---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:39:17 -0400
Subject: I just called the law offices of Guillaume Lavoie Ste-Marie and Karim Renno again RE The Bell and Rogers lawsuit against Lackman and my concerns about Justices Bell and Leblanc
To: ernesto@torrentfreak.com, andy@torrentfreak.com, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, graeme.mcphail@rci.rogers.com, service@drapeaulex.com, fguay@smart-biggar.ca, glavoiestemarie@smart-biggar.ca, Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, nick.moore@bellmedia.ca, jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, sfine@globeandmail.com, newsroom@globeandmail.ca, news@kingscorecord.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com, peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com, krenno@renvath.com, erichard@renvath.com, jean-pierre.blais@crtc.gc.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gikhouane@renvath.com, andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca
I must ask did anyone bother to study this portion of my email that I
sent earlier this week?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
On 8/3/17, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
>
> BTW Heres what I did next with my last email
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/08/the-sophia-harris-cbc-report-about.html
>
> Wednesday, 2 August 2017
> The Sophia Harris CBC report about the Anton Piller nonsense within
> the Bell and Rogers lawsuit in Federal Court against Adam Lackman
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 17:19:25 +0000
Subject: RE: The pdf files hereto attached forever prove that the RCMP, the US Treasury Dept, the latest NB AG Teddy Feming and Jacqueline Maarse know that Grant Thornton and KPMG were the auditors of the Brookline Savings Bank were I reported the fraud in 2003
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Darren Woroshelo Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:19:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Fwd: The pdf files hereto attached forever prove that the RCMP, the US Treasury Dept, the latest NB AG Teddy Feming and Jacqueline Maarse know that Grant Thornton and KPMG were the auditors of the Brookline Savings Bank were I reported the fraud in 2003
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I am currently absent on leave returning to work on Tuesday August 8 at 8:00 AM.
If your matter is with respect to the Fraser Fort George Advisory NCO, please contact S/Sgt. Charolotte PETERS at 250-692-7171 as she is the acting Advisory while I am away.
If your matter is with respect to the Staff Sergeant Major role I will get back to you upon my return on August 8 or if your matter is urgent reach out to SM Mike Procyk at 778-290-3838.
Cheers!
Staff Sergeant Darren Woroshelo
North District Advisory NCO
Fraser Fort George
4020 5th Avenue
Prince George, British Columbia V2M 7E7
darren.woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca / Tel: 250-561-3106 / Cell: 250-301-3101 / Fax: 250-561-3135
Sergent d'état-major Darren Woroshelo
S.-off. conseiller, District Nord
Fraser Fort George
4020 5th Avenue
Prince George, (Colombie-Britannique) V2M 7E7
darren.woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca / Tel: 250-561-3106 / Cell: 250-301-3101 / Fax: 250-561-3135
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Lavoie Ste-Marie, Guillaume" GLavoieSteMarie@smart-biggar.ca
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:54:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The Sophia Harris CBC report about the Anton Piller nonsense within the Bell and Rogers lawsuit in Federal Court against Adam Lackman
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your email. I am currently in Court and will be back in the office on August 3, 2017. I will have very limited access to my emails and may not be able to respond to your message in a timely manner. For immediate assistance, please call our office at 514-954-1500.
Kind regards,
Guillaume Lavoie Ste-Marie
Ceci est une réponse automatique à votre courriel.
Je vous remercie pour votre courriel. Je suis présentement en audition et serai de retour au bureau le 3 août 2017. J'aurai un accès très limité à mes courriels et je ne serai pas en mesure de vous répondre promptement. Si vous avez besoin d’assistance immédiate, veuillez joindre notre cabinet au numéro suivant: (514) 954-1500.
Cordialement,
Guillaume Lavoie Ste-Marie
---------- Original message ----------
From: Karim Renno krenno@renvath.com
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:53:42 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The Sophia Harris CBC report about the Anton Piller nonsense within the Bell and Rogers lawsuit in Federal Court against Adam Lackman
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Absence Alert
Please be advised that I will be out of the country from July 21 to August 6, 2017 and will have sporadic access to e-mail. For any emergency please contact my assistant Ghita Ikhouane at 514.937.1221 or gikhouane@renvath.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Message d'absence
Soyez avisé que je serai à l'extérieur du pays du 21 juillet au 6 août 2017 et aurai un accès sporadique à mes courriels. Pour toute urgence, prière de contacter mon adjointe Ghita Ikhouane au 514.937.1221 ou gikhouane@renvath.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)" hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:54:50 +0000
Subject: Accusé de réception / Acknowledge Receipt
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Mélanie Joly, ministre du Patrimoine canadien.
La ministre est toujours heureuse de prendre connaissance des commentaires de Canadiens sur des questions d'importance pour eux. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin.
Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre demande a été notée et qu'elle recevra toute l'attention voulue.
**********************
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Canadian Heritage.
The Minister is always pleased to hear the comments of Canadians on subjects of importance to them. Your email will be read with care.
If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and will be given every consideration.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 19:53:30 -0400
Subject: Re: The Sophia Harris CBC report about the Anton Piller nonsense within the Bell and Rogers lawsuit in Federal Court against Adam Lackman
To: ernesto@torrentfreak.com, andy@torrentfreak.com, "martine.turcotte"
Methinks Sophia Harris should review page 14 of one of pdf files
hereto attached ASAP N'esy Pas Minister Joly and Hubby Lacroix?
This was one of the pdf files attached
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
and this was the other
https://www.scribd.com/document/317811875/Melanie-Joly-vs-Hubby-Lacroix
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/tvaddons-piracy-rogers-bell-videotron-court-1.4231340
Cable giants step up piracy battle by interrogating Montreal software developer and searching his home
‘The whole experience was horrifying,’ TVAddons founder says of court-sanctioned search
By Sophia Harris, CBC NewsPosted: Aug 02, 2017 5:00 AM ET
Adam Lackman of Montreal is the defendant in a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by cable companies Bell, Rogers and Videotron. (Adam Lackman)
Canadian cable companies have ratcheted up their war on piracy by launching a new legal battle. The effort has already seen Bell, Rogers and Quebecor's Videotron search a Montreal software developer's home and interrogate him for more than nine hours.
"The whole experience was horrifying," says Adam Lackman, founder of TVAddons and defendant in a copyright infringement lawsuit launched by the television giants. "It felt like the kind of thing you would have expected to have happened in the Soviet Union."
Telecoms and content creators Bell, Rogers and Videotron began their piracy battle last year by filing a lawsuit against Canadian dealers who sell "free TV" Android boxes — devices that can be used to stream pirated content.
Now the companies are also targeting Lackman and TVAddons — a library of hundreds of apps known as add-ons. Once downloaded on the Android box or a computer with added software, some of the add-ons — such as Exodus and 1Channel — allow people easy access to pirated movies, TV shows and even live television.
Vincent Wesley shows off an Android box — a device that has this country's big cable companies very frustrated. (Vincent Wesley)
The suit includes a long list of programming allegedly made freely available via TVAddons including Bell's Game of Thrones and Rogers' Sportsnet.
In his defence, Lackman argues TVAddons doesn't host pirated content but instead connects users to sources already available online, so it serves as nothing more than a search engine.
Home visit
On June 9, the telecoms got an Anton Piller order, a civil search warrant that gives a plaintiff access to a defendant's home, without notice, to search for and seize relevant evidence before it can be destroyed.
A Federal Court judge would later declare the Anton Piller order in this case "unlawful," but that was weeks after a group of men arrived at Lackman's door at 8 a.m. on June 12.
Lackman says the group included a bailiff, two computer technicians, an independent counsel and a lawyer representing Bell, Rogers and Videotron.
- Cable giants step up battle against 'free TV' Android box
- Android box dealers lose court appeal to lift sales ban
According to court documents, the group stayed for 16 hours and the plaintiffs' lawyer and independent counsel interrogated Lackman for more than nine hours. He was given a break for dinner and to speak to his lawyer, who was present.
Lackman was "not permitted to refuse to answer questions" and his lawyer wasn't permitted to counsel him in his answers.
"Any time I would question the process, they would threaten me with contempt of court proceedings," says Lackman.
Besides seizing personal items such as his computer and phone, Lackman says the plaintiffs' lawyer and independent counsel forced him to hand over passwords for his email and social media accounts.
Order 'null and void'
But on June 29, Lackman had reason to be hopeful he'd get his possessions back after a Federal Court judge declared the Anton Piller order "null and void" and that all seized items be returned.
According to court documents, the judge said the search was supposed to be conducted between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. but instead lasted until midnight.
The judge also said the defendant was treated unfairly during the interrogation and wasn't offered "any of the protections normally afforded to litigants in such circumstances."
He added that "the most egregious part of the questioning" was when the plaintiffs' lawyer asked Lackman to spill information about other people running operations similar to TVAddons.
TVAddons consists of a library of hundreds of apps known as add-ons, some of which can be used to stream pirated content. (TVAddons/Twitter)
He also concluded that the plaintiffs' legal team used the order to try to shut down TVAddons.
"I am of the view that its true purpose was to destroy the livelihood of the defendant, deny him the financial resources to finance a defence to the claim made against him," the judge wrote.
"The defendant has demonstrated that he has an arguable case that he is not violating the [Copyright] Act," the judge continued, adding that by the plaintiffs' own estimate, only about one per cent of Lackman's add-ons were allegedly used to pirate content.
No returns
However, Lackman's belongings still haven't been returned. Nor can he access the TVAddons website or its social media accounts, which were also seized as part of the original order.
That's because Bell, Rogers and Videotron have appealed the court decision and a Federal Court of Appeal judge has ruled that until the appeal can be heard, Lackman will get nothing back.
The appeal judge said the issue isn't the fact the number of alleged copyright-infringing add-ons is small, but rather that TVAddons "targets a market of users seeking to knowingly access copyrighted materials without authorization."
The plaintiffs' law firm, Smart & Biggar, said it couldn't comment on the case at this point and that the appeal hearing will likely take place this fall.
As for Lackman, he plans to continue his defence. "At this point, there is no choice but to fight," he said in a written statement to CBC News.
To help pay the legal bills, he's trying to raise money on the fundraising site Indiegogo.
Lackman has also set up a new TVAddons website and Twitter account and tells CBC News his add-ons are still up and running.
1230 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Wendy Love
David Raymond Amos
@Wendy Love Methinks Adam Lackman and his lawyer need to talk to me ASAP.
Angus Stafford
@Wendy Love Not going to happen. Look up "Anton Pillar order."
Richard Mackay
@David Allan
I just read the link you posted and could you point to where the defendant's story doesn't is as you put it "somewhat hole-y."?
What is cant read from your link is that the search is just that a search, and from 8:00 to 20:00.
It makes no mention of having the power to "interrogate"
Now the courts declared the search null and void.
So where are the holes in his story?
The act clearly states 8:00 to 20:00
From the article:
"According to court documents, the judge said the search was supposed to be conducted between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. but instead lasted until midnight.
The act makes no mention of having the right to interrogate even less being charged with contempt of court for not answering questions!
From the article:
The judge also said the defendant was treated unfairly during the interrogation and wasn't offered "any of the protections normally afforded to litigants in such circumstances."
So it seems the cable companies and their lawyers use lies and intimidation to try and interrogate this man and I am guessing his lawyer did not know the actual powers of the act and the high price lawyer for the cable companies tried to trick their way into getting evidence!
So again I ask you to explain why you made your remarks?
I just read the link you posted and could you point to where the defendant's story doesn't is as you put it "somewhat hole-y."?
What is cant read from your link is that the search is just that a search, and from 8:00 to 20:00.
It makes no mention of having the power to "interrogate"
Now the courts declared the search null and void.
So where are the holes in his story?
The act clearly states 8:00 to 20:00
From the article:
"According to court documents, the judge said the search was supposed to be conducted between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. but instead lasted until midnight.
The act makes no mention of having the right to interrogate even less being charged with contempt of court for not answering questions!
From the article:
The judge also said the defendant was treated unfairly during the interrogation and wasn't offered "any of the protections normally afforded to litigants in such circumstances."
So it seems the cable companies and their lawyers use lies and intimidation to try and interrogate this man and I am guessing his lawyer did not know the actual powers of the act and the high price lawyer for the cable companies tried to trick their way into getting evidence!
So again I ask you to explain why you made your remarks?
David Raymond Amos
@Angus Stafford Perhaps you should read Judge Richard Bell's decision.
Montréal 21-JUN-2017 BEFORE The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell Language: B Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 14 on behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter reserved held in Court Senior Usher: Françoise Jacques Duration per day: 21-JUN-2017 from 09:30 to 05:25 Courtroom : Courtroom 306 - Montréal Court Registrar: Maxim Didkovski Total Duration: 1d Appearances: Me François Guay; Me Guillaume Lavoie St-Marie 514 954 1500 representing Plaintiff Me Éva Richard; Me Karim Renno; Me Hilal El Ayoubi 514 937 1221 representing Defendant Documents filed at hearing: 27 28 Comments: Hearing was recorded with DARS. During hearing parties for Court's convenience provided copies of the previously filed on the hearing of the June 9, 2017. As well as DARS recording of that hearing. All documents are part of the record already. Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 977 page(s) 234 - 244 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
Oral directions received from the Court: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell dated 01-JUL-2017 directing that "I have carefully considered the letter requesting a stay. I concluded the Anton Piller Order was overly broad and the Defendant subjected to improper questioning. In the circumstances I consider an ex parte stay would be inappropriate." placed on file on 01-JUL-2017 Confirmed in writing to the party(ies)
Do tell does CBC or Bell Canada recall when the Irving Media Empire
used KPMG and the Anton Pillar joke against the upstart newsrag in
Woodstock NB 10 years ago?
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/taking-on-the-irvings-and-winning/article1088742/
Taking on the Irvings (and winning)
GRANT ROBERTSON SAINT JOHN — Globe and Mail Update
Published Sunday, Nov. 04, 2007 10:32PM EST
Like a lot of Canadian towns, Woodstock, N.B., lays claim to a
bustling Tim Hortons, a scrappy junior hockey team and a busy rumour
mill. But in the past few weeks, the quiet enclave not far from the
U.S. border has become the site of a vitriolic newspaper war, pitting
one of the Maritimes' wealthiest families - the Irvings - against a
former employee determined to break their influence.
The second edition of the Carleton Free Press will hit the streets of
Woodstock this week, but already the new weekly - with a staff of 10
working out of a strip mall next to a pancake house - has become the
talk around town. And much of the attention stems from the accusations
being levelled against its publisher.
The feud between the incumbent Woodstock Bugle-Observer and the
upstart spilled into a Saint John courtroom Sunday after weeks of
mudslinging. Allegations of corporate espionage have led to
investigators with accounting firm KPMG being granted unprecedented
court clearance to search everything from the filing cabinets and
computer hard drives of former Bugle-Observer publisher Ken Langdon to
his wife's lingerie drawers.
Mr. Langdon quit his job with the Bugle-Observer last month, informing
its parent company, Brunswick News Inc., that he would soon be
starting a paper of his own in Woodstock. He had clashed with
executives over budgeting and recent financial performance of the
newspaper, one of more than a dozen papers the Irvings own in New
Brunswick, in addition to gas stations, oil refineries, lumber and a
host of other ventures.
In court documents and statements over the past few weeks, Irving
executives allege their former publisher took loads of key
confidential information on his way out the door, such as detailed
financial data, employee salary information and customer lists.
In its investigation, Brunswick News was granted a rare Anton Piller
order - believed to be the first in New Brunswick's history - which
allowed KPMG to move swiftly in searching Mr. Langdon's home to
confiscate files before they could potentially be destroyed.
Mr. Langdon said he was at the local Tim Hortons when he got a call
that investigators were on their way. He watched as they went through
his home, including sifting through his wife's lingerie. "It was
uncomfortable," he said in an interview at the new newspaper's
offices, which are adjacent to an Irving gas station.
Brunswick News sought - and won - a temporary injunction preventing
Mr. Langdon from personally soliciting advertisers, suppliers or staff
of the Bugle-Observer. It also asked for a permanent prohibition that
would keep him from negotiating with the top 15 advertisers in town,
from car dealerships to retailers, fearing he would use competitive
information against his old paper.
But Mr. Justice Peter Glennie lifted most of those restrictions
Friday, saying the public good from the creation of a new newspaper is
paramount, and keeping the Free Press from seeking out advertisers
would kill the enterprise.
Both sides hailed the ruling Sunday as a victory. In a province where
the Irving family controls most of the English-language newspapers,
and several French-language publications, Mr. Langdon said it was an
important win for newspaper competition.
A lawyer for Brunswick News said the company is not opposed to facing
a new rival, but the real issue is the data Mr. Langdon possessed. A
KPMG report provided to Brunswick News listed 64 pages of files he
allegedly downloaded.
"This case is not about competition with a new newspaper," Peter
Hutchison said outside court in Saint John. "It is about an employee
who has removed confidential information, who has solicited employees
to try to set up a competing business."
Mr. Langdon accuses the Irvings of trying to stamp out a potential
rival. For the past century, the Irving name has carried a reputation
for hard-nosed business strategies that either grind down rivals or
buy them out. It has allowed them to build one of Canada's biggest
private corporate empires.
Mr. Langdon's lawyers argued in court that the data KPMG found in his
possession was in his hands for three reasons: Some was left on the
drives of used computers he purchased from the company, while some was
a function of working from home, where he would often send information
to himself. The more recent downloads were collected to prepare
himself for a potential dismissal lawsuit with the company if he was
fired.
Brunswick News is already taking Mr. Langdon to court next month in a
separate suit, saying he breached his fiduciary duty by having this
data, and the firm may seek financial damages on the grounds it
allegedly has been harmed.
Mr. Langdon was with the Irving papers for 10 years. He ran an
advertising shopper that he sold to the Irvings and was eventually
made publisher of the Bugle-Observer. His biggest accomplishment
there, cited in affidavits, was taking the paper from a $118,000 loss
in 2003 to a $560,000 profit in 2006. He was offered one-year
severance for a three-year non-compete, but turned it down.
Circulation for the new paper is slightly more than 10,000.
Mr. Langdon's lawyers told the court that the data he possessed isn't
crucial to competing with the Irving papers. For example, thumbing
through the newspaper, then looking up phone numbers in the yellow
pages can easily compile a list of key advertisers.
Victor Mlodecki, vice-president of Brunswick News, argues Mr. Langdon
has essentially taken "the blueprint" for Irving's community
newspapers, and has information on the business plan for the coming
year.
"I don't mind competing with anyone," Mr. Mlodecki said at his office
in downtown Moncton. "But I don't want to compete with my own
newspaper across the street. He could literally replicate the entire
operation of the newspaper with the information he has."
http://www.smart-biggar.ca/contacts/GuillaumeLavoieSteMarie
Guillaume also has experience in managing large-scale multi-party
litigation and in seeking and executing complex extraordinary remedies
such as Anton Piller orders, interim and interlocutory injunctions,
Mareva injunctions and contempt orders before the Federal Court in
copyright and patent matters.
YEA RIGHT
Seems to mean old me that Judge Richard Bell disagrees with you and
Judge Leblanc N'esy Pas Danny Boy Drapeau?
Affidavit of Independent Supervising Solicitor Daniel S. Drapeau sworn
on 16-JUN-2017 on behalf of Independent Supervising Solicitor in
support of Motion Doc. No. 14 with Exhibits DSD-1 to DSD-13 filed on
16-JUN-2017
http://cordcuttersnews.com/now-know-happened-tvaddons-canadian-cable-companies-sized/
We Now Know What Happened to TVAddons (Canadian Cable Companies Sized It)
By Luke Bouma on August 1, 2017
We finally know who is behind the popular third-party Kodi add-on site
TVAddons and what happened to the site. Adam Lackman a Canadian
resident, today posted an update on his site TVaddons.
According to a TorrentFreak story and an Adam Lackman Indiegogo
fundraiser here is what happened.
What Happened When TVAddons Went Dark
On June 12, Adam Lackman, the owner of TVAddons, was the subject of an
Anton Pillar order in Canada. Anton Pillar orders are meant to
preserve evidence in civil lawsuits. During the execution of the
order, an independent (neutral) counsel overseeing the lawsuit,
performed a search and seizure of Adam’s premises that lasted a total
of 16 hours. His personal computer and other belongings were seized
including domain names and social media accounts that weren’t even
related to TV Addons. This all happened after a Canadian court
approved the Anton Pillar request.
Lackman was interrogated for nine hours and the domain names behind
TVAddons had been seized by the law firm behind the Anton Pillar
order.
On appeal, Lackman won an order to have everything returned to him;
however, Canadian cable companies appealed that ruling and won
allowing them to keep everything they took from Lackman.
So in Summary
Well the short end is TVAddons is being sued in the United States and
in Canada. According to Lackman he has already had $75,000 in legal
fees and is now looking to raise $250,000 to help pay his bills.
As of today the Canadian government’s appointed neutral law firm has
control of all TVAddons domains, computers, and any other files they
seized in the search of Lackman’s property.
According to the Canadian cable companies, they are going after
TVAddons because “Approximately 40 million unique users located around
the world are actively using Infringing Addons hosted by TVAddons
every month, and approximately 900,000 Canadian households use
Infringing Add-ons to access television content. The amount of users
of Infringing Addons hosted [by] TVAddons is constantly increasing,”
the complaint adds.
No date has been set for the next court hearing. For now the last
court appeal allows the Canadian law firm to keep everything they
found during the search of Lackman’s property until the nex hearing.
This raises the question if they will someday share that information
with the U.S. court case brought on by Dish Network.
Want to learn more? Check out the TorrentFreak story HERE.
About Luke Bouma
Luke Bouma graduated from Grand Valley State University and has spent
the last 3 years as a dedicated Cord Cutter. He has been featured as a
cord cutting expert for many publications like Wall Street Journal,
Maxim, Refinery29, and many more. He has also been a guest on Clear
Channel Radio to talk about Cord Cutting. Luke Bouma founded Cord
Cutters News, LLC back in 2014 and also writes for Mohu, Ting, and has
guest blogged for Roku.
Cord Cutters News, LLC
PO Box 11984
Killeen, TX 76547
Phone Number: (616) 606-0223
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Graeme McPhail
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:16:34 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Reply to David Raymond Amos from minister
Mélanie Joly
To: David Amos
?
I am out of the office until July 18 with no access to emails. If
your matter is urgent please call my assistant Renee Pelejo at (416)
935-2506.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:42:36 -0300
Subject: Yo George Cope I am still very curious if the lawyers Fred
Crooks and Maritine Turcotte have learned the meaning of the word
INTEGRITY yet?
To: george.cope@bell.ca, acampbell,
alyson.queen@bellaliant.ca, zeda.redden@bellaliant.ca,
karen.sheriff@bellaliant.ca, fred.crooks@bellaliant.ca,
sasha.irving@emera.com, James.Spurr@emera.com
Cc: martine.turcotte@bell.ca, "rick.hancox"
, bce@computershare.com,
david.rodenhiser@nspower.ca, "Bernard.LeBlanc"
, "kelly. lamrock",
"Bernard. Theriault", "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
, securities ,
"terry.seguin", "Edith. Cody-Rice"
, oig , krisaustin
, "David.ALWARD@gnb.ca",
"ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca", peacocrs
, "brigdit.leger",
lapoinjr, "Wayne.Lang"
----- Original Message -----
From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:28 AM
Subject: RE: I am curious
Mr. Amos,
I confirm that I have received your documentation.
There is no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself,
the documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in
the process of printing it.
I have asked one of my lawyers to review it in my absence and report
back to me upon my return in the office. We will then provide you with
a reply.
Martine Turcotte
Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
Tel: (514) 870-4637
Fax: (514) 870-4877
email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
Tel: (514) 870-4638
email: diane.valade@bell.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 6:12 AM
To: Turcotte, Martine (EX05453)
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca; W-Five@ctv.ca
Subject: I am curious
Madam
I did not receive a response from you to the last email so I am not
certain if you received it. I must inform you that I will be closing
my briefcase in Yahoo for public view at the end of the week. I have a
great deal of material to add and I only wish certain parties to view
it. I opened it for you the other day as an act of good faith. Mr.
Pozen can check my work in the dockets of the various courts around
Boston they are a matter of Public Record my files are not. As you can
see by this and some following emails. I am very busy dealing with
criminal matters first before filing civil complaints in the USA. As I
told you when you called a lot has been happening. I have made a lot
of cops mad at me and I don't trust them a bit particularly after the
Police Commission is willing to check their work so i have been busy
watching my back and covering my butt. However that does not mean that
I have not thought about our conversation and was curious about a few
things.
I was glad to receive your call and impressed by the fact that you
were more than willing to receive the material and a copy of the
wiretap tape in particular. Your stated willingness to uphold the law
was a rare statement to me. However I was curious why you only
mentioned my voicemail to Mr. Pozen and not the email to your company
and the news program that it owns. Did they not inform you as well? If
they didn't I am not surprised because I have some other rather
interesting denials from the Media. the most interesting would have to
be from the PBS program called Frontline when I introduced its
producer Michael Sullivan to the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan. Now
that is a story well worth W5 telling. Too bad they showed me their
ass. As a courtesy to you and a further act of good faith, I will not
forward this email to anyone else until after I return to the USA and
nothing has been resolved between BCE and I and I am compelled to name
it in my complaint. I would find it very hard to believe that Mr,
Pozen does not know everything he needs to know about me right now.
I had also called a lawyer, Steven Skurka who had a week long little
special on CTV . I had tried to inform him that I knew my rights his
assistant hollered at me. You from speaking to me yourself that I am
not a rude character. I found it too funny to be treated that way and
I had resolved to serve him this stuff byway of the local ATV Station
that had presented his smiling talking head to me. That is why I was
telling you that you could get this stuff from the local ATV station.
I found it quite strange that you did not rely on them to send it on
to you. Thus I must make an extra copy to comply with your request.
I know the date stamp on the forwarded email is incorrect but that is
because my old laptop goes to the first year in it when I boot up and
sometimes I am too busy or tired to bother changing it. However MSN
tracks it with the true date. Brad Smith and I have a bone to pick as
well and I have been checking his work rather closely since he ignored
my letter to him last year. His boss Bill Gates is gonna be very angry
and Brad Smith and Steve Balmer in the near future if I have anything
to do with it. If you do act ethically and immediately I will settle
with your company very cheaply in comparsion to the bottom lines of my
first two complaints. In fact I will be so impressed I will
immediatlely offer you a better job than the one you have now. Please
study the material I will provide you closely and ask me any thing you
wish.
I will do as I promised and send the material you requested as soon as
I can put it all together. Right now I am on the move and far away
from my printer. Is the following your correct address? Perhaps you
should consider sending someone to the my meeting with the Police
Commission in Fredericton next week in order to hear me speak of these
matters to law enforcement before I return to the USA. Once I do
return there I will serve the Mr. Pozen the material as promised and
call him to testify in my pending trial. The following emails should
explain some of my concerns to you. My wife will be in Canada next
week as well to pick up our kids. I will allow you to speak to her if
you wish. She has had a nervous breakdown over the legal crap and I do
have her Durable Power of Attorney pursuant to M.G.L. 201 B. Mr. Pozen
can ask Robert S. Creedon Jr. about that document. I argued it with
him before the entire Judicuary Commitee on Sept. 18th 2003.
I will call you in a minute to make certain that you get this and the
following emails.
David R. Amos
Martine Turcotte
1000 de la Gauchetiere Ouest
Floor 41
Montreal, Quebec H3B 58H Canada
Tel: (514) 870-4637
Fax: (514) 870-4877
For the Record I gave the Irving "Rag called the Gleaner" in Fat Fred
City and the CBC dudes in Toronto copies of the following lawsuits in
the USA in 2002 long before I gave some material to Bellglobemedia
byway of their W-Five yo yos. Clearly nobody knows how to read if they
don't think I ain't sued folks before EH?
Ask W-Five or their lawyers if I am a liar or not. Better yet ask
Stevey Boy Murphy or Andy Campbell in Fat Fred City if they dare to
chaleenge the truth. If all else fails and you bloggers seek counsel
you can trust why not ask Chucky Leblanc or your "Blogger General"
T.J. Burke he received the same documents on June 24th, 2004 the day
Danny boy Busierres and the Fat Fred City Finest attempted to banish
me from the LEG but it ain't worked out to well for them yet EH Chucky
Leblanc? However chucky was quick to report that I was banished the
following day and ain't said apeep about it since. Who to you think
told him not to talk about it? Kelly lamrock, T.J. Burke. the Irvings
or all three?
FYI W-Five took an interest in my matters at about the same time
Chretien's underling was calling Bush a moron.(I oftern call myself an
oxymoron Methinks somebody has been studing my words EH?) I supported
Chretein's underling's thinking in two affidavits demanding judgements
by default filed in the following dockets on December 12th, 2002.
The following day Cardinal Law (Methinks that is why chucky hates me
so) quit Beantown and ran off to the Holy See. Years later he helped
pick the latest Pope(a former Hitler Youth who is making his bones
with the croooked little Georgey Boy Bush Jr. right now in the USA.)
Never Forget the Queen is the protector of the Faith of the Church of
England . She would not allow her family's assests to be stolen and
given to the catholic Church. Why should I act any different?
----- Original Message -----
From: W-FIVE Viewer Mail
To: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: possble story
Dear Mr. Amos,
I would like to thank you for your email to W-FIVE, sorry for the
delay in responding.
We review every email and story idea that we receive here at W-FIVE
and give it serious consideration. Your email has been forwarded to
our executive and senior producer for review. If we are interested in
pursuing your idea further, you will be contacted by one of our
researchers.
Thanks again for your input. Your interest in our program is much
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Lisa-Marie
Production Coordinator
W-FIVE
-----Original Message-----
From: a friend of David Amos' email account
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:28 PM
To: W-FIVE@ctv.ca
Subject: possble story
I am a Canadian Citizen who thus far, as a plaintiff, has two Lawsuits
in the US District Court of Massachucetts they are numbered 02-11686-
RGS and 02-11687-RGS.
They were removed to that Court from the Norfolk Superior Court by the
US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan very improperly. However they shall
remain there because of my status as a Canandian Citizen. Judge Sterns
has not even held a Conference about the matters because he likely
does not want to hear the matter because I have presented all Members
of the Bar with their worst fear of a catch 22 problem.
Accordinging to law he is late. I have complained of 47 defendants 34
of whom are State Defendants( the Attorney General, The Commission of
Judicial Conduct Board of Bar Overseers etc) and 3 are Federal
Treasury Agents. Some of the defendants are over two months late in
their answer to the Summons.
The smallest suit amounts to 188 million dollars in the form of
relief. There is a lot to these matters and too much to briefly
explain. But in a nutshell my wife's Aunt, who is buried beside Rose
Kennedy, left my wife some money. It was stolen by her relatives in
executing the estate. No news there. But the crooks are very well
connected politically and every part of the old crony network in
Boston covered for them.
The crook and our cousin, Charles J. Kickham Jr of the Kickham Law
Office on Beacon St, has been past President of Bar Associations. He
has sat on the Board of Governors of Harvard Law School etc. I have
given much information to many members of the press who have simply
ignored some interesting facts.
What should be somewhat newsworthy is how far a wild colonial boy has
come in prosecuting Pro Se the most profund Yankee carpetbaggers. My
next two lawsuits Under title 18 are wickedly righteous. I have left
one copy of much information in Saint John New Brunswick at a lawyer's
Office, Mosher and Chedore 33 Charlotte St if some one wishes to view
them. I can be reached at this Cell number 506 434- 1379
David R. Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
Office of the Integrity Commissioner
Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
tel.: 506-457-7890
fax: 506-444-5224
e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
On 8/2/17, David Amos wrote:
> PROCEEDINGS QUERIES
> Recorded entry(ies) for T-800-17
> (Close)
>
> Court number information
> Court Number : T-800-17
> Style of Cause : Bell Canada et Al c. Adam Lackman et al
> Proceeding Category : Actions Nature : Copyright Infringement [Actions]
> Type of Action : Ordinary
>
> 70 records found for court number T-800-17
> Doc Date Filed Office Recorded Entry Summary
> - 2017-08-01 Montréal Lettre envoyée du greffe le 01-AOU-2017 à la
> partie défenderesse transmettant une copie de l'enregistrement
> audio-numérique, tel que demandé le 27 juillet 2017. Copie placée au
> dossier.
> - 2017-07-27 Montréal Demande d'une copie de l'enregistrement de la
> part de la partie défenderesse de l'audition entendue à Montréal le 21
> juin 2017. reçu(es) le 27-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-27 Montréal Lettre couverture de la partie défenderesse en
> date du 27-JUL-2017 concernant le doc. no 30 placée au dossier le
> 27-JUL-2017
> 32 2017-07-27 Montréal Preuve de signification électronique de la part
> de la défenderesse concernant la signification du document # 30
> Défense et demande reconventionelle déposé(e)(s) le 27-JUL-2017
> 31 2017-07-27 Montréal Consent on behalf of all parties to to extend
> the delay for serving and filling Défense et demande reconventionnelle
> of Adam Lackman (doc # 30) filed on 27-JUL-2017
> 30 2017-07-27 Montréal Défense incluant la demande reconventionnelle
> de la part de Adam Lackman f.a.s. TVADDONS.AG déposée le 27-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-13 Montréal Letter from Plaintiff dated 13-JUL-2017
> submittin additional copies of the proof of the Statement of Claim on
> the defendant on June 12, 2017. with proof of service upon Defendant
> on 13-JUL-2017 received on 13-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-07 Montréal Lettre envoyée du greffe le 07-JUL-2017 à la
> partie demanderesse confirmant la transmission de l'enregistrement
> audio-numérique de l'audience du 21-JUN-2017 Copie placée au dossier.
> - 2017-07-07 Montréal Demande de copie d'un enregistrement
> audio-numerique d'une audience de la Cour féderale en date du
> 21-JUN-2017. reçu(es) le 07-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-07 Ottawa Copy of Notice of Appeal (Appeal Court File No.
> A-202-17 ) appealing the Order of Bell, J. dated 29-JUN-2017 filed in
> the Court of Appeal on 02-JUL-2017 on behalf of Plaintiff placed on
> file on 07-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-01 Ottawa Oral directions received from the Court: The
> Honourable Mr. Justice Bell dated 01-JUL-2017 directing that "I have
> carefully considered the letter requesting a stay. I concluded the
> Anton Piller Order was overly broad and the Defendant subjected to
> improper questioning. In the circumstances I consider an ex parte stay
> would be inappropriate." placed on file on 01-JUL-2017 Confirmed in
> writing to the party(ies)
> - 2017-06-30 Ottawa Letter from Plaintiff dated 30-JUN-2017 requesting
> that the Hon. Mr. Justice Bell stay on an urgent interim basis paras.
> 4, 5 and 7 of the Court's Order dated June 29, 2017 until the
> Plaintiffs can file their notice of appeal and file a motion to stay
> said paragraphs (to be filed on July 4, 2017). - sent electronically
> to the Court (Bell, J.) - received on 30-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-30 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from both
> parties (by email) with respect to the Order with Reasons (Bell, J.)
> filed June 30, 2017 placed on file on 30-JUN-2017
> 29 2017-06-30 Ottawa Reasons (Order with Reasons) dated 30-JUN-2017
> rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell Matter considered with
> personal appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc.
> No. 14 Result: dismissed Filed on 30-JUN-2017 copies sent to parties
> Final Decision Certificate of Order entered in J. & O. Book, volume
> 1338 page(s) 124 - 126
> - 2017-06-27 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from all
> parties (by email) with respect to Direction of the Court dated June
> 27, 2017. placed on file on 27-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-27 Ottawa Oral directions received from the Court: The
> Honourable Mr. Justice Bell dated 27-JUN-2017 directing that re:
> Plaintiff's letter dated June 26, 2017 "The order in question was
> confirmed orally at the close of the hearing. However, if the parties
> wish to submit a draft Order, Justice Bell will be pleased to sign
> one." placed on file on 27-JUN-2017 Confirmed in writing to the
> party(ies)
> - 2017-06-26 Ottawa Letter from Plaintiffs dated 26-JUN-2017
> requesting confirmation from the Court as to whether an Order or
> Direction will be issued "refelcting the fact that certain aspects of
> the June 9 Order are to remain valid until June 30, 2017." (scanned to
> Bell, J.) received on 26-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-21 Montréal Montréal 21-JUN-2017 BEFORE The Honourable Mr.
> Justice Bell Language: B Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 14 on
> behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter reserved held in Court
> Senior Usher: Françoise Jacques Duration per day: 21-JUN-2017 from
> 09:30 to 05:25 Courtroom : Courtroom 306 - Montréal Court Registrar:
> Maxim Didkovski Total Duration: 1d Appearances: Me François Guay; Me
> Guillaume Lavoie St-Marie 514 954 1500 representing Plaintiff Me Éva
> Richard; Me Karim Renno; Me Hilal El Ayoubi 514 937 1221 representing
> Defendant Documents filed at hearing: 27 28 Comments: Hearing was
> recorded with DARS. During hearing parties for Court's convenience
> provided copies of the previously filed on the hearing of the June 9,
> 2017. As well as DARS recording of that hearing. All documents are
> part of the record already. Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 977
> page(s) 234 - 244 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
> 28 2017-06-21 Montréal Affidavit of Van Khai Luong sworn on
> 20-JUN-2017 on behalf of Plaintiff in support of Motion Doc. No. 14
> with Exhibits VKL-10 to VKL-16 filed at hearing on 21-JUN-2017
> 27 2017-06-21 Montréal Affidavit of Adam Lackman sworn on 21-JUN-2017
> on behalf of Defendant in opposition to Motion Doc. No. 14 filed at
> hearing on 21-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-20 Montréal Lettre envoyée du greffe le 20-JUN-2017 à la
> partie demanderesse Confirmant la transmission de la copie
> d'enregistrement SEAN Copie placée au dossier.
> - 2017-06-20 Montréal Demande d'enregistrement SEAN de l'audience du 9
> juin 2017 de la part de Mme Van Khai Luong (representante de la partie
> demanderesse) reçu(es) le 20-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-20 Montréal Cahier d'autorités comprenant 1 volume(s) de la
> part de la partie défenderesse reçu(es) le 20-JUN-2017
> 26 2017-06-20 Montréal Affidavit of Adam Lackman sworn on 20-JUN-2017
> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Defendant in opposition
> to Motion Doc. No. 14 with Exhibits AL-1 to AL-3 with proof of service
> upon Plaintiff on 20-JUN-2017 filed on 20-JUN-2017
> 25 2017-06-20 Montréal Prétentions écrites qui se trouve dans le
> dossier de requête de la part de la partie défenderesse concernant la
> requête doc. no 14 déposé(es) le 20-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-19 Montréal Letter from Plaintiff dated 19-JUN-2017 Asking
> registry for the Affidavit of the Independant Solicitor to be kept
> confidential conforming to the §.19 of the Order of June 12, 2017 of
> the Court. received on 19-JUN-2017
> 24 2017-06-19 Montréal Attestation de signification de l'avocat de la
> part Guillaume Lavoie St-Marie attestant la signification "Amended
> Order" daté du 12 juin 2017 à la partie défenderesse par signification
> à personne le 13-JUN-2017 déposé le 19-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-16 Montréal Lettre envoyée du greffe le 16-JUN-2017 à la
> partie défenderesse confirmant la transmission de la copie de
> l'enrigestrement de l'audience du 9 juin 2017 Copie placée au dossier.
> - 2017-06-16 Ottawa Directives verbales reçu(es) de la Cour: Monsieur
> le juge LeBlanc en date du 16-JUN-2017 suite à la demande de la copie
> de l'enregistrement de l'audience du 9 juin de la partie défenderesse:
> "persmission accordée" placées au dossier le 16-JUN-2017
> 23 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of service of Van Khai Luong sworn on
> 16-JUN-2017 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of of the Motion
> Record doc #22 upon Respondent by e-mail on 16-JUN-2017 filed on
> 16-JUN-2017
> 22 2017-06-16 Montréal Motion Record containing the following original
> document(s): 18 19 20 21 Number of copies received: 3 on behalf of
> Plaintiff filed on 16-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-16 Montréal Draft Order concerning Motion Doc. No. 18
> received on 16-JUN-2017
> 21 2017-06-16 Montréal Written Representations contained within a
> Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff concerning Motion Doc. No. 18
> filed on 16-JUN-2017
> 20 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of Van Khai Luong sworn on
> 16-JUN-2017 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
> support of Motion Doc. No. 18 with Exhibits VKL-1 to VKL-9 filed on
> 16-JUN-2017
> 19 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of GillesLétourneau sworn on
> 16-JUN-2017 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
> support of Motion Doc. No. 18 with Exhibits GL-1 filed on 16-JUN-2017
> 18 2017-06-16 Montréal Amended Notice of Motion contained within a
> Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff returnable at Special Sitting in
> Montréal on 21-JUN-2017 to begin at 09:30 for a declaration that the
> execution of the Anton Piller Order and Interim Injuction Order
> aspects of the Order issued on June 9, 2017 was lawfully conducted.
> filed on 16-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-16 Montréal Demande d'une copie de l'enregistrement du SEAN,
> soumise par Me Éva Richard , pour une audience qui a été entendue à
> Ottawa le 9 juin 2017 reçu(es) le 16-JUN-2017
> 17 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of EVE MICHAUD RICHMOND sworn on
> 16-JUN-2017 on behalf of Independent Supervising Solicitor. in support
> affidavit of Affidavit of the Independent Supervising Solicitor. filed
> on 16-JUN-2017
> 16 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of Independent Supervising Solicitor
> Daniel S. Drapeau sworn on 16-JUN-2017 on behalf of Independent
> Supervising Solicitor in support of Motion Doc. No. 14 with Exhibits
> DSD-1 to DSD-13 filed on 16-JUN-2017
> 15 2017-06-16 Montréal Consent on behalf of all parties to electronic
> service of all documents in this action. filed on 16-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-15 Ottawa Carte d'accusé de réception reçu(e) de la partie
> demanderesse concernant la directive de la Cour datée du 15 juin 2016
> (ID.28) placé(e) au dossier le 15-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-15 Ottawa Directives verbales reçu(es) du juge qui préside
> en date du 15-JUN-2017 La requête sera entendue le mercredi 21 juin
> 2017 à 9 h 30 en personne à Montréal pour une durée maximale de quatre
> heures. Les sousmissions de la partie défenderesse devront être
> signifiées et déposées au plus tard à midi le mardi 20 juin 2017.
> placées au dossier le 15-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-14 Ottawa Communication to the Court from the Registry dated
> 14-JUN-2017 re: Notice of Motion filed by the Plaintiffs (Document 14)
> sent to the office of the Judicial Administrator to be scheduled on a
> special sitting.
> - 2017-06-12 Ottawa Lettre couverture de la partie demanderesse en
> date du 12-JUN-2017 concernant le doc. no 14 placée au dossier le
> 12-JUN-2017
> 14 2017-06-12 Ottawa Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff
> returnable (but no hearing date indicated at this time) for A
> DECLARATION that the execution of the Anton Piller Order and Interim
> Injuction Order aspects of the Order of the Honourable Mr. Justice
> LeBlanc issued on June 9, 2017 were lawfully conducted... filed on
> 12-JUN-2017
> 13 2017-06-12 Ottawa Amended Order rendered on 12-JUN-2017 by The
> Honourable Mr. Justice LeBlanc filed on 12-JUN-2017 Matter considered
> without personal appearance amending the Order of the Court issued on
> June 9th 2017. (Doc. 9) entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1336 page(s)
> 449 - 473 Interlocutory Decision copies sent to the Paintiff
> - 2017-06-11 Ottawa Letter from Plaintiff dated 11-JUN-2017 "...Upon
> review of the Order as issued, the undersigned solicitors noted that
> it does not include Schedules I through III referred to therein..."
> -scanned to the presiding Judge- received on 11-JUN-2017
> 12 2017-06-09 Ottawa List of Exhibits on behalf of Plaintiff (Please
> note that the exhibits are placed in annex "VA") filed on 09-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-09 Ottawa Ottawa 09-JUN-2017 BEFORE The Honourable Mr.
> Justice LeBlanc Language: B Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 2 on
> behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter granted held in Court in
> camera Senior Usher: Denis Martin Duration per day: 09-JUN-2017 from
> 13:30 to 14:30 Courtroom : Conference Room 1104, 11th Floor - Thomas
> D'Arcy McGee Bldg. - Ottawa Court Registrar: Catherine Doré Total
> Duration: 1h Appearances: Me François Guay & Me Guillaume Lavoie
> St-Marie 514-954-1500 representing Plaintiff Documents filed at
> hearing: 11 Exhibits filed at hearing: P-1 to P-3 Comments: Hearing
> confidentiel Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 976 page(s) 342 - 345
> Abstract of Hearing placed on file
> 11 2017-06-09 Ottawa Affidavit of Sébastien Brossoit sworn on
> 05-JUN-2017 on behalf of Plaintiff in support of Motion Doc. No. 2
> with Exhibits SB-1 filed at hearing on 09-JUN-2017
> 10 2017-06-09 Ottawa Tender of payment into Court on behalf of
> Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 149 in the amount of $50,000.00 filed at
> hearing on 09-JUN-2017
> 9 2017-06-09 Ottawa Order dated 09-JUN-2017 rendered by The Honourable
> Mr. Justice LeBlanc Matter considered with personal appearance The
> Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc. No. 2 Result: granted
> Filed on 09-JUN-2017 certified copies sent to the Plaintiff entered in
> J. & O. Book, volume 1336 page(s) 391 - 408 Interlocutory Decision
> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Plaintiff
> with respect to Oral direction of the Court dated June 8, 2017. placed
> on file on 08-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Oral directions received from the presiding judge
> dated 08-JUN-2017 directing that "Further to the Motion Record filed
> by the Plaintiffs on June 5, 2017, the Court directs that the contents
> of the Court record in respect of this proceeding, including the
> Statement of Claim, this Motion Record, any Order rendered thereon,
> and any other documents filed in respect thereof, be held in sealed
> envelopes in the custody of the Court until forty-eight (48) hours
> following the time at which the solicitors of record for the
> Plaintiffs notify the Court that said Orders and Statement of Claim
> have been served on the Defendant." placed on file on 08-JUN-2017
> Confirmed in writing to the party(ies)
> - 2017-06-06 Montréal Oral directions received from the presiding
> judge dated 06-JUN-2017 directing that "Plaintiffs' written
> representations can be accepted for filing despite their title and
> length." placed on file on 06-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-06 Ottawa ****** ANNULÉ(E) ****** Directives verbales
> reçu(es) du juge qui préside en date du 06-JUN-2017 "La requête ex
> parte à huis clos confidentielle pour une injonction sera entendue le
> vendredi le 9 juin 2017 à 13h30 à 90 rue Sparks, Ottawa, Ontario en
> personne, pour une durée ne dépassant pas deux heures." placées au
> dossier le 06-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-06 Ottawa Directives verbales reçu(es) du juge qui préside
> en date du 06-JUN-2017 La requête ex parte à huis close confidentielle
> pour une injonction provisoire sera entendue le vendredi 9 juin 2017 à
> 13 h 30 à 90 rue Sparks, Ottawa, Onatrio, en personne, pour une durée
> ne dépassant pas deux heures. placées au dossier le 06-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-05 Montréal Book of Authorities consisting of 1 volume(s) on
> behalf of Plaintiff in support to Motion (doc. 2) received on
> 05-JUN-2017 Sent directly to Presiding Judge
> - 2017-06-05 Montréal Covering letter from Plaintiff dated 05-JUN-2017
> concerning Doc. No. 8 placed on file on 05-JUN-2017
> 8 2017-06-05 Montréal Motion Record containing the following original
> document(s): 2 3 4 5 6 7 Number of copies received: 3 on behalf of
> Plaintiff filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 7 2017-06-05 Montréal Written Representations contained within a
> Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
> filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 6 2017-06-05 Montréal Affidavit of Jon Medline sworn on 02-JUN-2017
> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in support of
> Motion Doc. No. 2 with Exhibits JM-1 to JM-10 filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 5 2017-06-05 Montréal Affidavit of Peggy Tabet sworn on 02-JUN-2017
> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in support of
> Motion Doc. No. 2 with Exhibits PT-1 to PT-11 filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 4 2017-06-05 Montréal Affidavit of Shawn Omstead sworn on 02-JUN-2017
> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in support of
> Motion Doc. No. 2 with Exhibits SO-1 to SO-25 filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 3 2017-06-05 Montréal Affidavit of Andrew McGuigan sworn on
> 04-JUN-2017 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
> support of Motion Doc. No. 2 with Exhibits AM-1 to AM-54 filed on
> 05-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-05 Ottawa Communication to the Court from the Registry dated
> 05-JUN-2017 re: re: Motion forwarded to Trial JA to fix special
> hearing date.
> - 2017-06-02 Montréal Lettre de la partie demanderesse en date du
> 02-JUN-2017 demandant que toute correspondance entre la Cour et les
> procureurs soussignés concernant ce dossier soit traitée de manière
> confidentielle et n'apparaisse pas au dossier public de la Cour
> jusqu'à l'audition de ladite requête. reçue le 02-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-02 Montréal Draft Order concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
> received on 02-JUN-2017
> 2 2017-06-02 Montréal Notice of Motion made ex parte contained within
> a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff returnable (but no hearing date
> indicated at this time) for an interim injunction order (Anton Piller)
> (Mr. François Guay and Mr. Guillaume Lavoie Ste-Marie 514-954-1500)
> filed on 02-JUN-2017 Draft Order\\Judgment received.
> 1 2017-06-02 Montréal Statement of Claim filed on 02-JUN-2017 Tariff
> other action - $150.00
> The last database update occurred on 2017-08-02 17:35
> Top of page
>
> Several TVAddons Domains Transferred to Canadian Lawfirm
>
> • By Andy
> • on July 18, 2017
> • C: 57
> Breaking
> Last month, leading Kodi addon repository TVAddons shut down in the
> wake of a lawsuit filed in the US by satellite and broadcast provider
> Dish Network. Just over a month later and with no other news
> surfacing, TF has now discovered that several recent and historical
> TVAddons' domains have been transferred to a Canadian law firm.
> The last couple of months have been the most chaotic on record for
> the booming Kodi third-party addon scene. After years of largely
> interrupted service, a single lawsuit changed the entire landscape.
> Last month, TF broke the news that third-party Kodi add-on ZemTV and
> the TVAddons library were being sued in a federal court in Texas. The
> fallout was something to behold.
> Within days the ‘pirate’ Kodi community found itself in turmoil.
> Several high-profile Kodi addons took the decision to shut down and
> even TVAddons itself went dark without explanation.
> At the time, unsubstantiated rumors suggested that TVAddons’
> disappearance could be attributed to some coincidental site
> maintenance. However, with around 40 million regular users built up
> over a number of years, a disappearing Facebook page, and complete
> radio silence during alleged “routine maintenance,” something was
> clearly wrong.
> It would’ve taken just a couple of minutes to put a ‘maintenance’
> notice on the site but one didn’t appear back in June, and one hasn’t
> appeared since. Behind the scenes,
> however, things have been shifting.
> In addition to wiping the DNS entries of TVAddons.ag, on at least
> another couple of occasions the domain has been quietly updated. The
> image below shows how it used to look.
> TVAddons historical domain WHOIS
> PrivacyDotLink refers to a service offered by Cayman Islands-based
> registry Uniregistry. Instead of displaying the real name and address
> of the domain owner (in this case the person behind TVAddons.ag), the
> registry replaces the information with details of its own.
> The privacy service is used for many reasons, but it’s not hard to see
> why it’s of particular use to sites in the ‘pirate’ sector.
> While some of the changes to the TVAddons domain during the past five
> weeks or so haven’t been obvious, this morning we observed the biggest
> change yet. As seen in the image below, its ownership details are no
> longer obscured by the privacy service.
> TVAddons new domain WHOIS
> What stands out here is the name Daniel Drapeau. On closer inspection,
> this gentleman turns out to be a Canada-based lawyer who was admitted
> to the Quebec Bar in 1991.
> “A passion for IP and a 20 year track record, servicing corporations
> and individuals alike in a wide variety of industries, including
> industrial equipment, consumer products, publishing, food & beverage,
> fashion and arts,” Drapeau’s Linkedin page reads.
> “His forte is the strategic use of IP rights and litigation to achieve
> his clients’ goals, whether they be protective, aggressive or
> defensive. Specialties: Expeditive remedies, including injunctions and
> seizure orders.”
> The other fresh detail in the WHOIS is an address – 600, de
> Maisonneuve West, Montreal (Quebec) H3A 3J2. It’s a perfect match for
> the premises of DrapeauLex, a law firm launched by Drapeau in 2012.
> Only adding to the intrigue is the fact that other domains operated by
> TVAddons both recently and historically have also been transferred to
> the lawfirm.
> XMBCHUB.com, which was the domain used by TVAddons before making the
> switch several years ago, was transferred yesterday. The same can be
> said about Offshoregit.com, the domain used by TVAddons to distribute
> Kodi addons.
> While there are a few explanations for a lawyer’s name appearing on
> the TVAddons domains, none of them are yet supported by legal
> documentation filed in the United States. As of this morning, the Dish
> Network case docket had received no additional updates. No notice of
> action in Canada has been made public.
> Nevertheless, as a past president of the Intellectual Property
> Institute of Canada’s anti-counterfeiting committee, Drapeau is
> certainly an interesting character in the IP space. As noted in a 2009
> article by Professor of Law Michael Geist, Drapeau “urged the
> government to adopt a system of notice-and-takedown.”
> Interestingly, Drapeau also worked at law firm Smart & Biggar, where
> former colleague Jean-Sébastien Dupont recently went on to represent
> Canadian broadcasters in Wesley (Mtlfreetv.com) v. Bell Canada, the
> big Kodi-addon piracy case currently underway in Canada.
> At this stage, it’s unclear who Drapeau is working for in the TVAddons
> case. It’s possible that he’s working for Dish and this is a step
> towards the domains being handed over to the broadcaster as part of a
> settlement deal with TVAddons. That being said, the XBMChub and
> Offshoregit domains weren’t mentioned in the Dish lawsuit so something
> else might be underway.
> TorrentFreak reached out to Drapeau for comment and clarification, but
> at the time of publication, we had received no response.
> Dan Drapeau talks Intellectual Property from DrapeauLex on Vimeo.
> Tagged in:
> Kodi, TVaddons
>
used KPMG and the Anton Pillar joke against the upstart newsrag in
Woodstock NB 10 years ago?
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/taking-on-the-irvings-and-winning/article1088742/
Taking on the Irvings (and winning)
GRANT ROBERTSON SAINT JOHN — Globe and Mail Update
Published Sunday, Nov. 04, 2007 10:32PM EST
Like a lot of Canadian towns, Woodstock, N.B., lays claim to a
bustling Tim Hortons, a scrappy junior hockey team and a busy rumour
mill. But in the past few weeks, the quiet enclave not far from the
U.S. border has become the site of a vitriolic newspaper war, pitting
one of the Maritimes' wealthiest families - the Irvings - against a
former employee determined to break their influence.
The second edition of the Carleton Free Press will hit the streets of
Woodstock this week, but already the new weekly - with a staff of 10
working out of a strip mall next to a pancake house - has become the
talk around town. And much of the attention stems from the accusations
being levelled against its publisher.
The feud between the incumbent Woodstock Bugle-Observer and the
upstart spilled into a Saint John courtroom Sunday after weeks of
mudslinging. Allegations of corporate espionage have led to
investigators with accounting firm KPMG being granted unprecedented
court clearance to search everything from the filing cabinets and
computer hard drives of former Bugle-Observer publisher Ken Langdon to
his wife's lingerie drawers.
Mr. Langdon quit his job with the Bugle-Observer last month, informing
its parent company, Brunswick News Inc., that he would soon be
starting a paper of his own in Woodstock. He had clashed with
executives over budgeting and recent financial performance of the
newspaper, one of more than a dozen papers the Irvings own in New
Brunswick, in addition to gas stations, oil refineries, lumber and a
host of other ventures.
In court documents and statements over the past few weeks, Irving
executives allege their former publisher took loads of key
confidential information on his way out the door, such as detailed
financial data, employee salary information and customer lists.
In its investigation, Brunswick News was granted a rare Anton Piller
order - believed to be the first in New Brunswick's history - which
allowed KPMG to move swiftly in searching Mr. Langdon's home to
confiscate files before they could potentially be destroyed.
Mr. Langdon said he was at the local Tim Hortons when he got a call
that investigators were on their way. He watched as they went through
his home, including sifting through his wife's lingerie. "It was
uncomfortable," he said in an interview at the new newspaper's
offices, which are adjacent to an Irving gas station.
Brunswick News sought - and won - a temporary injunction preventing
Mr. Langdon from personally soliciting advertisers, suppliers or staff
of the Bugle-Observer. It also asked for a permanent prohibition that
would keep him from negotiating with the top 15 advertisers in town,
from car dealerships to retailers, fearing he would use competitive
information against his old paper.
But Mr. Justice Peter Glennie lifted most of those restrictions
Friday, saying the public good from the creation of a new newspaper is
paramount, and keeping the Free Press from seeking out advertisers
would kill the enterprise.
Both sides hailed the ruling Sunday as a victory. In a province where
the Irving family controls most of the English-language newspapers,
and several French-language publications, Mr. Langdon said it was an
important win for newspaper competition.
A lawyer for Brunswick News said the company is not opposed to facing
a new rival, but the real issue is the data Mr. Langdon possessed. A
KPMG report provided to Brunswick News listed 64 pages of files he
allegedly downloaded.
"This case is not about competition with a new newspaper," Peter
Hutchison said outside court in Saint John. "It is about an employee
who has removed confidential information, who has solicited employees
to try to set up a competing business."
Mr. Langdon accuses the Irvings of trying to stamp out a potential
rival. For the past century, the Irving name has carried a reputation
for hard-nosed business strategies that either grind down rivals or
buy them out. It has allowed them to build one of Canada's biggest
private corporate empires.
Mr. Langdon's lawyers argued in court that the data KPMG found in his
possession was in his hands for three reasons: Some was left on the
drives of used computers he purchased from the company, while some was
a function of working from home, where he would often send information
to himself. The more recent downloads were collected to prepare
himself for a potential dismissal lawsuit with the company if he was
fired.
Brunswick News is already taking Mr. Langdon to court next month in a
separate suit, saying he breached his fiduciary duty by having this
data, and the firm may seek financial damages on the grounds it
allegedly has been harmed.
Mr. Langdon was with the Irving papers for 10 years. He ran an
advertising shopper that he sold to the Irvings and was eventually
made publisher of the Bugle-Observer. His biggest accomplishment
there, cited in affidavits, was taking the paper from a $118,000 loss
in 2003 to a $560,000 profit in 2006. He was offered one-year
severance for a three-year non-compete, but turned it down.
Circulation for the new paper is slightly more than 10,000.
Mr. Langdon's lawyers told the court that the data he possessed isn't
crucial to competing with the Irving papers. For example, thumbing
through the newspaper, then looking up phone numbers in the yellow
pages can easily compile a list of key advertisers.
Victor Mlodecki, vice-president of Brunswick News, argues Mr. Langdon
has essentially taken "the blueprint" for Irving's community
newspapers, and has information on the business plan for the coming
year.
"I don't mind competing with anyone," Mr. Mlodecki said at his office
in downtown Moncton. "But I don't want to compete with my own
newspaper across the street. He could literally replicate the entire
operation of the newspaper with the information he has."
http://www.smart-biggar.ca/contacts/GuillaumeLavoieSteMarie
Guillaume also has experience in managing large-scale multi-party
litigation and in seeking and executing complex extraordinary remedies
such as Anton Piller orders, interim and interlocutory injunctions,
Mareva injunctions and contempt orders before the Federal Court in
copyright and patent matters.
YEA RIGHT
Seems to mean old me that Judge Richard Bell disagrees with you and
Judge Leblanc N'esy Pas Danny Boy Drapeau?
Affidavit of Independent Supervising Solicitor Daniel S. Drapeau sworn
on 16-JUN-2017 on behalf of Independent Supervising Solicitor in
support of Motion Doc. No. 14 with Exhibits DSD-1 to DSD-13 filed on
16-JUN-2017
http://cordcuttersnews.com/now-know-happened-tvaddons-canadian-cable-companies-sized/
We Now Know What Happened to TVAddons (Canadian Cable Companies Sized It)
By Luke Bouma on August 1, 2017
We finally know who is behind the popular third-party Kodi add-on site
TVAddons and what happened to the site. Adam Lackman a Canadian
resident, today posted an update on his site TVaddons.
According to a TorrentFreak story and an Adam Lackman Indiegogo
fundraiser here is what happened.
What Happened When TVAddons Went Dark
On June 12, Adam Lackman, the owner of TVAddons, was the subject of an
Anton Pillar order in Canada. Anton Pillar orders are meant to
preserve evidence in civil lawsuits. During the execution of the
order, an independent (neutral) counsel overseeing the lawsuit,
performed a search and seizure of Adam’s premises that lasted a total
of 16 hours. His personal computer and other belongings were seized
including domain names and social media accounts that weren’t even
related to TV Addons. This all happened after a Canadian court
approved the Anton Pillar request.
Lackman was interrogated for nine hours and the domain names behind
TVAddons had been seized by the law firm behind the Anton Pillar
order.
On appeal, Lackman won an order to have everything returned to him;
however, Canadian cable companies appealed that ruling and won
allowing them to keep everything they took from Lackman.
So in Summary
Well the short end is TVAddons is being sued in the United States and
in Canada. According to Lackman he has already had $75,000 in legal
fees and is now looking to raise $250,000 to help pay his bills.
As of today the Canadian government’s appointed neutral law firm has
control of all TVAddons domains, computers, and any other files they
seized in the search of Lackman’s property.
According to the Canadian cable companies, they are going after
TVAddons because “Approximately 40 million unique users located around
the world are actively using Infringing Addons hosted by TVAddons
every month, and approximately 900,000 Canadian households use
Infringing Add-ons to access television content. The amount of users
of Infringing Addons hosted [by] TVAddons is constantly increasing,”
the complaint adds.
No date has been set for the next court hearing. For now the last
court appeal allows the Canadian law firm to keep everything they
found during the search of Lackman’s property until the nex hearing.
This raises the question if they will someday share that information
with the U.S. court case brought on by Dish Network.
Want to learn more? Check out the TorrentFreak story HERE.
About Luke Bouma
Luke Bouma graduated from Grand Valley State University and has spent
the last 3 years as a dedicated Cord Cutter. He has been featured as a
cord cutting expert for many publications like Wall Street Journal,
Maxim, Refinery29, and many more. He has also been a guest on Clear
Channel Radio to talk about Cord Cutting. Luke Bouma founded Cord
Cutters News, LLC back in 2014 and also writes for Mohu, Ting, and has
guest blogged for Roku.
Cord Cutters News, LLC
PO Box 11984
Killeen, TX 76547
Phone Number: (616) 606-0223
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Graeme McPhail
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:16:34 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Reply to David Raymond Amos from minister
Mélanie Joly
To: David Amos
?
I am out of the office until July 18 with no access to emails. If
your matter is urgent please call my assistant Renee Pelejo at (416)
935-2506.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:42:36 -0300
Subject: Yo George Cope I am still very curious if the lawyers Fred
Crooks and Maritine Turcotte have learned the meaning of the word
INTEGRITY yet?
To: george.cope@bell.ca, acampbell
alyson.queen@bellaliant.ca, zeda.redden@bellaliant.ca,
karen.sheriff@bellaliant.ca, fred.crooks@bellaliant.ca,
sasha.irving@emera.com, James.Spurr@emera.com
Cc: martine.turcotte@bell.ca, "rick.hancox"
david.rodenhiser@nspower.ca, "Bernard.LeBlanc"
"Bernard. Theriault"
"terry.seguin"
"ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca"
lapoinjr
----- Original Message -----
From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:28 AM
Subject: RE: I am curious
Mr. Amos,
I confirm that I have received your documentation.
There is no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself,
the documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in
the process of printing it.
I have asked one of my lawyers to review it in my absence and report
back to me upon my return in the office. We will then provide you with
a reply.
Martine Turcotte
Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
Tel: (514) 870-4637
Fax: (514) 870-4877
email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
Tel: (514) 870-4638
email: diane.valade@bell.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 6:12 AM
To: Turcotte, Martine (EX05453)
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca; W-Five@ctv.ca
Subject: I am curious
Madam
I did not receive a response from you to the last email so I am not
certain if you received it. I must inform you that I will be closing
my briefcase in Yahoo for public view at the end of the week. I have a
great deal of material to add and I only wish certain parties to view
it. I opened it for you the other day as an act of good faith. Mr.
Pozen can check my work in the dockets of the various courts around
Boston they are a matter of Public Record my files are not. As you can
see by this and some following emails. I am very busy dealing with
criminal matters first before filing civil complaints in the USA. As I
told you when you called a lot has been happening. I have made a lot
of cops mad at me and I don't trust them a bit particularly after the
Police Commission is willing to check their work so i have been busy
watching my back and covering my butt. However that does not mean that
I have not thought about our conversation and was curious about a few
things.
I was glad to receive your call and impressed by the fact that you
were more than willing to receive the material and a copy of the
wiretap tape in particular. Your stated willingness to uphold the law
was a rare statement to me. However I was curious why you only
mentioned my voicemail to Mr. Pozen and not the email to your company
and the news program that it owns. Did they not inform you as well? If
they didn't I am not surprised because I have some other rather
interesting denials from the Media. the most interesting would have to
be from the PBS program called Frontline when I introduced its
producer Michael Sullivan to the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan. Now
that is a story well worth W5 telling. Too bad they showed me their
ass. As a courtesy to you and a further act of good faith, I will not
forward this email to anyone else until after I return to the USA and
nothing has been resolved between BCE and I and I am compelled to name
it in my complaint. I would find it very hard to believe that Mr,
Pozen does not know everything he needs to know about me right now.
I had also called a lawyer, Steven Skurka who had a week long little
special on CTV . I had tried to inform him that I knew my rights his
assistant hollered at me. You from speaking to me yourself that I am
not a rude character. I found it too funny to be treated that way and
I had resolved to serve him this stuff byway of the local ATV Station
that had presented his smiling talking head to me. That is why I was
telling you that you could get this stuff from the local ATV station.
I found it quite strange that you did not rely on them to send it on
to you. Thus I must make an extra copy to comply with your request.
I know the date stamp on the forwarded email is incorrect but that is
because my old laptop goes to the first year in it when I boot up and
sometimes I am too busy or tired to bother changing it. However MSN
tracks it with the true date. Brad Smith and I have a bone to pick as
well and I have been checking his work rather closely since he ignored
my letter to him last year. His boss Bill Gates is gonna be very angry
and Brad Smith and Steve Balmer in the near future if I have anything
to do with it. If you do act ethically and immediately I will settle
with your company very cheaply in comparsion to the bottom lines of my
first two complaints. In fact I will be so impressed I will
immediatlely offer you a better job than the one you have now. Please
study the material I will provide you closely and ask me any thing you
wish.
I will do as I promised and send the material you requested as soon as
I can put it all together. Right now I am on the move and far away
from my printer. Is the following your correct address? Perhaps you
should consider sending someone to the my meeting with the Police
Commission in Fredericton next week in order to hear me speak of these
matters to law enforcement before I return to the USA. Once I do
return there I will serve the Mr. Pozen the material as promised and
call him to testify in my pending trial. The following emails should
explain some of my concerns to you. My wife will be in Canada next
week as well to pick up our kids. I will allow you to speak to her if
you wish. She has had a nervous breakdown over the legal crap and I do
have her Durable Power of Attorney pursuant to M.G.L. 201 B. Mr. Pozen
can ask Robert S. Creedon Jr. about that document. I argued it with
him before the entire Judicuary Commitee on Sept. 18th 2003.
I will call you in a minute to make certain that you get this and the
following emails.
David R. Amos
Martine Turcotte
1000 de la Gauchetiere Ouest
Floor 41
Montreal, Quebec H3B 58H Canada
Tel: (514) 870-4637
Fax: (514) 870-4877
For the Record I gave the Irving "Rag called the Gleaner" in Fat Fred
City and the CBC dudes in Toronto copies of the following lawsuits in
the USA in 2002 long before I gave some material to Bellglobemedia
byway of their W-Five yo yos. Clearly nobody knows how to read if they
don't think I ain't sued folks before EH?
Ask W-Five or their lawyers if I am a liar or not. Better yet ask
Stevey Boy Murphy or Andy Campbell in Fat Fred City if they dare to
chaleenge the truth. If all else fails and you bloggers seek counsel
you can trust why not ask Chucky Leblanc or your "Blogger General"
T.J. Burke he received the same documents on June 24th, 2004 the day
Danny boy Busierres and the Fat Fred City Finest attempted to banish
me from the LEG but it ain't worked out to well for them yet EH Chucky
Leblanc? However chucky was quick to report that I was banished the
following day and ain't said apeep about it since. Who to you think
told him not to talk about it? Kelly lamrock, T.J. Burke. the Irvings
or all three?
FYI W-Five took an interest in my matters at about the same time
Chretien's underling was calling Bush a moron.(I oftern call myself an
oxymoron Methinks somebody has been studing my words EH?) I supported
Chretein's underling's thinking in two affidavits demanding judgements
by default filed in the following dockets on December 12th, 2002.
The following day Cardinal Law (Methinks that is why chucky hates me
so) quit Beantown and ran off to the Holy See. Years later he helped
pick the latest Pope(a former Hitler Youth who is making his bones
with the croooked little Georgey Boy Bush Jr. right now in the USA.)
Never Forget the Queen is the protector of the Faith of the Church of
England . She would not allow her family's assests to be stolen and
given to the catholic Church. Why should I act any different?
----- Original Message -----
From: W-FIVE Viewer Mail
To: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: possble story
Dear Mr. Amos,
I would like to thank you for your email to W-FIVE, sorry for the
delay in responding.
We review every email and story idea that we receive here at W-FIVE
and give it serious consideration. Your email has been forwarded to
our executive and senior producer for review. If we are interested in
pursuing your idea further, you will be contacted by one of our
researchers.
Thanks again for your input. Your interest in our program is much
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Lisa-Marie
Production Coordinator
W-FIVE
-----Original Message-----
From: a friend of David Amos' email account
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:28 PM
To: W-FIVE@ctv.ca
Subject: possble story
I am a Canadian Citizen who thus far, as a plaintiff, has two Lawsuits
in the US District Court of Massachucetts they are numbered 02-11686-
RGS and 02-11687-RGS.
They were removed to that Court from the Norfolk Superior Court by the
US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan very improperly. However they shall
remain there because of my status as a Canandian Citizen. Judge Sterns
has not even held a Conference about the matters because he likely
does not want to hear the matter because I have presented all Members
of the Bar with their worst fear of a catch 22 problem.
Accordinging to law he is late. I have complained of 47 defendants 34
of whom are State Defendants( the Attorney General, The Commission of
Judicial Conduct Board of Bar Overseers etc) and 3 are Federal
Treasury Agents. Some of the defendants are over two months late in
their answer to the Summons.
The smallest suit amounts to 188 million dollars in the form of
relief. There is a lot to these matters and too much to briefly
explain. But in a nutshell my wife's Aunt, who is buried beside Rose
Kennedy, left my wife some money. It was stolen by her relatives in
executing the estate. No news there. But the crooks are very well
connected politically and every part of the old crony network in
Boston covered for them.
The crook and our cousin, Charles J. Kickham Jr of the Kickham Law
Office on Beacon St, has been past President of Bar Associations. He
has sat on the Board of Governors of Harvard Law School etc. I have
given much information to many members of the press who have simply
ignored some interesting facts.
What should be somewhat newsworthy is how far a wild colonial boy has
come in prosecuting Pro Se the most profund Yankee carpetbaggers. My
next two lawsuits Under title 18 are wickedly righteous. I have left
one copy of much information in Saint John New Brunswick at a lawyer's
Office, Mosher and Chedore 33 Charlotte St if some one wishes to view
them. I can be reached at this Cell number 506 434- 1379
David R. Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
Office of the Integrity Commissioner
Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
tel.: 506-457-7890
fax: 506-444-5224
e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
On 8/2/17, David Amos
> PROCEEDINGS QUERIES
> Recorded entry(ies) for T-800-17
> (Close)
>
> Court number information
> Court Number : T-800-17
> Style of Cause : Bell Canada et Al c. Adam Lackman et al
> Proceeding Category : Actions Nature : Copyright Infringement [Actions]
> Type of Action : Ordinary
>
> 70 records found for court number T-800-17
> Doc Date Filed Office Recorded Entry Summary
> - 2017-08-01 Montréal Lettre envoyée du greffe le 01-AOU-2017 à la
> partie défenderesse transmettant une copie de l'enregistrement
> audio-numérique, tel que demandé le 27 juillet 2017. Copie placée au
> dossier.
> - 2017-07-27 Montréal Demande d'une copie de l'enregistrement de la
> part de la partie défenderesse de l'audition entendue à Montréal le 21
> juin 2017. reçu(es) le 27-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-27 Montréal Lettre couverture de la partie défenderesse en
> date du 27-JUL-2017 concernant le doc. no 30 placée au dossier le
> 27-JUL-2017
> 32 2017-07-27 Montréal Preuve de signification électronique de la part
> de la défenderesse concernant la signification du document # 30
> Défense et demande reconventionelle déposé(e)(s) le 27-JUL-2017
> 31 2017-07-27 Montréal Consent on behalf of all parties to to extend
> the delay for serving and filling Défense et demande reconventionnelle
> of Adam Lackman (doc # 30) filed on 27-JUL-2017
> 30 2017-07-27 Montréal Défense incluant la demande reconventionnelle
> de la part de Adam Lackman f.a.s. TVADDONS.AG déposée le 27-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-13 Montréal Letter from Plaintiff dated 13-JUL-2017
> submittin additional copies of the proof of the Statement of Claim on
> the defendant on June 12, 2017. with proof of service upon Defendant
> on 13-JUL-2017 received on 13-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-07 Montréal Lettre envoyée du greffe le 07-JUL-2017 à la
> partie demanderesse confirmant la transmission de l'enregistrement
> audio-numérique de l'audience du 21-JUN-2017 Copie placée au dossier.
> - 2017-07-07 Montréal Demande de copie d'un enregistrement
> audio-numerique d'une audience de la Cour féderale en date du
> 21-JUN-2017. reçu(es) le 07-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-07 Ottawa Copy of Notice of Appeal (Appeal Court File No.
> A-202-17 ) appealing the Order of Bell, J. dated 29-JUN-2017 filed in
> the Court of Appeal on 02-JUL-2017 on behalf of Plaintiff placed on
> file on 07-JUL-2017
> - 2017-07-01 Ottawa Oral directions received from the Court: The
> Honourable Mr. Justice Bell dated 01-JUL-2017 directing that "I have
> carefully considered the letter requesting a stay. I concluded the
> Anton Piller Order was overly broad and the Defendant subjected to
> improper questioning. In the circumstances I consider an ex parte stay
> would be inappropriate." placed on file on 01-JUL-2017 Confirmed in
> writing to the party(ies)
> - 2017-06-30 Ottawa Letter from Plaintiff dated 30-JUN-2017 requesting
> that the Hon. Mr. Justice Bell stay on an urgent interim basis paras.
> 4, 5 and 7 of the Court's Order dated June 29, 2017 until the
> Plaintiffs can file their notice of appeal and file a motion to stay
> said paragraphs (to be filed on July 4, 2017). - sent electronically
> to the Court (Bell, J.) - received on 30-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-30 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from both
> parties (by email) with respect to the Order with Reasons (Bell, J.)
> filed June 30, 2017 placed on file on 30-JUN-2017
> 29 2017-06-30 Ottawa Reasons (Order with Reasons) dated 30-JUN-2017
> rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell Matter considered with
> personal appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc.
> No. 14 Result: dismissed Filed on 30-JUN-2017 copies sent to parties
> Final Decision Certificate of Order entered in J. & O. Book, volume
> 1338 page(s) 124 - 126
> - 2017-06-27 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from all
> parties (by email) with respect to Direction of the Court dated June
> 27, 2017. placed on file on 27-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-27 Ottawa Oral directions received from the Court: The
> Honourable Mr. Justice Bell dated 27-JUN-2017 directing that re:
> Plaintiff's letter dated June 26, 2017 "The order in question was
> confirmed orally at the close of the hearing. However, if the parties
> wish to submit a draft Order, Justice Bell will be pleased to sign
> one." placed on file on 27-JUN-2017 Confirmed in writing to the
> party(ies)
> - 2017-06-26 Ottawa Letter from Plaintiffs dated 26-JUN-2017
> requesting confirmation from the Court as to whether an Order or
> Direction will be issued "refelcting the fact that certain aspects of
> the June 9 Order are to remain valid until June 30, 2017." (scanned to
> Bell, J.) received on 26-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-21 Montréal Montréal 21-JUN-2017 BEFORE The Honourable Mr.
> Justice Bell Language: B Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 14 on
> behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter reserved held in Court
> Senior Usher: Françoise Jacques Duration per day: 21-JUN-2017 from
> 09:30 to 05:25 Courtroom : Courtroom 306 - Montréal Court Registrar:
> Maxim Didkovski Total Duration: 1d Appearances: Me François Guay; Me
> Guillaume Lavoie St-Marie 514 954 1500 representing Plaintiff Me Éva
> Richard; Me Karim Renno; Me Hilal El Ayoubi 514 937 1221 representing
> Defendant Documents filed at hearing: 27 28 Comments: Hearing was
> recorded with DARS. During hearing parties for Court's convenience
> provided copies of the previously filed on the hearing of the June 9,
> 2017. As well as DARS recording of that hearing. All documents are
> part of the record already. Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 977
> page(s) 234 - 244 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
> 28 2017-06-21 Montréal Affidavit of Van Khai Luong sworn on
> 20-JUN-2017 on behalf of Plaintiff in support of Motion Doc. No. 14
> with Exhibits VKL-10 to VKL-16 filed at hearing on 21-JUN-2017
> 27 2017-06-21 Montréal Affidavit of Adam Lackman sworn on 21-JUN-2017
> on behalf of Defendant in opposition to Motion Doc. No. 14 filed at
> hearing on 21-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-20 Montréal Lettre envoyée du greffe le 20-JUN-2017 à la
> partie demanderesse Confirmant la transmission de la copie
> d'enregistrement SEAN Copie placée au dossier.
> - 2017-06-20 Montréal Demande d'enregistrement SEAN de l'audience du 9
> juin 2017 de la part de Mme Van Khai Luong (representante de la partie
> demanderesse) reçu(es) le 20-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-20 Montréal Cahier d'autorités comprenant 1 volume(s) de la
> part de la partie défenderesse reçu(es) le 20-JUN-2017
> 26 2017-06-20 Montréal Affidavit of Adam Lackman sworn on 20-JUN-2017
> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Defendant in opposition
> to Motion Doc. No. 14 with Exhibits AL-1 to AL-3 with proof of service
> upon Plaintiff on 20-JUN-2017 filed on 20-JUN-2017
> 25 2017-06-20 Montréal Prétentions écrites qui se trouve dans le
> dossier de requête de la part de la partie défenderesse concernant la
> requête doc. no 14 déposé(es) le 20-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-19 Montréal Letter from Plaintiff dated 19-JUN-2017 Asking
> registry for the Affidavit of the Independant Solicitor to be kept
> confidential conforming to the §.19 of the Order of June 12, 2017 of
> the Court. received on 19-JUN-2017
> 24 2017-06-19 Montréal Attestation de signification de l'avocat de la
> part Guillaume Lavoie St-Marie attestant la signification "Amended
> Order" daté du 12 juin 2017 à la partie défenderesse par signification
> à personne le 13-JUN-2017 déposé le 19-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-16 Montréal Lettre envoyée du greffe le 16-JUN-2017 à la
> partie défenderesse confirmant la transmission de la copie de
> l'enrigestrement de l'audience du 9 juin 2017 Copie placée au dossier.
> - 2017-06-16 Ottawa Directives verbales reçu(es) de la Cour: Monsieur
> le juge LeBlanc en date du 16-JUN-2017 suite à la demande de la copie
> de l'enregistrement de l'audience du 9 juin de la partie défenderesse:
> "persmission accordée" placées au dossier le 16-JUN-2017
> 23 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of service of Van Khai Luong sworn on
> 16-JUN-2017 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of of the Motion
> Record doc #22 upon Respondent by e-mail on 16-JUN-2017 filed on
> 16-JUN-2017
> 22 2017-06-16 Montréal Motion Record containing the following original
> document(s): 18 19 20 21 Number of copies received: 3 on behalf of
> Plaintiff filed on 16-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-16 Montréal Draft Order concerning Motion Doc. No. 18
> received on 16-JUN-2017
> 21 2017-06-16 Montréal Written Representations contained within a
> Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff concerning Motion Doc. No. 18
> filed on 16-JUN-2017
> 20 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of Van Khai Luong sworn on
> 16-JUN-2017 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
> support of Motion Doc. No. 18 with Exhibits VKL-1 to VKL-9 filed on
> 16-JUN-2017
> 19 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of GillesLétourneau sworn on
> 16-JUN-2017 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
> support of Motion Doc. No. 18 with Exhibits GL-1 filed on 16-JUN-2017
> 18 2017-06-16 Montréal Amended Notice of Motion contained within a
> Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff returnable at Special Sitting in
> Montréal on 21-JUN-2017 to begin at 09:30 for a declaration that the
> execution of the Anton Piller Order and Interim Injuction Order
> aspects of the Order issued on June 9, 2017 was lawfully conducted.
> filed on 16-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-16 Montréal Demande d'une copie de l'enregistrement du SEAN,
> soumise par Me Éva Richard , pour une audience qui a été entendue à
> Ottawa le 9 juin 2017 reçu(es) le 16-JUN-2017
> 17 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of EVE MICHAUD RICHMOND sworn on
> 16-JUN-2017 on behalf of Independent Supervising Solicitor. in support
> affidavit of Affidavit of the Independent Supervising Solicitor. filed
> on 16-JUN-2017
> 16 2017-06-16 Montréal Affidavit of Independent Supervising Solicitor
> Daniel S. Drapeau sworn on 16-JUN-2017 on behalf of Independent
> Supervising Solicitor in support of Motion Doc. No. 14 with Exhibits
> DSD-1 to DSD-13 filed on 16-JUN-2017
> 15 2017-06-16 Montréal Consent on behalf of all parties to electronic
> service of all documents in this action. filed on 16-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-15 Ottawa Carte d'accusé de réception reçu(e) de la partie
> demanderesse concernant la directive de la Cour datée du 15 juin 2016
> (ID.28) placé(e) au dossier le 15-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-15 Ottawa Directives verbales reçu(es) du juge qui préside
> en date du 15-JUN-2017 La requête sera entendue le mercredi 21 juin
> 2017 à 9 h 30 en personne à Montréal pour une durée maximale de quatre
> heures. Les sousmissions de la partie défenderesse devront être
> signifiées et déposées au plus tard à midi le mardi 20 juin 2017.
> placées au dossier le 15-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-14 Ottawa Communication to the Court from the Registry dated
> 14-JUN-2017 re: Notice of Motion filed by the Plaintiffs (Document 14)
> sent to the office of the Judicial Administrator to be scheduled on a
> special sitting.
> - 2017-06-12 Ottawa Lettre couverture de la partie demanderesse en
> date du 12-JUN-2017 concernant le doc. no 14 placée au dossier le
> 12-JUN-2017
> 14 2017-06-12 Ottawa Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff
> returnable (but no hearing date indicated at this time) for A
> DECLARATION that the execution of the Anton Piller Order and Interim
> Injuction Order aspects of the Order of the Honourable Mr. Justice
> LeBlanc issued on June 9, 2017 were lawfully conducted... filed on
> 12-JUN-2017
> 13 2017-06-12 Ottawa Amended Order rendered on 12-JUN-2017 by The
> Honourable Mr. Justice LeBlanc filed on 12-JUN-2017 Matter considered
> without personal appearance amending the Order of the Court issued on
> June 9th 2017. (Doc. 9) entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1336 page(s)
> 449 - 473 Interlocutory Decision copies sent to the Paintiff
> - 2017-06-11 Ottawa Letter from Plaintiff dated 11-JUN-2017 "...Upon
> review of the Order as issued, the undersigned solicitors noted that
> it does not include Schedules I through III referred to therein..."
> -scanned to the presiding Judge- received on 11-JUN-2017
> 12 2017-06-09 Ottawa List of Exhibits on behalf of Plaintiff (Please
> note that the exhibits are placed in annex "VA") filed on 09-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-09 Ottawa Ottawa 09-JUN-2017 BEFORE The Honourable Mr.
> Justice LeBlanc Language: B Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 2 on
> behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter granted held in Court in
> camera Senior Usher: Denis Martin Duration per day: 09-JUN-2017 from
> 13:30 to 14:30 Courtroom : Conference Room 1104, 11th Floor - Thomas
> D'Arcy McGee Bldg. - Ottawa Court Registrar: Catherine Doré Total
> Duration: 1h Appearances: Me François Guay & Me Guillaume Lavoie
> St-Marie 514-954-1500 representing Plaintiff Documents filed at
> hearing: 11 Exhibits filed at hearing: P-1 to P-3 Comments: Hearing
> confidentiel Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 976 page(s) 342 - 345
> Abstract of Hearing placed on file
> 11 2017-06-09 Ottawa Affidavit of Sébastien Brossoit sworn on
> 05-JUN-2017 on behalf of Plaintiff in support of Motion Doc. No. 2
> with Exhibits SB-1 filed at hearing on 09-JUN-2017
> 10 2017-06-09 Ottawa Tender of payment into Court on behalf of
> Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 149 in the amount of $50,000.00 filed at
> hearing on 09-JUN-2017
> 9 2017-06-09 Ottawa Order dated 09-JUN-2017 rendered by The Honourable
> Mr. Justice LeBlanc Matter considered with personal appearance The
> Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc. No. 2 Result: granted
> Filed on 09-JUN-2017 certified copies sent to the Plaintiff entered in
> J. & O. Book, volume 1336 page(s) 391 - 408 Interlocutory Decision
> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Plaintiff
> with respect to Oral direction of the Court dated June 8, 2017. placed
> on file on 08-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Oral directions received from the presiding judge
> dated 08-JUN-2017 directing that "Further to the Motion Record filed
> by the Plaintiffs on June 5, 2017, the Court directs that the contents
> of the Court record in respect of this proceeding, including the
> Statement of Claim, this Motion Record, any Order rendered thereon,
> and any other documents filed in respect thereof, be held in sealed
> envelopes in the custody of the Court until forty-eight (48) hours
> following the time at which the solicitors of record for the
> Plaintiffs notify the Court that said Orders and Statement of Claim
> have been served on the Defendant." placed on file on 08-JUN-2017
> Confirmed in writing to the party(ies)
> - 2017-06-06 Montréal Oral directions received from the presiding
> judge dated 06-JUN-2017 directing that "Plaintiffs' written
> representations can be accepted for filing despite their title and
> length." placed on file on 06-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-06 Ottawa ****** ANNULÉ(E) ****** Directives verbales
> reçu(es) du juge qui préside en date du 06-JUN-2017 "La requête ex
> parte à huis clos confidentielle pour une injonction sera entendue le
> vendredi le 9 juin 2017 à 13h30 à 90 rue Sparks, Ottawa, Ontario en
> personne, pour une durée ne dépassant pas deux heures." placées au
> dossier le 06-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-06 Ottawa Directives verbales reçu(es) du juge qui préside
> en date du 06-JUN-2017 La requête ex parte à huis close confidentielle
> pour une injonction provisoire sera entendue le vendredi 9 juin 2017 à
> 13 h 30 à 90 rue Sparks, Ottawa, Onatrio, en personne, pour une durée
> ne dépassant pas deux heures. placées au dossier le 06-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-05 Montréal Book of Authorities consisting of 1 volume(s) on
> behalf of Plaintiff in support to Motion (doc. 2) received on
> 05-JUN-2017 Sent directly to Presiding Judge
> - 2017-06-05 Montréal Covering letter from Plaintiff dated 05-JUN-2017
> concerning Doc. No. 8 placed on file on 05-JUN-2017
> 8 2017-06-05 Montréal Motion Record containing the following original
> document(s): 2 3 4 5 6 7 Number of copies received: 3 on behalf of
> Plaintiff filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 7 2017-06-05 Montréal Written Representations contained within a
> Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
> filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 6 2017-06-05 Montréal Affidavit of Jon Medline sworn on 02-JUN-2017
> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in support of
> Motion Doc. No. 2 with Exhibits JM-1 to JM-10 filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 5 2017-06-05 Montréal Affidavit of Peggy Tabet sworn on 02-JUN-2017
> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in support of
> Motion Doc. No. 2 with Exhibits PT-1 to PT-11 filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 4 2017-06-05 Montréal Affidavit of Shawn Omstead sworn on 02-JUN-2017
> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in support of
> Motion Doc. No. 2 with Exhibits SO-1 to SO-25 filed on 05-JUN-2017
> 3 2017-06-05 Montréal Affidavit of Andrew McGuigan sworn on
> 04-JUN-2017 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
> support of Motion Doc. No. 2 with Exhibits AM-1 to AM-54 filed on
> 05-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-05 Ottawa Communication to the Court from the Registry dated
> 05-JUN-2017 re: re: Motion forwarded to Trial JA to fix special
> hearing date.
> - 2017-06-02 Montréal Lettre de la partie demanderesse en date du
> 02-JUN-2017 demandant que toute correspondance entre la Cour et les
> procureurs soussignés concernant ce dossier soit traitée de manière
> confidentielle et n'apparaisse pas au dossier public de la Cour
> jusqu'à l'audition de ladite requête. reçue le 02-JUN-2017
> - 2017-06-02 Montréal Draft Order concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
> received on 02-JUN-2017
> 2 2017-06-02 Montréal Notice of Motion made ex parte contained within
> a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff returnable (but no hearing date
> indicated at this time) for an interim injunction order (Anton Piller)
> (Mr. François Guay and Mr. Guillaume Lavoie Ste-Marie 514-954-1500)
> filed on 02-JUN-2017 Draft Order\\Judgment received.
> 1 2017-06-02 Montréal Statement of Claim filed on 02-JUN-2017 Tariff
> other action - $150.00
> The last database update occurred on 2017-08-02 17:35
> Top of page
>
> Several TVAddons Domains Transferred to Canadian Lawfirm
>
> • By Andy
> • on July 18, 2017
> • C: 57
> Breaking
> Last month, leading Kodi addon repository TVAddons shut down in the
> wake of a lawsuit filed in the US by satellite and broadcast provider
> Dish Network. Just over a month later and with no other news
> surfacing, TF has now discovered that several recent and historical
> TVAddons' domains have been transferred to a Canadian law firm.
> The last couple of months have been the most chaotic on record for
> the booming Kodi third-party addon scene. After years of largely
> interrupted service, a single lawsuit changed the entire landscape.
> Last month, TF broke the news that third-party Kodi add-on ZemTV and
> the TVAddons library were being sued in a federal court in Texas. The
> fallout was something to behold.
> Within days the ‘pirate’ Kodi community found itself in turmoil.
> Several high-profile Kodi addons took the decision to shut down and
> even TVAddons itself went dark without explanation.
> At the time, unsubstantiated rumors suggested that TVAddons’
> disappearance could be attributed to some coincidental site
> maintenance. However, with around 40 million regular users built up
> over a number of years, a disappearing Facebook page, and complete
> radio silence during alleged “routine maintenance,” something was
> clearly wrong.
> It would’ve taken just a couple of minutes to put a ‘maintenance’
> notice on the site but one didn’t appear back in June, and one hasn’t
> appeared since. Behind the scenes,
> however, things have been shifting.
> In addition to wiping the DNS entries of TVAddons.ag, on at least
> another couple of occasions the domain has been quietly updated. The
> image below shows how it used to look.
> TVAddons historical domain WHOIS
> PrivacyDotLink refers to a service offered by Cayman Islands-based
> registry Uniregistry. Instead of displaying the real name and address
> of the domain owner (in this case the person behind TVAddons.ag), the
> registry replaces the information with details of its own.
> The privacy service is used for many reasons, but it’s not hard to see
> why it’s of particular use to sites in the ‘pirate’ sector.
> While some of the changes to the TVAddons domain during the past five
> weeks or so haven’t been obvious, this morning we observed the biggest
> change yet. As seen in the image below, its ownership details are no
> longer obscured by the privacy service.
> TVAddons new domain WHOIS
> What stands out here is the name Daniel Drapeau. On closer inspection,
> this gentleman turns out to be a Canada-based lawyer who was admitted
> to the Quebec Bar in 1991.
> “A passion for IP and a 20 year track record, servicing corporations
> and individuals alike in a wide variety of industries, including
> industrial equipment, consumer products, publishing, food & beverage,
> fashion and arts,” Drapeau’s Linkedin page reads.
> “His forte is the strategic use of IP rights and litigation to achieve
> his clients’ goals, whether they be protective, aggressive or
> defensive. Specialties: Expeditive remedies, including injunctions and
> seizure orders.”
> The other fresh detail in the WHOIS is an address – 600, de
> Maisonneuve West, Montreal (Quebec) H3A 3J2. It’s a perfect match for
> the premises of DrapeauLex, a law firm launched by Drapeau in 2012.
> Only adding to the intrigue is the fact that other domains operated by
> TVAddons both recently and historically have also been transferred to
> the lawfirm.
> XMBCHUB.com, which was the domain used by TVAddons before making the
> switch several years ago, was transferred yesterday. The same can be
> said about Offshoregit.com, the domain used by TVAddons to distribute
> Kodi addons.
> While there are a few explanations for a lawyer’s name appearing on
> the TVAddons domains, none of them are yet supported by legal
> documentation filed in the United States. As of this morning, the Dish
> Network case docket had received no additional updates. No notice of
> action in Canada has been made public.
> Nevertheless, as a past president of the Intellectual Property
> Institute of Canada’s anti-counterfeiting committee, Drapeau is
> certainly an interesting character in the IP space. As noted in a 2009
> article by Professor of Law Michael Geist, Drapeau “urged the
> government to adopt a system of notice-and-takedown.”
> Interestingly, Drapeau also worked at law firm Smart & Biggar, where
> former colleague Jean-Sébastien Dupont recently went on to represent
> Canadian broadcasters in Wesley (Mtlfreetv.com) v. Bell Canada, the
> big Kodi-addon piracy case currently underway in Canada.
> At this stage, it’s unclear who Drapeau is working for in the TVAddons
> case. It’s possible that he’s working for Dish and this is a step
> towards the domains being handed over to the broadcaster as part of a
> settlement deal with TVAddons. That being said, the XBMChub and
> Offshoregit domains weren’t mentioned in the Dish lawsuit so something
> else might be underway.
> TorrentFreak reached out to Drapeau for comment and clarification, but
> at the time of publication, we had received no response.
> Dan Drapeau talks Intellectual Property from DrapeauLex on Vimeo.
> Tagged in:
> Kodi, TVaddons
>
Lackman was "not permitted to refuse to answer questions" and his lawyer wasn't permitted to counsel him in his answers.
"Any time I would question the process, they would threaten me with contempt of court proceedings," says Lackman.
That is a violation of a person lawyer and client privileged and rights
Time to take Bell to court and sue them for millions