---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 22:33:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks YOU or Kriss Austin or my sneaky
cousin Madame Mitton or her Cry Baby Boss or their buddy Chucky
Leblanc should have asked their buddies Cardy and Higgy et al why they
sent me butter tarts in 2018 N'esy Pas Hamish?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:31:33 -0300
Subject: Methinks YOU or Kriss Austin or my sneaky cousin Madame
Mitton or her Cry Baby Boss or their buddy Chucky Leblanc should have
asked their buddies Cardy and Higgy et al why they sent me butter
tarts in 2018 N'esy Pas Hamish?
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
jbosnitch@gmail.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@bellaliant.net>,
"Sherry.Wilson"<Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
"Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"
<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>,
"Hamish.Wright"<Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>, "john.green"
<john.green@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "Holland,
Mike (LEG)"<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
james.fowler@fowlerlawpc.com, Guillaume.LeBlanc@fowlerlawpc.
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, James.McAvity@gnb.ca,
shara.munn@gnb.ca, corry.toole@gnb.ca, remi.allard@gnb.ca,
maurice.blanchard@gnb.ca, claude.hache@gnb.ca,
christopher.titus@gnb.ca, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
Luc.LaBonte@gnb.ca, "martin.gaudet"<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Tom.Critchlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, tj <tj@burkelaw.ca>, "Kim.Poffenroth"
<Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, "Jack.Keir"
<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, law@shapirohalpern.com, joshuahalpern@outlook.com,
"blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Magee"
<Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 12 January 2018
YO Dominic Cardy how can you Conservatives brag of buying Butter Tarts
when CBC tells me you dudes have to sell your HQ? Yet you wackos want
control of our provincial economy?
http://davidraymondamos3.
Tuesday, 10 October 2017
Methinks if Blaine Higgs had two clues between his ears he would not
have hired the Arsehole Dominic Cardy in the first place
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:00:25 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Dominic Cardy how can you Conservatives brag of buying
Butter Tarts when CBC tells me you dudes have to sell your HQ? Yet you
wackos want control of our provincial economy"
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.camedia-
******************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.camedia-
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Cardy, Dominic (LEG)"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:22:47 +0000
Subject: Hamish's birthday
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: "Wright, Hamish (LEG)"<Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>
Dear Mr. Amos,
As a regular correspondent I thought you would like to know that it's
Hamish's 20th birthday! We even gave him some butter tarts in your
honour! I'm sure he'd appreciate a note.
Have a good weekend, best wishes,
Dominic
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:52:25 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Mr McKee and his LIEbrano buddies
must see that Chucky Leblanc is not so fond of his hero Higgy lately
but he still loves butter tarts and attacks the protesters Cardy hates
N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:52:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Mr McKee and his LIEbrano buddies
must see that Chucky Leblanc is not so fond of his hero Higgy lately
but he still loves butter tarts and attacks the protesters Cardy hates
N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
(Le français suit)
Thank you for your e-mail. This response is to assure you that your
message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
and questions from constituents. Due a high volume of email received,
there may be a delay before I'm able to respond.
My Riding Office is open Mondays from 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m., Tuesdays,
Wednesdays and Thursdays from 8:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. and Fridays from
9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. You can reach the office at (506) 378-1565.
For media requests, please call: 506-429-2285.
Below you will find some links and phone numbers which may be helpful:
Orange Level:
As of February 9, Zone 1 (Moncton region - including
Memramcook-Tantramar) is in the Orange Level. Here are the rules:
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
Travel Registration:
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
You can register online, or by calling toll free 1-833-948-2800
(Monday to Friday from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Atlantic and Saturday and
Sunday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Atlantic, except for holidays)
Non-health questions
For non-health related questions, including questions about compliance
with the state of emergency, you can call 1-844-462-8387 (operational
seven days a week from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m). The email address is
helpaide@gnb.ca.
Concerns about workplace safety should continue to be directed to
WorkSafeNB (1-800-999-9775). Businesses owners with questions they
can’t find answered on the COVID-19 Guidance for
Business<https://www2.gnb.ca/
webpage, should contact Opportunity NB’s team of Business Navigators
by emailing: nav@navnb.ca, or calling 1-833-799-7966.
For questions related to travel restrictions during COVID-19, please
call: 1-833-948-2800.
211 New Brunswick
As the province navigates the second wave of COVID-19, people who need
support are often unsure where to turn. Whether it is help obtaining
food, mental health support or other non-emergency programs and
services in the community, residents are advised to dial 2-1-1. This
is a free, bilingual, confidential resource to help New Brunswickers
navigate the network of community, social, non-clinical health and
government services.
Here is a link to a list of other Contact Information that may be useful:
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
Thank you once again for contacting me. Take care and stay safe!
-----
Merci pour votre courriel. Cette réponse a pour but de vous assurer
que votre message a bien été reçu. Je suis heureuse de recevoir les
commentaires et les questions de mes concitoyens. En raison d'un
volume élevé de courriels reçus, il se peut qu'il y ait un délai avant
que je puisse répondre.
Mon bureau de circonscription est ouvert les lundis de 8h30 à 16h30,
les mardis, mercredis et jeudis de 8h30 à 14h30 et les vendredis de
09h00 à 12h00. Vous pouvez rejoindre le bureau à (506) 378-1565.
Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez appeler le : 506-429-2285.
Vous trouverez ci-dessous quelques liens et numéros de téléphone qui
peuvent vous être utiles :
Niveau orange:
Depuis le 9 février, la zone 1 (région de Moncton - y compris
Memramcook-Tantramar) est dans le niveau orange. Voici les règles :
<https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
Enregistrement d’un voyage au Nouveau-Brunswick:
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
Vous pouvez vous enregistrer dès maintenant, en ligne, ou en appelant
au 1-833-948-2800 (Du lundi au vendredi de 8 h à 20 h, heure de
l’Atlantique, et le samedi et dimanche de 10 h à 14 h, heure de
l’Atlantique, sauf les jours fériés).
Ligne d’information pour les questions qui ne sont pas reliées à la santé
Une ligne d’information sans frais et une adresse courriel ont été
mises sur pied afin d’aider à répondre aux questions qui ne sont pas
reliées à la santé, y compris les questions relatives à la conformité
à l’état d’urgence. Le service est offert dans les deux langues
officielles. Les gens peuvent téléphoner au 1-844-462-8387 sept jours
par semaine, de 9 h à 17 h. L’adresse courriel est : helpaide@gnb.ca.
Les préoccupations relatives à un lieu de travail non sécuritaire
devraient continuer d’être acheminées à Travail sécuritaire NB
(1-800-999-9775). Les propriétaires d’entreprises qui ont des
questions pour lesquelles ils ne peuvent trouver de réponses sur le
site Web Lignes directrices sur la COVID-19 à l’intention des
entreprises<https://www2.gnb.
sont invités à communiquer avec l’équipe des navigateurs d’affaires
d’Opportunités NB par courriel (nav@navnb.ca) ou par téléphone
(1-833-799-7966).
Pour toute question relative aux restrictions de voyage pendant
COVID-19, veuillez appeler : 1-833-948-2800.
211 Nouveau-Brunswick
Alors que la province affronte la deuxième vague de COVID-19, les gens
qui ont besoin de soutien ne savent pas toujours vers qui se tourner.
Que ce soit pour obtenir de la nourriture, des services de soutien en
matière de santé mentale ou d’autres programmes et services non
urgents dans la communauté, les résidents peuvent composer le 2-1-1.
Il s’agit d’une ressource gratuite, bilingue et confidentielle ayant
pour but d’aider les gens du Nouveau-Brunswick à s’orienter dans le
réseau des services communautaires et sociaux, des services de santé
non cliniques et des services gouvernementaux.
Voici un lien vers une liste d'autres informations de contact qui
peuvent être utiles :
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
Je vous remercie encore une fois de m'avoir contacté. Prenez soin de
vous et restez en sécurité !
Megan Mitton
Députée / Member of the Legislative Assembly of NB
Memramcook-Tantramar
Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca
Riding Office / Bureau de circonscription: (506) 378-1565
Office / Bureau -Fredericton: (506) 457-6842
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:50:43 -0300
Subject: Methinks Mr McKee and his LIEbrano buddies must see that
Chucky Leblanc is not so fond of his hero Higgy lately but he still
loves butter tarts and attacks the protesters Cardy hates N'esy Pas?
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
jbosnitch@gmail.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@bellaliant.net>,
"Sherry.Wilson"<Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
"Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"
<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
james.fowler@fowlerlawpc.com, Guillaume.LeBlanc@fowlerlawpc.
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, James.McAvity@gnb.ca,
shara.munn@gnb.ca, corry.toole@gnb.ca, remi.allard@gnb.ca,
maurice.blanchard@gnb.ca, claude.hache@gnb.ca,
christopher.titus@gnb.ca, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
Luc.LaBonte@gnb.ca, "martin.gaudet"<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Tom.Critchlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, tj <tj@burkelaw.ca>, "Kim.Poffenroth"
<Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, "Jack.Keir"
<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, law@shapirohalpern.com, joshuahalpern@outlook.com,
"blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Magee"
<Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
https://www.facebook.com/
David Raymond Amos
Liz Kramer·
FYI You do not get a jury of your peers nor do you have the right to
free legal counsel when the Crown attempts to convict you for
"disturbing the peace" Hence you and all your friends should report in
social media BIGTIME what is going on because we all know Higgy's
buddies in the corporate media never will tell the truth of your
protests
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.
Causing disturbance, indecent exhibition, loitering, etc.
175 (1) Every one who
(a) not being in a dwelling-house, causes a disturbance in or
near a public place,
(i) by fighting, screaming, shouting, swearing, singing or
using insulting or obscene language,
is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Marginal note:Evidence of peace officer
(2) In the absence of other evidence, or by way of corroboration
of other evidence, a summary conviction court may infer from the
evidence of a peace officer relating to the conduct of a person or
persons, whether ascertained or not, that a disturbance described in
paragraph (1)(a) or (d) or an obstruction described in paragraph
(1)(c) was caused or occurred.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 175 1997, c. 18, s. 6
Criminal Code
laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Criminal Code
Federal laws of canada
1 Comment
David Raymond Amos
I see that my old foes Luc Labonté and Claude Haché made the CBC news
today and just one day after I emailed and blogged about them and
THEIR BUDDIES in the RCMP. Trust that the sneaky and very greedy
lawyer Brian Munro has been duly informed many times about my concerns
about the dubious actions of the RCMP within various matters over the
years particularly the prosecution of the Tingley Family and he always
plays dumb so that he could keep billing for his services. However he
certainly cannot deny the fact that knows my brother in law and his
crooked law firm very well TOO TOO FUNNY N'esy Pas???
https://davidraymondamos3.
DAVIDRAYMONDAMOS3.BLOGSPOT.COM
One person was arrested at a demonstration outside of Premier Blaine
Higgs's house in Quispamsis
Liz Kramer
MtiagrecSdchtSpngfot nh1a4 atos cor4:gre3m8o gPuMd ·
Why are they not wanting us to see Quebec rising?
0:23 / 1:33
Kateryna Kharytska
was live.
MtiagrecSdchtSpngfot nh1a3 atos cor2:gre4m5o gPuMd ·
24 Comments
9 Shares
Comments
Liz Kramer
The number of views was at 174,000 this morning. Look now. Wow
Diane Doucet
Liz Kramer
43K
They tinker with view counts? 🤔
Laura Sommerville
Liz Kramer
I noticed that too!
David Raymond Amos
Laura Sommerville
Me Too
David Raymond Amos
Liz Kramer
Enjoy my poor spelling
https://davidraymondamos3.
Monday, 15 March 2021
DAVIDRAYMONDAMOS3.BLOGSPOT.COM
One person was arrested at a demonstration outside of Premier Blaine
Higgs's house in Quispamsis
Kelly Sue
I don't see the view count. I heard the was tear gas. 🙁
Liz Kramer
Kelly Sue
what kind of rumour is this I don’t see any tear gas, did you?
Liz Kramer
Sounds kinda like when people said we wrecked higgs lawn and threw a
rock and broke a window LOL
Kelly Sue
Liz Kramer
I dunno I just heard that the police used it on the protestors. It
could be wrong
David Raymond Amos
Kelly Sue
You are very wrong
Kelly Sue
David Raymond Amos
oh good!!! I heard it from a few people. I'm so glad it's not true!
David Raymond Amos
Kelly Sue
That was last year
https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/
MONTREAL.CTVNEWS.CA
Experts worry use of tear gas at recent protests in Montreal could
increase spread of COVID-19
David Raymond Amos
Kelly Sue
They did use some pepper spray though
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
CBC.CA
Thousands protest pandemic health measures in Montreal | CBC News
Kelly Sue
David Raymond Amos
thanks for this!
David Raymond Amos
Kelly Sue
You are welcome Feel free to ask me anything
David Raymond Amos
Liz Kramer
Chucky Leblanc deleted his video about the protest up on the Miramichi
yesterday Yet he has turned on his buddy Higgy today Methinks the
nasty French blogger is confused as usual N'esy Pas?
https://
CHARLESOTHERPERSONALITIE.
Anti COVID-19 vaccines protest in Miramichi......just happened to be in ...
David Raymond Amos
Methinks we now know the reason Cardy's buddy Chucky Leblanc took down
his video of the protest up on the Miramichi N'esy Pas?
PC MLA and Education Minister Dominic Cardy has questions about
Conroy's decision to attend the rally. (Ed Hunter/CBC)
Education Minister Dominic Cardy said Conroy would have to answer for
her presence at the rally.
"I would not go near those sort of rallies with a 10-foot pole," said
Cardy, who clashed with anti-vaccination groups when trying to win
passage of a bill on mandatory vaccinations for school children.
Cardy said the rallies are being organized by Vaccine Choice Canada,
who fought his bill and who he called "one of the most dangerous
organizations around, spreading misinformation around vaccines."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
MLA defends attending rally against New Brunswick's COVID-19
restrictions | CBC News
CBC.CA
David Raymond Amos
Hot off the press Now Chucky has uploaded a new video to respond to
his CBC buddies Too Too Funny N'esy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
YOUTUBE.COM
Miramichi MLA Michelle Conroy should be allow to attend any protest
she wishes. Shame on CBC!!!
David Raymond Amos
Methinks Higgy is not so popular with Cardy's buddy Chucky "Cry Baby"
Leblanc anymore N'esy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
YOUTUBE.COM
New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs should be ashamed of himself!!!!
David Raymond Amos
https://
David Raymond Amos
Methinks Higgy and Cardy are gonna eat a lot of butter tarts while
reading my next email Nesy Pas?
David Raymond Amos
Lots of comments just went "Poof"
https://www.facebook.com/
David Raymond Amos
I must stand corrected
https://www.facebook.com/
Terry Sisson
Appreciate the heads up as to the ending of the video. Saved me about
15 minutes of wasted time and a great deal of time was wasted by the
police.
David Raymond Amos
Looks who is talking about wasting people's precious time
Terry Sisson
David Raymond Amos
Yes, I am answering him and glad you noticed.
David Raymond Amos
Terry Sisson
Liz Kramer ran in the same election you did against the current
Attorney General in her neighbouhood her words are not worth listening
to as she is being prosecuted by Teddy Baby Flemming's minions for
your hero Higgy's benefit????
Terry Sisson
David Raymond Amos
Drop us a line David when you have your facts straight and recognize
which party we are in favor of and I for one do not know minions nor
do I have any heroes that are in government!
David Raymond Amos
Yea Right
David Raymond Amos
Say Hey Krisssy Baby Austin and his buddies Higgy and Maggie for me will ya?
Terry Sisson
David Raymond Amos
Say Goodbye David. When you become more of a human being, drop us a line.
David Raymond Amos
Terry Sisson
COVID-19
One arrested in protest outside Premier Higgs's house
Published an hour ago
Marlo Glass | Telegraph-Journal
SAINT JOHN • One person was arrested at a demonstration outside of
Premier Blaine Higgs's house in Quispamsis on Saturday afternoon.
The Kennebecasis Regional Police Force confirmed they were on the
scene enforcing the mandatory order of the Emergency Measures Act.
Zone 2, which includes the greater Saint John area, moved into phase
red of the province's pandemic recovery plan on Jan. 20. Sgt. Kim
Bennett confirmed one arrest was made.
"There have been demonstrations for the past few Saturdays, and the
police have been on the scene as well," said Bennett.
Liz Kramer of Rothesay, who streamed a video of the demonstration on
her Facebook page, told the Telegraph-Journal she was arrested for
disturbing the peace, as well as ticketed for violating the Emergency
Measures Act for not wearing a mask.
Craig McDougall, the officer in charge of the police response to the
gathering, was not available for comment at the time of publication.
Kramer ran in the 2020 provincial election as an independent candidate
for the Rothesay riding.
The Telegraph-Journal asked the premier's office for comment on
Saturday but did not receive a response by publication time.
Kramer returned to the premier's house on Sunday to "let everyone know
she wasn't afraid," she said. She received another ticket for not
wearing a mask in her car with another person.
She says she is "protesting the non-justification of a continued state
of emergency," and that she "isn't an anti-masker, just a
freedom-lover."
On Saturday, she was issued an additional ticket for protesting
outside the premier's house the week prior.
Kramer said she intends to fight the tickets in court on March 18
David Raymond Amos
Terry Sisson
Why not say Hey to the cops who called me when they arrested my friend
Liz Kramer? Listen for their number
https://archive.org/details/
David Raymond Amos
Terry Sisson
Methinks Liz Kramer and her latest post easily proves that there are
more "human beings" like us and less sheople like you with each
passing day N'esy Pas?
On 3/14/21, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Out of the Gate I should ask where was the media and WHY the very
> corrupt RCMP did not remain true to their promise to the local
> politicians and arrest anyone else in Moncton today???
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/
>
>
> Could it be that Canadians have had enough of this malicious lock down
> nonsense and are hitting the streets in tidal waves all over the
> country just before questionable budgets are tabled and confidence
> votes begin?
>
> Go Figure
>
> https://www.facebook.com/
>
>
> Deja Vu Anyone???
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/
>
> Talk New Brunswick
> JcsteefScapdnounaresoyrh 2m3ehd ·
> This happened in front of Premier Higgs home today
> https://www.facebook.com/
> If you don't want to watch the whole thing it ends with her being arrested.
>
>
> Methinks the Crown Attorneys in New Brunswick must now that Liz Kramer
> ran against their current boss Teddy Baby Flemming in the last
> election now even though Higgy had her arrested before all the people
> in Moncton were yet CBC won't talk about it but an Irving newsrag
> certainly did CORRECT???
>
> COVID-19
> One arrested in protest outside Premier Higgs's house
> Published an hour ago
> Marlo Glass | Telegraph-Journal
>
> SAINT JOHN • One person was arrested at a demonstration outside of
> Premier Blaine Higgs's house in Quispamsis on Saturday afternoon.
>
> The Kennebecasis Regional Police Force confirmed they were on the
> scene enforcing the mandatory order of the Emergency Measures Act.
> Zone 2, which includes the greater Saint John area, moved into phase
> red of the province's pandemic recovery plan on Jan. 20. Sgt. Kim
> Bennett confirmed one arrest was made.
>
> "There have been demonstrations for the past few Saturdays, and the
> police have been on the scene as well," said Bennett.
>
> Liz Kramer of Rothesay, who streamed a video of the demonstration on
> her Facebook page, told the Telegraph-Journal she was arrested for
> disturbing the peace, as well as
> ticketed for violating the Emergency Measures Act for not wearing a mask.
>
> Craig McDougall, the officer in charge of the police response to the
> gathering, was not available for comment at the time of publication.
>
> Kramer ran in the 2020 provincial election as an independent candidate
> for the Rothesay riding.
>
> The Telegraph-Journal asked the premier's oce for comment on
> Saturday but did not receive a response by publication time.
>
> Kramer returned to the premier's house on Sunday to "let everyone know
> she wasn't afraid," she said. She received another ticket for not
> wearing a mask in her car with another person.
>
> She says she is "protesting the non-justification of a continued state
> of emergency," and that she "isn't an anti-masker, just a
> freedom-lover."
>
> On Saturday, she was issued an additional ticket for protesting
> outside the premier's house the week prior.
>
> Kramer said she intends to fight the tickets in court on March 18.
>
>
> https://pipsc.ca/news-issues/
>
> President Daviau asks political leaders in New Brunswick where they stand
>
> PIPSC President, Debi Daviau has reached out to all political leaders
> in New Brunswick to clarify their positions on issues that matter most
> to our members.
>
> Read the letter
>
> Several hundred PIPSC members live and work in New Brunswick. Our
> membership in the province includes Crown Prosecutors, Crown Counsel,
> Legal Aid Services employees, agrologists and agronomists, engineers,
> architects and land surveyors, as well as veterinarians and veterinary
> pathologists.
>
> All who have continued to provide critical services to the people of
> New Brunswick during the COVID 19 crises. And many who have been on
> the front lines of the provincial and federal response to the
> pandemic.
>
> President Daviau has asked each party to clarify what their position
> is on the following issues:
>
> (1) If elected, what will your party do to ensure an effective,
> well-funded provincial public service continues to be in place in the
> years ahead?
>
> (2) If elected, in light of ongoing health concerns related to the
> COVID-19 pandemic, what will your party do to ensure the safety of our
> members returning to their regular work locations? And will your party
> support appropriate work-life balance accommodations for our members
> and their families given the continued uncertainty regarding what will
> constitute the “new normal” in the future?
>
> (3) If elected, will your party ensure that our members receive fair
> compensation that is competitive with those of their counterparts
> across Canada? As you may know, public service professionals in New
> Brunswick are currently among the lowest paid in the country.
>
> (4) With the move from a defined benefit pension plan to a shared risk
> pension plan, our members are now left with a retirement plan that
> delivers less and costs more. If elected, what will your party do to
> address this shortfall?
>
> We are a non-partisan union and ready to collaborate with the next New
> Brunswick government to ensure that New Brunswickers continue to
> receive the excellent public services that they expect and depend on.
> Published on 8 September 2020
>
>
> https://pipsc.ca/groups/nbcp/
>
>
> NBCP Group Executive
>
>
> President
> Christopher T. Titus
> Group : NBCP
> Department : OAG
> Phone : 1-506-658-2580
> Email : christopher.titus@gnb.ca
>
> Vice-President
> Claude Haché
> Group : NBCP
> Department : OAG
> Phone : 1-506-453-2784
> Email : claude.hache@gnb.ca
>
>
> Secretary
> Maurice Blanchard
> Group : NBCP
> Department : OAG
> Phone : 1-505-856-3536
> Email : maurice.blanchard@gnb.ca
>
>
> Treasurer
> Rémi Allard
> Group : NBCP
> Department : OAG
> Phone : 1-506-856-2310
> Email : remi.allard@gnb.ca
>
> Member
> Corry Toole
> Group : NBCP
> Department : OAG
> Phone : 1-506-643-2381
> Email : corry.toole@gnb.ca
>
> Member
> Shara Munn
> Group : NBCP
> Department : OAG
> Phone : 1-506-658-2610
> Email : shara.munn@gnb.ca
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Protesters who allegedly violated N.B. COVID rules hire Ontario lawyer
>
> Judge rejects request to bar media from publishing name of one of five
> facing charges
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Mar 10, 2021 2:40 PM AT
>
> Two people arrested and charged following a protest outside Moncton
> city hall in January have hired an Ontario lawyer who unsuccessfully
> requested a publication ban to restrict reporting the name of one of
> those facing charges. (Radio-Canada )
>
> A provincial court judge on Wednesday denied a request to prohibit
> media from reporting the name of one of five people charged with
> violating New Brunswick's COVID-19 rules at a protest in Moncton.
>
> The request was made by Ontario lawyer Joshua Halpern, who is
> representing Bathurst residents Nicholas DeAngelis, 34, and
> 31-year-old Britney Green.
>
> DeAngelis and Green were arrested and charged following the Jan. 24
> protest outside Moncton city hall. Both were scheduled to appear in
> Moncton provincial court Wednesday to enter pleas on the charges they
> face.
>
> Neither were present, but were represented by Halpern, who appeared by
> phone.
>
> "I'd like to request a publication ban on this file," Halpern told
> Provincial Judge Brigitte Volpé after she read the charges against
> DeAngelis.
>
> Publication bans are standard for the names of victims of sexual
> crimes and for those under 18 facing charges, but the names of adults
> charged are public record because of the open court principle.
>
> Prosecutor opposed request
>
> "I understand there's been a lot of media attention around this and he
> feels he's being harassed by the media," Halpern said.
>
> The defence lawyer sought the ban based on a section of the criminal
> code that allows barring names of witnesses and victims of crime at
> the request of a Crown prosecutor.
>
> Crown prosecutor Maurice Blanchard opposed the request, saying he
> didn't believe such a ban would be allowed.
>
> "Unless I'm mistaken, your client is the accused, not a victim here,"
> the judge said.
>
> "Not a victim, but he is a witness as well as being an accused," Halpern
> said.
>
> "The section under which you're [requesting the ban], in my opinion,
> doesn't permit me to do that," Volpé said, adding Halpern could file
> an application seeking such a ban and a hearing would need to be held
> to consider the request.
>
> DeAngelis faces criminal charges of causing a disturbance at a
> Superstore in Moncton by screaming, mischief by interfering with the
> use of property, and resisting two police officers on Dec. 31, 2020.
>
> DeAngelis is alleged to have violated the province's Emergency
> Measures Act on Dec. 31 by not wearing a mask, not wearing a mask in
> Shediac on Jan. 22 and Jan. 24 by taking part in a gathering of more
> than five people while not physically distanced and not wearing a
> mask.
>
> Green faces similar criminal charges.
>
> It's also alleged she violated the Emergency Measures Act on Dec. 31
> by not wearing a mask and Jan. 24 by taking part in a gathering of
> more than five people while not physically distanced and not wearing a
> mask.
>
> Halpern requested an adjournment so he can get disclosure of the
> Crown's evidence. He's scheduled to appear in court by phone on April
> 21.
>
> Jonathan Rossiter, 29, of Nackawic, Dawn Teakles, 49, of Moncton, and
> David Robert West, 54, of Riverview were also charged following the
> protest outside city hall.
>
> Teakles returns to court March 22, while West is scheduled to appear April
> 6.
>
> An arrest warrant was issued for Rossiter after he missed a court
> appearance in February.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Moncton protester against COVID rules found fit after psychiatric
> evaluation
>
> David West of Riverview arrested during Jan. 24 protest outside
> Moncton city hall
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Feb 25, 2021 5:05 PM AT
>
> David West of Riverview arrested during Jan. 24 protest outside
> Moncton city hall
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Feb 25, 2021 5:05 PM AT | Last
> Updated: February 25
>
> An anti-mask protest took place in Moncton on Jan. 24 and five people
> were arrested. (Radio-Canada )
>
> A Riverview man arrested during a protest against COVID-19
> restrictions in Moncton last month was found fit to stand trial
> following a 30-day psychiatric evaluation.
>
> David Robert West, 54, will be released from custody and is next
> scheduled to appear in court April 6.
>
> West was among five people arrested and held in custody following the
> Jan. 24 protest outside Moncton city hall, but was the only one still
> in custody.
>
> He appeared in Moncton provincial court Thursday afternoon by video
> from the Southeast Regional Correctional Centre in Shediac.
>
> Defence lawyer Guillaume LeBlanc told provincial court Judge Paul
> Duffie that he had yet to receive disclosure of the Crown's evidence.
>
> West indicated during an appearance Jan. 28 that he was "just not all
> there in the head right now." A judge had ordered the psychiatric
> evaluation at the Restigouche Hospital Centre in Campbellton at
> LeBlanc's request.
>
> West faces several criminal charges, including allegations he resisted
> a police officer on Oct. 8, 2020, assaulted a peace officer on the
> same date, caused a disturbance at a grocery store in Moncton on Dec.
> 31, 2020 and violated the province's Emergency Measures Act at a
> Shediac grocery store on Jan. 22 this year, according to a list of
> charges read in court Thursday.
>
> Jonathan Rossiter, 29, of Nackawic, Dawn Teakles, 49, of Moncton,
> Nicholas Deangelis, 34, of Bathurst, and Britney Green, 31, of
> Bathurst were the others arrested and charged following the Jan. 24
> protest.
>
> Green and Deangelis are scheduled to return to court March 10. Teakles
> returns to court March 22. An arrest warrant was issued after Rossiter
> missed his Tuesday court appearance.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Warrant issued after anti-mask protester skips Moncton court appearance
>
> Jonathan Rossiter, 29, of Nackawic was set to enter a plea in Moncton court
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Feb 22, 2021 12:09 PM AT
>
> RCMP officers issued tickets and arrested several people at the
> protest for violating the province's emergency measures during a
> protest outside Moncton city hall on Jan. 24. (Guy
> LeBlanc/Radio-Canada)
>
> A judge issued an arrest warrant Monday after a person arrested and
> charged following an anti-mask protest in Moncton missed his court
> appearance.
>
> Jonathan Rossiter, 29, of Nackawic faces criminal charges of
> assaulting, resisting and obstructing police officers on Jan. 24 in
> Moncton. He also faces a charge of violating the province's Emergency
> Measures Act by taking part in a gathering of more than five people
> outside, while people were not more than two metres apart and wearing
> masks.
>
> He was one of six arrested Jan. 24 at the protest outside Moncton city
> hall. He was released from custody the following day and ordered to
> appear in court again on Monday to enter a plea on the charges.
>
> He was not present in Moncton provincial court, and no lawyer was
> there to represent him, so Judge Luc Labonté issued an arrest warrant.
>
> Dawn Teakles, 49, of Moncton, was also arrested at the protests and
> also faces similar criminal charges and an alleged violation of the
> Emergency Measures Act.
>
> Teakles was present in court and was wearing a mask, but did not enter a
> plea.
>
> Teakles told the judge she has applied for legal aid representation.
> She's scheduled to return to court March 22.
>
> Earlier, David West, 54, of Riverview was sent for a 30-day
> psychiatric evaluation and is scheduled to return to court Feb. 25.
>
> Bathurst residents Britney Green, 31, and Nicholas DeAngelis, 34, were
> released on bail Jan. 28 and are scheduled to return to court March
> 10.
>
> Codiac Regional RCMP Supt. Tom Critchlow told Moncton councillors last
> week that police had noted a protest Feb. 14 had followed the
> province's rules meant to reduce the spread of COVID-19.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
> For the record I crossed paths with Judge Luc Labonté BIGTIME when he
> was prosecuting Werner Bock He wisely dropped the charges as soon as
> he and I had a little pow wow on the phone and I sent him a few emails
> to prove what I said was true The same holds true only worse for James
> McAvity and his cohorts years 10 years before when he was prosecuting
> Corry Toole and my bother in law's former client Shawn Tabor in 2004
> because those fools continued to pursue the matter for the benefit of
> their friend David Lutz and wannabe liberal judge even though they
> were duly informed of the truth of the matter
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Charges against cattle farmer Werner Bock dropped
>
> Crown withdrew 2 counts of failing to provide proper food and water
> because cows have been sold
> CBC News · Posted: Jun 20, 2014 12:05 PM AT
>
> A New Brunswick cattle farmer is no longer facing charges of failing
> to care for his animals.
>
> Werner Bock, 70, of Petitcodiac, had been charged with two counts of
> failing to provide proper food and water to his cattle during the
> spring of 2011.
>
> But the Crown withdrew the charges under New Brunswick's SPCA Act in
> Moncton provincial court on Thursday, saying Bock has sold his cows
> and the herd no longer needs protection.
>
> Bock had claimed the case against him was a conspiracy by the
> government, veterinarians, the RCMP and CBC.
>
> He testified that lasers and heat rays had killed his cows.
>
> In December, Bock had been found unfit to stand trial. A psychiatric
> assessment showed he was suffering from a delusional disorder.
>
> Judge Troy Sweet had adjourned the case until June 19 and released
> Bock on the conditions that he keep the peace and report to Moncton
> Mental Health for assessment and treatment.
>
> Crown witnesses had testified about a pile of carcasses under hay
> bales, a dead cow in a brook and others buried in the woods.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
> The following year the LIEBRANOS and Luc Labonte cannot deny that I
> smelled something fishy while I was arguing Crown Attorneys in Federal
> Court
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "LaBonte, Luc (OAG/CPG)"<Luc.LaBonte@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:41:18 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks something smelled fishy between
> Dominic Leblanc and Trudeau The Younger's minions within the RCMP way
> back in 2004 yett the CBC or Keith Ashfield would never say shit about
> it but the media in Norway sometimes did
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will out of the office until January 4, 2016. I will periodically
> check my e-mails, however, expect delays for responses. Should you
> have an emergency, please contact 506-453-2784.
> Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 4 janvier 2016. Je vérifirai mon
> courriel de temps en temps mais il y aura un délai pour les réponses.
> Si vous avez une urgence, s.v.p. veuillez contacter le 506-453-2784.
>
>
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: FW: Message to Angie re confirmation that David Banks of
>> the Dispatch 911 at the Fredericton City Police said he sent the 911
>> audio evidence to the Crown
>> To: "Evelyn Greene"<evelyngreene@live.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "thepurplevioletpress"
>> <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.
>> Cc: "We are Fred up"<WEAREFREDUP@gmail.com>, andremurraynow@gmail.com
>> Date: Saturday, January 28, 2012, 2:38 PM
>>
>>
>> http://
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>
>> http://
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> http://
>>
>> On 1/28/12, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> No special treatment when police face charges: lawyer
>>> Craig Babstock (Times & Transcript) – With more than 20 years
>>> experience as a Crown prosecutor, Luc Labonté knows how some people
>>> will react when they hear an RCMP officer had his assault charged
>>> stayed earlier this week. He knows that some will have the perception
>>> this individual no longer faces a charge because he’s a police
>>> officer.
>>>
>>> “Unfortunately, we’ll never be able to change those people’s minds,”
>>> says Labonté.
>>>
>>> But New Brunswick’s director of Public Prosecutions Services wants to
>>> assure the public that people who are charged with a crime are all
>>> treated the same, no matter if they are a Mountie, a plumber or a
>>> newspaper reporter.
>>>
>>> “Our system is based on evidence, not on someone’s profession,” says
>>> the prosecutor.
>>>
>>> The case in question involved an accusation a Mountie committed a
>>> summary assault against his spouse in December and was supposed to go
>>> to trial in Moncton provincial court on Tuesday. Instead, the Crown
>>> asked for a stay of proceedings, saying the request came from the head
>>> office in Fredericton, which the judge granted. Head office gave no
>>> reason for the request, beyond saying the file was reviewed and it was
>>> determined that it was not appropriate to proceed with a charge at
>>> this time.
>>>
>>> Knowing the public is quick to scrutinize cases involving a police
>>> officer, Labonté agreed to talk about the procedure that’s in place in
>>> cases where a police officer is charged, in an attempt to reassure the
>>> public there is no bias, either for or against an officer.
>>>
>>> In this particular case, an RCMP officer investigated the RCMP officer
>>> who was accused and eventually laid the charge against him in court.
>>> That investigator told the Times & Transcript earlier this week that
>>> his work was reviewed by officers from a non-RCMP police force in the
>>> province.
>>>
>>> Labonté says while it’s preferable not to have officers from the same
>>> police force investigate one another, this particular investigation
>>> was independently reviewed by two Crown prosecutors. New Brunswick is
>>> what’s known as a “pre-screening province,” meaning that the Crown
>>> reviews charges and approves them before they are laid in court. The
>>> director says no prosecutor deals with files involving police officers
>>> from their own area.
>>>
>>> “If I’m a Moncton prosecutor and they bring me a file about a Codiac
>>> RCMP member, I would immediately not look at that file and send it to
>>> head office,” says Labonté. “If a Moncton prosecutor said no to a
>>> charge for a Moncton police officer, it would look bad.”
>>>
>>> The head office finds a prosecutor in the province who has not had
>>> dealings with that police officer. Because Mounties are frequently
>>> transferred, they also check where that person has been located in the
>>> past so there’s no conflict with the Crown assigned to the file.
>>>
>>> During his career in Moncton, Labonté took on files involving police
>>> officers in other parts of the province of whom he had no knowledge,
>>> which allowed him to treat each case like any other file.
>>>
>>> “We want to make sure they don’t get any special treatment or treated
>>> more harshly than any other person,” he says. “We ensure the threshold
>>> required to prosecute someone is met.”
>>>
>>> A common misperception about Crown prosecutors is that they are out to
>>> register convictions, but that’s not the case. As a sign in the lobby
>>> of the Crown’s office in the Moncton Law Courts says, the goal is to
>>> present the facts and let the judge or jury decide guilt.
>>>
>>> “We are to be an unbiased presenter of the facts, we’re not there to
>>> seek convictions,” he says.
>>>
>>> Labonté says cases are constantly reviewed leading up to a trial and
>>> there are many reasons why a stay may be sought. For example a witness
>>> may disappear, a person can change their story, new evidence can be
>>> discovered, or a new person reviewing the file may have a different
>>> opinion whether or not it should proceed.
>>>
>>> While Labonté can’t discuss the specifics of the Moncton case from
>>> this week, he says he reviewed the file and recommended the case not
>>> go to trial. That recommendation went to his deputy minister, who
>>> agreed. In cases where the Crown requests a stay of proceedings, it
>>> has a year to decide if it wants to lay the charge again.
>>>
>
>
>
> JAMES MCAVITY
> Crown Prosecutor (Acting)
> Saint John, Crown Prosecutors Office (Regional Office )
> Justice & Public Safety
> Phone : (506) 658-2580
> Fax : (506) 658-3061
> Email : James.McAvity@gnb.ca
>
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/
>
>
> Guillaume LeBlanc
>
> Fowler Law P.C. inc. Full-time
> Dates Employed Sep 2020 – Present
> Employment Duration 7 mos
> Location Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
>
>
>
> James E. Fowler
> Called to the bar: 1979 (NB); Q.C.2013 (NB)
> Fowler Law P.C. Inc.
> 69 Waterloo St.
> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 0E1
> Phone: 506-857-8811
> Fax: 506-857-9297
> Email: james.fowler@fowlerlawpc.com
>
> https://www.facebook.com/
>
> https://www.shaplegal.com/
>
> (647) 932-2147
>
> law@shapirohalpern.com
>
> Joshua Halpern
> Law Society Number
> 78744E
> Class of Licence Definitions
> Lawyer (L1)
> Real Estate Insured †
> No
> Status Definitions
> In Private Practice
> Business Name
> Shapiro Halpern Law
> Business Address
> 149 Willowdale Ave.Toronto, OntarioM2N 4Y5
> Phone
> 1 647 932 2147
> Email Address
> joshuahalpern@outlook.com
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:17:25 -0400
> Subject: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for the third time The pdf
> files hereto attached are for real
> To: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com, "brian.gallant"
> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "chris.collins"<chris.collins@gnb.ca>, tj
> <tj@burkelaw.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>
>
> Robert K. Mckee
> Called to the bar: 2012 (NB)
> Fowler Law P.C. Inc.
> 69 Waterloo St.
> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 0E1
> Phone: 506-857-8811
> Fax: 506-857-9297
> Email: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Robert McKee to run for the Liberals in Moncton Centre
> Lawyer won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, a spokesperson for
> the party says
> CBC News · Posted: Jun 03, 2018 4:50 PM AT
>
> Robert McKee, a 32-year-old lawyer and first-term Moncton city
> councillor, declared his candidacy for the Moncton Centre Liberal
> nomination on May 17. (Submitted)
>
> Robert McKee has won the Moncton Centre Liberal nomination and will
> run for the party in the upcoming provincial election this fall.
>
> The 32-year-old lawyer was elected to Moncton city council in May,
> 2016, representing Ward 3, and declared his candidacy for the Moncton
> Centre Liberal nomination on May 17.
>
> He won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, according to Duncan
> Gallant, a spokesperson for the party.
>
> The availability to run in Moncton Centre for the Liberals opened up
> after Speaker Chris Collins said he wouldn't reoffer for the party.
>
> Speaker Chris Collins won't reoffer for Liberals, plans to sue
> premier for libel
> 8 Liberals quit over premier's 'humiliating' treatment of Chris Collins
>
> Premier Brian Gallant suspended Collins from the Liberal caucus on the
> basis of allegations of harassment made by a former employee of the
> legislature.
>
> Collins described Premier Gallant's handling of the allegations as
> "atrocious" and will finish his term as an independent.
>
> The election is scheduled for Sept. 24.
>
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I. Introduction
>
> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II. Preliminary Matter
>
> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III. Issue
>
> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV. Analysis
>
> A. Standard of Review
>
> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V. Conclusion
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
[Message clipped] View entire message