BC Housing Sector Urges Federal Parties to Act on Affordability Recommendations
"Too many British Columbians struggle to find an affordable home to rent or own because of a lack of housing options. Nearly six in ten uncommitted Canadian voters cite access to affordable housing as a top election issue, according to an August 2019 Angus Reid survey.
The next federal government has the opportunity to improve affordability by reducing taxes on new rental homes, encouraging housing supply to match transit targets and changing mortgage underwriting rules.
Six organizations representing the BC housing sector have partnered to make housing affordability recommendations that focus on much-needed solutions."thics Guy
Trust that I called their "Ethics Guy" to explain my concerns about their Industry
Kim Spencer
Manager, Professional Standards
Kim oversees REBGV’s Professional Standards and Business Practices departments.
He began his career with Block Bros. Realty. Later, he was General Manager of Legend Real Estate Group. He’s also held positions as national sales manager of Top Producer Systems and Director of Member Service and Relations at the BC Real Estate Association.
Kim’s been a real estate educator for 35 years, teaching the real estate pre- and post-licensing courses and a number of professional development courses dealing with ethics, risk management and agency.
Known to REBGV’s members as ‘The Ethics Guy®’, Kim works with REALTORS® and managing brokers to promote professionalism and member cooperation in his bi-weekly column in the REALTOR® News. He also makes presentations at brokerages and member meetings.
When he’s not in the office, Kim enjoys spending time with his family and entertaining his varied interests from gardening to collecting classic cars.
Canadian mortgage and title insurers form new association
A group of mortgage and title insurance companies licensed to do business in Canada have signed a Letter of Intent formalizing their commitment to launch the Mortgage and Title Insurance Industry Association of Canada early in 2015
Author of the article:
Julius Melnitzer
Publishing date: December 10, 2014
A group of mortgage and title insurance companies licensed to do business in Canada have signed a Letter of Intent formalizing their commitment to launch the Mortgage and Title Insurance Industry Association of Canada early in 2015.
The new group consists of Canada Guaranty Mortgage Insurance Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, FCT Insurance Company Limited, Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Company of Canada and Travelers Insurance Company of Canada. The title insurance providers in this group are currently members of the Title Insurance Industry Association of Canada, which will transition its activities to the new association.
The Mortgage and Title Insurance Industry Association of Canada (MTIIAC) is a not-for-profit industry association representing a group of private-sector mortgage default insurers and title insurers. Collectively, MTIIAC members are proud to have helped millions of Canadian families and individuals realize the dream and security of homeownership.
We work with governments and stakeholders across Canada to reduce barriers to responsible homeownership and to help ensure a fair, safe, and stable real estate marketplace.
Together, our members are dedicated to making homeownership possible for people who are ready to buy, and to making homeownership safe and secure for all homebuyers.
MTIIAC Members
What we do
The object and purpose of MTIIAC is:
To promote the common interests and concerns of the private sector mortgage and title insurance industry in Canada;
To provide information and education to its members and the public;
To advocate for the betterment of and on behalf of the private sector mortgage and title insurance industry in Canada and our customers;
To maintain and promote professional standards and ethics in the mortgage and title insurance industry in Canada;
To promote open and fair competition among its members and other mortgage and title insurance providers in Canada, complying with all competition laws and regulations and not restraining competition or causing harm to consumers of mortgage and title insurance.
MTIIAC Principles of Fair Conduct
To engage only in business practices that are lawful and consistent with a high standard of ethical behaviour.
To encourage a culture of compliance within their organizations with federal and provincial laws and regulations that govern the mortgage and title insurance business and with these Principles.
To treat consumers in a fair and ethical manner.
To encourage and assist our customers/the homeowners we serve to be financially literate about our products and services and the protections these products afford them.
To promote open and fair completion among its members and other title and mortgage insurance providers in Canada, complying with all competition laws and regulations and not restraining competition or causing harm to consumers of title and mortgage insurance.
Randal Slavens joined Canada Guaranty in 2013 and is currently Vice President, Risk Management & Adjudication Strategy, where he is responsible for optimizing and managing all facets of the adjudication process. Prior to joining Canada Guaranty, Randal spent more than 10 years at TD Bank where he worked in a variety of roles including Risk Management, Real Estate Secured Lending and Treasury & Balance Sheet Management. Randal holds an MBA from the Rotman School of Management, a Master’s in International Affairs from Carleton University and a certification in Financial Risk Management.
John Rider is Senior Vice President Retail and Commercial Title Insurance at CTIC. John has a wealth of career knowledge and experience in strategic planning, operational restructuring and innovation, sales and sales training an product development. John is a lawyer who practiced in the area of Commercial Real Estate before leading the commercial department of another title insurance company in Canada, establishing the market for commercial title insurance in Canada. He is a graduate of Queens University and Western University.
Lori Sartor was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Title Insurance Industry Association of Canada (TIIAC) in October 2013. From October 2013 until March 2014 she held the office as Treasurer and in March 2014 Lori was appointed as Secretary of TIIAC.
Lori is currently Vice President, Residential Solutions and Marketing at FCT. As Vice President, Residential Solutions, Lori drives the strategic direction and product innovation for FCT’s lawyer segment.
Lori joined FCT in 1996 and during her tenure she has held a variety of roles including Vice President, Lender’s Advantage; and Vice President, Valuation Services.
In 2004, Lori completed her masters in business administration from York University’s Schulich School of Business with a focus on marketing and strategic management. Previous education achievements include an honours bachelor of arts from McMaster University and a legal assistant diploma from Fanshawe College.
Kris Barnier is Sagen MI Canada’s Vice President of Government Relations. Kris joined the Company in 2012. Prior to joining the Company, he served in the Offices of the Premier of Ontario, Minister of Finance and Deputy Premier of Ontario, and the Office of the Attorney General/Minister of Aboriginal Affairs of Ontario. He has also held senior Government Relations and Policy roles with the Toronto Board of Trade and Canadian Automobile Association. Kris received his honours Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Studies from Queen’s University in 1999 and his Post Diploma Certificate in Public Relations from Humber College in 2000.
Rob V. Budhwa is Senior Counsel (Corporate Lead) at FCT, where he has carriage of all corporate legal matters, litigation and complaints management. Prior to joining FCT, Rob had gained significant experience in providing both external and internal legal guidance in the banking and financial services industry in both the US and Canada. In particular, he focused on consumer lending (secured/unsecured), retail and commercial banking, and financial services regulatory matters. His dual licensure and experience have provided him with the unique ability to provide guidance on both sides of the border and identify cross-border gaps in industry practices for both large multinational firms and industry startups.
More recently, Rob served as General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Privacy Officer of CFF Bank, a Canadian Schedule I bank startup that raised approximately $245 million in assets and over $1.5 billion in loans under administration. During his time at CFF Bank, he successfully guided this newly licensed Schedule I Bank through a challenging regulatory framework while implementing a new innovative consumer lending division including secured/unsecured lending, retail banking products and mortgage originations.
Rob is currently licensed in both California and Ontario. Additionally, he believes in the importance of community development/involvement and in his spare time he serves on the Board of Directors for several local non-profit organizations.
Winsor Macdonell is Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Sagen MI Canada, the country’s largest private residential mortgage default insurer. Winsor is responsible for Sagen MI Canada’s legal, compliance and government relations activities. Winsor joined the company in 1999. Previously, he spent three years in the life and property and casualty industry. Winsor received an honours Bachelor of Commerce degree from Queens University and his LL.B. from Dalhousie University.
Steven Offer is Senior Vice President, Sales and Business Development, and Government Relations, responsible for business development with financial institutions and government relations for Chicago Title Insurance Company (Canadian Branch).
Steven was called to the Bar of the Law Society of Upper Canada in 1976. After a successful 9 years of private practice specializing in real estate and corporate commercial law and partner in the law firm of Offer & David, he was first elected as Member of Provincial Parliament for the riding of Mississauga North in 1985; and was re-elected in 1987 and 1990. Within a short time after joining the Legislative Assembly of Ontario in 1985, Steven was appointed Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations from June 1985 to September 1987; In 1987 Steven was appointed Parliamentary Assistant to the Attorney General and served in that capacity until 1989. In 1989 he was appointed to cabinet as the Solicitor General of Ontario.
Following his successful political career Steven joined the law firm of Anderson Sinclair in 1995 and pursued the practice of law in the areas of residential and corporate and commercial law. Additionally he became more involved in the provision of services to financial institutions and has been with the organization through to its evolution today where he has been instrumental in the creation of a variety of lending programs and processes.
Steven is also on the Government Relations Committee for the Canadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals (CAAMP) and has served on the Board of the Title Insurance Industry Association of Canada since its inception.
Steven has never forgotten the importance of community. He is a founding member of the Mississauga Children’s Festival, past board member of Forum Italia Non-Profit Housing Corporation; Mississauga Board of Trade and past member and Chair of the Mississauga Economic Advisory Council and Past-President of the Community Foundation of Mississauga. Steven continues his involvement with the Foundation.
With more than 25 years of mortgage industry experience, Maria joined Canada Guaranty in 2006 and is currently Senior Vice President, Operations where she is accountable for Underwriting, Loss Management, and Information & Technology functions of the business.
Prior to joining Canada Guaranty, Maria managed the Specialized Sales Forces for RBC Royal Bank where she oversaw strategic planning, training, analysis, and program development for this team. During her time at RBC, she held various management positions in sales, market planning and operations. Maria holds an MBA from Dalhousie University and is a Fellow of the Institute of Canadian Bankers.
Prior to joining MTIIAC, Ed served as Director of Policy to Ontario’s Minister of Government and Consumer Services and the Minister Responsible for Accessibility. He previously held a variety of policy and communications roles in the offices of the Minister of Children and Youth Services, the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, the Minister Responsible for the 2015 Pan/Parapan Am Games and the Minister of Labour.
Mail: PO Box 26056 Churchill Mississauga, Ontario L5L 5W7
Anyone can scroll down to review the fact that I talked to the political lawyer Steven Offer years ago and the lawyer John Rider must have recalled my many spit and chews with his pals in First Canadian Title. I must say the FNF Canada characters where very stupid not to return my calls today and even dumber yet to piss me off by having another Yankee lawyer call me and try to play dumb just like they have done for 15 very long years
What would this lawyer have done if she were to see her husband falsely imprisoned then thrown out of her home that she had paid the mortgage off on many years before byway of bullshit about unpaid rent owed to nobody then have legions of cops lawyers and politicians laugh about her family's plight for 16 years while she raised her children alone???
Kimberly Wilson is a Managing Counsel & Vice President at Fidelity National Financial based in Jacksonville, Florida.
---------- Original message ---------- From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:08:15 +0000 Subject: RE: The Norfolk County Register of Deeds and very crooked lawyer little Billy O'Donnell refused to discuss the Homestead Act with me in 2004 long before my wife and kids were thrown in the streets of Milton To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:07:54 -0400 Subject: The Norfolk County Register of Deeds and very crooked lawyer little Billy O'Donnell refused to discuss the Homestead Act with me in 2004 long before my wife and kids were thrown in the streets of Milton To: jacampbell@fnf.com, charles.dattola@fnf.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, TMitchell@fnf.com, tnolan@fnf.com, registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org, cgaska@firstam.com, investor.relations@firstam.com, debsmith@fnf.com, dkmurphy@fnf.com, maria.filippelli@fnf.com, Lon.Povich@state.ma.us, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, gopublic@cbc.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, corporate.communications@firstam.com Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca
Need I say that this video by little Billy O'Donnell still pisses me off to this very day?
Obviously I made certain that all the mindless Fidelity lawyers you sold the Title Insurance on the very fraudulent real estate sale ordered by a very corrupt probate court knew all about it very long time ago In fact it was in early 2006 when I discovered the lawyers conned my wife into settling with the crooks with my forged signature CORRECT Jeffrey A Campbell and Barry Bachrach?
NCRD Homestead Announcement 4,656 views NorfolkDeeds Published on Dec 20, 2011 NCRD Homestead Announcement - Norfolk County Register of Deeds Bill O'Donnell discusses the Homestead Act
---------- Original message ---------- From: "Mitchell, Toni" TMitchell@fnf.com Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 07:26:13 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Bruce Herring and the jokers in Fidelity calls lawyers need another clue EH? To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I am attending a seminar today and will have limited access to email and voice mail. If you need assistance in my absence, please call 617-350-8828 and ask for your call to be directed to the appropriate party. Thank you.
---------- Original message ---------- From: "Wilson, Kim"<Kim.Wilson@fnf.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:55:01 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: The RCMP Watch Dogs, the FNF, and many lawyers such as Kenny DeGiorgio, Lenny Prescott should not deny that I called them all again Correct Kimberly Wilson ? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
ALERT YOU WILL ONLY RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE ONCE.
I am out currently out of the office and will not return until the next business day. I will not have access to my email or voicemail while I am out of the office.
My office hours are 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. and I will respond to your message as soon as possible when I return to the office.
If you need immediate assistance and cannot wait until my return to the office, please see contact list below.
Agency Account Manager: Barry.mazer@fnf.com<mailto:Barry.mazer@fnf.com> Cell 941-928-9924 ________________________________ NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:54:51 -0700 Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: The RCMP Watch Dogs, the FNF, and many lawyers such as Kenny DeGiorgio, Lenny Prescott should not deny that I called them all again Correct Kimberly Wilson ? To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Thank you for getting in touch with MPP Caroline Mulroney. This account is no longer being routinely monitored.
If your matter is related to the Ministry of the Attorney General, please email attorneygeneral@ontario.ca. For all other inquiries, please email caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org and a member of our team will be happy to assist you.
Thank you again for getting in touch with MPP Mulroney.
Sincerely,
-- Office of Caroline Mulroney
MPP York-Simcoe Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Francophone Affairs
Députée pour York-Simcoe procureure générale et ministre déléguée aux Affaires francophones
---------- Original message ---------- From: Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:54:51 -0700 Subject: Out of the office Re: The RCMP Watch Dogs, the FNF, and many lawyers such as Kenny DeGiorgio, Lenny Prescott should not deny that I called them all again Correct Kimberly Wilson ? To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Thank you for your message. I am currently out of the office and not responding to emails at this time. I will return any emails upon my return Monday, April 19. If this is an urgent matter related to editorial, please contact Times Globe managing editor Barbara Simpson.
All the best, Nathalie
*Nathalie Sturgeon * Reporter, Telegraph-Journal | Brunswick News Inc. ------------------------------
---------- Original message ---------- From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:54:50 +0000 Subject: Automatic Reply To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:54:52 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: The RCMP Watch Dogs, the FNF, and many lawyers such as Kenny DeGiorgio, Lenny Prescott should not deny that I called them all again Correct Kimberly Wilson ? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email. ______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ---------- From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:55:39 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: The RCMP Watch Dogs, the FNF, and many lawyers such as Kenny DeGiorgio, Lenny Prescott should not deny that I called them all again Correct Kimberly Wilson ? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your understanding.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at (506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse. Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Wednesday, 14 April 2021 Since 2004 I have proven many times to many people that the lawyers who fraudlently sold my wife's homes and sold Title Insurance on the evil deals should be prosecuted
What would this lawyer have done if she were to see her husband falsely imprisoned then thrown out of her home that she had paid the mortgage off on many years before byway of bullshit about unpaid rent owed to nobody then have legions of cops lawyers and politicians laugh about her family's plight for 16 years while she raised her children alone???
Kimberly Wilson 1292 Queens Island Ct, Jacksonville, FL 32225 904 535 8130 Kimberly Wilson is a Managing Counsel & Vice President at Fidelity National Financial based in Jacksonville, Florida.
Fidelity National Title Group Wilson, Kimberly
Here is a link to one about the same issues from 2017
Monday, 20 November 2017 The Norfolk County Register of Deeds and very crooked lawyer little Billy O'Donnell refused to discuss the Homestead Act with me in 2004 long before my wife and kids were thrown in the streets of Milton
---------- Original message ---------- From: "Mitchell, Toni"<TMitchell@fnf.com> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:36:04 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: I called again To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office on vacation until Tuesday, Dec. 4th and will only check email occassionally. I will have no access to voice mail. If you need immediate assistance please call 800-882-1266 and ask to be directed to someone who can assist you. Thank you. ________________________________ NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@d2-ironport03.sec.gov> Date: 03 Dec 2018 12:42:05 -0500 Subject: Message Notification To:
Thank you for contacting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of Inspector General (OIG). We have received your submission and will evaluate the information provided and take appropriate action, which may include referral to another SEC office, notification to another agency, or additional inquiry. In this regard, please note the following:
• If you believe your life is in imminent danger, contact your local law enforcement department. • We only have the authority to address allegations or complaints that relate to SEC programs, operations, and personnel. • In some cases, we may need to contact you for further information in order to evaluate your allegation(s). We may contact you from an SEC email address such as OIG@sec.gov or by calling you from 202-551-2000. Please do not attempt to contact us on 202-551-2000 as this number is not equipped to receive incoming calls. • Should you wish to make a complaint or report information to the SEC OIG, you may do so by visiting our website at https://www.sec.gov/oig, clicking on the link Submit Online Hotline Complaint to access our web form, or by calling our toll-free hotline at (877) 442-0854. Please note that you may remain anonymous, however; this may limit our ability to investigate if we are unable to contact you for additional information.
Thank you again for contacting the OIG.
Respectfully,
The Office of Inspector General U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-2977 Fax: 202-772-9265; oig@sec.gov
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@d2-ironport03.sec.gov> Date: 20 Sep 2017 11:56:37 -0400 Subject: Message Notification To:
Thank you for contacting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of Inspector General (OIG). We have received your submission and will evaluate the information provided and take appropriate action, which may include referral to another SEC office, notification to another agency, or additional inquiry. In this regard, please note the following:
• If you believe your life is in imminent danger, contact your local law enforcement department. • We only have the authority to address allegations or complaints that relate to SEC programs, operations, and personnel. • In some cases, we may need to contact you for further information in order to evaluate your allegation(s). We may contact you from an SEC email address such as OIG@sec.gov or by calling you from 202-551-2000. Please do not attempt to contact us on 202-551-2000 as this number is not equipped to receive incoming calls. • Should you wish to make a complaint or report information to the SEC OIG, you may do so by visiting our website at https://www.sec.gov/oig, clicking on the link Submit Online Hotline Complaint to access our web form, or by calling our toll-free hotline at (877) 442-0854. Please note that you may remain anonymous, however; this may limit our ability to investigate if we are unable to contact you for additional information.
Thank you again for contacting the OIG.
Respectfully,
The Office of Inspector General U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-2977 Fax: 202-772-9265; oig@sec.gov
Steven Offer is Senior Vice President, Sales and Business Development, and Government Relations, responsible for business development with financial institutions and government relations.
Steven was called to the Bar of the Law Society of Upper Canada in 1976. After a successful 9 years of private practice specializing in real estate and corporate commercial law and partner in the law firm of Offer & David, he was first elected as Member of Provincial Parliament for the riding of Mississauga North in 1985; and was re-elected in 1987 and 1990. Within a short time after joining the Legislative Assembly of Ontario in 1985, Steven was appointed Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations from June 1985 to September 1987; In 1987 Steven was appointed Parliamentary Assistant to the Attorney General and served in that capacity until 1989. In 1989 he was appointed to cabinet as the Solicitor General of Ontario.
Following his successful political career Steven joined the law firm of Anderson Sinclair in 1995 and pursued the practice of law in the areas of residential and corporate and commercial law. Additionally he became more involved in the provision of services to financial institutions and has been with the organization through to its evolution today where he has been instrumental in the creation of a variety of lending programs and processes.
Steven now serves as the Secretary of the Title Insurance Industry Association of Canada (TIIAC). He is also on the Government Relations Committee for the Canadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals (CAAMP) and is a member of the CAAMP Fraud Committee.
Steven has never forgotten the importance of community. He is a founding member of the Mississauga Children’s Festival, past board member of Forum Italia Non-Profit Housing Corporation; Mississauga Board of Trade and past member and Chair of the Mississauga Economic Advisory Council. He is currently the President of the Community Foundation of Mississauga.
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE:FNF), is a leading provider of title insurance and transaction services to the real estate and mortgage industries. FNF is the nation’s largest title insurance company through its title insurance underwriters – Fidelity National Title, Chicago Title, Commonwealth Land Title, Alamo Title and National Title of New York – that collectively issue more title insurance policies than any other title company in the United States.
You can contact Fidelity National Financial, Inc.'s Board of Directors to provide comments, to report concerns, or to ask a question, at the following address.
Corporate Secretary Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Ave Jacksonville, FL 32204 United States
Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel, Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
Mr. Michael L. Gravelle is a Secretary & General Counsel at Austerlitz Acquisition Corp. II, a Secretary & General Counsel at Austerlitz Acquisition Corp. I, a Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel at Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp., a Chief Compliance Officer at Trasimene Capital Management LLC, a Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel at Cannae Holdings, Inc., a Secretary & Managing Director at Fidelity National Financial Ventures LLC, an Executive Vice President & General Counsel at Black Knight, Inc., a Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel at Black Knight Financial Services LLC, a Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel at ServiceLink Holdings LLC, a Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel at Fidelity National Financial, Inc., a Secretary & General Counsel at Trasimene Capital FT LP II, a Secretary, Director, General Counsel & EVP at New BKH Corp. and a Senior Vice President at Certegy Payment Services, Inc. He is on the Board of Directors at Fidelity National Title Insurance Co., WildCard Systems, Inc. and New BKH Corp. Mr. Gravelle was previously employed as a Secretary & General Counsel by Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II, an Executive Secretary & Director by Black Knight Financial Services, Inc., a Secretary, Senior Vice President & General Counsel by Remy International, Inc., a Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel by Lender Processing Services, Inc., a Secretary, Chief Legal Officer & Executive VP by Fidelity Information Services LLC, a Secretary, Chief Legal Officer & Executive VP by Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Secretary, Senior Vice President & General Counsel by Old Remco Holdings LLC, a Secretary, Executive VP & General Counsel by Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.
Meet the team behind FNF Canada
Dustin Allan
President
Dustin Allan is President of FNF Canada. In his current role Dustin oversees the activities of all five major business lines of the company with full P & L responsibility and oversight of day to day activities that drive customer satisfaction and adherence to service level agreements.
Dustin has spent over 15 years in the Canadian financial services industry spending much of that time at one of the Schedule A banks in a variety of operations, marketing, and sales roles.
Dustin holds a Master of Business Administration graduate degree from University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Business
Steven Offer
Senior Vice President, Sales, Business Development & Government Relations
Steven Offer is Senior Vice President, Sales and Business Development, and Government Relations, responsible for business development with financial institutions and government relations.
Steven was called to the Bar of the Law Society of Upper Canada in 1976. After a successful 9 years of private practice specializing in real estate and corporate commercial law and partner in the law firm of Offer & David, he was first elected as Member of Provincial Parliament for the riding of Mississauga North in 1985; and was re-elected in 1987 and 1990. Within a short time after joining the Legislative Assembly of Ontario in 1985, Steven was appointed Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations from June 1985 to September 1987; In 1987 Steven was appointed Parliamentary Assistant to the Attorney General and served in that capacity until 1989. In 1989 he was appointed to cabinet as the Solicitor General of Ontario.
Following his successful political career Steven joined the law firm of Anderson Sinclair in 1995 and pursued the practice of law in the areas of residential and corporate and commercial law. Additionally he became more involved in the provision of services to financial institutions and has been with the organization through to its evolution today where he has been instrumental in the creation of a variety of lending programs and processes.
Steven now serves as a member of the Mortgage and Title Insurance Industry Association of Canada (MTIIAC).
Steven has never forgotten the importance of community. He was a founding member of the Mississauga Children’s Festival, past board member of Forum Italia Non-Profit Housing Corporation; Mississauga Board of Trade and past member and Chair of the Mississauga Economic Advisory Council.
Craig O’Brien
Vice President, Sales & Business Development
Craig O’Brien is Vice President, Sales & Business Development at FNF Canad
Craig is responsible for the continued development and growth of multiple business lines throughout Canada. He has a diverse background with extensive experience in the Appraisal Management sector in Canada and throughout sixteen Caribbean countries. Craig has also held senior leadership roles in mortgage lending, strategy, credit and operations in both non-prime and prime mortgage business lines.
Craig works very closely with several large financial Institutions, credit unions, mortgage associations and a number of other banks and mortgage broker lender partners; and is a current member of Mortgage Professionals Canada.
As Vice President, National Underwriting Counsel for Chicago Title Insurance Company Canada Brigitte is responsible for title insurance underwriting and risk assessment on residential and commercial transactions in all Canadian Provinces and Territories. Brigitte brings a wealth of expertise and knowledge with regards to risk assessment and underwriting all types of real estate transactions.
Solution oriented and known to bring creative options to the table, Brigitte has worked on major real estate transactions, mortgage portfolios, cross-border transactions and renewable energy projects, to only name a few. Brigitte has been invited to be a guest speaker at various conferences with the Real Estate Forum, The Canadian Bar Association, The Canadian Institute and CAAMP.
Brigitte obtained her law degree in Ottawa and her Notarial Diploma in Quebec City. Member of the Chambre des Notaires du Québec, Brigitte is also a certified insurance representative and claims adjuster with the Autorité des marchés financiers in the Province of Québec.
TORONTO, ON, August 30, 2017– Indigoblue Group of Companies, an industry leader providing innovative solutions and consistently superior returns and service through its Mortgage Investment Corporation and Legal Group, is pleased to announce a strategic partnership with Chicago Title Insurance Company Canada, a national provider of residential and commercial title insurance products, as well as FNF Canada, an innovative provider of national mortgage, appraisal and loan related services to large and small Canadian lenders.
“We are pleased to be a strategic partner with Chicago Title Insurance Company Canada and FNF Canada. We share a common vision of providing our partners and clients with unparalleled service, return on investment and innovative solutions. Our partnership further allows us to service our clients efficiently while providing customized solutions. We are very excited about this partnership and look forward to building on it in years to come, said Harry Singh, Chief Executive Officer, Indigoblue Group of Companies.
In this new strategic partnership, Chicago Title Insurance Company Canada will act as the sole provider of residential title insurance solutions and FNF Canada will handle all of the full-service appraisal management services that support the mortgage brokers at Indigoblue MIC.
“As part of our continued expansion into the private mortgage investment corporation market, we look forward to working with the Indigoblue Group of Companies. Our new partnership gives our company additional strength in supporting all facets of the mortgage industry, allowing us to service the evolving needs of our strategic partners and clients, said Craig O’Brien, Vice President, Sales and Business Development at FNF Canada. ”
About FNF Canada FNF Canada is an innovative provider of national mortgage, appraisal, and loan related services to large and small Canadian lenders. FNF Canada specializes in facilitating all aspects of a mortgage transaction, including title insurance, document processing, property tax management, appraisal management and valuations services. Our exclusive end to end solution suite is unmatched in the industry, seamlessly integrating all FNF services on a single platform which provides our customers with the complete transaction life cycle. For more information about FNF Canada, visit www.fnf.ca
About Chicago Title Insurance Company Canada Chicago Title Insurance Company is a wholly owned division of Fidelity National Financial (FNF). FNF, operating through its subsidiary Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., is one of the North America’s largest title companies, providing core title insurance products, escrow, and other real estate related products. FNF, a Fortune 500 company, has offered security for real estate transactions for over 150 years. Chicago Title Insurance Company, a subsidiary of FNF has been licensed In Canada for nearly 50 years. For more Information about Chicago Title Insurance Company Canada, visit www.chicagotitle.ca
About Indigoblue Group of Companies Indigoblue Group of Companies is an industry leader delivering consistently superior service and returns through Indigoblue Mortgage Investment Corporation (MIC) and Indigoblue Legal Group. The group provides alternative mortgage solutions, alternative investments and real estate law services to Canadians.
Indigoblue MIC is primarily focused on residential mortgage opportunities that fill the gap created by tighter lending guidelines at traditional banks and trust companies. Guided by corporate governance and strategic knowledge provided by highly seasoned independent board of directors, Indigoblue MIC is led by a team of industry veterans who have previously managed and guided operations of highly efficient lenders in the Canadian marketplace. With a sharp focus on safeguarding investor assets, the fund originates mortgage opportunities primarily through the Canadian mortgage broker network. Indigoblue MIC holds maintains a strong reputation for consistently superior service in combination with transparent pricing and lending policies. For more information about Indigoblue MIC visit, www.ibmic.ca
Indigoblue Legal Group is a legal practice in Ontario committed to providing exceptional service in the areas of real estate, corporate law, and trademarks. Indigoblue Legal Group specializes in servicing real estate transactions including: buying, selling, mortgage refinancing, review of real estate contracts such as: commercial head leases, and/or transferring title/ ownership. For more information about Indigoblue Legal Group visit, www.iblegal.ca
Contacts FNF and Chicago Title Insurance Company Canada Media Sandy Huard, 289-562-0088 x 24184 Director, Marketing & Communications shuard@fnf.ca
FNF Canada Craig O’Brien, 289-562-0088 x 24432 VP, Sales & Business Development cobrien@fnf.ca
Chicago Title Insurance Company Canada John Rider, 289-562-5216 x 24476 SVP Retail and Commercial Title Insurance jrider@ctic.ca
Indigoblue Group of Companies
Media Kayla Patullo, 877-260-5307 Director, Marketing and Operations kayla@indigoblue.ca
Indigoblue Group of Companies Harry Singh, 877-219-3138 Chief Executive Officer harry@indigoblue.ca
Indigoblue Legal Group Alessandra Ocampo, 877-278-8014 Barrister & Solicitor alessandra@indigoblue.ca
John Rider
Senior Vice President, Retail and Commercial Title Insurance - Chicago Title Insurance Company, Canada
Chicago Title Insurance Company has been providing security for real estate transactions for over 150 years and has been protecting Canadians for the last 35 of those years. Chicago Title is a subsidiary of Fidelity National Title Group, the world's largest title insurer and an industry leader in all measures of financial strength.In fact, based on its worldwide operations, Fidelity National Title Group generates the largest claims reserves in the industry. As part of the Fidelity family of underwriters, every insurance policy written by Chicago Title in Canada is backed by those financial resources.
Consulting to Cognition LLP as their Chief Innovator, developing and assisting with Strategy, operations, new product development, sales programming and business development/sales.
Mr. Amos, We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Clearly somebody Is very nervous and wondering when you will do your job EH Bobby Paulson and Deanoo Buzza????
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,141 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 192.223.136.# (Fidelity Investments) ISP Fidelity Investments Location Continent : Europe Country : United Kingdom (Facts) State/Region : London, City of City : London Lat/Long : 51.5, -0.1167 (Map) Language unknown Operating System Unknown Unknown Browser Netscape 4.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;) Javascript disabled Time of Visit Oct 22 2012 3:09:11 pm Last Page View Oct 22 2012 3:09:11 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL unknown Visit Entry Page Visit Exit Page Out Click Time Zone unknown Visitor's Time Unknown Visit Number 29,141
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,142 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 192.223.136.# (Fidelity Investments) ISP Fidelity Investments Location Continent : Europe Country : United Kingdom (Facts) State/Region : London, City of City : London Lat/Long : 51.5, -0.1167 (Map) Language unknown Operating System Microsoft WinNT Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E) Javascript disabled Time of Visit Oct 22 2012 3:09:11 pm Last Page View Oct 22 2012 3:09:13 pm Visit Length 2 seconds Page Views 2 Referring URL unknown Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....nk-fraud-payout.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....nk-fraud-payout.html Out Click Time Zone unknown Visitor's Time Unknown Visit Number 29,142
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,079 Domain Name cibc.ca ? (Canada) IP Address 199.198.251.# (CIBC World Markets) ISP CIBC World Markets Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : New York City : New York Lat/Long : 40.7528, -73.9725 (Map) Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 17 2012 10:02:09 pm Last Page View Oct 17 2012 10:02:09 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL http://www.google.ca...NEJ2IL7cj1xsTVXbAU1_ Search Engine google.ca Search Words jennifer warren cibc Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-5:00 Visitor's Time Oct 17 2012 4:02:09 pm Visit Number 29,079
Plus you certainly testified at the US Senate Baknking Commitee on the same day you thanked me. Furthermore when notified you and many others before and after you became governor that the Senate's records were missing the FBI were not long catching you with the wrong lady in Wasington but you were never prosected. Howcome??? Years later in 2011 I raised hell with CNN about YOU and the missing records YOUR In the the ARENA show was quickly cancelled CORRECT?
Please don't even try to pretend that I did not just send you this Tweet. As you no doubt know I keep perfect records.
10:33 PM - 24 Oct 12 · Details Tweet text Reply to @CurrentSpitzer Reply to @CurrentSpitzer David Marshall@DJMMarshall Image will appear as a link Add location Link will appear shortened Links will appear shortened 115Tweet
Eliot Spitzer: The Romney campaign ‘is so much less than meets the eye’ “The anxiety about our future that has allowed Mitt Romney a seat at the table is what will drive our politics for the next decade.” —Eliot Spitzer read post
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,156 Domain Name qwest.net ? (Network) IP Address 65.126.23.# (US TREASURY) ISP Qwest Communications Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Georgia City : Atlanta Lat/Long : 33.6222, -84.5231 (Map) Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinNT Browser Firefox Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1 Javascript version 1.5 Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024 Color Depth : 24 bits Time of Visit Oct 24 2012 3:34:48 pm Last Page View Oct 24 2012 3:34:48 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL http://www.google.co...zsAQlGzG9stxwNllgwig Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....ling-led-to-911.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....ling-led-to-911.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-5:00 Visitor's Time Oct 24 2012 9:34:48 am Visit Number 29,156
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,155 Domain Name qwest.net ? (Network) IP Address 65.126.23.# (US TREASURY) ISP Qwest Communications Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Georgia City : Atlanta Lat/Long : 33.6222, -84.5231 (Map) Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinNT Browser Firefox Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1 Javascript version 1.5 Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024 Color Depth : 24 bits Time of Visit Oct 24 2012 3:14:46 pm Last Page View Oct 24 2012 3:14:46 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL http://www.google.co...zsAQlGzG9stxwNllgwig Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....ling-led-to-911.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....ling-led-to-911.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-5:00 Visitor's Time Oct 24 2012 9:14:46 am Visit Number 29,155
Bob Bauer a former blogger for Huffington Post returned to Perkins $ Coie after a period of service to President Barack Obama as his White House Counsel from December of 2009 until June of 2011.
He is now General Counsel to the President’s re-election committee, to Obama for America, and General Counsel to the Democratic National Committee. He has also served as co-counsel to the New Hampshire State Senate in the trial of Chief Justice David A. Brock (2000); general counsel to the Bill Bradley for President Committee (1999-2000); and counsel to the Democratic Leader in the trial of President William Jefferson Clinton (1999).
He has co-authored numerous bipartisan reports, including "Report of Counsel to the Senate Rules and Administration Committee in the Matter of the United States Senate Seat From Louisiana" in the 105th Congress of the United States (March 27, 1997); "Campaign Finance Reform," A Report to the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the United States Senate (March 6, 1990); and "The Presidential Election Process in the Philippines" (1986), a bipartisan report prepared at the request of the Chairman and Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
Too bad so sad the lawyer Obama didn't ignore his legal counsel and check my work for himself long ago. It is clear to me that Bob Bauer never studied Maritimers and their lawsuits as closely as I studied his work over the years.
If Obama does not finally simply say my name and expose what he knows about Romney and I way back before he was even a Governor then he deserves to lose this election.
However even though I would NOT wish to see another GOP president you and your Bankster buddies won't mind that a bit but I doubt the NDP and the Liberals will agree EH Mr Prime Minister?
Somebody wise should scroll to the bottom of this email and understand that it was Fidelity that knowingly sold the Title Insurance on the fraduulent sale of my family's home in 2005 then Citizens Bank illegally recorded the discharge of a mortage long after the deal was done. They and the FSA know I have the records from the Registry of Deeds. Clearly the Royal Bank Of Scotland and British FSA has ADMITTED knowing all this for way past too long.
Veritas Vincit David Raymond Amos 902 800 0369
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> To: <info@chicagotitle.ca> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:01 PM Subject: Fwd: Here is why I hung on the lawyer for Fidelity, Deb Smith
She said she did not get my email even after I had the proof I that I had sent it to her twice. I know the lawyers for First American Title are not any more ethical but at least after all my calls and emails and blogs etc they can't say their company didn't know the awful truth about themselves before we meet in court.
Veritas Vincit David Raymond amos
From: Smith, Debra - New York debsmith@fnf.com Date: Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: First American and Fidelity National Title Insurance dudes and other Real Estate Crooks To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
I will be out of the office from Monday, October 13th through Friday, October 17th. I will have no access to email. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Maria Filippelli at maria.filippelli@fnf.com or 212-880-1317. Thank you. Debra
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:36 PM Subject: RE: First American and Fidelity National Title Insurance dudes and other Real Estate Crooks To: debsmith@fnf.com
Hey Gypsy just in case you think I am joking about Mikey Allen and the Alliance Realty dudes in Moncton and the Cendant Corp dudes in New Jersey who read my work in your blog quite often, I figured I would expand on things a little bit for the benefit of my fellow common man who pays taxes and and the mortgage on his home in good faith that the bankers and government are ethical and won't screw him out of house and home the first chance they get if you have the power to embarass them. It happened to me and it can happen to anyone.
To stay on topic in this blog here is a little bit of what your MP Mikey Allen knew about mean old me as soon as he got elected in 2006. Hell I even discussed this crap with him on the phone after the election and he asked what he could do. I demanded that he uphold his oath as a parliamentarian and uphold the laws that the smiling bastards make then I went to Woodsock and stuck some documents and CD under his door to prove to him I am a man of my word and that his boss Stevey Boy Harper was a crook. A bunch of kids in the computer access place right next door to Allen's office watched me do it after I explained some shit to them and they had told me that the new Neo Con government had cut the funding and they were about to be shut down. Hell I even said it in Youtube the day after I did it.
Rest assured that the New Brunswick Real Estate Association learned last year what their overseer the Minister of Justice of New Brunswick knew I knew about their business over four years ago. The crooks in Cendant Corp and the Title company dudes have laughed at me way past too long for the benefit of Stevey Boy Harper and his puppet master. Brian Mulroney.
Here are just a few of quite litterly thousands of document lawyers do not want to argue with me about. I am writng this as I wait for John Hershberger of Fidelity National Title Insurance in Jacksonville, FL, 32207 to never call me back as usual. (904 854 8976)
The above documents about Putnam Investments, Coldwell Bankers, Cendant Corp, Brian Mulroney and the US Senate Committee on Banking caused the following hearings from years ago to disappear from the Congrgessional record just as soon as I made a few calls at about this time last year.
These are the title dudes top lawyers. These publicly held corporations sold the Title Insurance on two very fraudulent real estate transactions which involves the forging of my wife's signature and the creation of a fraudulent document bearing mine etc etc. The first order of business of any lawyer working for a publicly held company is to protect its shareholders' investment. The lawyers MUST act with integrity not only according to their licence to practice law for a fee but according to the Code of Ethical Conduct of the publicly held company.
The lawyers were very foolish indeed to make false allegations against me while I was running for aseat in the 39th Parliament and then invite me to sue their company just because they thought the corrupt public officials would protect their fancy arses. Now that the actions of many bankers, accountants and lawyers etc involving countless questionable real estate business have come under scrutiny methinks somebody should settle with me ASAP and tell the truth thewhole the and nothing but the truth for the benefit of many people around the world who have lost bags of money already because of loss of confidence in their business.
Kenneth D. DeGiorgio Senior Vice President, General Counsel The First American Corporation
Corporate Headquarters: The First American Corporation1 First American WaySanta Ana, California 92707 Toll Free: 1.800.854.3643 Local: 1.714.250.3000
Kenneth D. DeGiorgio is senior vice president and general counsel for The First American Corporation.
DeGiorgio's tenure with First American began in 1999 when he was appointed regulatory counsel. He was promoted to vice president and associate general counsel in 2001, then to his current position as senior vice president and general counsel three years later. DeGiorgio also serves on the board of directors of RP Data Ltd., an Australian public company in which First American owns a minority interest.
DeGiorgio began his career as an associate in the Los Angeles office of White & Case, a law firm based in New York. A California native, he graduated with honors from Harvard University before attending University of California, Los Angeles School of Law, where he earned a juris doctor degree; and Anderson Graduate School of Management at UCLA, where he received a master’s degree in business administration. DeGiorgio resides in Long Beach, Calif.
Peter T. Sadowski Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
Peter T. Sadowski is Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE: FNF), a Fortune 500 provider, and a leading provider of title insurance, specialty insurance and claims management services.
As Chief Legal Officer, Peter manages the Company's Legal Department, consisting of more than 200 attorneys, paralegals and support personnel from coast to coast. In addition, Peter directs Fidelity National Global Solutions, the company's international arm; the UCCPlus division; as well as directing the National Title Services of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company and the National Business Units of Chicago Title Insurance Company. These national commercial units handle large, multi-state, multi-site commercial transactions and work directly with large national clients.
Peter was born in Warsaw, Poland, and came to the United States at the age of 14. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from St. Louis University in 1976 and his Law degree in 1978 from St. Louis University School of Law.
During the first two years after law school, Peter served as Assistant Attorney General of Missouri under John Ashcroft, who was then Missouri Attorney General and who became the U.S. Attorney General under President George W. Bush. In 1980 he joined the Stolar Partnership, a law firm in St. Louis, where he became a partner in 1984. In 1996 Peter formed his own firm, named Goldberg, Katz, Sadowski and Stansen.
Peter joined Fidelity National Financial in January 1999 and works from its headquarters in Jacksonville, Florida.
Perhaps the lawyer within Mr Motamed should read the document hereto attached and finally call me back HIMSELF in order to have CNA settle with me ASAP for the benefit of its shareholders. The wrongs of your client are irrefuttable.
I am tired of CNA's minor minions being rude and inviting me to sue the company or being very nice but playing as dumb as posts. After your company acknowledged receiving the last three emails I sent directly to you I see no reason why I shouldn't sue you and youor associates personally as well. Do you Mr Motamed??? I doubt that you would be as patient as I after the ridulous letter I got fron one of CNA's lawyers in 2005.
After seven long years of waiting for the PUBLICLY held company to finally act ethically I called YOUR lawyers' offices and several others. In return NOBODY within CNA would talk to me or return my calls once AGAIN. Everybody was in a "meeting" as usual. However many found the time to surf the Internet in order to try to figure out why I am so pissed off and preparing to sue CNA and a host of other companies. Trevor Schauenberg should know that the same holds true for GE.
Scroll down to see a little proof of the obvious malice from CNA today. First I will prove to you that you dudes brag to much for your own good and that I am not as dumb as you lawyers claim I am. EH Mr Obama: coumsel??? ( Say Hoka Hey to Mitt, Madoff, Greg Craig and his buddy Mr Eisen for me will ya?)
Maritimers know how litigate, play on the stock market and practice hard ball politicking too. After all this is the 200 year anniversary of the War of 1812 in that one pissed off Canadians burnt the White House and half of Washington Correct Mr Harper?
From: Information At CNA Surety <info@cnasurety.com> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 03:22:27 +0000 Subject: E-mail Receipt Acknowledgment To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your interest in CNA Surety. This is to acknowledge receipt of your email.
Your inquiry has been forwarded to the appropriate department for handling. You can expect a response soon, usually within one business day if this is an underwriting issue.
If this matter relates to a claim, you can expect to receive a written response within a reasonable amount of time.
Should you wish to speak with a representative right away, please call toll-free at 1-800-331-6053.
Underwriting Services CNA Surety 1-800-331-6053
The information contained in this e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and that you will be held responsible for any such unauthorized activity, including liability for any resulting damages. As appropriate, such incident(s) may also be reported to law enforcement. If you received this e-mail in error, please reply to sender and destroy or delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.
The phrase “perfect storm,” taken from the title of Sebastian Junger’s breathtaking saga of the Gloucester fishing fleet’s encounter with destiny in the North Atlantic, has been used to describe everything from meteorological catastrophes to financial collapses.
Albeit well worn, the term describes with pinpoint accuracy the situation in which large, multiple line insurers currently find themselves. Like the 50-foot waves that buffeted the swordboat “Andrea Gail” in The Perfect Storm, powerful forces are challenging carriers on all sides: the prolonged soft market in property/casualty lines; possible reserve inadequacies for life companies; the stock market volatility, the credit crunch, and the ongoing crisis in the housing market.
Given the number, nature, and magnitude of these challenges, few would question the decision of industry veteran Thomas F. Motamed to retire last June from The Chubb Corporation after a distinguished 31-year career with the insurer. Motamed joined Chubb in 1977 as a claims trainee and in 2002 was elected vice chairman and chief operating officer.
Quite a few people, however, might wonder what motivated Motamed to defer his well-earned R&R and instead return to the executive suite, this time at a leading multi-line carrier based in Chicago.
On January 5, 2009, Motamed began his tenure as chairman and chief executive officer of CNA Financial, the holding company of CNA insurance companies. He succeeded Stephen W. Lilienthal, who retired in Deccember 2008 after holding those positions since 2002.
In an exclusive interview with Rough Notes, Motamed explained his reasons for accepting the top post at CNA and, from the perspective of his first 30 days on the job, shared his insights into the myriad challenges that face his organization and its competitors in today’s storm-tossed market.
“First and foremost, I thought there was a tremendous opportunity to build a great company,” Motamed said. “CNA has been around since 1897, so it has a long history, and I thought it had good people. This is a people business, and if you have good people who are on the right page, you can win.”
Ranking priorities
Given the “perfect storm” in which insurers are struggling to remain afloat, how do leaders like Motamed approach the challenge of establishing their priorities?
“Everyone—individuals, businesses in general, and certainly insurance companies—is facing a decline in the value of their assets,” Motamed observed. “To me, probably the most serious issue insurance companies are dealing with, particularly life companies, is the asset side of the balance sheet. Clearly, everyone is hoping for an economic recovery and a financial market recovery, but we need to be constantly looking at ways to improve the financial side of the business.”
In recent months, some life insurers have been petitioning their home state insurance departments to reduce reserve requirements to help preserve their financial stability ratings in the current crisis. We asked Motamed to comment on this trend.
“Every insurance company I know has taken a hit on the asset side,” he replied. “When that happens, you’re subjected to scrutiny by the rating agencies. I believe that all of us who run companies, who believe that we have good products, services and people, don’t want to operate under the cloud of a lower rating. People look to the financial strength of insurers to protect their assets when it comes to a claim,” he pointed out.
“It’s important to remember that we’re not the only ones in control of our destiny. We’re watched by the rating agencies and by state regulators, and by the federal government when it gives TARP money to insurers.” In this environment, Motamed remarked, “I think everyone is trying to avoid a downturn in their rating.”
Eye on the cycle
These days you’d have to go a long way to find any Pollyannas in the insurance business, and Motamed is no relentless optimist. Neither, however, is he a pessimist; his long experience in the industry informs his stance as a confirmed realist.
“I think it’s a great business with great people, and it’s cyclical,” he said. “People have to understand that we’re in a cycle now where it’s not as lucrative for insurers, and customers are getting lower prices. And that will change.”
For that reason, Motamed sees no reason to view today’s soft property/casualty market as anything more than an inevitable turn in the traditional underwriting cycle.
“A lot of people are complaining about the soft market, but the current soft cycle is a lot shorter than historic soft market cycles,” he commented. “It’s not as bad as people think, and the calendar year results are pretty good for most insurance companies. The current accident years are coming under some pressure, but a lot of companies reported pretty good earnings and combined ratios, aside from what happened on the investment side of the house.
“Core property and casualty results continue to be pretty good,” Motamed continued. “Growth is not good, but in economic times like these, where sales and payrolls are down and people are not reinvesting in their businesses, it’s hard to charge people more money for insurance when they’re already suffering economically.”
In times like these, Motamed said, “Whether you’re an insurance company or an agent, the most important thing you can do is stay close to the customer. We have to stay close to our agents and brokers, and we have to execute our fundamentals in a superb way. We also have to be clear about our abilities in the marketplace, and we have to exercise what I call ‘continuing underwriting discipline,’” Motamed asserted.
It’s equally important to recognize, he continued, that “this is a face-to-face business. Underwriters need to be in front of their agents, and agents need to be in front of their customers. Technology is never going to change the face-to-face nature of the business, and I don’t think it should.”
Pointing to another imperative, Motamed said, “We have to make sure we’re providing excellent service to the ultimate customer, because that’s who pays the bills.”
Playing to strengths
How does Motamed characterize the key strengths of CNA in today’s economic climate?
“I’ve learned a lot about the company since I got here, and I’ve been very pleased,” Motamed replied. “First, we have good ratings, and people look to that. We have solid service capabilities in claims, risk control, and back-office operations. We’re known in the marketplace for underwriting strength in our HealthPro business, construction, and our programs.” (The CNA HealthPro division was profiled in an article titled “Leading the Way in Health Care Liability” in the October 2008 issue of Rough Notes.)
A key strength for CNA is its relationships with the agents and brokers who distribute its products, Motamed emphasized. “We’re very much an independent agent company, and agents will be hearing more about CNA expanding its relationships with groups like the Big ‘I’ and the CIAB. We believe we have to work with our agency force to provide first-class solutions to clients,” he said.
“Agents need to be more selective as to whom they represent,” Motamed remarked, “and stick with those relationships and build stronger relationships with a core group of companies, rather than dealing with a fractured list of markets. It’s not economical, and it creates problems on the E&O side if you don’t really know what your markets are selling.”
What’s more, Motamed commented, “Agents have to be more vocal to their underwriters as to what products and services they want and what their customers are willing to pay for. On the other hand, we as underwriters know that price is part of every sales equation, but agents need to demonstrate their value to the client as well as the value of the market they are representing.
“At the end of the day,” Motamed asserted, “relationships are everything. In soft markets and hard markets, agents want long-term relationships with their clients, and we want the same with our agents. It’s cost effective; ultimately it’s more profitable not only for the agent and the underwriter but also for the client when there’s a long-term relationship.”
Future of consolidation
The last several years have seen the consolidation of some industry giants that few if any industry observers ever would have imagined joining forces. Centuries-old names have disappeared amid a wave of mergers and acquisitions as insurers seek to control their ever-rising costs of doing business. We asked Motamed to comment on this trend and whether he expects it to continue.
“It’s kind of a ‘tale of two cities,’” he responded. “On the one hand, I expect more consolidation because there are companies with weaker balance sheets that are unable to raise capital in this economic climate. Underwriting results have deteriorated in the soft market, so logically that suggests that some companies would view a sale to be in the best interests of their shareholders.
“On the other hand, there are fewer buyers, because they have weaker balance sheets as well,” Motamed observed, “and they also have the problem of raising capital today. What’s more, today there are many fewer companies to buy than there were 30 years ago. So when you look at consolidation, logically it should happen—but will it? Only time will tell.”
Like his peers in the executive suites of other top insurers, Motamed was leery of playing the role of crystal ball gazer. Asked what he thinks the property/casualty business might look like three to five years from now, he did offer some thoughts.
“I can’t predict the future with any degree of accuracy, but I expect there will be a turning point on pricing in the next year or two,” Motamed said. “However, that will be muted by the effects of the economy. Underwriters will be able to get a better price for the product, but whether it’s payroll, sales, or total insured values, they are still going to be depressed until the economy comes back.
“We’re looking at a scenario where the bottom line may improve, but growth will be difficult in a soft economy. Profitability could improve as rates increase, but the fact is that clients still won’t be paying a lot more for their insurance,” Motamed said.
Challenges notwithstanding, Motamed declared: “I continue to be excited about the opportunities at CNA. It’s great to be back in the saddle, and CNA has a lot of advantages. We have talented people who really want to work with our agents, and our local presence in the marketplace with CNA offices is very important so our field people can have face-to-face discussions with their agents,” Motamed said. “We want to be a company that thinks in a big way but acts very locally.”
Just Dave By Location Visit Detail Visit 18,009 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 159.10.134.# (CNA Insurance) ISP CNA Insurance Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Illinois City : Chicago Lat/Long : 41.8119, -87.6873 (Map) Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinNT Browser Internet Explorer 9.0 Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 1 2012 5:51:58 pm Last Page View Oct 1 2012 5:58:44 pm Visit Length 6 minutes 46 seconds Page Views 5 Referring URL http://search.yahoo....i=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-701 Search Engine search.yahoo.com Search Words "dave raymond amos" Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...per-and-bankers.html Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-6:00 Visitor's Time Oct 1 2012 3:51:58 pm Visit Number 18,009
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 28,816 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 159.10.134.# (CNA Insurance) ISP CNA Insurance Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Illinois City : Chicago Lat/Long : 41.8119, -87.6873 (Map) Language English (U.S.)en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 1 2012 10:04:30 pm Last Page View Oct 1 2012 10:12:11 pm Visit Length 7 minutes 41 seconds Page Views 2 Referring URL http://www.google.co...0...1c.1.RBXKPU-ieVc Search Engine google.com Search Words david amos madoff Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-6:00 Visitor's Time Oct 1 2012 3:04:30 pm Visit Number 28,816
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 28,817 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 159.10.134.# (CNA Insurance) ISP CNA Insurance Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Illinois City : Chicago Lat/Long : 41.8119, -87.6873 (Map) Language English (U.S.)en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 1 2012 10:15:13 pm Last Page View Oct 1 2012 10:18:00 pm Visit Length 2 minutes 47 seconds Page Views 3 Referring URL http://search.yahoo....ls&ei=utf-8&fr=b2ie7 Search Engine search.yahoo.com Search Words madoff qsls Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-6:00 Visitor's Time Oct 1 2012 3:15:13 pm Visit Number 28,817
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 28,818 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 159.10.134.# (CNA Insurance) ISP CNA Insurance Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Illinois City : Chicago Lat/Long : 41.8119, -87.6873 (Map) Language English (U.S.)en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 1 2012 10:21:49 pm Last Page View Oct 1 2012 10:21:49 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-6:00 Visitor's Time Oct 1 2012 3:21:49 pm Visit Number 28,818
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 28,819 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 159.10.134.# (CNA Insurance) ISP CNA Insurance Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Illinois City : Chicago Lat/Long : 41.8119, -87.6873 (Map) Language English (U.S.)en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 1 2012 10:47:38 pm Last Page View Oct 1 2012 11:03:16 pm Visit Length 15 minutes 38 seconds Page Views 3 Referring URL http://www.google.co...tKrZA&oq=david amos Search Engine google.com Search Words david amos madoff Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-6:00 Visitor's Time Oct 1 2012 3:47:38 pm Visit Number 28,819
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 28,820 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 159.10.134.# (CNA Insurance) ISP CNA Insurance Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Illinois City : Chicago Lat/Long : 41.8119, -87.6873 (Map) Language unknown Operating System Unknown Unknown Browser Netscape 4.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;) Javascript disabled Time of Visit Oct 1 2012 10:47:42 pm Last Page View Oct 1 2012 10:47:42 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL unknown Visit Entry Page Visit Exit Page Out Click Time Zone unknown Visitor's Time Unknown Visit Number 28,820
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 28,821 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 159.10.134.# (CNA Insurance) ISP CNA Insurance Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Illinois City : Chicago Lat/Long : 41.8119, -87.6873 (Map) Language English (U.S.)en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.1) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 1 2012 10:48:33 pm Last Page View Oct 1 2012 10:48:33 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-6:00 Visitor's Time Oct 1 2012 3:48:33 pm Visit Number 28,821
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 28,822 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 159.10.134.# (CNA Insurance) ISP CNA Insurance Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Illinois City : Chicago Lat/Long : 41.8119, -87.6873 (Map) Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 1 2012 11:10:25 pm Last Page View Oct 1 2012 11:10:25 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-6:00 Visitor's Time Oct 1 2012 4:10:25 pm Visit Number 28,822
The Norfolk County Register of Deeds and very crooked lawyer little Billy O'Donnell refused to discuss the Homestead Act with me in 2004 long before my wife and kids were thrown in the streets of Milton
---------- Original message ---------- From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:08:15 +0000 Subject: RE: The Norfolk County Register of Deeds and very crooked lawyer little Billy O'Donnell refused to discuss the Homestead Act with me in 2004 long before my wife and kids were thrown in the streets of Milton To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:07:54 -0400 Subject: The Norfolk County Register of Deeds and very crooked lawyer little Billy O'Donnell refused to discuss the Homestead Act with me in 2004 long before my wife and kids were thrown in the streets of Milton To: jacampbell@fnf.com, charles.dattola@fnf.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, TMitchell@fnf.com, tnolan@fnf.com, registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org, cgaska@firstam.com, investor.relations@firstam.com, debsmith@fnf.com, dkmurphy@fnf.com, maria.filippelli@fnf.com, Lon.Povich@state.ma.us, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, gopublic@cbc.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, corporate.communications@firstam.com Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca
Need I say that this video by little Billy O'Donnell still pisses me off to this very day?
Obviously I made certain that all the mindless Fidelity lawyers you sold the Title Insurance on the very fraudulent real estate sale orderd by a very corrupt probate court knew all about it very long time ago In fact it was in early 2006 when I discovered the lawyers conned my wife into settling with the crooks with my forged signature CORRECT Jeffrey A Campbell and Barry Bachrach?
NCRD Homestead Announcement 4,084 views NorfolkDeeds Published on Dec 20, 2011 NCRD Homestead Announcement - Norfolk County Register of Deeds Bill O'Donnell discusses the Homestead Act
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Mitchell, Toni" TMitchell@fnf.com Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 07:26:13 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Bruce Herring and the jokers in Fidelity calls lawyers need another clue EH? To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I am attending a seminar today and will have limited access to email and voice mail. If you need assistance in my absence, please call 617-350-8828 and ask for your call to be directed to the appropriate party. Thank you.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 03:56:31 -0300 Subject: Perhaps Tom Motamed best ask Obama or Fidelity/Chicago Title about a perfect storm in England and NYC as the Witch of November comes early to the Maritimes To: Thomas.Motamed@cna.com, samb@roughnotes.com, salenger@marvinzonis.com, Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, cgaska@firstam.com, investor.relations@firstam.com, debsmith@fnf.com, dkmurphy@fnf.com, maria.filippelli@fnf.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk, public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk, ministers@hm-treasury.gov.uk, Barbara.Cottam@citizensbank.com, alfred.smithers@fco.gov.uk, oig@sec.gov, Consumer.Queries@fsa.gov.uk, sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk, registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org, D.Jones@citizensbank.com, Jim.Hughes@citizensbank.com Cc: claims@ctic.ca, corporate.communications@firstam.com, dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, RBauer@perkinscoie.com, counsel@barackobama.com, paul@mittforpresident.com
Clearly somebody Is very nervous and wondering when you will do your job EH Bobby Paulson and Deanoo Buzza????
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,141 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 192.223.136.# (Fidelity Investments) ISP Fidelity Investments Location Continent : Europe Country : United Kingdom (Facts) State/Region : London, City of City : London Lat/Long : 51.5, -0.1167 (Map) Language unknown Operating System Unknown Unknown Browser Netscape 4.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;) Javascript disabled Time of Visit Oct 22 2012 3:09:11 pm Last Page View Oct 22 2012 3:09:11 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL unknown Visit Entry Page Visit Exit Page Out Click Time Zone unknown Visitor's Time Unknown Visit Number 29,141
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,142 Domain Name (Unknown) IP Address 192.223.136.# (Fidelity Investments) ISP Fidelity Investments Location Continent : Europe Country : United Kingdom (Facts) State/Region : London, City of City : London Lat/Long : 51.5, -0.1167 (Map) Language unknown Operating System Microsoft WinNT Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E) Javascript disabled Time of Visit Oct 22 2012 3:09:11 pm Last Page View Oct 22 2012 3:09:13 pm Visit Length 2 seconds Page Views 2 Referring URL unknown Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....nk-fraud-payout.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....nk-fraud-payout.html Out Click Time Zone unknown Visitor's Time Unknown Visit Number 29,142
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,079 Domain Name cibc.ca ? (Canada) IP Address 199.198.251.# (CIBC World Markets) ISP CIBC World Markets Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : New York City : New York Lat/Long : 40.7528, -73.9725 (Map) Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Oct 17 2012 10:02:09 pm Last Page View Oct 17 2012 10:02:09 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL http://www.google.ca...NEJ2IL7cj1xsTVXbAU1_ Search Engine google.ca Search Words jennifer warren cibc Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-5:00 Visitor's Time Oct 17 2012 4:02:09 pm Visit Number 29,079
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Amos" motomaniac333@gmail.com To: viewpoint@current.com; news@thetelegraph.com.au; maxnews@astral.com; jrogers@nhpr.org; john_chambers@standardandpoors.com; david_beers@standardandpoors.com; nikola_swann@standardandpoors.com; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com Cc: adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca; shirley.bond.mla@leg.bc.ca; gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca; chief@vpd.ca; John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:14 PM Subject: Well Mr Spitzer I have been waiting NINE years for YOU to act ETHICALLY and serve an October surprise on the GOP and Mitt Romney in particular
You MUST REMEMBER THESE FILES Your letter and mine are in both of them
Plus you certainly testified at the US Senate Baknking Commitee on the same day you thanked me. Furthermore when notified you and many others before and after you became governor that the Senate's records were missing the FBI were not long catching you with the wrong lady in Wasington but you were never prosected. Howcome??? Years later in 2011 I raised hell with CNN about YOU and the missing records YOUR In the the ARENA show was quickly cancelled CORRECT?
Please don't even try to pretend that I did not just send you this Tweet. As you no doubt know I keep perfect records.
https://twitter.com/CurrentSpitzer
24m Viewpoint @CurrentSpitzer The #Viewpoint Number of the Day = 1. That's where we're heading — the world's top producer of oil: http://bit.ly/RkMuC2
10:33 PM - 24 Oct 12 · Details Tweet text Reply to @CurrentSpitzer Reply to @CurrentSpitzer David Marshall@DJMMarshall Image will appear as a link Add location Link will appear shortened Links will appear shortened 115Tweet
5m David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos @CurrentSpitzer Say Hey to Obama for me http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html … & http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf … $$$$ http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2 … @ http://www.nycga.net/members/davidraymondamos/ …
http://current.com/shows/viewpoint/
Eliot Spitzer: The Romney campaign ‘is so much less than meets the eye’ “The anxiety about our future that has allowed Mitt Romney a seat at the table is what will drive our politics for the next decade.” —Eliot Spitzer read post
by Viewpoint Staff
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos To: pm@pm.gc.ca ; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; motomaniac333@gmail.com ; NewsTips@turner.com ; patrick.j.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov ; bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net ; MulcaT ; erin@issaforcongress.com ; john@issaforcongress.com ; darrell@issaforcongress.com Cc: RBauer@perkinscoie.com ; MElias@perkinscoie.com ; aculvahouse@omm.com ; counsel@barackobama.com ; granthuihi@garyjohnson2012.com ; gregory.craig@skadden.com ; icnucnwecan@yahoo.com ; Rathika.Sitsabaiesan@parl.gc.ca ; riho.kruuv@mfa.ee ; george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk ; public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk ; j.kroes@interpol.int ; michael.geller@rbs.com Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 9:44 PM Subject: Mr Obama and his lawyer Mr Bauer are no doubt well aware of why the US Treasury Dept in Alanta and many others are nervous EH Mr Harper?
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,156 Domain Name qwest.net ? (Network) IP Address 65.126.23.# (US TREASURY) ISP Qwest Communications Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Georgia City : Atlanta Lat/Long : 33.6222, -84.5231 (Map) Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinNT Browser Firefox Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1 Javascript version 1.5 Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024 Color Depth : 24 bits Time of Visit Oct 24 2012 3:34:48 pm Last Page View Oct 24 2012 3:34:48 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL http://www.google.co...zsAQlGzG9stxwNllgwig Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....ling-led-to-911.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....ling-led-to-911.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-5:00 Visitor's Time Oct 24 2012 9:34:48 am Visit Number 29,156
QSLS Politics By Location Visit Detail Visit 29,155 Domain Name qwest.net ? (Network) IP Address 65.126.23.# (US TREASURY) ISP Qwest Communications Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Georgia City : Atlanta Lat/Long : 33.6222, -84.5231 (Map) Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinNT Browser Firefox Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1 Javascript version 1.5 Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024 Color Depth : 24 bits Time of Visit Oct 24 2012 3:14:46 pm Last Page View Oct 24 2012 3:14:46 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL http://www.google.co...zsAQlGzG9stxwNllgwig Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....ling-led-to-911.html Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....ling-led-to-911.html Out Click Time Zone UTC-5:00 Visitor's Time Oct 24 2012 9:14:46 am Visit Number 29,155
Bob Bauer a former blogger for Huffington Post returned to Perkins $ Coie after a period of service to President Barack Obama as his White House Counsel from December of 2009 until June of 2011.
He is now General Counsel to the President’s re-election committee, to Obama for America, and General Counsel to the Democratic National Committee. He has also served as co-counsel to the New Hampshire State Senate in the trial of Chief Justice David A. Brock (2000); general counsel to the Bill Bradley for President Committee (1999-2000); and counsel to the Democratic Leader in the trial of President William Jefferson Clinton (1999).
He has co-authored numerous bipartisan reports, including "Report of Counsel to the Senate Rules and Administration Committee in the Matter of the United States Senate Seat From Louisiana" in the 105th Congress of the United States (March 27, 1997); "Campaign Finance Reform," A Report to the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the United States Senate (March 6, 1990); and "The Presidential Election Process in the Philippines" (1986), a bipartisan report prepared at the request of the Chairman and Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
Too bad so sad the lawyer Obama didn't ignore his legal counsel and check my work for himself long ago. It is clear to me that Bob Bauer never studied Maritimers and their lawsuits as closely as I studied his work over the years.
If Obama does not finally simply say my name and expose what he knows about Romney and I way back before he was even a Governor then he deserves to lose this election.
However even though I would NOT wish to see another GOP president you and your Bankster buddies won't mind that a bit but I doubt the NDP and the Liberals will agree EH Mr Prime Minister?
Somebody wise should scroll to the bottom of this email and understand that it was Fidelity that knowingly sold the Title Insurance on the fraduulent sale of my family's home in 2005 then Citizens Bank illegally recorded the discharge of a mortage long after the deal was done. They and the FSA know I have the records from the Registry of Deeds. Clearly the Royal Bank Of Scotland and British FSA has ADMITTED knowing all this for way past too long.
---------- Original message ---------- From: "Mitchell, Toni"<TMitchell@fnf.com> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:36:04 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: I called again To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office on vacation until Tuesday, Dec. 4th and will only check email occassionally. I will have no access to voice mail. If you need immediate assistance please call 800-882-1266 and ask to be directed to someone who can assist you. Thank you. ________________________________ NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@d2-ironport03.sec.gov> Date: 03 Dec 2018 12:42:05 -0500 Subject: Message Notification To:
Thank you for contacting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of Inspector General (OIG). We have received your submission and will evaluate the information provided and take appropriate action, which may include referral to another SEC office, notification to another agency, or additional inquiry. In this regard, please note the following:
• If you believe your life is in imminent danger, contact your local law enforcement department. • We only have the authority to address allegations or complaints that relate to SEC programs, operations, and personnel. • In some cases, we may need to contact you for further information in order to evaluate your allegation(s). We may contact you from an SEC email address such as OIG@sec.gov or by calling you from 202-551-2000. Please do not attempt to contact us on 202-551-2000 as this number is not equipped to receive incoming calls. • Should you wish to make a complaint or report information to the SEC OIG, you may do so by visiting our website at https://www.sec.gov/oig, clicking on the link Submit Online Hotline Complaint to access our web form, or by calling our toll-free hotline at (877) 442-0854. Please note that you may remain anonymous, however; this may limit our ability to investigate if we are unable to contact you for additional information.
Thank you again for contacting the OIG.
Respectfully,
The Office of Inspector General U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-2977 Fax: 202-772-9265; oig@sec.gov
---------- Original message ---------- From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:30:48 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas? To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write directly to the Department of Justice at mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ? mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
---------- Original message ---------- From: "Butts, Gerald"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.
Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:34:58 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ethics-ethique ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:22:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Re My many calls to the Calgary Police Dept about their client Partick Doran and his many cohorts To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This will confirm that we have received your enquiry and it has been placed in a priority sequence. *********************************** La présente confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre requête et qu'elle a été placée en ordre de priorité de réception.
Thank you/Merci
Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada 73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101 RCMP Mailstop #58/ GRC Arrêt Postal #58 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
"Strong Ethics, Strong Organization" « Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide »
This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the originator."
« Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »
---------- Original message ---------- From: Complaints <complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:30:14 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Wanna know just how bad the Canadain Justice sytem truly is? Read the wicked email I just got To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
This automated email is being sent to acknowledge receipt of your recent correspondence to the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP. The material you have provided will be reviewed and actioned as necessary, which may include additional follow-up. Thank you The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce courriel automatique confirme la réception de votre correspondance envoyée récemment à la Commission civile d’examen et de traitement des plaintes relatives à la GRC. Les documents que vous avez fournis seront examinés et les mesures nécessaires seront prises, ce qui pourrait comprendre un suivi additionnel. Merci. La Commission civile d’examen et de traitement des plaintes relatives à la GRC
---------- Original message ---------- From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:30:21 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Wanna know just how bad the Canadain Justice sytem truly is? Read the wicked email I just got To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write directly to the Department of Justice at mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ? mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
---------- Original message ---------- From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:30:19 -0800 Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Wanna know just how bad the Canadain Justice sytem truly is? Read the wicked email I just got To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Thank you for getting in touch with MPP Caroline Mulroney. This account is no longer being routinely monitored.
If your matter is related to the Ministry of the Attorney General, please email attorneygeneral@ontario.ca. For all other inquiries, please email caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org and a member of our team will be happy to assist you.
Thank you again for getting in touch with MPP Mulroney.
Sincerely,
-- Office of Caroline Mulroney
MPP York-Simcoe Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Francophone Affairs
Députée pour York-Simcoe procureure générale et ministre déléguée aux Affaires francophones
---------- Original message ---------- From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:30:19 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Wanna know just how bad the Canadain Justice sytem truly is? Read the wicked email I just got To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email. ______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ---------- From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)" <fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:30:23 +0000 Subject: RE: Wanna know just how bad the Canadain Justice sytem truly is? Read the wicked email I just got To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:30:25 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Wanna know just how bad the Canadain Justice sytem truly is? Read the wicked email I just got To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
---------- Original message ---------- From: Complaints <complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 20:33:51 +0000 Subject: RE: Attn Madame Mulroney say hey to sneaky assiant Nabeel and your many Crown Counsels for me will ya? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Good afternoon David Amos,
The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP (the "Commission") is in receipt of your three emails of October 29, thank you.
Your emails were thoroughly reviewed, but no information on a new public complaint against a member of the RCMP could be located. The only RCMP interaction about which you may have wanted to lodge a complaint which was identified, appears to have occurred in 2004, when RCMP members removed you from the New Brunswick legislature. Due to the time which has passed, and your several opportunities to bring this up with Commission staff in the past (and with staff from the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP, which the current Commission replaces), a public complaint will not be accepted regarding this incident.
Should you have a complaint you would like to make regarding the conduct of an on-duty RCMP member, for an incident occurring within the last year, the Commission invites you to submit a complaint using our online complaint form at https://www.crcc-ccetp.gc.ca/en/make-complaint-form. Alternatively, you may contact our Intake Office at our toll-free number listed below.
Your October 29th emails will be kept on file for information purposes only.
Respectfully,
Intake Office, Operations Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP / Government of Canada complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca / Tel: 1-800-665-6878
Bureau de réception des plaintes, Opérations Commission civile d’examen et de traitement des plaintes relatives à la GRC / Gouvernement du Canada plaintes@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca / Tél : 1-800-665-6878
---------- Original message ---------- From: Michael GIBBS <michael.p.gibbs@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 18:56:59 -0400 Subject: Re: Fwd: On all Hallows Eve many FEDS and many ghosts knew I saw RED not just the ghosts of Anna Mae Pictou Aquash and her old lover boy Dennis Banks (Out of Office) To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will away from my office until Nov 13th. In my absence Insp John Sutherland will be the acting District Commander. Thanks,
Mr. Amos, We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Sunday, 19 November 2017 Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before The Supreme Court
BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Respondent on the cross-appeal (and formally Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant on the cross-appeal (and formerly Respondent) Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017. Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16 Citation: 2017 FCA 213 CORAM:
WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Respondent on the cross-appeal (and formally Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant on the cross-appeal (and formerly Respondent) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos) filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan (Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious, and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr. Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr. Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016. As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal. This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal. […]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale. […] 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this section. [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that: 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale. 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr. Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb, focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer. [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable apprehension of bias: 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the reasonable apprehension of bias: … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v. Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R. (4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v. Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict: 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement, as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.), for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge. His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept, that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85: To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making, or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making. 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage. In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving events from over a decade ago. (emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R. (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4 F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr. Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD. He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr. Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time, both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry, begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr. Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215, 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006 in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court. (…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance. A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he suspects he is barred from the House of Commons. [footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada, 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly. Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28 (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in public office because the actors, who barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321 D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”. “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald, conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.” (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons, these allegations are not particularized and are directed against non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such, the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend. The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment, dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety without leave to amend. "Wyman W. Webb" J.A. "David G. Near" J.A. "Mary J.L. Gleason" J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15. DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton, New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES: David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal (on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
> > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" > <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca > Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 00:14:35 +000 > Subject: RE: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing today in > Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the Queen's sneaky > little minions who think they are above the law and the rest of us as well > To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your > comments. > > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos > commentaires. > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is > Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 00:15:21 +0000 > Subject: Re: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing today in > Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the Queen's sneaky > little minions who think they are above the law and the rest of us as > well > To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received > > Kveðja / Best regards > Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 > Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > To: coi@gnb.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Good Day Sir > > After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed > to speak to one of your staff for the first time > > Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who > answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt > at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker > Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. > > These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I > suggested that you study closely. > > This is the docket in Federal Court > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T > > These are digital recordings of the last three hearings > > Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug > > January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015 > > April 3rd, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing > > > This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All > > > The only hearing thus far > > May 24th, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown > > > This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity > > Date: 20151223 > > Docket: T-1557-15 > > Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 > > PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell > > BETWEEN: > > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS > > Plaintiff > > and > > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN > > Defendant > > ORDER > > (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on > December 14, 2015) > > The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to > the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November > 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim > in its entirety. > > At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a > letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then > capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian > Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, > (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter > he stated: > > As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the > work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. > You are your brother’s keeper. > > Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former > colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to > expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of > people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses > or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to > me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime > Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former > Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of > Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; > former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former > Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff > Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court > of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired > Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted > Police. > > In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my > personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many > potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am > of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I > hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in > Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, > [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding > allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has > requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. > > > AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of > the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There > is no order as to costs. > > “B. Richard Bell” > Judge > > > Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment > already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent > to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. > > I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court > Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the > bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my > lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? > > Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment > already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent > to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. > > I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court > Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the > bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my > lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? > > "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca > Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM > Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in > Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to > submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you > dudes are way past too late > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à > lalanthier@hotmail.com > > Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca > > Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at > lalanthier@hotmail.com > > To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca > > Thank you, > > Merci , > > > http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html > > > > 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over > five years after he began his bragging: > > January 13, 2015 > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate > > December 8, 2014 > Why Canada Stood Tall! > > Friday, October 3, 2014 > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And > Stupid Justin Trudeau? > > > Vertias Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Kulik, John"<john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com> > Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000 > Subject: McInnes Cooper > To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, > "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > > Dear Mr. Amos: > > I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate > with our firm, please do so through me. > > Thank you. > > John Kulik > [McInnes Cooper]<http://www.mcinnescooper.com/> > > John Kulik Q.C. > Partner & General Counsel > McInnes Cooper > > tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350 > > 1969 Upper Water Street > Suite 1300 > Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1 > > asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215 > > > > Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential > and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended > only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have > received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or > telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues > dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont > confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client. > Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si > vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur > par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM > Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David > Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a > publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late > To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca > peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com, > david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca, > greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.ca, > joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.ca, > peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca, > Whistleblower@ctv.ca > > https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do > > http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/35072/FM030_Respondent_Attorney-General-of-Canada-on-Behalf-of-the-United-States-of-America.pdf > > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html > > I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell > them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in > Feferal Court? > > Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but > he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT? > > Veritas Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400 > Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in > the USDOJ for me will ya? > To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com, > cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, > gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca > Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, > michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com > > QSLS Politics > By Location Visit Detail > Visit 29,419 > Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government) > IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice) > ISP US Dept of Justice > Location Continent : North America > Country : United States (Facts) > State : District of Columbia > City : Washington > Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map) > Language English (U.S.) en-us > Operating System Microsoft WinXP > Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 > Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET > CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; > DI60SP1001) > Javascript version 1.3 > Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 > Color Depth : 32 bits > Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm > Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm > Visit Length 0 seconds > Page Views 1 > Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg > Search Engine google.com > Search Words david amos bernie madoff > Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html > Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html > Out Click > Time Zone UTC-5:00 > Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm > Visit Number 29,419 > > http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html > > > Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its > because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400 > Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy > To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry > affect the interests of every person in every district of every > country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with > Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and > some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record. > > All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of > Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the > Conservatives > > > Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the > link to Madoff and Putnam Investments > > Here is why > > http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2 > > Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate > Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice > Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the > following file > > http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf > > http://occupywallst.org/users/DavidRaymondAmos/ > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Hansen, David"David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca > Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000 > Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen > To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Hello Mr. Amos, > > I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic > region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil > litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named > defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an > existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which > Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please > provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action > and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other > matters. > > Thanks > > David A. Hansen > Regional Director | Directeur régional > General Counsel |Avocat général > Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et > services de consultation > Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice > Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke > 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke > Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse > B3J 1P3 > david.hansen@justice.gc.ca > Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902) > 426-2329 > This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client > privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If > you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete > this entire e-mail. > Before printing think about the Environment > Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. > Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire. > > > Subject: > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 > From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca > To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > > January 30, 2007 > > WITHOUT PREJUDICE > > Mr. David Amos > > Dear Mr. Amos: > > This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, > 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. > > Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have > taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve > Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. > > Sincerely, > > Honourable Michael B. Murphy > Minister of Health > > CM/cb > > > Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: > > Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 > From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, > nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, > motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca, > Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has > forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not > > Dear Mr. Amos, > > Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off > over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I > was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. > > As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position > is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process > testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the > Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these > services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this > instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. > > As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false > imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear > that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada > the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment > and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. > > It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on > December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. > > Sincerely, > > Warren McBeath, Cpl. > GRC Caledonia RCMP > Traffic Services NCO > Ph: (506) 387-2222 > Fax: (506) 387-4622 > E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > > > > Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > Office of the Integrity Commissioner > Edgecombe House, 736 King Street > Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 > tel.: 506-457-7890 > fax: 506-444-5224 > e-mail:coi@gnb.ca > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300 >> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to >> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET? >> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, >> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, >> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is, >> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com >> >> FBI Boston >> One Center Plaza >> Suite 600 >> Boston, MA 02108 >> Phone: (617) 742-5533 >> Fax: (617) 223-6327 >> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov >> >> Hours >> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal >> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday >> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any >> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our >> office at (617) 742-5533. >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300 >> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is >> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap >> tapes Sell them on Ebay? >> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, >> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com, >> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, >> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com >> >> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html >> >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html >> >> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask >> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING???? >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY >> >> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the >> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball >> cards? >> >> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc >> >> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006 >> >> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html >> >> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139 >> >> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143 >> >> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >> Senator Arlen Specter >> United States Senate >> Committee on the Judiciary >> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >> Washington, DC 20510 >> >> Dear Mr. Specter: >> >> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >> raised in the attached letter. >> >> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. >> >> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously. >> >> Very truly yours, >> Barry A. Bachrach >> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> To: "Rob Talach"rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com >> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM >> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing >> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why >> >> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean >> a lot to you >> >> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400 >> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW >> Bernadine Chapman?? >> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca, >> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca, >> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca, >> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, >> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, >> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca, >> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Clemet1@parl.gc.ca, maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk, >> david@fairwhistleblower.ca >> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, >> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, >> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, >> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca, >> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >> >> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm >> >> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf >> >> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500 >> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy >> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH >> Constable Peddle??? >> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> >> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails. >> >> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC >> Director General >> HR Transformation >> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502 >> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2 >> >> Tel 613-843-6039 >> Cel 613-818-6947 >> >> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC >> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines >> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502 >> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2 >> >> tél 613-843-6039 >> cel 613-818-6947 >> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> > > First things first have a Look at the 3 documents hereto attached (Not > a big read) > > Listen to these old voicemails from interesting FEDS at about the > same point in time (Won't take long) > > http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc > > then ask youselves or the lawyers Senator Shelby or Spizter or Cutler > or Bernie madoff's old buddy Robert Glauber where the webcast and > transcript went for a very important hearing held in late 2003 by the > United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. > > http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=90F8E691-9065-4F8C-A465-72722B47E7F2 > > Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the > Mutual Fund Industry > > November 20, 2003 02:00 PM > The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a > series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and > Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.” > > Archived Webcast > > Witness Panel 1 > > Mr. Stephen M. Cutler > Director - Division of Enforcement > Securities and Exchange Commission > cutler.pdf (175.5 KBs) > > Mr. Robert Glauber > Chairman and CEO > National Association of Securities Dealers > glauber.pdf (171.1 KBs) > > Eliot Spitzer > Attorney General > State of New York > spitzer.pdf (68.2 KBs) > > Permalink: > http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2003/11/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry > > > Trust that the evil women and men that PM Trudeau "The Younger" > appointed to to his cabinet will continue to play dumb because of > their oath to The Privy Council. However it does not follow that > everybody who works for them are dumb and they have no such oath to > uphold N'esy Pas?. > > Veritas Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com> > Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000 > Subject: RCMP > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > David, > > Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the > RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British > Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been > brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP > members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim. > > We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair > LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment. > His contact information is as follows: > > Mr. Barry Carter > Mair Jensen Blair LLP > 1380-885 W. Georgia Street > Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8 > Phone: 604-682-6299 > Fax 1-604-374-6992 > > This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your > case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion > as to whether you should take further action in this matter. > > You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within > which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin > your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean > that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you > should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to > obtain legal advice/representation. > > Thank you again for considering our firm. > > Yours truly, > > Lisa Porteous > Case Manager/Paralegal > > lporteous@kleinlyons.com > www.kleinlyons.com > > KLEIN ∙ LYONS > Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue > Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada > Office 604.874.7171 > Fax 604.874.7180 > Direct 604.714.6533 > > This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client > privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is > addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please > telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail. > > Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Scorched Earth = Butt Hurt 59 views Mad Shangi Published on Mar 12, 2018 What happens when you trigger a sex-doll peddlin' fake MGTOW? Well, you get doxxed of course.
Blog Archive • ▼ 2018 (1) o ▼ January (1) Glen Canning: Exploiter of Rehtaeh Parsons • ▼ 2017 (11) o ▼ December (1) Disturbed Troll Glen Canning Leaves Even More Angr... o ▼ October (10) The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Am... The New Baconfat Mission Statement Archive: Glen Canning and Leah Parsons on Stage Butt-Hurt Troll Glen Canning Posts A Comment The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos (1980's s... The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos The Musical PWNage of Glen Canning RIP BARRY WINTERS: Don't Let Free Speech Die With ... Glen Canning: Psychopath Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
Tuesday, 24 October 2017
Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
Welcome to The Baconfat Legacy - started in tribute to Mr. Barry Winters: a controversial blogger, opinionated troll and Edmonton resident, who sadly passed away. Before his passing, his blog was the subject of hate crime charges due to the offensive politically incorrect nature of Barry's writing. I will continue this blog in that tradition. You are going to read words like "faggot,""nigger," "kike,""spick,""nip,""bitch,""cunt,""whore,""slut,""wop," "midget," and anything else that just happens to pop into my head, because like Barry I'm an equal opportunity offender. And if you don't like the aggressive, in your face, deliberately offensive nature of this blog well you can suck my fucking dick. Go tell David Amos and Glen Canning to go fuck themselves too. Alert your local authorities and go bitch to your friends in the government, because the Baconfat is back baby.
And in the interest of free speech I hope you fuckers try to shut me down, because I will fight you. If you don't like this blog, then don't read it. Go read the fucking Babysitter's Club for all I care. But any bullshit trumped up charges you throw at me will make my day. Because the day we start locking people up for talking shit in a fucking blog, is the day that fascism rules. C'yall in court, motherfuckers.
Glenda E. Cole City Solicitor Called to the bar: 1988 (AB); Q.C.2013 (AB) Phone: 403-268-5182
City Solicitor's Office Law Dept., 12th Flr., 800 Macleod Trail S.E. PO Box 2100, Stn. M Calgary, Alberta T2P 2M5 Phone: 403-268-2441 Fax: 403-268-4634
Listed Individuals Shannon C. Belvedere Mary Ann Bendfeld Jocelyn J. Caldwell Glenda E. Cole C. Tat Fan Jill S. Floen James T. Floyd Paul Frank Leila J. Gosselin Brian C. Graham Andrea Hankins-Palmer Amanda Hart T. E. Haufe B. R. Inlow Denise C. Jakal Lori L. Kerr My-Le Lai David J. Lewis Richard Loomer Lesia Luciuk Ola Malik David E. Mercer Douglas D. Merchant Hanna Oh Lise Olsen Carol L. Reesor Marnie B. Rusen Colleen N. Sinclair Tina Squire R. Shawn Swinn Stephen B. Wheeler Trudy Wobeser
72. The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary, Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the Plaintiff ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had researched Byron Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of Justice in late 2006 has not been made public. More importantly the lawyer who has been the MP representing Fundy Royal for the past eleven years and that the former Minister of Public Safety acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about Byron Prior that contained the entire text of his website before the writ was dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email exchange has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on the Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed. The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find published on the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman” character named Max published within the YouTube domain. It was an interview of Byron Prior as he was protesting on the grounds of the House of Commons the day after the Prime Minister was found in “Contempt of Parliament” and his most contemptuous minority mandate became a matter of history. His majority mandate is history and the Plaintiff seeks relief.
73. The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons during 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the Plaintiff but he does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the same street as the Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is being prosecuted by the Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It is unlikely he would move far from the city soon. If the Crown wishes to argue this complaint Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc should be summoned to testify about what they know of this matter and of their being illegally barred from parliament properties as well. Failing that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of documentation including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide byway of digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the concerns of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the Plaintiff and many others.
74. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff that she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and while visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by the RCMP and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert area of Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency offices of the Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded her emails to and from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former Premier and the office of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff to support her. The Plaintiff introduced himself to all the aforementioned parties in order to assist Robin Reid and they were ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff discovered he could no longer assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the actions of Neo Nazis who supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP and many other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well aware of the reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people in any fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown but their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.
75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel, sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom. The actions of these Trolls created an important example of cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs and videos published about his family before the malice was removed from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee. A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells, who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry Winters and his blogs.
76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to university students and anyone else who will listen to them particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations.
78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior. The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend to be anyone by having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP or the EPS) appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows commercial programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to jail because of robo calls.
79. The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions to sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring his complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was trying to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to pull the same trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that if the EPS managed to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s signature then it would delay his lawsuit because the EPS could claim that his complaint under investigation and that the EPS could say nothing about it until the matter had concluded. The Plaintiff informed the EPS that anyone could use an anonymous phone number and claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it should do so from an identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just like he does. In fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous calls for many years and the police claimed they could do nothing because the malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada.
80. The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of two Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and promptly ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends were being much harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the RCMP in NB created a YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to catch a local arsonist. As soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about eleven incidents of arson on his friend’s farm in the same area the Plaintiff and his friend were attacked by many Troll’s within the Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only laughed at the obvious malice that they were publishing for a year without attempting to moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the RCMP YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of “Organized Crime”. The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand to a local office of the RCMP. Once the Plaintiff had a conversation with a member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s complaint, the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and said nothing further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most of the comments digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and the RCMP. Years later the Crown stayed the “Organized Crime” charges against the Tingleys and a publication ban was placed on their concerns about malicious prosecution. The matter was put before the Supreme Court of Canada Rodney Tingley, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen SCC Docket no. 34107 and the Plaintiff had no idea of any outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak with some of the Tingleys and they admitted to knowing about him and his common concerns with the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have advised them not to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same holds true with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another German who moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting against them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as they attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of lawsuit.
81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015 particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes. The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today. In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’ bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian involvement in the War on Iraq.
83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014 Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway campaign of 2006.
What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,” or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits are not.
Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy” David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing, marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security, and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400 Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is interesting though
Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
"But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command, including a Canadian general.
That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff, who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000 U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
"I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying into the US policy.
At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there were deployed WMD.
Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was onerous
American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which ....not necessarily in that order. "
You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21, 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th Parliament.
85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
86. The Plaintiff states that on December 15th, 2014 the Crown in Alberta contacted him byway of an email account he seldom uses since his last communications with the Sergeant-at-Arms and Robin Reid. The Sergeant-at-Arms wanted to know about a contact he had that day with the constituency office of a recently appointed Cabinet Minister. All the other statements in this complaint should prove that the Plaintiff knew why a political lawyer from NB was ignoring a new constituent’s contacts all summer after answering a message in Twitter promising to meet with him. It was obvious to the Plaintiff that as soon as the lawyer was a Cabinet Minister he was attempting to use his influence to intimidate the Plaintiff byway of the Sergeant-at-Arms like his political associates in NB did in 2004.
87. The Plaintiff states that before he had a chance to respond to the email from the Sergeant-at-Arms of Alberta, three members of the RCMP members in plain clothes were pounding on the basement entrance of a condo at 1:30 AM. They did not identify themselves as being the police as they attempted to harass the Plaintiff on private property in the middle of the night without a warrant. The Plaintiff was twice the age of the oldest one and considered them to be tough talking kids who were trying to enter a home in the middle of the night so as he closed the door he told them he was calling the cops. They hollered on the other side of the door that they were the cops as the Plaintiff called their headquarters and was immediately patched through to them. The Plaintiff refused their request when RCMP tried to con him into coming outside in freezing temperatures in the middle of the night so they could supposedly speak with him instead of saying what they needed to say over the telephone. If what the RCMP was saying was remotely true then they should have identified themselves and asked for him instead of someone else when he answered the door. The Plaintiff’s response to the RCMP’s trickery was that it was best that they communicate in writing and that he would be contacting their lawyers in the morning. The Crown received its very justifiable responses and the law was not upheld. The Plaintiff was ignored as the RCMP continued to harass his family deep into the New Year as he headed for the BC coast then back to the Maritimes to run for public office again.
88. The Plaintiff states that in regards to this complaint the actions and inactions of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the RCMP in Alberta affirmed to the Plaintiff that he is still barred under threat of arrest from all parliamentary properties in Canada because they did not deny it. The RCMP does not have the integrity to talk to or email him about anything because they know he tries to record everything just like they do. Instead of acting ethically the standard operating procedure of the RCMP since 2004 is to intimidate his friends and family in a malicious effort to impeach his character and separate them. That is the reason the Plaintiff stays away from most people most of the time. The actions of the RCMP towards the Plaintiff and many others and his experiences in the USA served to convince him that the Crown acts just like corrupt Americans. In order to cover up wrongs it would prefer to injure and imprison ethical citizens in mental wards rather than uphold the law or argue them publicly in a court of law. In 2002 the Plaintiff explained why he would seek public office in Canada to American lawyers he was suing within statements of a lawsuit about legal malpractice. Now he is doing the same to Canadian lawyers in the employ of the government whose wages are once again being paid by his fellow taxpayer. As the Plaintiff prepares to deal with a predicable motion to dismiss and a motion for a publication ban to delay and conceal this matter before polling day perhaps the lawyers working for the Crown should study the Plaintiff’s work found within documents in the Governor General’s office. Trust that he will look forward to talking to the first lawyer to answer this complaint because it has been years since he could get any lawyer in Canada to discuss anything with him. There is no ethical dilemma to be found in this statement, the Crown counsels should just do their job according to the law of the land, seek the documents in the possession of the lawyer who is the Governor General of Canada and let the political cards fall where they may. In closing the Plaintiff must remind the Crown that two members of the Canadian Forces acting as security for the Highland Games held on the grounds of the Lieutenant Governor’s residence in NB approached the Chief of the Amos Clan claiming that an unnamed party found him “overbearing”. He gave them a copy of the Governors General’s letter and freely left the parliamentary property.
Rob has both US and Canadian expertise in the areas of fintech digital transformation, privacy, retail and commercial banking, consumer lending (secured/unsecured), and financial services regulatory matters. His dual licensure and experience have provided him with the unique ability to provide guidance on both sides of the border and identify cross-border gaps in industry practices for both large multinational firms and industry startups. Currently, Rob heads up the Corporate Law group at FCT, where he manages all corporate legal affairs, litigation and various strategic initiatives. Prior to this, Rob helped guide a startup Schedule I Retail Bank from 5 employees to 176 employees, open 37 branches across Canada, and raise over $90M in private debt/equity in just under two years. He then navigated a successful exit and sale of the bank. Rob has also served as SVP and Assistant General Counsel for a large multinational bank where he navigated a high performance mortgage and consumer lending division through the subprime mortgage crisis, on both sides of the border. Rob believes in the importance of community development and in his spare time he serves on the Board of Directors for various non-profit foundations.
Key areas of expertise: Licensed in both Canada (Ontario) and US (California) Banking & Consumer Lending expertise (retail banking, personal secured/unsecured, mortgages) Credit Cards Corporate Contractual (partnership agreements, M&A's, vendor service agreements) Transactional (real property, secondary marketing, securitization/portfolio) Corporate Secretary expertise Litigation Compliance (US and Canada) Chief Privacy Officer Fraud HR/Employment
Carriage of all corporate legal affairs, data and technology (including SaaS) transformation, M&A, strategic direction, data management and privacy governance, corporate litigation, trademarks, marketing, HR, IT procurement and a few other tasks to keep things busy.
Tasked with building out a technology legal team as we roll out our transformation strategy into a leading digital real estate technology provider.
Assisted with strategic M&A efforts to help curb declining revenues in a contracting industry. Prior to commencing employment, this financial services company held approximately $3.6B in AUM. Upon the management and negotiation of a few key acquisitions (over the span of 2 years), including the acquisition of a larger industry leading competitor, the company grew to approximately $6.5B AUM. Negotiated a successful exit as the company declared itself an industry leader in RESP's.
In addition to managing M&A efforts, other responsibilities included: Managing any and all legal matters for both the not-for-profit (Knowledge First Foundation) and for-profit entities, including M&A and corporate affairs. Corporate Secretary for the not-for-profit and for-profit board of directors. Chief Privacy and Chief AML Officer …
Founding member of this Schedule I Canadian Bank Raised over $90M in capital raises over the span of 2 years; growing the shareholder base to over 500 shareholders Grew the startup bank from 5 employees to 176 employees, and from 0 branches to 37 branches across Canada in span of two years. Managed various acquisitions relating to the startup of a Schedule I Bank, including a $40M acquisition of another Schedule I bank Managed the sale of the consolidated bank to a large industry player Negotiated successful exit just over two years from inception. …
FLTA HISTORY: The Florida Land Title Association has roots that extend back to 1914 when a group of title abstractors joined together to form an association dedicated to improving the practice and procedures of searching land titles. Incorporated in 1971 The Florida Land Title Association, Inc., is a non profit trade association that is still dedicated to serving the land title insuring industry by promoting shared goals of education, professionalism, ethical standards, and to effectively advocate member concerns.
I would like to start this message by acknowledging the steady leadership and excellent work of our association staff, our Board of Directors (BOD), and everyone who is contributing so significantly with our various committees and working groups. A quick review of the other sections of this Newsletter will reveal the current efforts and priorities of our Association being powered by our industry’s most dedicated professionals. Despite the incredible challenges of the current pandemic, I am very grateful and proud that our Association is in a stronger position at this moment, both financially and structurally, than it was before the pandemic hit us around this time last year. And we have big plans and opportunities to continue our success.
A big focus for this coming month will be our first fully virtual Lobby Days. Those of you that have participated in past years already know that Lobby Days has become one of the most important and impactful events of our Association as we generate awareness and engagement between FLTA members and key policymakers around current Association legislative priorities and promote the overall benefits that the title insurance and real estate settlement industry provides. And now this event is open to easier access and more participation by being virtual. Are you interested in participating? Get more specific details and register.
Another big focus that I would like to highlight starts with the charitable action of past BOD member, Aaron Davis, who has travelled to Texas to help with the natural disaster caused by their recent storm. Our Association was inspired by Aaron’s efforts and has contributed $250 to the Harper, TX, Fire Department GoFundMe Account and we encourage any interested members to contribute individually as well. I know that giving back is an integral part of who we are as individuals, and I am very proud that our Association is evolving in a way that will put formal structure and resources around these efforts. What started with our BOD decision to donate $20,000 to be split between five Florida area food banks with increased demands created by Covid-19 and a call to action for our members that was met with so much enthusiasm has now evolved into formal BOD approval to establish an FLTA affiliated Charitable Action Foundation with 501(C)(3) status and a commitment to strengthening the communities where our members live and work.
We envision our foundational philanthropy will not be simply about writing a check. This new organization will put structure around our ongoing relationships, collaborations, shared missions to serve our communities, and the giving of our time and talents to specific need driven challenges as well as the broader long-term goals. Our Foundation will heighten our Association’s identity internally and externally.
The scientific research, and the development and rollout of vaccines gives us hope that the dark and isolating days of this pandemic are numbered. And in its wake, we will have an opportunity to connect in ways both old and new in order to advance the interests of our title insurance and real estate settlement industry in Florida and to serve our communities better than we have before.
I hope this newsletter contains information that is helpful for you and that you are also proud and engaged in our Association. Your ideas, comments and questions are always welcome! I can be reached at lprescott@firstam.com.
Respectfully,
Len Prescott, 2020-2021 President
Board of Directors
Leonard (Len) Prescott President First American Title Insurance Company 2121 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 710 Coral Gables, FL 33134 (305) 908-6252
Len Prescott is Vice President, Florida State and Regional Counsel and Regional Underwriting Director for First American Title Insurance Company. With an extensive background in securities, insurance, and real estate, Len uses his first-hand experience and broad industry perspective to oversee the Company’s Florida State and Regional Underwriting Departments. Aside from his leadership and management responsibilities, Len is a very active transactional underwriter and has underwritten many of the most complex and largest title transactions in Florida. Along with crafting solutions to the most challenging underwriting issues, Len develops and presents educational programs for agents and production staff throughout the state. He frequently represents the interests of First American and its agents before the Office of Insurance Regulation, the Florida Department of Financial Services, and the Florida Legislature. Len has been a contributing author for many changes to Florida statutes of importance to the title industry including the treatment of Construction Liens, Estoppels, Property Information Reports, MRTA, Lis Pendens and Homestead. Prior to being promoted to Regional Underwriting Director, Len joined the Company as Florida State Counsel and previously served as Underwriting Counsel in Miami for several of the largest national title insurance underwriters. He is regularly featured as a national speaker for the American Land Title Association (ALTA) and other state and regional title associations. He has served multiple past terms and is a current member of the Board of Directors and President of the Florida Land Title Association (FLTA), and is an active Member and Sponsor for the Executive Council of the Real Property, Probate & Trust Law Section (RPPTL) of the Florida Bar, currently serving as a Vice-Chair of RPPTL’s Title Insurance Committee. He is an active member of the Florida and Maryland Bar Associations. Len graduated, summa cum laude, from the University of New Hampshire, is a member of the Academic Honor Society Phi Beta Kappa and received his Law Degree from the Georgetown University Law Center.
Charles L. Ferguson, CLS Chair, CLT Institute Council FNF Family of Companies 2203 N. Lois Avenue, #450 Tampa, FL 33607 (813) 405-1395
Charles (Chuck) L. Ferguson is a Senior Commercial Examiner for the Fidelity National Title Florida Agency Operations. He is responsible for not only providing Commitments and other reports for the various customers served by the Company, but also in helping answer questions in trying to get them to closing. Being a transplant from the cold tundra of Northeast Ohio, he has been in the industry for more than 30 years and has been licensed in the state for over 25. He holds the designation of Certified Land-Title Searcher (CLS) since 1993. Charles is also the current chair for the Education Committee with the Florida Land Title Association.
Karla Staker Director FNF Family of Companies 2400 Maitland Center Pkwy Ste. 200 Maitland, FL 32751 (407) 618-5094
Karla J. Staker is a Vice President and Senior State Underwriting Counsel with the Fidelity National Financial family of companies in Maitland, Florida. She received a J.D. and a bachelor’s degree in sociology from the University of Florida. Karla also holds bachelor degrees in accounting and business administration from Florida Southern College. Except for a brief stint in private practice, Karla has been an underwriter with Fidelity National’s group of underwriters since 1986. She is a member of The Florida Bar and is board certified in Real Estate Law. She is also a member of the Executive Council of the Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section of The Florida Bar. She serves as a co-vice chair of the Section’s Title Issues and Standards Committee. She is a past president of the Florida Land Title Association and serves on its board of directors.
Leonard (Len) Prescott
Charles L. Ferguson, CLS
Karla Staker