains the strategies used by tax
>> avoiders and demonstrates the damage they cause. It contrasts the
>> scammers who promote tax avoidance schemes and tax havens with the
>> outnumbered and out-financed but public-spirited campaigners who are
>> leading the fight against them. For the sake of our democracies,
>> hopefully, it will spur governments to take action against rogue
>> states that act as tax havens and against tax avoiders and the
>> professional organizations and individuals that facilitate them.”
>> Neil Brooks
>> Professor Emeritus and Senior Scholar
>> Osgoode Hall Law School
>>
>> Produced by Robin Benger and Christopher Sumpton
>> Computer animation: Mark Alberts
>> Music: Kurt Swinghammer
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:30:07 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Attorney General José Eduardo Cardozo the attachments
>> are for real and I am on the phone to your offices in Brazil (61)
>> 2025-8900 and (61) 2025-3516 right now
>> To: drci@mj.gov.br, sao.etica@mj.gov.br
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> http://www.justica.gov.br/
>>
>> http://www.justica.gov.br/sua-
>>
>> Business hours:
>> Monday to Friday from 8 to 18 hours
>> Phone:
>> (61) 2025-8900 / 8901
>> Address:
>> Department of Asset Recovery and International Legal Cooperation - SNJ /
>> MJ
>> SCN QD 06, Block A, 2nd floor - Shopping ID
>> 70716-900 - Brasília-DF
>> E-mail:
>> drci@mj.gov.br
>>
>>>> Ask yourselves why the govenemnt of Brazil was checking my work today
>>>> if you do not bother to read the rest of this email
>>>>
>>>> Just Dave
>>>> By Location Visit Detail
>>>> Visit 23,524
>>>> Domain Name gvt.net.br ? (Brazil)
>>>> IP Address 189.27.189.# (Unknown Organization)
>>>> ISP Unknown ISP
>>>> Location
>>>> Continent : South America
>>>> Country : Brazil (Facts)
>>>> State/Region : Rio Grande do Sul
>>>> City : Porto Alegre
>>>> Lat/Long : -30.0333, -51.2 (Map)
>>>> Language Portuguese (Brazil)
>>>> pt-br
>>>> Operating System Macintosh WinNT
>>>> Browser Safari 1.3
>>>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like
>>>> Gecko) Chrome/47.0.2526.111 Safari/537.36
>>>> Javascript version 1.5
>>>> Monitor
>>>> Resolution : 1366 x 768
>>>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>>>> Time of Visit Apr 17 2016 9:27:22 pm
>>>> Last Page View Apr 17 2016 9:27:22 pm
>>>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>>>> Page Views 1
>>>> Referring URL http://keywords-moni...vidamos
>>>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com.
>>>> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com.
>>>> Out Click
>>>> Time Zone UTC-4:00
>>>> Visitor's Time Apr 17 2016 9:27:22 pm
>>>> Visit Number 23,524
>>>>
>>
>> Etc Etc Etc
>>
>