https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/pandemic-rules-civil-liberties-association-1.6284670

Pandemic restrictions are due for a rethink, civil liberties group says

At two-year mark, it's time for individuals to take more responsibility for managing risk, advocate says

CBC News · Posted: Dec 14, 2021 6:54 AM AT

Cara Zwibel, a director with the Canadian Civilian Liberties Association, says the restrictions brought in almost two years ago don't fit well with where we are now in the pandemic. (CBC)

The announcement two weeks ago that New Brunswick grocery stores could now opt to ask customers for proof of vaccination caught many by surprise.

During the introduction of the government's COVID-19 "winter action plan" on Dec. 3, Health Minister Dorothy Shephard stated that retail outlets, salons and grocery stores must enforce physical distancing — or could instead opt to require proof of vaccination from all patrons.

The move to include grocery stores, which are considered essential, in proof-of-vaccination checks prompted a wave of questions and criticism, particularly on social media.

Health Minister Dorothy Shephard has since clarified that statement, saying that there is "no intent" on major retailers' part to ask for proof-of-vaccination, and retailers have said the same, with Sobeys spokesperson Paul Wyke confirming the chain will not be asking customers for proof of vaccination at its New Brunswick stores.

But the mere fact that the subject was raised has sparked a broader conversation about civil liberties, and about whether we have reached a stage in the pandemic where we should revisit the level of restrictions we're willing to accept.

Cara Zwibel, director of the fundamental freedoms program with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said the suggestion that the unvaccinated won't have access to essentials such as food and medicine is worrisome.

"We've been concerned for a long time about premising access to public spaces on vaccination status and what the objective has been throughout," Zwibel told Information Morning Moncton on Monday.

While it might have been "easier to justify" such rules when talking about movie theatres, restaurants or other places that are considered non-essential, it's much harder to justify those kind of restrictions when talking about access to food, medicine and other essentials.

"The government should make sure that our access to those things are facilitated by the rules," Zwibel said.

Instead, "there might be a signal in these new rules that suggests they are freer to do it now," she said. "So that's a problem."

Early on, the objective of requiring proof of vaccination in certain spaces was to encourage vaccination, Zwibel said. (Alberto Pezzali/The Associated Press)

A different stage of the pandemic

Almost two years in, we have reached "a different stage" of the pandemic, one in which some of the rules are no longer a comfortable fit and are in need of alterations.

Early on, the objective behind requiring proof of vaccination in certain spaces was to encourage vaccination, Zwibel said.

But she believes that almost everyone who could be incentivized to be vaccinated has now been incentivized.

"So I don't know whether these changes are going to increase vaccination rates or just cause the people who are still hesitant … to dig in and be more resentful," Zwibel said.

"At this point, we need to start putting some responsibility back on individuals to make decisions about how they manage risk … rather than giving our government all the power to decide how risk can be mitigated."

Zwibel noted she is keenly aware of ongoing seriousness of the COVID-19 situation, with rising case counts and the spiralling threat of the highly transmissible omicron variant.

"But I also wonder at what point people are not going to be willing to live under these conditions," she said.

"We do still have a situation where governments are dictating how many people we can have in our homes. That's a big departure in a liberal democracy … and I think people may be starting to lose patience with that and really wonder how much longer we can do this."

Given that it seems clear that the virus isn't going away anytime soon, Zwibel said, people should be thinking about "what we're willing to live with for the long haul."

As a longer-term solution, she also thinks governments should be investing in health-care systems, many of which were operating at or close to capacity even before the pandemic.

In the short term, she'd like to see widespread access to rapid testing so people can make better decisions about whether to gather with others rather than having government make these calls.

She also thinks people should be reaching out to their elected representatives and raising these issues with them.

"We have to give people the tools to protect themselves," she said.

"And we do need to put more power in people's own hands to make decisions for themselves."

Information Morning Moncton

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

298 Comments

John Grail

Cannot even say that transmission reduction for being vaccinated is not very good. "Official" sources put it around only 25% reduction...

Fred Brewer

Reply to @John Grail: But it greatly increases your chance of staying alive if you have the vax. Over 80% of NB covid deaths so far have been in the unvaxxed.

Pat Holland

Reply to @Fred Brewer: if someone wants to risk their own safety that is not for the government to decide

David Amos

Reply to @Pat Holland: I concur

Laura Smith

Nice to see New Brunswick getting a mention! Too bad about the content.

David Amos

Reply to @Laura Smith: C'est Vrai

JOhn D Bond

I really wish some of these champions of freedom would actually mount a challenge through the courts on the plethora of issues that they are raising day after day after day.
The few cases thus far have ruled in favor of the governments but some just don't seem to either recognize or accept that.
Coming out here daily and berating governments, promoting derision is really quite counter productive and will only result in the situation getting worse for all.
Very sad.

David Amos

Reply to @JOhn D Bond: Federal Court File No. T-1557-15

Michael Lambert

What was the purpose behind the government putting the option of denying essential services to the unvaccinated on the table? To further antagonize those who havent gotten the vaccine? Its great that none of the retailers have done this....but the real question....what in the world was our government thinking when they put this option on the table? So wrong.

Lou Bell

Reply to @Michael Lambert: Any business has the right to deny people access to their retail location ! If they don't want the unvaxxed in their locations , they have the right to deny them , just as you do with your home ! And there ARE retailers who have done just that ! Tough luck !

Michael Lambert

Reply to @Lou Bell: Access to food is a human right. Would you support coercing vaccination via starvation?

Gilles LeBlanc

Reply to @Michael Lambert: No one is starving , it's 2021 there's Instacart , curbside, Amazon , Walmart.

Blair Churchill

Reply to @Michael Lambert: the purpose was to get business to buy in and the government could wash its hands of responsibility.

JOhn D Bond

Reply to @Michael Lambert: It always was on the table for any business to do if they chose to. Private enterprise is not an essential service controlled by the government. For that to happen and be an essential service, they would need to be owned and operated by the government which they are not.
But yet no grocery store has yet attempted to do anything more that what was done last year. So this is just rhetoric from the anti vax trying to spin a non issue into an issue.

John Dale

Reply to @Michael Lambert: Sadly, some would Michael.

Fred Brewer

Reply to @Michael Lambert: This was never about denying access to food. The store would have been obligated to provide curbside service under the Human Rights Act.

David Amos

Reply to @Blair Churchill: YUP

John Grail

Content deactivated

You know if CBC allowed open and civil dialogue, there would be a lot less people believing this was a government conspiracy.

Blair Churchill

Content deactivated

Reply to @John Grail: hey doesnt that tell you something?

JOhn D Bond

Content deactivated

Reply to @John Grail: That type of information is always allowed. The challenge most like is tone or content of the post that makes it less than civil or fake information.

David Amos

Content deactivated

Reply to @John Grail: Yea Right

David Amos

Content deactivated

Reply to @Blair Churchill: is that subject to another clarification???

David Amos
Content deactivated

Reply to @JOhn D Bond: So you say EH???

David Amos

Content deactivated

"Health Minister Dorothy Shephard has since clarified that statement, saying that there is "no intent" on major retailers' part to ask for proof-of-vaccination, and retailers have said the same, with Sobeys spokesperson Paul Wyke confirming the chain will not be asking customers for proof of vaccination at its New Brunswick stores."

Methinks its not wise to believe anything until its officially denied N'esy Pas?

Jan Janson

Content deactivated

Reply to @David Amos: Translation: We thought we could goad them into doing our dirty work and they didn't take the bait.

Blair Churchill

Content deactivated

Reply to @David Amos: is that subject to another clarification? lol

David Amos

Content deactivated

David Amos

Content deactivated

I wonder if the lawyer Cara Zwibel remembers our conversations and emails 10 years ago

Lou Bell

Content deactivated

Reply to @David Amos: She's probably laughing wildly if she's read your post !

David Amos

Content deactivated

Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks folks should Google her name and mine so they can laugh at you N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Content deactivated

Reply to @Lou Bell: Perhaps in the "Mean" Time the Sobeys spokesperson Paul Wyke should Google Harper and Bankers

https://raymond1212.rssing.com/chan-70058897/all_p56.html

Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3

‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks come Monday morning Minister John Haggie and the lawyers Cara Zwibel, John Drover and Rosellen Sullivan are gonna figure out that I still live and paying attention N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/05/charter-challenge-filed-against-nls.html

#nbpoli#cdnpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/ccnl-challenge-bill-1.5564822

Canadian Civil Liberties Association looking to challenge Bill 38 amendment

Will begin with advocacy before litigation

CBC News· Posted: May 11, 2020 7:46 PM NT

Cara Zwibel is the director the Canadian Civil Liberties Association's Fundamental Freedoms program. (Submitted by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association)

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association plans to challenge the government of Newfoundland and Labrador's amendment to Bill 38 — the Public Health Protection and Promotion Act — calling it unconstitutional.

The controversial amendment was passed in the House of Assembly last Tuesday, giving power to police to detain individuals found in non-compliance with public health orders, with the possibility of removing people who are not primary residents from the province entirely, among many more sweeping powers.

A government public health order issued a week ago prohibited entry to the province to anyone but those who are travelling for work, relocating for work, and primary residents. Some exceptions can be made for those travelling to Newfoundland and Labrador for the purposes of taking care of health needs of a family member. As of Monday nearly 2,000 exemption applications had been filed with the province.

"The basis is that this is a restriction of rights that are protected by the charter, and it's not reasonable or justified," said Cara Zwibel, director of the CCLA's Fundamental Freedoms program.

"There's no evidence that doing this is necessary. The province had in place less strict restrictions previously. The people who did enter the province had to self-isolate for a period. There's no indication that that was inadequate."

The CCLA is a nonprofit organization based in Toronto devoted to the defence of civil liberties and constitutional rights.

Zwibel said the organization is not dismissive of the public health concerns related to travellers entering Newfoundland and Labrador, which, as of Monday, has 14 active cases of COVID-19.

N.L. marks 1st day in new stage of reopening plan with zero new cases of COVID-19

"The question is whether it's achieving the right balance between protecting the public and maintaining the rights that are constitutionally entrenched. They're in our charter for a reason. They're there to make sure that Canadian citizens and permanent residents are supposed to be able to move around the country freely," she said.

"If there is a restriction that is being put in place the government has to demonstrate why it's necessary. So sort of fear and speculation is just not enough in our view. 'Better safe than sorry' doesn't hold up in a court."

Standing by decision

Health Minister John Haggie is standing by the House of Assembly's decision to amend Bill 38.
During Monday's daily COVID-19 briefing Haggie said police officers needed clarity on their role in enforcing public health orders.

Health Minister John Haggie says the amendment to Bill 38 was to clarify the role of law enforcement officers in enforcing public health orders. (Peter Cowan/CBC)

Public health orders issued by government in March saw a fining system implemented under which peace officers could fine individuals $500 up to $2,500, issue a prison sentence of up to six months, or a combination of the two. Similarly, non-essential businesses that are in operation could face fines of $5,000 to $50,000, and owners would be held personally liable and open to individual fines. Fines will also multiply after the first instance.

Skirting the rules this weekend? Here's what it could cost you

Since March new orders have been issued, such as the ban on all non-essential travel to the province.

"The Supreme Court itself have referred to the whole constitution act as a living tree that is pruned and grows over time with good case law. So the view from [the Department of Justice and Public Safety] and ourselves, on advice from the law enforcement, peace officers, is that they needed clarity around their role. That clarity was provided. It was debated in the House," said Haggie.

"At the end of the day, the tensions built into that, the way the Constitution and the Charter of Rights is framed, allows for rights to be abridged or reduced only to the extent that is necessary for the greater public good. Whether or not our actions meet that test would be a decision a court would take should someone choose to challenge it."

Zwibel said CCLA is in discussion with local counsel, and will begin advocating for the amendment to be overturned. She said the hope is that will be enough for government to reverse its decision, but the CCLA will bring litigation if necessary.

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

With files from On The Go

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/charter-case-bill-38-filed-1.5577349

Charter challenge filed against N.L.'s travel restriction Bill 38

Kim Taylor challenges government after first being denied a visit home for her mother's funeral

CBC News· Posted: May 20, 2020 6:47 PM NT

Lawyer John Drover is representing Kim Taylor in a Charter challenge against the government of Newfoundland and Labrador. (Bruce Tilley/CBC)

The Newfoundland and Labrador government is facing a court challenge over its legislation that controls travel into the province to slow the spread of COVID-19.

Kim Taylor has launched a legal challenge against Bill 38, after she was barred from attending her mother's funeral in early May.

She is backed by lawyer John Drover and defence lawyer Rosellen Sullivan — representing the Canadian Civil Liberties Association — who have filed an application on Taylor's behalf under Section 6, which deals with mobility rights, of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

"Mobility of people is a basic, human right and she has been denied hers and we're all being denied ours," Drover told CBC News on Wednesday.

"We have never had travel restrictions put in place like this. We have some of the strictest in Canada here in Newfoundland and don't really believe that the government of Newfoundland has put the thought into it to make it comply with the charter."

Taylor was denied entry into the province following her mother's death under public health restrictions on travellers to Newfoundland and Labrador. (CBC)

Now that the application is filed, Drover said he and Sullivan will push the court for an early hearing, hoping to have the case heard within the next three days, set filing dates and arrange to hear the argument within the next month.

Damage done

Taylor was eventually given an exemption to travel to the province from her home in Nova Scotia, 11 days after being rejected.

But Taylor said she is mounting this case on principle, and is not seeking any monetary damages. All lawyers are working pro bono, and none of the parties is asking for costs.

Drover said his client's funeral arrangements — including 14 days of self-isolation as required under public health orders — were lost in that 11-day period, and he echoes the idea that this challenge isn't only about Taylor.

She was denied entry for her mother's funeral. Now she's taking the N.L. government to court

Canadian Civil Liberties Association looking to challenge Bill 38 amendment

"This is not about whether my client can come to Newfoundland. Yes, she can come to Newfoundland now. This is about how anybody in Canada can freely move within Canada," he said.
"It's not right. No province in Canada can shut its borders to Canadian citizens."

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

With files from Anthony Germain

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

78 Comments

david kirby
I think it was one of Nflds' favourite sons, John Crosbie, who said the Charter would provide work for lawyers for ever

http://www.spdefence.ca/our-team/

Rosellen Sullivan

rsullivan@sbkdefence.com
T: 709.739.4141
F: 709.739.4145
Rosellen Sullivan was born in St. John’s. She graduated from University of Ottawa in 1995 with a Master’s of Criminology and from Dalhousie Law School in 1998. Rosellen worked with the Department of Justice until 2006. She was Junior Inquiry Counsel to Commissioner Antonio Lamer at the Lamer Inquiry which examined three wrongful convictions in Newfoundland and Labrador. Her work on the Inquiry led to a keen interest criminal defence law, which she pursued in 2006 when she joined Robert Simmonds, QC. She is also a former member of the Board of Regents at Memorial University.

https://makethecall.ca/john-drover/

Contact

With no cost and no risk to you, it’s worth making the call.

Call us anytime at 576-CALL. Or come by our offices between 9:00 and 5:00, Monday through Friday, located on the 5th floor of the Paramount Building at 34 Harvey Road, St. John’s, NL, A1C 2G1.
Mailing address: PO Box 5236, A1C 5W1

John Drover

1.709.576.2255

Meet John

A partner at Roebothan McKay Marshall with over 10 years’ legal experience, John has built a thriving practice focused on Personal Injury, Civil Litigation, and Wills and Estates. His academic accomplishments include a Gold Medal for Academic Excellence during his undergraduate studies in Folklore and Chemistry, as well as the F.A. Aldrich Graduate Award during his graduate studies in Folklore. A tireless scholar, John is currently completing his Master of Laws, Intellectual Property at NYU. He’s also an active member of the Arts community, and does some pro bono work for female filmmakers as part of his practice. After a number of years as president of the NL Folk Arts Society, John is currently Chair of the board for Artistic Fraud of Newfoundland. In his spare time, he can often be found practicing yoga.

LEGAL MEMBERSHIPS AND AFFILIATIONS

Canadian Bar Association
Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador

EDUCATION

1999 – Bachelor of Arts Degree in Folklore/Chemistry from Memorial University of Newfoundland (Received Gold Medal for Academic Excellence)
2003 – Masters of Arts, Folklore from Memorial University of Newfoundland
2008 – Bachelor of Laws from Dalhousie University
2009 – Called to the Newfoundland and Labrador Bar

John Drover

Called to the bar: 2009 (NL)

Roebothan McKay Marshall

Associate

5th Flr., 34 Harvey Rd.

PO Box 5236, Stn. C

St. John's, Newfoundland and LabradorA1C 5W1

Phone: 709-576-2255

Fax: 709-753-5221

Email: jdrover@wrmmlaw.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 06:40:58 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Oh My Could somebody within the CCLA actually be ethical?
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour@myginch.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
"dan.ahlstrand",
woodsideb@fredericton.ca, Arthur Taylor ,
occupyfredericton , "Jacques.Poitras"

Cc: David Amos ,
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, mail@ccla.org,
thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com, Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jgraham@amlnet.com, together@jordangraham.ca,
peter.dauphinee@gmail.com, danfour@myginch.com, evelyngreene@live.ca,
wearefredup@gmail.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
acampbell@ctv.ca, mckeen.randy@gmail.com

--- On Fri, 2/3/12, Cara Zwibel wrote:

From: Cara Zwibel
Subject: RE: Attn Cara Zwibel I called the CCLA and tried to tell you
people about this email before you talked to the CBC etc
To: "'David Amos'"
Date: Friday, February 3, 2012, 6:02 AM

Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your email. I am not currently in the office and will
not be for the rest of the day, but feel free to call me next week if
you’d like. As you know, we are aware of the situation in Fredericton
as well as the legal cases where s. 301 of the Criminal Code has been
held to violate the Charter. The information you have provided about
prior use of the section in Fredericton is helpful.
Thank you for contacting the CCLA and should you wish to speak to me
directly, please get in touch next week.
Sincerely,
Cara

Cara Faith Zwibel, LL.B., LL.M.
Director, Fundamental Freedoms Program/ Directrice, programme libertés
fondamentales

Canadian Civil Liberties Association/ Association canadienne des
libertés civiles
360 Bloor St. West, Suite 506 / 360 rue Bloor Ouest, Bureau 506
Toronto, ON M5S 1X1
tel: 416 363 0321 ext. 255
email: czwibel@ccla.org
web: www.ccla.org
twitter: @cancivlib

This electronic mail message may contain privileged and confidential
information intended solely for the recipient(s) named in it. Any
further distribution or use of this message without the sender's
permission is prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete this message.

Ce message électronique peut contenir des informations privilégiées et
confidentielles destinées uniquement aux destinataires désignés. Toute
diffusion ou utilisation de ce message sans autorisation de
l'expéditeur est interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur,
veuillez aviser l'expéditeur immédiatement et supprimer ce message.

From: David Amos [mailto:myson333@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:38 AM
To: czwibel@ccla.org; oldmaison@yahoo.com; terry.seguin; Robert. Jones
Cc: MacKnightb; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com; mail@ccla.org;
thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com; Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
jgraham@amlnet.com; together@jordangraham.ca;
peter.dauphinee@gmail.com; danfour@myginch.com; evelyngreene@live.ca;
wearefredup@gmail.com; mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com;
acampbell@ctv.ca; mckeen.randy@gmail.com
Subject: Attn Cara Zwibel I called the CCLA and tried to tell you
people about this email before you talked to the CBC etc

For the record the CCLA would not allow me to speak to anyone so i
will call you directly after I click send.

Cara Zwibel, Director, Fundamental Freedoms Program - czwibel@ccla.org
or 416-363-0321 ext 255

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dc34xAjq-_I&list=UUVftTJcoljDpNQR81drXb4g&index=1&feature=plcp

Clearly Chief Macknight recieved it before the CCLA entered the fray EH?.

--- On Wed, 2/1/12, David Amos wrote:

From: David Amos
Subject: Oh my Chucky what monumental Bullshitters you and Danny Boy are
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour@myginch.com, evelyngreene@live.ca,
wearefredup@gmail.com, thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com,
mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com, acampbell@ctv.ca,
mckeen.randy@gmail.com
Cc: "terry.seguin",
thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com, MacKnightb@fredericton.ca,
Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jgraham@amlnet.com,
together@jordangraham.ca, peter.dauphinee@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2012, 12:47 PM

Wednesday, February 01, 2012

The last time Section 301 of the Criminal Code for used in Fredericton
was around 1902!!!

Someone told me this story - Two editors of the Daily Gleaner wrote a
bad editorial against the Chief of Police of the Day. The Chief got
upset, He arrested and jailed the editors over night. That was their
punishment. Shouldn't this be setting a precedent??? From the Editors
of the Daily Gleaner to the Blogger!!! Hey? We're making
headway!!...:P By the way? I found this little story minutes ago -
Click below - Libel section in Criminal Code unconstitutional: N.L.
court

Posted by Charles LeBlanc at 10:44:00 AM

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

The was a defamatory libel case in Moncton a few years ago. it
resulted in a guilty verdict. It's not as are are you claim.
11:46 AM, February 01, 2012

Charles LeBlanc said...

criminal or civil???
11:49 AM, February 01, 2012

Anonymous said...

We all know that the Gleaner isn't an unbiased paper and that Irving
has it's hands in what the editors publish!
12:54 PM, February 01, 2012

Dan F said...

Are Canadian courts so complicit with the police that there are no
hungry lawyers willing to sue on your behalf for false arrest and
malicious prosecution?
1:09 PM, February 01, 2012

stu student law optional said...

Great searching Charles that will be a significant precident to change
legal landscape to something sensible against this silly libel claim
by FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE bullies.
1:09 PM, February 01, 2012

Anonymous said...

sigh...rolling my eyes...
3:01 PM, February 01, 2012
Try denying the rest of the email I Double Dog Dare Ya Frenchy. You
know as well as that there no need for you to bullshit about
researching anything. I proved to leagions of people long ago that you
Fake Left wackos in Fat fred City knew all about Section 301 ala Byron
Prior and my assistance to him since 2004. Well Chucky baby what YOU
have to worry about is Section 300. It has not been found
unconstitutional. That is the law that got Byron Prior locked up
DUMMY. The CROWN has LOTS of time to figure that one out before they
lay chges on April 20th.

GET IT YET FRENCHY???

If not why not seek the legal advice of your know it all Blogging Butt
Buddy Mikey Baby Archibald (You he is remember the sneaky dude who
gave you your first digital camera the year after I gave you your
first computer in frint of the LEG in 2004) he ws always worried about
tenants rights just like Andre Murray is now. It appearsto me that
Mindless Mikey does not seem to wish to comment in your blog anymore
or are you blocking him just like you did with mean old me years ago?

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html

BTW I saved every video thatyou posted of Jenn Wambolt in YOUTUBE
whom you and Norrad interveiwed BEFORE you delete again or opt make
more blogs. I will lay odds that my converstions with Evelyn Green and
Andre Murray last week caused you and Norrad to go visit Mrs Wambolt
and make your interview and compose a special story N'sy Pas Chucky
Baby?

http://thepurplevioletpressnb.blogspot.com/2012/01/offline-rest-of-week-investigating.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYr28zSf9UI&list=UUVftTJcoljDpNQR81drXb4g&index=3&feature=plcp

Nedd I say why don't you evilblogggers tell the truth for a change or
do the Fat Fred City Finest and the RCMP a favour and eat your own
bullshit and die? Est assured I will use YOUR BULLSIT against them
when I deem the timing is just right.

--- On Sun, 1/29/12, David Amos wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:28:07 -0400
> Subject: RE Sec 301 For the PUBLIC RECORD now that the Fat Fred City
> Finest have evil Chucky Leblanc's Computer
> To: jgraham@amlnet.com, together@jordangraham.ca,
> peter.dauphinee@gmail.com, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> , thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com,
> occupyfredericton@gmail.com, WEAREFREDUP@gmail.com,
> brother.chao@gmail.com, markandcaroline@gmail.com, tim4nm@gmail.com,
> "Jacques.Poitras",
> brent.mazerolle@timestranscript.com, "mclaughlin.heather"
> , acampbell@ctv.ca, nmoore
> , dale.carruthers@sunmedia.ca,
> maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
> Cc: johnkelly475@yahoo.ca, evelyngreene@live.ca, Barry Winters
> , "Ken.Zielke",
> "Barry.Shaw", "bob.rae"
> , "robert.trevors"
> , toewsv1 , MacKnightb
> , woodsideb ,
> grahamj@fredericton.ca, eic@theaq.net
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/01/24/nb-leblanc-reaction-629.html
>
> http://www.theaq.net/2012/being-charles-leblanc/-10080
>
> I see that the CBC etc are supporting Chucky Baby bigtime while he is
> supporting his blogging buddy Andre but not the ladies such as Evelyn
> Greene and Jenn Wambolt EH?
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2012/01/another-victim-from-fredericton-gestapo.html
>
> They can never deny that you, Chucky, his cyber butt buddies, all your
> cop buddies and I know a lot about section 301 and CRIMINAL Libel EH
> Mr Baconfat?
>
> EVEN THE VERY CORRUPT CBC and vverbody and his dog knows that you and
> Chucky's many cyber friends have been calling me a pedophile for
> years.
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2009/09/david-amos-liar.html
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2hlv5M6V5Q&feature=plcp&context=C3459e78UDOEgsToPDskJp_jxblg8-qi-TV63wVfxq
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/3000115/Byron-Prior-judgement
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2009/10/byron-prior-from-newfoundland-is.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/05/nfld-whistleblower-dodges-libel-charge.html
>
> http://nbpolitico.blogspot.com/2007/11/pick-lane.html
>
> http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=5YoYexTqY8o
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>
> From: Evelyn Greene
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:09:56 -0300
> Subject: FW: GNB harassing public
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com
>
>
> Gentlemen: Can you try and get me some press coverage and I have lots
> to say. Jenn Wambolt was provoked, then the Sheriffs and police said
> she uttered threats and her lawyer quit just hours before the hearing.
> You call this Justice. Evelyn Greene
>
> From: David Amos
> Subject: Re: FW: Message to Angie re confirmation that David Banks of
> the Dispatch 911 at the Fredericton City Police said he sent the 911
> audio evidence to the Crown
> To: "Evelyn Greene", "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> , "thepurplevioletpress"
>
> Cc: "We are Fred up", andremurraynow@gmail.com
> Date: Saturday, January 28, 2012, 2:38 PM
>
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2012/01/another-victim-from-fredericton-gestapo.html
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r20grqEq4O0&context=C359aa54ADOEgsToPDskLn7jsBsjMNWCHYGvg_AydA
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/78095644/January-11-2012-Affidavit-Andre-Murray-Jurisdiction-Motion
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2011/10/jenn-wambolt-protesting-rcmp-brutally.html
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yVzq-_3uP0&feature=plcp&context=C38cba40UDOEgsToPDskIRYudpd1ZVKUe48Ey7z9Sa
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2011/10/evelyn-greene-problems-with-racist.html
>
> On 1/28/12, David Amos wrote:
>> No special treatment when police face charges: lawyer
>> Craig Babstock (Times & Transcript) – With more than 20 years
>> experience as a Crown prosecutor, Luc Labonté knows how some people
>> will react when they hear an RCMP officer had his assault charged
>> stayed earlier this week. He knows that some will have the perception
>> this individual no longer faces a charge because he’s a police
>> officer.
>>
>> “Unfortunately, we’ll never be able to change those people’s minds,”
>> says Labonté.
>>
>> But New Brunswick’s director of Public Prosecutions Services wants to
>> assure the public that people who are charged with a crime are all
>> treated the same, no matter if they are a Mountie, a plumber or a
>> newspaper reporter.
>>
>> “Our system is based on evidence, not on someone’s profession,” says
>> the prosecutor.
>>
>> The case in question involved an accusation a Mountie committed a
>> summary assault against his spouse in December and was supposed to go
>> to trial in Moncton provincial court on Tuesday. Instead, the Crown
>> asked for a stay of proceedings, saying the request came from the head
>> office in Fredericton, which the judge granted. Head office gave no
>> reason for the request, beyond saying the file was reviewed and it was
>> determined that it was not appropriate to proceed with a charge at
>> this time.
>>
>> Knowing the public is quick to scrutinize cases involving a police
>> officer, Labonté agreed to talk about the procedure that’s in place in
>> cases where a police officer is charged, in an attempt to reassure the
>> public there is no bias, either for or against an officer.
>>
>> In this particular case, an RCMP officer investigated the RCMP officer
>> who was accused and eventually laid the charge against him in court.
>> That investigator told the Times & Transcript earlier this week that
>> his work was reviewed by officers from a non-RCMP police force in the
>> province.
>>
>> Labonté says while it’s preferable not to have officers from the same
>> police force investigate one another, this particular investigation
>> was independently reviewed by two Crown prosecutors. New Brunswick is
>> what’s known as a “pre-screening province,” meaning that the Crown
>> reviews charges and approves them before they are laid in court. The
>> director says no prosecutor deals with files involving police officers
>> from their own area.
>>
>> “If I’m a Moncton prosecutor and they bring me a file about a Codiac
>> RCMP member, I would immediately not look at that file and send it to
>> head office,” says Labonté. “If a Moncton prosecutor said no to a
>> charge for a Moncton police officer, it would look bad.”
>>
>> The head office finds a prosecutor in the province who has not had
>> dealings with that police officer. Because Mounties are frequently
>> transferred, they also check where that person has been located in the
>> past so there’s no conflict with the Crown assigned to the file.
>>
>> During his career in Moncton, Labonté took on files involving police
>> officers in other parts of the province of whom he had no knowledge,
>> which allowed him to treat each case like any other file.
>>
>> “We want to make sure they don’t get any special treatment or treated
>> more harshly than any other person,” he says. “We ensure the threshold
>> required to prosecute someone is met.”
>>
>> A common misperception about Crown prosecutors is that they are out to
>> register convictions, but that’s not the case. As a sign in the lobby
>> of the Crown’s office in the Moncton Law Courts says, the goal is to
>> present the facts and let the judge or jury decide guilt.
>>
>> “We are to be an unbiased presenter of the facts, we’re not there to
>> seek convictions,” he says.
>>
>> Labonté says cases are constantly reviewed leading up to a trial and
>> there are many reasons why a stay may be sought. For example a witness
>> may disappear, a person can change their story, new evidence can be
>> discovered, or a new person reviewing the file may have a different
>> opinion whether or not it should proceed.
>>
>> While Labonté can’t discuss the specifics of the Moncton case from
>> this week, he says he reviewed the file and recommended the case not
>> go to trial. That recommendation went to his deputy minister, who
>> agreed. In cases where the Crown requests a stay of proceedings, it
>> has a year to decide if it wants to lay the charge again.
>>
>>
>> On 1/27/12, David Amos wrote:
>>> Ms Greene your lawyer and the Attorney General did not respond I
>>> strongly sugggest that you print this document ASAP
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>
>>> Check this out
>>>
>>> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2012/01/bloggers-treated-like-royality-at-2012.html
>>>
>>> Need I say more?
>>>
>>> On 1/26/12, David Amos wrote:
>>>> Ms Greene
>>>>
>>>> I just got off the phone with Luc labonte's office. Perhaps your
>>>> lawyer should talk to me ASAP
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>> On 1/25/12, Evelyn Greene wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Leo, this is unreal. Mr. Labonte is the Director of Public
>>>>> Prosecutions;
>>>>> therefore, has a duty to ensure the Regional Director, Hilary Drain
>>>>> plays
>>>>> by
>>>>> the rules and regulations. I am forwarding to you a press release
>>>>> which
>>>>> was
>>>>> in the Moncton Times on Friday, October 21, 2011, wherein Mr. Labonte
>>>>> was
>>>>> quoted on or about the 12th paragraph: " "We ensure the threshold
>>>>> required
>>>>> to prosecute someone is met." Who does he mean by we if he cannot
>>>>> control
>>>>> the actions of the Regional Prosecutor to act without bias. My email
>>>>> clearly revealed the crown is deliberately withholding evidence. IN
>>>>> THE
>>>>> THIRD PARAGRAPH OF THIS MEDIA REPORT, LABONTE SAYS: "OUR SYSTEM IS
>>>>> BASED
>>>>> ON
>>>>> EVIDENCE,......" WOULD YOU PLEASE ASK MR. LABONTE WHAT SYSTEM HILARY
>>>>> DRAIN
>>>>> IS OPERATING FROM BECAUSE MY EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN NOTHING SHORT OF
>>>>> CROWN
>>>>> MISCONDUCT. MR. RUSSOMANNO, AS PER YOUR ADVICE, I WILL CEASE FROM
>>>>> ASKING
>>>>> ANY QUESTIONS OF THE PROSECUTION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FOLLOWING UP ON
>>>>> RIGHT
>>>>> TO INFORMATION REQUEST. I AM GRATEFUL TO HAVE YOU REPRESENT ME.
>>>>> THANK
>>>>> YOU. EVELYN GREENE
>>>>> From: Luc.LaBonte@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: evelyngreene@live.ca
>>>>> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:51:28 -0400
>>>>> Subject: RE: Message to Angie re confirmation that David Banks of the
>>>>> Dispatch 911 at the Fredericton City Police said he sent the 911 audio
>>>>> evidence to the Crown
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ms. Greene, As I have stated to you repeatedly, the issues of
>>>>> disclosure
>>>>> are
>>>>> to be dealt by the Regional Fredericton office. Should the Crown fail
>>>>> to
>>>>> comply with its obligation to disclose you have the right to request
>>>>> relief
>>>>> from the Court pursuant to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. For
>>>>> your
>>>>> information, Mr. Robert Murray is a retired Director of Public
>>>>> Prosecutions
>>>>> who is hired from time to time to assist the short staffed Fredericton
>>>>> office. This person is beyond reproach and has not acted unethically.
>>>>> Prosecutors are permitted to speak to defendants. If you do not wish
>>>>> to
>>>>> speak to a prosecutor, that is your right. In closing, your continued
>>>>> attempts to argue your case through e-mails and correspondence are not
>>>>> the
>>>>> appropriated medium. I understand your frustrations with the judicial
>>>>> system, but nonetheless, that is where you should make your arguments.
>>>>> If
>>>>> you are successful, you can then request the appropriate remedy. I do
>>>>> not
>>>>> intend to embark in an exchange of e-mails to discuss your file.
>>>>> Please
>>>>> argue your issues in court, where they belong. Luc J. LabontéAssistant
>>>>> Deputy Attorney General (Public Prosecutions Services)Sous-procureur
>>>>> général
>>>>> adjoint (Service des poursuites publiques) From: Evelyn Greene
>>>>> [mailto:evelyngreene@live.ca]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 8:31 PM
>>>>> To: LaBonte, Luc (OAG/CPG); Castonguay, Pierre (OAG/CPG);
>>>>> marie.claudeblais@gnb.ca; Forbes, Nancy (OAG/CPG); Alward, David Hon.
>>>>> (PO/CPM); NB911 - Fredericton; Lavigne, Christopher (OAG/CPG); Drain,
>>>>> Hilary
>>>>> (OAG/CPG); Blunston, Darlene (OAG/CPG); Bray, Michael (JUS);
>>>>> russomanno@wsgalaw.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: Message to Angie re confirmation that David Banks of the
>>>>> Dispatch 911 at the Fredericton City Police said he sent the 911 audio
>>>>> evidence to the Crown Dear Mr. Labonte:
>>>>>
>>>>> This will confirm my telephone conversation with your secretary,
>>>>> Angie,
>>>>> today. I asked her to confirm to you and your crown prosecutors that
>>>>> I
>>>>> spoke with the head of the 911 dispatch dept. at Fredericton City
>>>>> Police
>>>>> today, Mr. David Banks, who confirmed to me that he sent the 911 audio
>>>>> evidence to the crown already. So why have I not received it yet and
>>>>> was
>>>>> told by Ms. Drain's office that there is no disclosure at their office
>>>>> for
>>>>> me at this time?
>>>>>
>>>>> (1) Please confirm what the status of this report is now? I am
>>>>> copying
>>>>> Mr.
>>>>> Banks.
>>>>>
>>>>> (2) A crown prosecutor was in court yesterday on your behalf, a Mr.
>>>>> Murray,
>>>>> who got up during court and asked me to attend outside the room with
>>>>> him.
>>>>> I
>>>>> do not know this man and I believe this is unethical behaviour on his
>>>>> part.
>>>>> Would you please confirm your position on this matter. He is the 6th
>>>>> crown
>>>>> prosecutor on this case and I am still awaiting information from Mr.
>>>>> Lavigne
>>>>> as to the questions he asked of the police regarding irregularities on
>>>>> the
>>>>> CCTV video and audio given by the police to the Crown's office. What
>>>>> is
>>>>> the
>>>>> status of this information? No one can dispute the fact that the CCTV
>>>>> video
>>>>> and audio are tampered evidence, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Evelyn Greene
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: john kelly
> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re: Perhaps John Kelly and I should have a long talk ASAP EH
> Peter Teasdale? 902 800 0369
> To: David Amos
>
> Dear David,
>
> Thank you for your support, this is just a quick update...
>
> I now have limited access to the internet and the Crown is unlawfully trying
> to
> trestrict even that, They attempted to have a section placed in an order
> that I
> have refused to acknowledge or sign. The section is restrictive
> unreasonable and
> is a blatant attempt to stop me from commenting on their false charges and
> providing the truth to anyone.
>
>
> That section states the following (in capitals) " PROVIDED HE DOES NOT POST
> ANY
> COMMENT OR CONTENT ON THEM THAT IS RELEVANT TO THESE PROCEEDINGS -
> SPECIFICALLY
> ANYTHING THAT IS ON THE WEBSITE WWW.ROTTENAPPLES.INFO AND ANY OTHER
> INFORMATION
> REGARDING DETECTIVE MERCER OR DETECTIVE FRIZELL OR OTHER NAMED PEOPLE IN
> CONDITIONS 5 AND 6 ".
>
> My next court date is October the 7th and despite numerous requests
> and promises
> the RCMP cannot provide any evidence to substantiate the allegation and
> charges
> they have laid agains me. Applications will be made to the Court to get them
> to
> comply...more to follow soon.....
>
> truly, John Kelly
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: David Amos
> To: johnkelly475@yahoo.ca; peter.teasdale ;
> "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca";
> gstirling@parlee.com; smassinon@calgaryherald.com;
> grossea@bennettjones.com;
> bmarks@ctv.ca; Jacques.Poitras ;
> "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> ; terry.seguin ; danfour
> ; "spinks08@hotmail.com"
> Cc: cps@calgarypolice.ca; Randy.McGinnis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Barry Winters
> ; Ken.Zielke
> Sent: Sat, September 18, 2010 10:49:23 AM
> Subject: Perhaps John Kelly and I should have a long talk ASAP EH Peter
> Teasdale? 902 800 0369
>
> What the RCMP claims is pure bullshit need I mention the name of Byron
> Prior to CBC or the mindless bad arsed blogger Chucky leblanc?
>
> http://calgary.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100917/CGY_website_libel_100917/20100917/?hub=CalgaryHome
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:57:17 -0300
> Subject: How is your conscience and sense of ethical conduct doing now
> ladies?
> To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com, Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com
> Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca",
> "Dean.Buzza"
>
> Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
> Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
> July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
> Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
> Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
> held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
> Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
> previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
> including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
> and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
> working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
> Chartered Secretaries.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)"
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
>
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.com
>
> <>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp.com;
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com; nmiller@corridor.ca;
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com;
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=821
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash-corp-soars-bhp-bid-rejected/article1675353/
>
>
> http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00828/BHPrelease_828561a.pdf
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/media/POT_2010_Letter_from_BHP_Billiton's_Chairman.pdf
>
> http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/aboutUs/companyOverview/ourBoard.jsp
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/about/management_board/senior_management/podwika/
>
> http://www.corridor.ca/media/2010-press-releases/20100510.html
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=712&name=foster&pg=&office=
>
> http://www.robmooremp.com/081908.htm
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009/05/07/nb-penobsquis-water-lawyer-1056.html?ref=rss
>
>
> http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.ca/2010/03/risk-and-reward-when-rural-life-meets-economic-development/5666
>
>
> http://www.vancouverislandwaterwatchcoalition.ca/go456a/FRACKING
>
> http://www.elements.nb.ca/theme/ecojustice/JeanPaul/JeanPaul.htm
>
> http://www.nbmediacoop.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1133:penobsquis-residents-seek-compensation-for-damages&catid=82:environment&Itemid=197
>
>
> From: David Amos
> Subject: Attn Rob Moir I have read some of your work perhaps you
> should read something from years ago
> To: fundyroyalndp@gmail.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, bbixby@burnslev.com,
> david@lutz.nb.ca, drosenblatt@burnslev.com,
> markwright4mp@politician.com
> Cc: fosterd@bennettjones.ca, corporate.relations@potashcorp.com,
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, fbinhct@leo.gov
> Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 9:46 PM
>
>
> First things first meet Lenny Gold, Dougy Foster and Joey Podwika. You
> can be certain that these wicked bastards know exactly who I am and
> are no doubt quite nervous that the Feds have not figured out a way to
> shut me up yet.
>
> Everybody knows that far away corporate lawyers such as these three
> stooges have been making the big score off us dumb Maritimers forever
> and a day and have been laughing their nasty arses off at us all the
> way to their buddies' bank. They appear to fear only one Maritimer and
> that is yours truly. Ask them if I am liar or not as I speak of the
> Bank Fraud Tax Fraud, Securities Fraud and Murders that you are afraid
> to talk about. Shawn Graham should know everthing he partied hardy
> with my G.A.L. Brian Bixby's Law firm in Beantown one year ago and I
> effected an introduction with the lawyer Leonard Gold because that
> very dumb Maritimer came to Beantown to talk to many evil Yankees ten
> times more worldly wise than Shawny Baby ever could be.
>
> Your laments Bobby Baby about lost water really rot my socks. You
> should know I covered that base years ago and everybody just ran away
> scared. Ask the Minister Larry Cannon why I laughed when he gave out a
> little federal gold just before Bernie Lord had the writ dropped in
> 2006 in the provincial election. It was very telling thing just like
> all the money being passed out right now.
>
> I noticed that you and all you NDP pals ignored the fact that I ran in
> that election as well as the Fed one and the one in Nova Scotia
> earlier that year. Yea I saw you and Pat Hannratty ducking out the
> back just as I walked in that night in January of 2006. Why you didn't
> answer my friend Jack's letter either spoke to your personal integrity
> EH? If Rob Moore or none of the Conservatives on the Hill faraway
> won't talk to you just ask the lawyer Smith in Saint John the boss of
> the NB Securities Commission if I didn't raise a little Hell while he
> filled the other lawyer Nicholson's boots in PUB just long enough to
> cram the pipeline through to the trunk while the election was on and I
> was intervening in the pipeline matter in Saint John at the same time
> and Norm Miller and his lawyer ignored my arguments but read my words
> about it all on the web all the same.
>
> Better yet why not have some fun and ask the very strange PCS dudes in
> Sussex why they had my photo posted at the gate and the RCMP were to
> be called if I made an appearance there while I was running against
> your pal John Carty in Fat Fred City. Your clue to their malice is UBS
> and another lawyer named Dave Aufhauser whom I have been battling with
> for six long years. Do you even know who he is? Rest assured Lenny,
> Dougy and Joey do.
>
> Whereas you trust the words of the very malicious CBC or the Irvings
> and not mine read what the CBC were saying one year ago. Then read
> what the local Irving rag wrote about me four god damned years ago.
>
> For the record Bobby Baby I still remember you commenting on the
> trouble I was having with the Feds so that my minor son could return
> to the USA to comfort his mother and how little milk of human kindness
> you have had in your greedy little PHD soul ever since. Can ya tell I
> don't like you not even a little bit?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/03/27/nb-mccullyfield.html
>
> Read on Teacher pay particular attention to my words about oil and
> gas.and crossborder public corruption. For the record I have always
> considered the water in Penobsquis a federal matter concerning the NEB
> and if they ignore me then maybe i would take it up in the Federal
> Court. It won't go anywhere though if Maritimers don't finally wise up
> start listening to me.
>
>
> FYI I have started to upload some of my ducument for the public to
> view. They can be found here and there will be a great deal more to
> follow as my time allows.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/people/view/554842-david-raymond-amos
>
> This Maritimer Danny Boy Fitzgeral who is studying for his PHD in
> Holland made several interesting blogs about me as he attacked my
> integrity. In the end methinks I may have turned him my way and in
> return I left his school out of my battles.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/03/3rd-part-political-runs-in-maritimes.html
>
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/03/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-1b.html
>
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-2.html
>
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/canadian-action-party-cap-qsls.html
>
> Perhaps you should study them sometime EH Teacher? You should take
> careful notice that college degrees mean less than nothing to me. Just
> like any true Maritimer it is fighters, foresters, farmers and
> fishermen I admire not rich snots that do not understand the meaning
> of hard work. That said it does appear that Danny Boy does work very
> hard on his blog. I do know how long such things take and his blog is
> a fine and as fancy as anyones and constantly updated. I particularly
> apprciate the fact he leaves his comments open without moderation.
>
> Also for the record I signed your Fake Left friends' petition.
>
> Penobsquis Deserves Safe Water
>
> 98 Fran Oliver There is no excuse for this situation. A responsible
> provincial government and a responsible corporation would never allow
> local families to bear the financial and social burden, likely
> resulting from a provincial mining operation, while government and
> corporation choke on huge profits.
>
> 99 David Raymond Amos Ask Garth Moore why my picture is posted at the
> gate while I ran for Parliament will ya?
>
> My friends tell me tha the Photo the PCS dudes had posted as some sort
> of criminal the RCMP were watching out for was clipped from the pages
> of the Kings County Record that contained the following articles.
>
> The following email and two deleted blogs can be found within one
> pigheaded Maritimer's blog about government injustice. After the
> Irvings had his pal's Chucky Leblanc' former blog wiped out I had to
> tease and torture him into doing the right thing and allowing just one
> of my comments to stand. Some much for Freedom on Speech on the
> Internet when even Maritime bloggers are unethical EH teacher?
>
> For the record only the Gypsy and Danny Boy fitzgerald have allowed
> all of my comments to stand the test of time and ethics. Thus far so I
> must give credit where credit is due. Your chosen profession such as
> it is should at least understand that EH Mr. Moir?
>
> Here is my last post in the blogs tonight. Obviously I do not pretend
> to be somebody I am not. N'est Pas?
>
> http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.com/2008/04/from-student-to-city-councillor.html
>
> Veritas Vincit
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> The following email can be found here
> http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/04/tjburke-letter-to-me.html
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> Subject: David Amos
>
> Hello Lisa,
>
> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> federal
> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
> Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>
> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
> the candidates' debate held June 18.
>
> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>
> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
> photo
> that ran, but this one is very similar.
>
>
> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>
> Gisele McKnight editor
> Kings County Record
> Sussex, New Brunswick
> Canada
> 506-433-1070
>
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:38:35 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: henrybanta
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
> Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
> ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
> people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.com, ir
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash-corp-soars-bhp-bid-rejected/article1675353/
>
>
> http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00828/BHPrelease_828561a.pdf
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
> Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
> ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
> people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.com, ir
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash-corp-soars-bhp-bid-rejected/article1675353/
>
>
> http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00828/BHPrelease_828561a.pdf
>
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "STAINTON-JAMES, Angela"
>> > To: "'David Amos'"
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:50 AM
>> > Subject: RE: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do
>> > about people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada
>> > such slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear David
>> >
>> > Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Hugh Robertson. Your e-mail
>> > has come through to Hugh's constituency office when, clearly, you need
>> > his Department. Sadly, I do not have an e-mail address for him but
>> > the telephone number of the Department of Media Culture and Sport is
>> > 020 7211 6200 and they should be able to provide you with the
>> > necessary information.
>> >
>> > Thank you for writing to Hugh and if you have any problem at all
>> > please do not hesitate to come back to me.
>> >
>> > Best wishes
>> > Angela Stainton-James
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: 29 May 2010 23:24
>> > To: STAINTON-JAMES, Angela; toewsv1
>> > Cc: RHar100@aol.com; Gilles. Blinn; gilles.moreau; roger. gillies;
>> > rogerduguay21
>> > Subject: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do about
>> > people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada such
>> > slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> > Need I say that "Satan's Crack Dealer" and his many evil little fans
>> > atacked the wrong pissed of Maritimer in Youtube? Scroll down read
>> > real slow and then call your lawyer or the cops Mr Roberson
>> >
>> > http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6074892060
>> > Richard Coughlan
>> > Faversham, United Kingdom
>> > email RHar100@aol.com
>> > Website:http://youtube.com/user/coughlan666
>> > Phone 07935333407
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:46:20 -0300
>> > Subject: Mr. Finkelstein I just discovered you and your concerns today
>> > perhaps we should have a long talk ASAP? i an be reached at 506 485
>> > 2578 for a couple of days
>> > To: normfinkelstein@gmail.com
>> >
>> > Need I say that I am hounoured that this evil person hates me/
>> >
>> > http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/05/americans-have-never-guarantteed.html
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:46 -0300
>> > Subject: Lets see if the Russians will understand Fwd: We just talked
>> > this what I was trying to relate to the President of Mexico while he
>> > was in Canada
>> > To: info@rusembassy.ca
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:19:51 -0300
>> > Subject: We just talked this what I was trying to relate to the
>> > President of Mexico while he was in Canada
>> > To: atperez_lee
>> >
>> > The easiest way to check something about my concerns quickly is to go
>> > to the US Senate Banking Committee hearing on November 18th and 20th
>> > 2003 and notice the webcasts and transcripts of a very important
>> > hearing about the financial industry are missing. Please notice the
>> > crook Eliot Spitzer testified on the 20th
>> >
>> >
>>http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.List&Month=0&Year=2003
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1
>>
>> >
>> >
>>http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>>
>> >
>> > Now look for Spitzer's answer to me on page 13 of this pdf file
>> >
>> > http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>> >
>> > The easy answer to your next question is YES I am the the guy nobody
>> > will talk about. so perhaps you should for the benefit of your
>> > concerns and pocketbook. (Google David Amos and Wendy Olsen to see how
>> > far down the rabbbit hole I can take anyone)
>> >
>> > I explained some of it a year ago on many talk shows and nobody cared.
>> > Listen here if you wish then go figure whom you should trust.
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJGDSlnyKro
>> >
>> > If nothing else have laugh at my espense and Google this expression
>> > "Nobody will say my name"
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is just one of the many reasons why
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
>> > To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Thank you for your response.
>> >
>> > Wendy Olsen
>> > Victim Witness Coordinator
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
>> > To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Ms Olsen
>> >
>> > Thank you for keeping me informed.
>> >
>> > Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
>> > make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
>> > disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
>> > of Law within a purported democracy.
>> >
>> > As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
>> > wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
>> > privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
>> > protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>> >
>> > The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
>> > aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
>> > the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
>> > pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
>> > was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
>> > trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
>> > secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
>> > poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
>> > are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
>> > beginning over seven years ago..
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> > 506 756 8687
>> >
>> > P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
>> > soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
>> > night.
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>> >
>> > Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
>> > is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
>> > timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
>> > forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
>> > wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>> >
>> > "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
>> > and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>> >
>> > He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
>> > Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
>> > acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
>> > Putnam insiders.
>> >
>> > Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
>> > is in hot water again.
>> >
>> > Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
>> > private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
>> > investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
>> > enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>> >
>> > --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos wrote:
>> >
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>> > OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, "oig"
>> > , Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
>> > ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald"
>> > Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
>> > mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
>> > david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
>> > benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
>> > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>> >
>> > Need I say BULLSHIT?
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>> > OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
>> > ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
>> > Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
>> > editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us, MartiK1 ,
>> > "Paul. Harpelle", Jason Keenan
>> > , Kandalaw
>> > Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>> >
>> > From: "Peck,Dave"
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
>> > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
>> > INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: David Amos
>> >
>> > I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>> >
>> > Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>> >
>> > He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
>> > gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us
>> >
>> > I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Chief Dave Peck
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: USANYS-MADOFF
>> > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
>> > To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
>> > Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
>> > received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
>> > victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.
>> >
>> > This includes your email to the Government.
>> >
>> > If the correspondence from victims is unsealed, the victim's personal
>> > identifying information including name, address, telephone number and
>> > email address (to the extent it was included on the correspondence)
>> > will become public. The Government must submit a response to the
>> > request by NBC and ABC by Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know
>> > whether you consent to the full disclosure of your correspondence, or
>> > whether you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy
>> > or other reasons.
>> > If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
>> > know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
>> > can. Thank you.
>> >
>> > I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
>> > emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
>> > reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
>> > chickenshits.
>> >
>> > I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
>> > never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
>> > with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: PChavkin@mintz.com
>> > Cc: webo
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)"
>> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
>> > Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> > On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
>> > guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
>> > March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>> >
>> > Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
>> > consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
>> > defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
>> > Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
>> > imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
>> > released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
>> > Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
>> > conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
>> > whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
>> > will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
>> >
>> > Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
>> > the Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
>> > counsel to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce
>> > its intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
>> > individuals who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>> >
>> > The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
>> > heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
>> > restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
>> > also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
>> > concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
>> > proceeding.
>> >
>> > A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
>> > be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
>> > Southern District of New York:
>> >
>> > http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
>> > To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
>> > Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
>> > To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
>> > USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Cc: oig
>> > Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
>> > etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> > horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Sartory, Thomas J."
>> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
>> > Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
>> > Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
>> > While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
>> > Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
>> > help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
>> > attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
>> > will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>> >
>> > We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > Thomas J. Sartory
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
>> > To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
>> > reed@hbsslaw.com
>> > Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> >
>> > Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?
>> >
>> > UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> > This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
>> > received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
>> > system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
>> > This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
>> > for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "R Hide (MIN)"
>> > To: "David Amos"
>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:33 PM
>> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
>> > have an idea for you Ben
>> >
>> >
>> > On behalf of the Hon Rodney Hide, Minister of Local Government, I wish
>> > to acknowledge receipt of your email.
>> >
>> > Your correspondence has been placed in front of the Minister.
>> >
>> > regards
>> >
>> > Sandy Grove
>> > Ministerial Private Secretary (Advisory)
>> > Office of Hon Rodney Hide
>> > WELLINGTON
>> > Ph 04 817 6630
>> > Email: sandy.grove@parliament.govt.nz
>> >
>> > The content of this email, including any attachment, is intended for
>> > the named recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
>> > communication of the Department of Internal Affairs It may contain
>> > privileged material and/or confidential information.
>> >
>> > If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not
>> > copy it, distribute it or take any action in reliance on it. If you
>> > have received this email in error, please notify the sender
>> > immediately and delete this email. Although this email has been
>> > scanned for viruses, this email is not guaranteed to be free of
>> > viruses and should be checked by your own security mechanisms. No
>> > liability is accepted for any loss or damage arising from the use of
>> > this email or its attachments.
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 3:05 pm
>> > To: T Ryall (MIN); Amy Adams; Jim Anderton;
>> > anderton.wigram@xtra.co.nz; Jacinda Ardern; Shane Ardern; Chris
>> > Auchinvole; Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi; Rick Barker; Carol Beaumont; David
>> > Bennett; Loren Bolton (MIN); Jackie Blue; Chester Borrows;
>> > chester.wanganui@xtra.co.nz; chester.hawera@xtra.co.nz; John Boscawen;
>> > Sue Bradford; socialjustice@greens.org.nz; Simon Bridges; Natalie
>> > Roberts (MIN); Brendon Burns; bb@brendonburns.co.nz; Chris Carter;
>> > labourwest@xtra.co.nz; D Carter (MIN); cartermp@xtra.co.nz; J Carter
>> > (MIN); northlandelectorate@xtra.co.nz; Steve Chadwick; Charles
>> > Chauvel; Ashraf Choudhary; J Coleman (MIN); J Collins (MIN);
>> > office@judithcollins.co.nz; Clayton Cosgrove;
>> > claytoncosgrovekaiapoi@xtra.co.nz; David Cunliffe;
>> > dcunliffe@xtra.co.nz; Clare Curran; lianne.dalziel@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > Kelvin Davis; Jacqui Dean; Catherine Delahunty; Roger Douglas; P Dunne
>> > (MIN); electjville@xtra.co.nz; Ruth Dyson; ruth.dyson@xtra.co.nz; B
>> > English (MIN); elecgor@esi.co.nz; Darien Fenton;
>> > office@labournorth.org.nz; C Finlayson (MIN); Jeanette Fitzsimons; Te
>> > Ururoa Flavell; Craig Foss; craigfoss@backingthebay.co.nz; David
>> > Garrett; Aaron Gilmore; p.goff@parliament.govt.nz; phil@goff.org.nz;
>> > Jo Goodhew; sandra.goudie@national.org.nz; Kennedy Graham; Hon. Tim
>> > Groser (MIN); nathan.guy@national.org.nz;
>> > national.horowhenua@xtra.co.nz; national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz; Kevin
>> > Hague; Hone Harawira; Terry Ututaonga; George Hawkins; John Hayes; P
>> > Heatley (MIN); Tau Henare; tau.henaremp@xtra.co.nz; R Hide (MIN);
>> > rodney@epsom.org.nz; Paul Hutchison; hunua.electorate@xtra.co.nz;
>> > Shane Jones; shanejonesmp@xtra.co.nz; S Joyce (MIN); Rahui Katene;
>> > Nikki Kaye; Sue Kedgley; J Key (MIN); genelle@johnkey.mp.net.nz;
>> > A.King@parliament.govt.nz; kilbirnieeo@xtra.co.nz;
>> > colin.kingmp@xtra.co.nz; winnie.laban@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > mana.electorate@xtra.co.nz; Melissa Lee;
>> > Iain.leesgalloway@parliament.govt.nz; Keith Locke;
>> > greenmps.auckland@greens.org.nz;
>> > peseta.sam.lotuiiga@parliament.govt.nz; Tim Macindoe;
>> > moana.mackey@labour.org.nz; Nanaia Mahuta;
>> > tainuielectorate@xtra.co.nz; Trevor Mallard; WOAoffice@xtra.co.nz;
>> > petone.eo@clear.net.nz; W Mapp (MIN); Todd McClay; M McCully (MIN);
>> > murray.mccully@xtra.co.nz; Sue Moroney; waikatohub.mps@xtra.co.nz;
>> > Stuart Nash; Russel Norman; Hekia Parata; David Parker; Allan Peachey;
>> > Ritchie Wards; lynne.pillaymp@xtra.co.nz; S Power (MIN);
>> > simonpower.feilding@xtra.co.nz; simonpower.marton@xtra.co.nz; Rajen
>> > Prasad; Paul Quinn; angela.bray@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > jen.toogood@parliament.govt.nz; Chris Hipkins;
>> > marlene.ditchfield@xtra.co.nz; janette.granville@xtra.co.nz; Pete
>> > Hodgson; pete@petehodgson.co.nz; Parekura Horomia;
>> > ikaroa.gis@xtra.co.nz; ikaroa.hstgs@xtra.co.nz; Darren Hughes; Raymond
>> > Huo; office@grantrobertson.co.nz; Ross Robertson;
>> > rae.waterhouse@xtra.co.nz; michael.clatworthy@xtra.co.nz; Eric Roy; H
>> > Roy (MIN); Heather Henderson; Pita Sharples (MIN); Sua William Sio;
>> > Trish Wanden; mp.rodney.warkworth@xtra.co.nz; N Smith (MIN);
>> > nick@nick4nelson.co.nz; Maryan Street; Lindsay Tisch;
>> > tolleywhk@xtra.co.nz; tolleygis@xtra.co.nz;
>> > chris.tremain@national.org.nz; napier.electorate@airnet.net.nz;
>> > Metiria Turei; greenmps.dunedin@greens.org.nz; T Turia (MIN);
>> > Tari.Turia@xtra.co.nz; Philip Twyford; Louise Upston; Nicky Wagner; K
>> > Wilkinson (MIN); waimakariri@xtra.co.nz; M Williamson (MIN); Michael
>> > Woodhouse; blueandgold@parliament.govt.nz; P Wong (MIN);
>> > pansy.wong@xtra.co.nz; ahan.young@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > rosslynn@hrc.co.nz; sylviab@hrc.co.nz; michaelW@hrc.co.nz;
>> > phillippa.smith@oag.govt.nz; Mark.Holman@ssc.govt.nz;
>> > mark.thornton@justice.govt.nz; boris.vanbeusekom@justice.govt.nz;
>> > tinz@paradise.net.nz; >; emma.miles@police.govt.nz;
>> > John.Rivers@police.govt.nz; Mike.Webb@police.govt.nz;
>> > nurses@nzno.org.nz; gay@pha.org.nz; qsolutionsrising@gmail.com;
>> > easy@island.net; jardim.stratton@gmail.com;
>> > christinejhansen@gmail.com; no_to_nwo@yahoo.co.uk;
>> > johan.niklasson@evolution-production.com; lunalas@cox.net;
>> > saxon1hero@yahoo.co.uk; journalist@bellsouth.net;
>> > irenew.politico@gmail.com; daniel.solis@seznam.cz;
>> > vickytoxotis@hotmail.com; wef339@mail.com; katcre22@yahoo.com;
>> > scott@tkgtech.com; amandablake@blueyonder.co.uk;
>> > who.flu.2009@gmail.com; jazon@ymail.com; sineadcasper@live.ie;
>> > acpscotland@hotmail.co.uk; p.duffy93@ntlworld.com;
>> > tua46054@temple.edu; ciaranmcloone@ooglemail.com;
>> > marek_p2000@yahoo.com; black2000at@hotmail.com;
>> > madame_karnak@yahoo.com; sracine@gmail.com;
>> > annikatornlind@hotmail.com; manonf6@yahoo.com; matt@mattengelman.com;
>> > grantlear@hotmail.com; helix7@hotmail.com; editor@uncensored.co.nz;
>> > melocacau@gmail.com; steve.gosschalk@gmail.com;
>> > tidalelectric@gmail.com; vapi.kupenga@xtra.co.nz;
>> > eastwood.vincent@gmail.com; sichel@nsw.chariot.net.au;
>> > mlm@archaeoskymatrix.com
>> > Cc: laos_newzealand@yahoo.co.nz; jane burgermeister
>> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
>> > have an idea for you Ben
>> >
>> > From: National Kapiti Electorate Office
>> > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +1300
>> > Subject: RE: NZ HEALTH MINISTER TONY RYALL - MS PENNY DO YOU READ
>> > EMAILS AS WELL AS WRITE THEM?
>> > To: David Amos
>> >
>> > Dear Mr Amos
>> > Thank you for copying Nathan in with your email to NZ Health Minister
>> > Tony
>> > Ryall. This has been passed on to Nathan for his information.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Heather
>> >
>> > Heather Shaw| Electorate Agent for Hon Nathan Guy MP for Otaki
>> > P: +64 4 298 2906| F: +64 4 298 4845| Shop 3, 23 Amohia Street,
>> > Paraparaumu,
>> > Kapiti Coast 5032
>> > www.nathanguy.co.nz
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Heather
>> >
>> > Jan 3rd, 2004
>> >
>> > Mr. David R. Amos
>> > 153 Alvin Avenue
>> > Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos
>> >
>> > Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
>> > my predecessor,
>> > the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the
>> > delay in responding.
>> >
>> > If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>> > suggest that you contact
>> > the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
>> > criminal activity should be brought
>> > to their attention since the police are in the best position to
>> > evaluate the information and take
>> > action as deemed appropriate.
>> >
>> > I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>> >
>> > Yours sincerely
>> > A. Anne McLellan”
>> >
>> > September 11th, 2004
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
>> > Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and
>> > CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the
>> > other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of
>> > New Brunswick.
>> >
>> > I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot
>> > intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
>> > and courts of
>> > Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
>> > authorities
>> > regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>> >
>> > Yours sincerely.
>> >
>> > Renee Blanchet
>> > Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:12:44 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: We just talked
>> To: scott.white@thecanadianpress.com, pagek@parl.gc.ca,
>> editor@policeprofessional.com
>> Cc: IgnatM , LaytoJ ,
>> jemma@policeprofessional.com, hiddenfromhistory
>>
>>
>> Need i say i was not surprised when Askari and his boss Kevin Page
>> formerly of the PCO office did not respond to my phone calls or email
>> yesterday?
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:39:54 -0300
>> Subject: We just talked
>> To: askarm@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Mostafa Askari
>> Director General
>> Library of Parliament
>> Economic and Fiscal Analysis
>> Parliament Buildings
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A9
>> Canada
>>
>> Telephone : 613-992-8045
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:07:59 -0300
>> Subject: You Cato dudes played dumb again about your missing blog and
>> the documents I sent ya but lets see if one of your Directors is a
>> dumb as you and the Feds pretend to be
>> To: barnold@cato.org, kcouchman@cato.org, ckennedy@cato.org,
>> amast@cato.org
>> Cc: "rick. skinner", "Dean.Buzza"
>>
>>
>> The text of the blog of Tom Palmer's that Cato denies existed can be
>> found within my blog and many other places as well as this email
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2005/03/ides-of-march.html
>>
>> March 24, 2005
>> Crazy as a Loon, but Free
>>
>> Off to Iceland!
>>
>> Well, Bobby Fischer has his Icelandic passport. The U.S. government
>> can now stop persecuting him for the crime of playing chess in
>> Yugoslavia. Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if
>> you consider his anti-Semitism and praise for the 9-11 attacks), but
>> he’s not out of his mind for choosing Iceland as his country of
>> refuge. And the Icelanders, who may later regret having such an
>> utterly crazy person wandering around in their country, have done the
>> right thing by offering him refuge.
>>
>> NOTE: I seem to have attracted a stalker, who keeps posting strange
>> messages on this site. Whatever.
>>
>> Posted by Tom Palmer at March 24, 2005 07:09 AM | TrackBack
>>
>> Comments
>> Quite frankly I do not understand this. What does Iceland gain from
>> this? Fischer himself stated that he would NEVER return to chess. So,
>> it is unlikely that he will play for Iceland... and even though he
>> did, it is not like he’d be back at the top.
>> Now, he might want to teach his fellow Icelanders
>> Fischerrandom...Fischerrandom is to chess what Estonian grammar is to
>> linguistic ...And THAT sounds like a threat to me. NV
>>
>>
>> Posted by: Nathalie I. Vogel at March 24, 2005 08:36 AM
>> I doubt that Iceland has much to gain. (And I suspect that the
>> inhabitants of Reykjavik may suffer from having an insufferable
>> loudmouth crackpot wandering around.) But they did the right thing.
>> The better thing would have been for the U.S. to drop its case against
>> Mr. Fischer. I don't think you should lose your passport or suffer
>> criminal prosecution for traveling someplace to play chess. I think
>> that the position of the U.S. government (and of both Democratic and
>> Republican administrations) is the harder one to understand.
>>
>> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 24, 2005 08:47 AM
>> TGP: "Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if you
>> consider his anti-Semitism "
>>
>> I don't want to go all Szaszian on someone for what is most likely a
>> casual comment, but suggesting someone is "out of his mind" simply
>> because he is (labeled as) anti-Semitic seems overmuch. Immoral,
>> perhaps...poorly informed, possibly...holding to views developed as a
>> result of childhood associations, maybe...a confusion on either the
>> part of Fischer or the person making the accusation of anti-Semitism
>> with anti-Zionism, quite possible. But "out of his mind"?
>>
>> Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 24, 2005 11:17 AM
>> Ross, Tom did refer to 'his' anti-Semitism; maybe it's not just that
>> Fischer does not like Jews, but that he suffers from a particularly
>> radical form of bigotry.
>>
>> I wouldn't know myself, but that was the inference I drew from Tom's
>> comment.
>>
>> Posted by: Henri Hein at March 25, 2005 02:45 AM
>> Then, Henri, he would be immoral, or bigoted, not "out of his mind".
>> And he should consult an ethicist, not a travel agent or chiropracter
>> to bring him back to his mind or better align it.
>> Again, my point was merely that "out of his mind" implies one must be
>> crazy or mentally ill to be anti-Semitic; I think that's a category
>> error.
>>
>> Ross
>>
>> Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 25, 2005 06:54 PM
>> Ross's points are well taken, but I do think that some term such as
>> "crazy" (I'll stay away from "mentally ill") is useful in describing
>> Mr. Fischer. (And even Thomas Szasz readily admits that there are
>> "lots of crazy people" around; he just says that they're not sick.)
>>
>> The anti-Semitism that Mr. Fischer spouts is not of the "they wouldn't
>> be welcome in our club" sort (bad as that is), but of the "Organized
>> International Jewry is out to get me," sort. The former is an example
>> of bad behavior, bad manners, immoral views, or the like. The latter
>> sort of anti-Semitism is an obsession that seems in general to be
>> immune to either moral appeal (since it's a claim about an alleged
>> state of affairs, viz., that the Jews run everything and are out to
>> get one) or to factual refutation (how do you argue someone out of
>> such a...for want of a better word...crazy view?).
>>
>> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 25, 2005 11:34 PM
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: rjvattuone@aol.com
>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
>> Subject: This is going to get interesting
>>
>>
>> Hey Richard
>>
>> Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston
>> 617 698-6549 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 617 698-6549
>> end_of_the_skype_highlighting. I will be hitting the road shortly
>> and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to
>> Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP.
>> I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all
>> know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have
>> evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my
>> phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain
>> Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts
>> you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards
>> would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you.
>> Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the
>> following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to
>> see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the
>> past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned
>> me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they
>> have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
>>
>> The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not
>> allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support
>> what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I
>> will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better
>> not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work
>> better and are free.
>>
>> From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
>>
>> In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man
>> like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One
>> particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well
>> thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and
>> examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him
>> to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to
>> privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every
>> action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their
>> advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is
>> simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his
>> mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he
>> plays chess so very well.
>>
>> I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things
>> you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby
>> ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because
>> the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody
>> with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public
>> scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do
>> not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to
>> understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it
>> would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ
>> Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
>>
>> I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him
>> nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense
>> of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against
>> the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for
>> his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and
>> present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A
>> jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers
>> without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may
>> glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted
>> against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in
>> arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the
>> media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the
>> courts to act properly in the public interest.
>>
>> Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is
>> time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in
>> the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the
>> charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just
>> one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming
>> very soon. I will have lots to say.
>>
>> It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the
>> men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts.
>> Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made.
>> However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the
>> crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune.
>> I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much
>> public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA.
>> It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be
>> compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their
>> own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or
>> we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for
>> a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I
>> applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope
>> we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend
>> of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak
>> out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I
>> could happen to you next. Get it?
>>
>> If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this
>> message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments.
>> I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you
>> down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is
>> true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that
>> helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn
>> than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear.
>> Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have
>> much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is
>> just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly
>> game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but
>> my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not
>> a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach
>> his attorney a trick or two of mine.
>>
>> If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379
>> begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 506 434-1379
>> end_of_the_skype_highlighting Feel free to argue me and stress test my
>> ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am
>> protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I
>> speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a
>> mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his
>> cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their
>> masks of virtue.
>>
>> Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous.
>> Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many
>> others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against
>> me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already
>> happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin
>> got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved
>> to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way
>> and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at
>> chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his
>> game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to
>> others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the
>> need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am
>> busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
>>
>> Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public
>> servants?"
>>
>> Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips
>> fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me
>> you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
>>
>> My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector
>> General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me
>> Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf
>> because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is
>> now out of the job.
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:12 PM
>> December 7th, 2003
>>
>> Gene Healy Senior Editor Cato Institute
>> 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
>> Washington D.C. 20001-5403
>> Phone (202) 842-0200 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
>> (202) 842-0200 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>> Fax (202) 842-3490
>> RE: Corruption
>> Sir,
>> Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all its enclosures
>> recently sent to the Hearst Corporation and many others. Many of your
>> directors such as Lewis E. Randall, John C. Malone and Jeffrey S. Yass
>> should find the documents an interesting read. I ask that you make
>> them available for their review.
>> I watched David Boaz speak on C-Span the other day and heard him say
>> many things. What I found the most interesting was that he said that
>> the Cato Institute was named after some rather prolific letter
>> writers. I invite you all to read mine. They can be found at the
>> website mentioned in the enclosed documents. I could not send this
>> letter to Mr. Boaz because he is not a lawyer and an officer of the
>> court as you are. This is because only law enforcement authorities or
>> officers of the court have any right to listen to the copy of wiretap
>> numbered 139. It is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the
>> court in order that you may act ethically and see that it is properly
>> investigated. Please share the contents of the Cd with only the proper
>> authorities so that I may never be accused of violating anyone’s
>> Fourth Amendment Rights.
>> As I have said to many other lawyers, at the very least I have now
>> made you a witness to my pursuit of justice. I ask you simply the
>> following. What will you do with your newfound knowledge of Civil
>> Rights Violations and Government Corruption?
>> Best Regards
>> David R.Amos
>> 153 Alvin Ave.
>> Milton MA. 02186
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:22 PM
>> Um, as I was saying about some people being, um, a bit....well,
>> "different."
>>
>> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 27, 2005 09:12 PM
>> Did I mention that I found snotty Oxford dudes had stuffed shirts and
>> were great fun to poke fun at as they bullshit others about how smart
>> they are?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: marnie.ferguson@keyporter.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:08 PM
>> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com ; egeetter@bu.edu ;
>> dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; lawrence_summers@harvard.edu ;
>> wrogersjr@therogerslawfirm.com ; thomas.hannigan@ropesgray.com ;
>> jotodd@toddweld.com
>> Cc: warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; dan@dankennedy.net ; w.kirtz@neu.edu ;
>> howiecarr@wrko.com ; bzelnick@bu.edu ; n.daniloff@neu.edu ;
>> barnicle@969fmtalk.com ; wsj.ltrs@wsj.com ; amy.wolfcale@dowjones.com
>> ; joseph.stern@dowjones.com ; letters@washpost.com ; fair@fair.org ;
>> editor@usatoday.com ; pressreleases@upi.com ; letters@time.com ;
>> newshour@pbs.org ; ombudsman@npr.org ; morning@npr.org ;
>> letters@newsweek.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ;
>> dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; gillooly@dailyfreepress.com ;
>> dfpnews@dailyfreepress.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; pr@ap.org ;
>> nightline@abcnews.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:21 PM
>> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>>
>>
>> Hey
>>
>> It appears that all the Law Schools know nothing of ethical behavior
>> if it may affect their coffers. I made it my task to prove it. Lets
>> see if I can turn the worm and make the light dawn on Marblehead for
>> the benefit of all.
>>
>> Whereas Todd Klipp is on Legal Advisory Committee United Educators
>> (UE) Insurance Risk Retention Group I called Corporate Counsel, Jan
>> Holt and told her something is up and that I would be serving the Hard
>> Copy of the evidence that proves what I say is true upon Mr. Klipp. If
>> I were you I would go to the US District Court in Beantown, query the
>> dockets that bear my name and ask the BU professor Chief Justice Young
>> about his integrity and his association with crooks like Charles J.
>> Kickham Jr. and all of his cohorts.
>>
>> Cardinal Law would be a good witness to ask to start a proper
>> investigation that is if you can get whoever becomes the next US
>> Ambassador to the Vatican to make him fess up about his sins.
>> Otherwise ask his former secretary Robert Kickham he is now O'Malley's
>> secretary. I have no doubt that little bastard knows everything but
>> trust that the three legal stooges Todd, Rogers and Hannigan have told
>> him to shut up and wait for me to quit or die. However I think the
>> Kickhams will soon fold their hand and start rattin out others very
>> soon. Their is no honour amongst theives and I have the Kickhams
>> cornered after three years of hard work. Their big daddy Chucky is
>> dead and the rest of them are as dumb as a post. Uncle Franky has been
>> dead since last June and I have finally forced the court to admit it.
>> None of their accountings have been assented to by anyone and the IRS
>> must check their work before my wife will settle. the Feds have a big
>> problem and everybody knows its me.
>>
>> I am proud to say I won't quit and don't care if I die. I made certain
>> that my truths live on and that no Kickham relatives can no longer
>> claim to be kin to my little Clan. I refuse to allow my family to
>> associate with bible pounding criminals that expound of law nor will I
>> settle with them in order that they may escape justice. They must be
>> held accountable and so should all their friends.
>>
>> I may seem crazy but at least I know my rights and will not allow
>> wrongs against my family to go unpunished, particularly when the
>> wrongs are practiced by people well paid or licensed by the state to
>> insure that matters such as this never happen. If I am not crazy then
>> the governments of Canada and the USA must be insanely corrupt. I know
>> for a fact that there are a lot of ordinary people that agree with me
>> therefore I know I am OK but I have my doubts about you. i am giving
>> Mr. Klipp just enough evidence to impeach George Bush and for safe
>> measure I am giving the same material to many others as well. Here's
>> hoping ethics wins out after all. Otherwise we are all losers and the
>> crooks within such organizations as the Aspen Institute will keep on
>> advising the bastards on how to screw us all.
>>
>> The judges of the First Circuit of the US District Court have a lot to
>> be accountable for and Judge Young is well aware of it all. He has no
>> right to teach others about trial practice and the law until he proves
>> that he understands how to uphold the law. I will be suing the bastard
>> in short order you pick whether you wish to stand with him or me.
>> There is no middle ground in this legal battle for Boston University
>> to stand on. Judge Young is in your employ. However methinks he is no
>> longer a feather in your cap. The University has bragged to have such
>> a man to teach the students. What say you now?
>>
>> Trust that I don't care if anyone reads this email or not. In fact it
>> will be more fun if ya didn't.
>>
>> "The Honorable William G. Young was appointed judge of the U.S.
>> District Court for Massachusetts in 1984, after serving as associate
>> justice of the state’s Superior Court. Prior positions include special
>> assistant attorney general, chief counsel to the governor, and clerk
>> for the Honorable Raymond Wilkins, former chief justice of the
>> Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Judge Young has a long list of
>> pro bono activities, teaching experience, and several awards,
>> including the Award for Judicial Excellence from the Massachusetts
>> Academy of Trial Attorneys. Judge Young developed the course Advanced
>> Trial Practice and also teaches Evidence."
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: jb95@bu.edu
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:02 PM
>> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: MauraH@ci.boston.ma.us ; maurah@maurahennigan.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:36 PM
>> Subject: I just called I am not kidding
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.org ;
>> pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.org ; peter. reiling@aspeninstitute.org ;
>> clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
>> Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto
>> maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com
>> ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ;
>> david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
>> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ;
>> INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
>> Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
>> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ;
>> Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
>> Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman
>>
>>
>> Hey Fellas
>> I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I
>> sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament
>> in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit
>> his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot
>> from his job right after the last Yankee election.
>> Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need
>> for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is
>> merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my
>> concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does
>> nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to
>> embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people
>> claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say
>> you?
>> Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he
>> likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me
>> falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my
>> pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very
>> interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
>> David R. Amos
>>
>>
>> "Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars,
>> including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and
>> those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also
>> manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the
>> Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford
>> University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As
>> American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes
>> Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in
>> Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership.
>> He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the
>> practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government
>> and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and
>> healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards,
>> especially in the arts."
>>
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:23 PM
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: backtalk@motherjones.com
>> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:01 PM
>> Subject: Fw: Cya in court Cato
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; tcarpent@cato.org ;
>> dboaz@cato.org ; rpilon@cato.org ; cpreble@cato.org ; tlynch@cato.org
>> ; blindsey@cato.org ; rlevy@cato.org ; tfirey@cato.org ;
>> ecrane@cato.org
>> Cc: Wes Penre@Illuminati News ; freedom_of_information@yahoogroups.com
>> ; Letters@globeandmail.ca ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; lloyd
>> brinson ; J. D. Kuntz ; elois@newdata.ca ; Jack Hook ; John Bjornstrom
>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:47 PM
>> Subject: Cya in court Cato
>>
>>
>>
>> Hey Tommy Boy
>> You invited me. These are your words correct? I tried to register on
>> line but your link does not work. I want to come. we should be in
>> agreement in most things but I know we are not and we should really
>> talk about it before I file my civil lawsuits. You people have already
>> proven to me your malice. this is your last chance to act ethically.
>> My criminal trial will begin shortly thereafter and I may call some of
>> you to testify at it. One of them could be you. I am one of those
>> people that many already turn to for an honest opinion. Right or wrong
>> they know my answer comes from sincere ethical consideration because I
>> am more a man of my word than legions of lawyers ever were. I am good
>> to my friends and sheer hell to my foes. I hate the false fronts of
>> integrity of the people you joke about within your following
>> invitation. You are joking. I am not.
>> Dear Friend,
>>
>> Would you like to be the person to whom others turn for an explanation
>> of the debate over Social Security and retirement, the economics of
>> international trade, or how to control pollution and protect the
>> environment through incentives? Would you like to be better able to
>> explain the benefits of free markets, private property, and free trade
>> to your friends, colleagues, and family members?
>>
>> If so, you should come to Washington, D.C., for the Cato University
>> seminar April 28 to May 1 on Applied Economics: User-Friendly Tools to
>> Understand Politics, Business Enterprise, and Life. The faculty
>> includes top-level economists and policy experts from universities and
>> the Cato Institute.
>>
>> The seminar will be held in the F. A. Hayek Auditorium of the Cato
>> Institute, with dinner and a tour at Mount Vernon, the historic home
>> of George Washington.
>>
>> Our goal is to help attendees become the people to whom their friends
>> turn to explain the economy and how political interference in markets
>> tends to generate disaster. And there's a reason it's being held in
>> Washington, D.C. You see, we want to change fundamentally the culture
>> of Washington, D.C. Washington's a very strange city. Most of the
>> people here spend their working days taking from Peter to give to Paul
>> (minus a substantial cut, of course). Or writing minute and
>> incomprehensible "regulations" on the optimal size of broccoli, or
>> warning people to wear sensible shoes, or just figuring out new ways
>> to strip American citizens of their rights and dignity.
>>
>> You can come to D.C. for a long weekend and learn how to change that.
>> You'll learn how to make the arguments that will convince your
>> friends, coworkers, and neighbors that they don't need or benefit from
>> all those rules, redistributions, regulations, and rip-offs.
>>
>> You're invited to attend one Cato University seminar, or two, or
>> three. Each is a stand alone seminar, but all three are complementary.
>> (The other two are on history and on the art and technique of
>> persuasion.)
>>
>> Please check out the faculty and schedule, and register using our
>> secure registration form. Online registration is safe, easy, and fast.
>>
>> Come to Washington, D.C. ... and learn how to change it.
>>
>> I look forward to welcoming you to Cato University this year.
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> and Signed by you. Tom Palmer
>>
>> In order not to be somehow overlooked, I just called you cell phone to
>> cell phone so that I would have a record of contact to let you know we
>> had a problem to discuss. You were to busy to talk so you missed your
>> chance. Methinks you are a fine example of the reason your buddy Gene
>> Healy and his ilk ignored me. I read enough of your work to think you
>> are a very snotty tall talking whore for the Global Corps. I wanted to
>> hear your voice to be certain my feelings were correct. You did not
>> dissappoint me. If you don't like my opinion of you, sue me and bring
>> all these emails to court. I promise I will not file a motion to
>> dismiss. In fact I can't wait to meet your lawyers. I thought what you
>> said about Bobby Fischer was far more offensive and as you can see I
>> blogged in his defense. Many people call me crazy too. That seem to be
>> the label bad actors put on someone when they are cornered. I wanted
>> you to hear my voice so that you would understand that I am not nuts
>> but very sincere. when you shunned my last words were see you in
>> court. Ignore me some more and you certainly will. Check my work
>> before you laugh and call me crazy too.
>> In order to prove you all I am serious I will send Roger Pilon, Vice
>> President for Legal Affairs at 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.,
>> Washington D.C. 20001-5403 hard copy of exactly the same material I
>> sent to two Solicitor Generals last year just before I ran for
>> Parliament. Teddy Olson quit and went into private practice as soon as
>> Stephen Harper opened his mouth about the Arar Inquiry but thus far
>> Landslide Annie has hung onto hers. Now if you have any questions of
>> me before we meet, ask them to New Canadian Ambassador Franky Boy
>> McKenna. He knows exactly who I am and what has happened in the year
>> since. If you want a Yankee perspective ask John Ashcroft, John
>> Edwards. Tom Ridge, Clark Kent Ervin, Theodore Olson or David
>> Aufhauser to name a few. They all are now free agents and in the same
>> hot water as your buddy and now you.
>> I emailed ya, blogged ya, called ya and am now telling some your
>> friends plus a few of mine for good measure. Under Title 18 of the
>> federal code you are all as guilty as everyone else if you don't get
>> honest real fast. Ask Frank Quatronne and Martha Stewart about email
>> evidence in federal court
>> In light of the reasons I was falsely imprisoned and what I had sent
>> you dudes the year before it makes Cato's work in "Go Directly to
>> Jail: The Criminalization of Almost Everything." a total bullshit
>> piece of work. It is my job to properly shame you bastards so that
>> nobody will take you seriously ever again.
>>
>> "At one time, the sanction of the criminal law was reserved for
>> serious, morally culpable offenders. But during the past 40 years, an
>> unholy alliance of tough-on-crime conservatives and anti-big-business
>> liberals has utterly transformed the criminal law. Today, while
>> violent crime often goes unpunished, Congress continues to add new,
>> trivial offenses to the federal criminal code. With more than 4,000
>> federal offenses on the statute books, and thousands more buried in
>> the Code of Federal Regulations, it is now frighteningly easy for
>> American citizens to be hauled off to jail for actions that no
>> reasonable person would regard as crimes. At the same time, rampant
>> federalization and mandatory minimum sentencing are making America’s
>> criminal justice system ever more centralized and punitive. The result
>> is a labyrinthine criminal code, a burgeoning prison population, and
>> often real injustice. Go Directly to Jail examines those alarming
>> trends and proposes reforms that could rein in a criminal justice
>> apparatus at war with fairness and common sense."
>> If you dudes do not want me to turn up after being invited please let
>> me know why in writing and introduce me to the lawyer I will be
>> arguing someday in court.
>> David R. Amos
>> 153 Alvin Ave.
>> Milton, MA 02186
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: dante17678@hotmail.com
>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:20 AM
>> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: rjvattuone@aol.com
>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:04 AM
>> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: lsewell@canadians.org
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:27 AM
>> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: jeffryhouse@hotmail.com
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:03 AM
>> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Jack Layton ;
>> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
>> Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ;
>> macaul1@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
>> Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
>> david.anderson1@sk.sympatico.ca
>> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:12 PM
>> Subject: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> I got a better one for ya Petey Boy. "Thar she blows". I bet Belinda
>> is really pissed off at everybody and is letting off some steam. If I
>> were you I would start bailing out of your new party like any other
>> rat that would desert a sinking ship. That is one boat that could
>> never float. The way you back stabbed your way into its creation will
>> likely never be forgotten. Some of the new Senators Martin just
>> appointed proved that didn't they? Right now you are just hanging on
>> and kissing Harper's arse because nobody else will ever trust you in
>> their Dory except maybe the diddler, Billy Matthews. He is used to
>> turningcoat and needs help bailing out his punky little craft. I think
>> the liberals are tired of him by now and Johnny Crosbie is likely
>> pretty pissed at him too. I think you two dudes should be good company
>> for each other as everybody else tries to distance themselves from a
>> couple of cry babies that call themselves Maritimers. You were born
>> there alright but a lair lawyer and a nasty old diddler reflect poorly
>> upon the rest of us. But bad apples fall from the best of trees. The
>> sooner the better so that they don't suck the sap out of the good
>> ones.
>> Dare to argue me Petey Boy? I am ten times meaner with no temper than
>> the man that pitches silly fits kicks chairs. I would kick your arse
>> in a good debate. I would laugh if you asked me to step outside, head
>> for the door and quit talking immediately in a sincere effort to kick
>> your arse in the street. Win or lose, rest assured I would have fun.
>> Fighting is a true Maritime tradition. EH MacKay? Feel free to try to
>> call me a liar. Everybody knows it would be a case of the pot trying
>> to call the kettle black.
>>
>> "The Nova Scotia MP described his relations with Conservative Leader
>> Stephen Harper as "hunky-dory, everything's great - that's a good
>> Maritime phrase."
>> Forwarded Message
>>
>> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:14:47 -0800 (PST)
>>
>> From: David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> Subject: Attn Don Amos
>>
>> To: MEC.investors@magnaent.com, dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca,
>> smay@pattersonpalmer.ca
>>
>> As I stated within an earlier email, Scott Daruty finally called me
>> back and pissed me off. He picked the wrong guy to try and toy with. I
>> will take up my concerns with Magna byway of Daruty and Cellucci down
>> here in the Yankee courts. I have much proof of what I sent Belinda
>> Stronach long before she ever became a Member of Parliament up home. I
>> will deal with her in a political fashion first to see if she is
>> interested in up holding the public trust while protecting her
>> interests in Magna. Good luck with your conscience as a lawyer named
>> Amos as you check my work. Here is my phone number 506 434-1379
>> begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 506 434-1379
>> end_of_the_skype_highlighting if you have any questions before
>> deciding whether or not to uphold the law and protect the investor's
>> interests in Magna from my necessary civil actions. I gave my material
>> to Argeo P. Cellucci in Canada in July of 2002 before I sent the
>> Sheriffs out with my first complaints. I know by the fax numbers at
>> the top of my first complaint that it was Ashcroft and Cellucci that
>> directed the US Attorney to try to make my complaints evaporate. Now
>> that Cellucci speaks for Magna and Belinda speaks for Canadians there
>> is a couple of Amos boys that should have along talk about many
>> things. But forget trying to label me as your brother until I am
>> assured of your integrity. I have a high contempt towards lawyers and
>> their sense of ethics for very justifiable reasons.
>>
>> Note: forwarded message attached.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
>> kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; danthebagelman@msn.com ; info@electtomobrien.com ;
>> lcampenella@ledger.com ; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
>> Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
>> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ;
>> Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us ; dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ;
>> MEC.investors@magnaent.com
>> Cc: zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ;
>> thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ;
>> martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ;
>> Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ;
>> Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
>> johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
>> McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
>> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ;
>> INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca
>> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:14 PM
>> Subject: Shame on you Della
>>
>>
>> At least I am a man of my word. I called you personally as I stated I
>> would. I have the record of the call that I was directed to do by your
>> boss, Stevey Boy May. Too bad you would not speak to me to protect
>> your own interests. At least I have your signature because no word
>> from you is worthless to me. You can never claim ignorance of my
>> concerns after directing me to your lawyer. I stuck my hand out to you
>> as a layman but you had picked your friends the lawyers and had
>> enlisted them to bite it? Do you really Think I am afraid of dealing
>> with the likes of Johnny Crosbie and Stevey Boy May when I am
>> preparing a lawsuit against the likes of John Edwards, John Ashcroft
>> and Theodore Olson to name a few? Plus there is the irrefutable fact
>> that you and the law firm you work for have already admitted that you
>> are aware of the crimes practiced against me. You have done nothing to
>> uphold the law and have already filed the evidence of that fact in the
>> Newfoundland Supreme Court. Lady, either I or my estate will bankrupt
>> you and your firm with its own sworn testimony that you witnessed. You
>> can take that to the bank. The first question I must ask you Della
>> what did your law fir do with its copy of the police surveillance tape
>> # 139 and did you listen to it? You should not have because you are
>> not an officer of the court nor are you employed by law enforcement.
>> The Lieutenant Governor Roberts notified me that he had given his
>> copies of the material to Tommy Marshall to be investigated but I have
>> received no word from your law firm as to what the hell they did with
>> their copies. Have your lawyers explain their integrity to you because
>> you and I will never come to an understanding of ethical behavior
>> after your treatment of me today. I often sing the praises of Newfys
>> because they are amongst the nicest folks on the planet excepting of
>> course their lawyers and their cohorts such as you Della. By the way I
>> heard about the clerks in Supreme Court having a little wager over who
>> buys lunch if I managed to do what I said I would do. I would like to
>> meet the lady who felt I was as serious as a heart attack and willing
>> to buy lunch if I was not a man of my word. I would love to buy her
>> lunch some time because the courts need more folks like her in their
>> employment. She clearly did not disregard the word of a common man.
>> On the other hand after our exchange of the mere few words today it
>> would not be wise for me to trust your word or typing if I had left
>> the voicemail you desired. I have much evidence of many edited
>> transcripts of things I have said in the past. You and I will argue
>> them some day no doubt byway of your lawyer friends because I think
>> you don't speak pro se very well in order to protect your personal
>> interests. I just got off the phone with one of Frank Stronach's
>> Yankee lawyers Scott Daruty. He did me the service of really pissing
>> me off today by finally calling me back after I had torn a piece off
>> of Magna in Canada about his neglect of duty on their behalf. He
>> thought he was funny by joking that the Canadian lawyer, Don Amos was
>> my brother. No lawyer is a brother of mine. He thought I was joking
>> when I told him I would sue him personally if he did not uphold the
>> law and rat out Magna's brand new Vice President his brother, Argeo P.
>> Cellucci so I had to repeat myself so he would understand me in no
>> uncertain terms. I do make a lot of jokes about very serious business
>> however it would not be wise to underestimate my sincerity and attempt
>> to toy with me. I enjoy a good fight win or lose as long as I stand on
>> the right side of the battle. You just picked a fight with me lady on
>> a day when I ain't taking prisoners from lawyers or their cohorts. All
>> lawyers are liars and I have proven it. It is only laymen I will
>> settle with from now on and only if they tell the truth, the whole
>> truth and nothing but the truth.
>> I don't care if your god helps you or not. We can all do it again in
>> hell for all I care.
>> From now on I must rely on hard copy of my own creation. For now I
>> will send you and Stevey Boy a bunch of emails that have been
>> forwarded to many other people first. I require the record of doing
>> so. Whereas I have no doubt Stevey Boy will wan to argue about the
>> emails I have already sent I figure why not be hung for a cow as a
>> calf? Since everything in heaven and hell is done in threes. I will
>> forward to Magna's lawyer, Don Amos, Stevey Boy and three large emails
>> that contain Tiff files. There is no need to be redundant with hard
>> copy already sent to Scott Daruty and Johnny Crosbie. You can tell the
>> folks at Patterson Palmer who directed you to offend me that the
>> emails contain exactly the same documents that Greg Byrne and Johnny
>> Crosbie received and that you should all prepare to argue every word
>> within in them. The first email contains a file called Big Day. It
>> contains every document I served upon Two Solicitors Generals Theodore
>> Olson and Anne McLellan before I ran for Parliament and Olson quit his
>> job on June 24th immediately after Johnny Crosbie told Stevey Harper
>> to shut up about the Arar Inquiry. the second file is called Big
>> Canada Add and it is a copy of the documents served upon my political
>> opponents while running for Parliament. Last but not least are what
>> was added to the first to pile of documents and then served upon
>> Patterson and Palmer by way of Greg Byrne.
>> Scott Daruty is receiving the documents within "Big Day" and other
>> interesting material that Magna should find quite interesting to say
>> the least. Magna really made my day when they appointed Cellucci and
>> their new VP. I is comical that he is going to lobby the government
>> about horse racing especially after listening to what is recorded on a
>> lot of the tapes and the fact that the top dog of the RCMP had to
>> teach that dumb Yankee how to ride a horse last summer so that he
>> would not make an ass out himself at the Calgary Stampede. This was
>> almost as rich as when Martin sent Franky McKenna to Washington after
>> he and I had a spit and chew about dogs and pork. At least I am clever
>> enough to realize when I am a lucky man and how to make the best out
>> of a golden opportunity to see that justice is served upon some very
>> nasty bastards. I am very pissed off but still having more fun than
>> ten men. I love cornering lawyers and listening to them stutter and
>> try to duck the issues. I will wager that you are having a bad day
>> too. EH Della? It looks good on you if you are. Why not get mad? I
>> hope you share your anger with the others at Patterson and Palmer and
>> start bitchin about me. Never forget all I want is the truth from you.
>> It will cost you nothing. Why do you want to stand with crooks and
>> liars for a days pay? I bet you have witnessed lots of dirty dealings.
>> I truly beleive that there is no honour in your work. To me working
>> for lawyers is like a lady being sent to a nunnery in Medieval times.
>> I share ol Shake's opinion of such a place. Times changes nothing
>> lawyers still work for Jesuits. Look around downtown St John's and
>> call me a liar. I dare ya. Even the name of the town says it all.
>> Cya'll in Court:)
>> David R. Amos
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
>> kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; danthebagelman@msn.com ; info@electtomobrien.com ;
>> lcampenella@ledger.com ; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
>> Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
>> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ;
>> Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us ; dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com
>> Cc: zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ;
>> thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ;
>> martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ;
>> Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ;
>> Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
>> johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
>> McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
>> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ;
>> INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca
>> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:33 AM
>> Subject: RE: Me versus Patterson and Palmer
>>
>>
>> Hey Della,
>> I see that Stevey Boy is on vacation and told me to contact you. I am
>> happy to hear that he is saving all of my emails in a special spot for
>> some apparent future litigation. I keep very good records as well and
>> look forward to his argument but I will wager that I sue him first.
>> I see by the following Affidavit you witnessed and Stevey Boy filed in
>> court that every lawyer within Patterson Palmer is a flat out liar. I
>> served Greg Byryne in Fredericton myself with witnesses before Byron
>> Prior served everyone else in Newfoundland. If Byrne did not share the
>> info with his buddy Johnny Crosbie, it is not my fault. Yet I suspect
>> that he did so out of the gate because he sent me an email in which it
>> appears that he was conferring with many others about me and my
>> concerns. It was too funny that Byrne clicked the wrong button and
>> forwarded his email to me as well.
>> I also sent many of your people the same emails that I sent to Byrne
>> and May as soon as I got out off jail last October and Stevey Boy
>> first contacted Byron Prior and I had called him. (Thank you for
>> making a transcript of my voicemail and filing it in court for me. It
>> is quite hard for me to make lawyers even admit that I exist) Some of
>> the aforesaid emails were responded to by other members of your law
>> firm byway of their computers like Stevey Boy's just did. At least
>> computers are far more honest than the lawyers that own them. I am
>> compelled to rely on the integrity of their machines and the ability
>> of their computers and mine to keep perfect records. (Never forget I
>> am being prosecuted for sending an email to a lawyer I have been
>> litigating against for years who even went as far to fraudulently
>> create a document bearing my signature) Because of the fact I can
>> prove contact with many members of the law firm you work for, they can
>> never say that they did not know of my concerns and allegations long
>> before Stevey complained of Byron Prior's actions on behalf of his
>> client Billy Matthews. He only went forward with his malicious threat
>> when he thought my goose was cooked down here. There is quite simply
>> no way you could have prepared his filing on January 21st and he had
>> Judge green sign it in the time between Byron had served it and the
>> Judge signed it without the Bastards reading our private emails and
>> listening to our phone calls. I sent the last email containing the
>> words to Byron's counterclaim just before I went to court that morning
>> and he only managed to see it filed by 3 PM Newfy time. You may be a
>> fast typists but the courts don't work that fast unless they are
>> covering up something big time. No know as well as I that is true
>> because the judge and Stevey Boy do not even want other lawyers to
>> view the public record. Small wonder he took a vacation. If Stevey Boy
>> has any semblance of a conscience he no doubt has trouble dealing with
>> himself. I can only wonder if he and Johnny Crosbie are singing for
>> more tequila right now.
>> As you no doubt know I am preparing to defend myself in a criminal
>> trial in the USA and filing some rather profound civil lawsuits in
>> Canada and the USA that will make the whining of Billy Matthews in
>> Newfoundland Supreme court seem rather comical. I will be filing
>> copies of the documents you no doubt helped create for Stevey Boy May
>> on behalf of your law firm in many courts.
>> If Greg Byrne, the former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
>> New Brunswick had acted ethically last September while I was in Canada
>> and under Brad Green's jurisdiction I would not have been falsely
>> imprisoned in the USA the following month. I will be suing him, your
>> law firm and many others for personal injury and conspiracy to cover
>> up the many crimes practiced against my Clan and I. My question to
>> you, Della is why don't I sue you too? As you can see if you have read
>> my work my battle is with corrupt lawyers not layman. I would settle
>> with you in a heartbeat for costs if you would be honest about all
>> that you know to be true. If you decide to go against me I suggest
>> that you seek legal counsel outside of your law firm or in fact all of
>> Newfoundland. I am about to take on every damned lawyer within the
>> Newfoundland law Society. You would not be wise to doubt me before you
>> have a look at my work in the USA. I will deal with Newfys under the
>> heading of fun after I have embarrassed the Yankees.
>> I will give you a call as Stevey Boy suggests so that at least you can
>> understand that I am not an unreasonable person and not the sort of
>> person that lawyers claim that I am. I am just a simple, sincere and
>> serious man that refuses to play the wicked games lawyers play. I am
>> willing to die in order to expose the truth. No lawyer can say that.
>> they love money to much to be willing to miss the chance to spend it.
>> Judge me for yourself and your own best interests before you choose
>> whom to stand with.
>> Whether you believe me or not I am battling for your rights as well as
>> my own. I am forwarding this email to many ordinary people like you
>> and me. To Hell with the lawyers and politicians. They do what they do
>> for personal gain not public service. Their concerns are lucre not
>> justice and everybody knows it. All I did was go to great lengths to
>> prove it. There is no need for you and I to argue about simple truths.
>> As far as I am concerned up until the time you received this email all
>> you have done is type things and witness signatures. However you
>> cannot say that anymore.
>> My pending phone call to you is not harassment. I need the Yankee
>> phone bill record of my call to you in order to assist in the defence
>> of my freedom in the USA. Stevey Boy told me to call ya. Please be
>> nice. After today you can't say that you are not involved in my false
>> imprisonment in the USA. I am doing no more or less than Stevey Boy
>> and his malicious clients would do if the same thing had happened to
>> them. If Billy Matthews had been summoned to the USA while he was
>> running for his seat in Parliament to be presecuted by an unsigned
>> criminal complaint and then held without bail under the charges of
>> "other", he would be more pissed off than I am.
>> Cya'll in Court:)
>> David R. Amos
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "May, Steve"
>> To: "David Amos"
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:32 PM
>> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Dan and Tom Remember me
>>
>>
>> Mr. May is out of the office till 11 April 2005. He will not be
>> checking his e-mail. Please contact Della Hart at 709-570-5527
>> begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 709-570-5527
>> end_of_the_skype_highlighting or dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca if you
>> require immediate assistance.
>>
>>
>> 2005 01 T 0010
>> IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
>> TRIAL DIVISION
>> BETWEEN:
>> WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
>> AND:
>> BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
>>
>> AND BETWEEN:
>> BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>> SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENTCourt File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of
>> Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or
>> Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed
>> relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
>> to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of
>> the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety,
>> and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose
>> in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike
>> portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its
>> entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
>> A F F I D A V I T
>>
>> I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of
>> Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
>> as follows:
>>
>> THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER
>> solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
>> Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.
>>
>> THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
>> about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
>> Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
>> publication called “My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
>> with a Secret”. In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
>> Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
>> mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.
>>
>> THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
>> Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “1" to my
>> Affidavit.
>>
>> THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
>> received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
>> as Exhibit “2".
>>
>> THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
>> an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
>> was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit “3" to my Affidavit.
>> Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
>> that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
>> firm closed our file.
>>
>> THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
>> following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
>> allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
>> approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
>> old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
>> accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
>> saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
>> of the material on the site.
>>
>> THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
>> the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
>> a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to
>> commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
>> web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “4"
>> to this Affidavit.
>>
>> THAT I attach as Exhibit “5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
>> voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
>> of Mr. Prior.
>>
>> THAT I attach as Exhibit “6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
>> from Mr. Amos.
>>
>> THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr.
>> Amos.
>>
>> THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
>> e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
>> of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’
>> claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as
>> Exhibit “7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
>> to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
>> whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
>> the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
>> as Exhibit “8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
>>
>> THAT I attach as Exhibit “9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
>> addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
>> Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
>> Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
>> Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
>> Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
>> Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
>> letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
>> received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
>> representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
>> letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
>> his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered
>> his reply to Mr. Amos.
>>
>> THAT I attach as Exhibit “10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
>> Sunday, 23 January 2005.
>>
>> THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
>> Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.
>>
>>
>> SWORN to before me at
>> St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
>> and Labrador this 24th day of
>> January, 2005.
>>
>>
>> Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
>> STAMP
>> DELLA HART
>> A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
>> the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
>> My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
>> The Conservatives in Canada have very Punky Dory EH Tommy Boy?
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:26 PM
>> The Cato dudes ain't got nothin on me when it comes to letter writing.
>> Here is where I am teasing abunch of dumb Yankees. The whole world
>> calls our Newfys dumb. So what does that say of Danny williams the
>> Premier? He is a Rhodes Scholar that works for free. Is he dumb or
>> evil? I will have to ask the Aspen Dudes have I attend Tommy's little
>> hoe down EH?
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:38 PM
>> http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2005/03/former_dhs_insp.html#comments
>> HMMM no link we will try this way ok?
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:40 PM
>> I'm very proud to have had such a person as David Amos, help us with
>> our fight and the legal work. I will never be able to repay him.Thank
>> you David.
>> Byron Prior
>>
>> Posted by: Byron Prior at August 21, 2005 10:59 PM
>> keno hot spot califorina lottery odds of wining keno sandles
>> http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/win_at_keno.html keno paypal card keno
>> http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/daily_keno_wining_odds.html and ....
>> california state keno odds information ohayou - keno mp
>> http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/free_keno_clip_art.html keno satisiken
>> free keno http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/keno_twins.html keno outdoor
>> theatres keno casino_html
>> http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/keno_pattern.html .Thanks.
>>
>> Posted by: wildball keno at December 23, 2005 10:46 PM
>> This is great stuff! I can't wait to see how things end for David! An
>> "edge of the seat" and "mile a minute" thriller with unsuspected
>> twists and turns! Keep up the good work! When it comes to writing
>> fictional thrillers with international intrigue and betrayals, John
>> LeCarre has met his match. Love it!
>>
>> Posted by: MFH at January 24, 2006 02:05 PM
>> Post a comment
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:35:16 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: I called the crook from Calgary Jason Kenney to remind
>> him of the documents his office recieved from during the election of
>> the 40th Parliament
>> To: breitg@parl.gc.ca, hollam@parl.gc.ca, Mourani.Ma@parl.gc.ca,
>> wrzesb@parl.gc.ca, Kania.A@parl.gc.ca, McColeman.P@parl.gc.ca,
>> gloves@parl.gc.ca, rick@ricknorlock.ca, macked@parl.gc.ca,
>> Desnoyers.L@parl.gc.ca, rathgb0@parl.gc.ca, SECU@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: zorroboy2009@hotmail.com, tony@peoplestandup.ca,
>> waterwarcrimes@gmail.com, whistleblower ,
>> "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca", vickiconrad
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 19:33:09 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: I called the crook from Calgary Jason Kenney to remind
>> him of the documents his office recieved from during the election of
>> the 40th Parliament
>> To: peter.teasdale@gov.ab.ca, larry.stein@gov.ab.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:52:15 -0300
>> Subject: I called the crook from Calgary Jason Kenney to remind him of
>> the documents his office recieved from during the election of the 40th
>> Parliament
>> To: kennej@parl.gc.ca, godiny , toewsv1
>> , Mackap , robin reid
>> , "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca"
>> , tony ,
>> WaterWarCrimes , "Wayne.Lang"
>> , "John.DeWinter"
>> , billestabrooks
>>
>> Cc: pm , "info@gg.ca", info
>> , info , IgnatM
>> , LaytoJ
>>
>> His snotty help picked a very bad day to play games with me EH Vic
>> Toews? Although Kenney never cared about my human rights as he laughed
>> while i was falsely imprisoned and my children were sexualy harassed
>> and threatened at least he cannot deny receiving my documents twice
>> thanx to an ethical government computer EH stevey boy Harper?
>>
>> http://www.jasonkenney.ca/EN/contact_jason/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Minister
>> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:39:27 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Sept 23rd is coming fast for another Yankee War Resister
>> eh Mr Harper?
>> To: David Amos
>>
>>
>>
>> La version française suit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This is an automatic acknowledgement of your e-mail addressed to the
>> Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism.
>>
>>
>>
>> If this is a request for case information, the responsibility placed
>> on us by the Privacy Act to protect all personal information precludes
>> us from responding using e-mail unless we are able to verify that you
>> are entitled/authorized to receive the case specific information. In
>> this respect, if you are the applicant and you provide us with your
>> full name, date of birth, and a file number or Citizenship and
>> Immigration Canada (CIC) client ID, or you are a person to whom we are
>> authorized to release information (written consent on the citizenship
>> or immigration file) and are able to provide the applicant's full
>> name, DOB and the file number or CIC client ID, you will receive a
>> reply by e-mail within 10 - 30 working days. If you are not the
>> applicant or you are not authorized to receive the information, you
>> will not receive a further reply to your e-mail. Please note that we
>> will not respond to e-mails concerning the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> * Assessment of points/qualifications.
>> * Calculation of time for citizenship eligibility, visit
>> www.cic.gc.ca/english/e-services/index.asp .
>> * Refusal of an application by immigration or visa officials.
>> * Complaints about the Call Centre (will be sent to CIC officials for
>> necessary action/information).
>> * Processing of Permanent Resident Cards (will be sent to the
>> Permanent Resident Card Processing Centre for necessary
>> action/information).
>> * Processing of Citizenship applications (will be sent to the Case
>> Processing Centre in Sydney).
>> * Requests to expedite processing of cases (will be sent to the
>> processing office).
>> * Travel documents/requirements for travel to other countries.
>> * Complaints about U.S. Immigration.
>> * Issuance of Canadian passports (please consult www.passportcanada.gc.ca
>> ).
>> * Canadian citizens outside Canada seeking assistance (please consult
>> www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca ).
>> * Opinions about recent announcements/news releases/cases.
>> * Information about visiting, living, working or studying in Canada
>> (please consult www.cic.gc.ca ).
>> * Information about services in Canada
>> (www.goingtocanada.gc.ca/index.aspx)
>> * Requests to confirm the legitimacy of a lawyer, consultant or
>> organization.
>> * Requests for employment with the federal government (please consult
>> http://jobs-emplois.gc.ca).
>> * Complaints about consultants (Please visit www.csic-scci.ca )
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that e-mail is not a secure channel of communication. CIC
>> is not liable for the unauthorized disclosure of personal information
>> to or the misuse of that information by a third party where we took
>> reasonable means to verify the identity of the party.
>>
>>
>>
>> For more information about CIC, please visit one of the following sites.
>>
>>
>>
>> * General information - visit www.cic.gc.ca
>> * For the Call Centre, please visit
>> www.cic.gc.ca/english/contacts/call.asp
>> .
>> * For a list of visa offices, please visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/offices/missions.asp
>> .
>> * Application forms - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/applications/index.asp .
>> * Permanent Resident Card - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/pr-card/index.asp.
>> * Sponsor your family - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/sponsor/index.asp
>> .
>> * Immigrating to Canada - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/index.asp
>> .
>> * Refugees - visit http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugees/index.asp .
>> * Citizenship - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/citizenship/index.asp
>> .
>> * Announcements/News Releases - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/index.asp.
>>
>>
>>
>> For on-line services provided by CIC such as a change of address or to
>> check your application status, visit
>> www.cic.gc.ca/english/e-services/index.asp.
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> Ceci est un accusé de réception automatique au courriel que vous avez
>> acheminé au Ministre de la Citoyenneté, de l'Immigration et du
>> Multiculturalisme.
>>
>> Si ce courriel concerne une demande de renseignements sur l'état
>> d'avancement d'un dossier, nous devons souligner que la Loi canadienne
>> sur la protection des renseignements personnels interdit la
>> transmission d'information personnelle par voie électronique à moins
>> que nous ne soyons en mesure de vérifier que vous êtes autorisé à
>> recevoir cette information. Ainsi, si vous êtes le demandeur principal
>> et que vous nous fournissez votre nom complet, votre date de naissance
>> et le numéro de dossier ou le numéro d'identité du client attribué par
>> Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada (CIC), ou si vous êtes une personne
>> autorisée à recevoir des renseignements (consentement écrit au dossier
>> d'immigration ou de citoyenneté) et que vous nous fournissez le nom
>> complet du demandeur, sa date de naissance et le numéro de dossier ou
>> le numéro d'identité du client attribué par CIC, vous recevrez une
>> réponse par courriel dans un délai de 10 à 30 jours ouvrables. Si vous
>> n'êtes pas le demandeur ou que vous n'êtes pas autorisé à recevoir de
>> l'information, nous ne donnerons pas suite à votre courriel. Prière
>> de noter que nous ne répondrons pas aux courriels concernant les
>> questions suivantes :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> · Évaluation des points/compétences.
>>
>> · Pour le calcul du temps de résidence pour présenter
>> une demande de citoyenneté, visitez l'adresse suivante :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/services-e/index.asp.
>>
>> · Refus d'une demande par les agents responsables d'un
>> bureau des visas ou d'un Centre d'immigration du Canada.
>>
>> · Plaintes concernant le télécentre (seront transmises
>> aux représentants de CIC pour suite à donner/information).
>>
>> · Traitement des cartes de résident permanent (les
>> demandes seront envoyées au Centre de traitement des demandes pour
>> suivi/information).
>>
>> · Traitement des demandes de citoyenneté (celles-ci
>> seront transmises au Centre de traitement des demandes de Sydney).
>>
>> · Demandes pour accélérer le traitement d'un dossier
>> (les demandes seront envoyées au bureau responsable).
>>
>> · Documents de voyages/exigences pour voyager dans
>> d'autres pays.
>>
>> · Plaintes concernant les Service d'immigration des Etats-Unis.
>>
>> · Délivrance des passeports canadiens (veuillez
>> consulter le site www.passeportcanada.gc.ca ).
>>
>> · Citoyens canadiens à l'extérieur ayant besoin d'aide
>> (veuillez consulter le site www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca ).
>>
>> · Commentaires ou vues sur les annonces et communiqués
>> du Ministre ou sur un cas.
>>
>> · Information générale pour visiter, étudier ou
>> travailler au Canada (veuillez consulter notre site au www.cic.gc.ca
>> ).
>>
>> · Information sur des services disponibles au Canada
>> (www.serendreaucanada.gc.ca/index.aspx).
>>
>> · Demandes de confirmation de la légitimité d'un
>> avocat, consultant ou organisme.
>>
>> · Demandes d'emploi avec le gouvernement fédéral
>> (veuillez consulter le site www.jobs-emplois.gc.ca).
>>
>> · Plaintes concernant les consultants, veuillez
>> consulter le site (www.csic-scci.ca/fr/ )
>>
>>
>>
>> Veuillez noter que le courriel n'est pas une voie de communication
>> protégée. CIC se décharge de toute responsabilité pour ce qui est de
>> la divulgation non autorisée de renseignements personnels à une tierce
>> partie ou de la mauvaise utilisation de ces renseignements par une
>> tierce partie s'il a pris des mesures raisonnables pour s'assurer de
>> l'identité de cette partie.
>>
>>
>>
>> Pour plus de renseignements sur notre ministère, visitez les sites
>> suivants :
>>
>> Information générale : www.cic.gc.ca
>>
>> Pour l'adresse du télécentre:
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/contacts/telecentre.asp
>>
>> Pour la liste des bureaux des visas à l'étranger :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/bureaux/missions.asp
>>
>> Formulaires de demande :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/demandes/index.asp
>>
>> Carte de résident permanent :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/carte-rp/index.asp
>>
>> Parrainer des membres de la famille :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/immigrer/parrainer/index.asp
>>
>> Immigrer au Canada : http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/immigrer/index.asp
>>
>> Réfugié : http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/refugies/index.asp
>>
>> Citoyenneté : http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/citoyennete/index.asp
>>
>> Annonces et communiqués récents du Ministre:
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/ministere/media/index.asp
>>
>>
>>
>> Pour effectuer un changement d'adresse ou pour vérifier l'état de
>> votre demande d'immigration, consultez les services en ligne à
>> l'adresse suivante :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/services-e/index.asp.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 04:09:14 -0300
>> Subject: Sept 23rd is coming fast for another Yankee War Resister eh Mr
> Harper?
>> To: "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca", Minister@cic.gc.ca,
>> Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, resisters@sympatico.ca,
>> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: nelsonresisters@gmail.com, montrealresisters@hotmail.com,
>> vlannon@pacificcoast.net, goresisters@gmail.com,
>> londonresisters@yahoo.ca, vanresisters@yahoo.ca,
>> laverne_mott@ao.uscourts.gov, Angus.C@parl.gc.ca,
>> Atamenenko.A@parl.gc.ca, Bell.C@parl.gc.ca, Bevington.D@parl.gc.ca,
>> Black.D@parl.gc.ca, Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca, Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca,
>> Chow.O@parl.gc.ca, Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca,
>> Crowder.J@parl.gc.ca, Cullen.N@parl.gc.ca, Davies.L@parl.gc.ca,
>> Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca, Julian.P@parl.gc.ca,
>> Marston.W@parl.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, Martin.T@parl.gc.ca,
>> Masse.B@parl.gc.ca, Mathyssen.I@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nash.P@parl.gc.ca, Priddy.P@parl.gc.ca, Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca,
>> Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> When do ya think one will ignore his dumb lawyer such as Jeffry House,
>> sprout some balls, print a pdf file and say my name?
>>
>> Before polling day would benefit all Canadains not just the wannabes and
>> the
>> wannabe Prime Ministers eh Jacky boy Layton? .
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> If your too chicken to print a pdf file perhaps you can watch Youtube
>> then
>> EH Jacky Boy Layton?
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ga2phTOe9es
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPkRu0dNPUc
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:16 PM
>> Subject: Maybe Corey Glass should contact me before Harper gives him the
>> boot EH? 506 756 8687
>> To: nelsonresisters@gmail.com, montrealresisters@hotmail.com,
>> vlannon@pacificcoast.net, goresisters@gmail.com,
>> londonresisters@yahoo.ca,
>> vanresisters@yahoo.ca
>> Cc: Minister@cic.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>> resisters@sympatico.ca
>>
>>
>> http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hyjp9Xz2qeSoFhQcp6NFNoe97D-Q
>>
>> His purported friend Lee Zaslofsky would not give me his contact
>> number for some strange reason i will never understand.
>>
>> I would lay odds that would have be different if I had been elected
>> in the last couple of elections or was player within one of the
>> established politcal parties. It certainly appears to me that fellow
>> concerned Canadian citizens don't count to American war protesters and
>> their outspoken supporters unless they are politcally connected EH
>> Mikey Ignatieff AKA Canada's Prince of Darkness south of the 49th?
>>
>> That said I cannot begin to try to help anyone unless they learn how
>> to help themselves and that starts with picking up the phone retuning
>> calls and answering emails. N'est Pas Stevey Boy Harper?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:17:23 -0300
>> Subject: Your tally of blogs about me to date dictates that maybe you
>> can inspire a war resister such as Corey Glass to contact me before
>> Harper gives him the boot.
>> To: danf@danf.net, pm@pm.gc.ca
>> Cc: irishmike02@yahoo.com, common_ills@yahoo.com, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
>> Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca, vancouvercatholicworker@yahoo.ca
>>
>> Like you everybody thinks I am a nut excepting of course Stevey Boy
>> Harper and the dummy Dion. They just flat out hate me. Nest Pas?
>>
>>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
>>
>>http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/05/david-amos-high-noon-email-to-ottawa.html
>>l
>>
>>http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/05/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-4.html
>>l
>>
>>http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>>l
>>
>>http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-2.html
>>l
>>
>>http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/03/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-1b.html
>>l
>>
>>http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/03/3rd-part-political-runs-in-maritimes.html
>>l
>>
>>http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/05/nfld-whistleblower-dodges-libel-charge.html
>>l
>>
>>http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/05/cow-mutilation-new-brunswick-landgrab.html
>>l
>

Pandemic restrictions are due for a rethink, civil liberties group says

At two-year mark, it's time for individuals to take more responsibility for managing risk, advocate says

A different stage of the pandemic

Canadian Civil Liberties Association looking to challenge Bill 38 amendment

Will begin with advocacy before litigation

Standing by decision

Charter challenge filed against N.L.'s travel restriction Bill 38

Kim Taylor challenges government after first being denied a visit home for her mother's funeral

Damage done

Rosellen Sullivan

Contact

With no cost and no risk to you, it’s worth making the call.

John Drover

1.709.576.2255

Meet John

LEGAL MEMBERSHIPS AND AFFILIATIONS

EDUCATION

John Drover

Trending Articles