https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/methinks-plot-has-thickened-within-this.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-roundup-tuesday-dec-8-1.5832816
---------- Original message ----------
From: Chuck Thompson <chuck.thompson@cbc.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:20:57 -0800
Subject: Annual Leave Re: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 YO HUBBY
LACRIOX WHY DOES CBC CONTINUE TO BLOCK MY COMMENTS AND IGNORE MY
LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CROWN?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
I'll be away from the office until Monday, February 1st. In my
absence, please contact Emma Bedard at emma.bedard@cbc.ca or on
416-205-7831.
Thanks,
Chuck
Chuck Thompson
Head of Public Affairs
CBC English Services
416-205-3747
416-509-3315 (cell)
--
Chuck Thompson
Head of Public Affairs
CBC English Services
416-205-3747
416-509-3315 (cell)
---------- Original message ----------
From: Dan Ciraco <dan.ciraco@cbc.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:20:55 -0800
Subject: OUT OF OFFICE Re: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 YO HUBBY
LACRIOX WHY DOES CBC CONTINUE TO BLOCK MY COMMENTS AND IGNORE MY
LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CROWN?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
I am currently out of the office, returning on February 1, 2016.
For immediate assistance, please contact my assistant at andre.st-amant@cbc.ca
Thank you.
--
Dan Ciraco
Senior Legal Counsel
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
416-205-3352
[image]
NOTICE : This e-mail is confidential, may be privileged and is
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all
copies. Thank you.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-roundup-tuesday-dec-8-1.5832816
N.B. COVID-19 roundup: 5 new cases Tuesday, Fredericton students can return to school
Regular in-school routines will resume after COVID-19 case was confirmed Monday
· CBC News· Posted: Dec 08, 2020 2:32 PM AT
Tony Mcalbey
Methinks everybody knows by now that they work with YOU Hence I must sue them N'esy Pas?
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health CM/cb
N.B. reports 14 new cases of COVID-19 as Shannex Saint John outbreak rises
6 new cases confirmed at Parkland Saint John, 1 case confirmed at Harrison Trimble High School in Moncton
Alexandre Silberman · CBC · Posted: Nov 29, 2020 10:17 AM AT
Methinks I know what you would do However as you well know already did so once but with no avail while you people make fun of me perhaps my kids will have better luck than I in the US of A N'esy Pas?
63 N.B. jobs lost as cannabis company closes up shop
Canopy Growth shutters its Tweed recreational cannabis location in Fredericton
· CBC News· Posted: Dec 09, 2020 3:10 PM AT
N.B. COVID-19 roundup: Russell says vaccine administration will likely take 12 months
New case is in Saint John and travel-related, province also warns of possible exposure on 2 flights
Mar 22, 2005
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
It is high time to sue the bastards Barry
After what happened to Jeannah last week I was so pissed at everybody it took me some time to calm down. Now I am directing my anger in a very cold, well thought out and ethical fashion. I am printing this email and saving it to use as evidence against Kerstein and many others in federal court. It is a bit of a rant with no one to proof read it. Rest assured I don't care.
As I told you long ago Norfolk Probate Court will never uphold the law. When they allowed William J. Kickham to be the executor of Uncle Franky's estate at the first of August after Jean had argued James Kickham, I knew the Feds were never get honest too and that the bastards would be coming after our home. Never forget Uncle Willy is an ex FBI agent. This has all boiled down to me trying to impeach George W. Bush and Paul Martin. I do not care if anyone believes me or not. That is the simple truth and that is why nobody will help me as well. Most folks do not understand my material. Most of the ones that do understand it, do not believe me. The one's that do believe me either do not care or are to chicken to help or attack me in order to cover up the public corruption for their own personal gain. It is just that simple. The proof of what I say is true is the fact that nobody will dare to call me a lair and put it in writing. Ask David Lutz, the Yankee Carpetbagger getting fat off of Maritime woes for years. He understands me very well. I looked him in the eye again last week just before his buddies threw me out of another court. He knows I am as serious as a heartattack or prostrate cancer.
The most offensive thing to me is the rampant apathy that I have found within my fellow man. However it has explained to me why so much evil has been so easily practiced throughout history. If I did not have children. I would not give a good god damn for my fellow man. I don't care what other people think of me. Most of the human race does not deserve any respect from me whatsoever. I can easily justify that thinking. My FTW attitude is back bigtime but I will never to anything that will cause my kids or my friends to be ashamed of me. Whether I win or lose this battle i will wager most folks will steer clear of me from now on and that is the way I want it anyway. I am feeling pretty mean right now. I will pick who I want to know rather than the other way around. Howard Hughes' actions makes a lot of sense to me now.
The letter at the bottom of this email to Adam Chu is just one example of what I am up to right now. I had to wait until I was certain that he got it. I am going to keep a lot of things under my hat after this in order to keep the smiling bastards in suspense as to whom I have contacted about what and when. I must find some fun in this or I will go nuts. There is great joy in knowing that there is no honour amongst thieves and eventualy the the truth will win out.
Here is what is what I have come to understand of happened on Sept 2nd. Jean was in line behind this Lapointe character and the Kerstein arsehole before court began .They were apparently waiting to file an emergency motion and an affidavit for Gregg Chandler to intevene in the probate matter and scoop a bunch more money with no opposition from you or Jean. They did not know Jean was there as Kerstein went on and on about how we were screwed and what jokers you and I were. Jean kept silent as Kerstein bragged at how everything was in the bag and he was having a lot of fun mouthing off at our expense and explaining how he dealt with you and us the day before. Kerstein went red as beet and likely shit his pants though when they finally got to the clerk and he saw that Jean was behind him all along and was there to oppose his actions.
Adam Chu September 7th, 2005
1212 Hancock St.
Quincy MA 02169
Re: My pending lawsuit against your buddy, Neil M. Kerstein
Sir,
Please find enclosed the hard copy of the material that you requested. As I told you during our conversation on Sept 1st in which I questioned you about your knowledge of the warrant Neil M. Kerstein purportedly signed on July 25th, in your presence. That document was about to be argued in Norfolk Probate Court. This material I have provided to you is exactly the same stuff sent to many Canadian politicians etc. on August 2nd before any warrant that Kerstein and his associate Troccoli claims was sworn out for my arrest in the USA. I have also enclosed a print out of an email sent out on Sept 1st that contained your name and address as proof of my contact with you at that time. The CD which is a copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
If you have any questions perhaps you should contact the lawyers listed below. The LaPointe character whom I have no doubt you know, made a rather interesting sneak attack against my Clan on Sept 2nd after your buddy Kerstein dodged our lawyer Barry Bachrach’s attempt to notify him that the date of the hearing had been changed by the court to Sept 16th. It now appears that Lapointe’s intervention in our matters on behalf of the nasty Yankees, Gregg Chandler and his wife Diane Sacco has put a new twist on everything. LaPointe claims to know the truth of everything so perhaps LaPointe, Barry Bachrach and you should have a long talk about the ethical conduct of Kerstein and Angela Troccoli before I decide to sue you too Mr. Chu.
Please send your answer to me byway of Barry Bachrach. Your buddy Kerstein bragged in front of my wife that he thinks Barry and I are jokers. Check my work to see for yourself. I am too busy politicking in Canada right now to bother much with cheap dime store lawyers from Quincy right now but you may feel free to prove my initial opinion of you to be wrong. Please help me impeach George W. Bush only if you have enough sand to act ethically and uphold the law as your license to practice law demands.
Jeffrey C Lapointe Barry A. Bachrach
Law Offices of George E Burke Bowditch & Dewey
339 Hancock Street 311 Main Street
Quincy MA 02171 Worcester MA 01608
David R. Amos
P.O. Box 73
Acworth, NH. 03601
Label/Receipt Number: 0304 1560 0002 1590 6866
Detailed Results:
Delivered, September 08, 2005, 12:51 pm, QUINCY, MA 02169
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
NORFOLK, SS. PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT
ROBERT F. O’MEARA, )
WILLIAM J. O’MEARA, )
BRIAN L. O’MEARA, )
plaintiffs ) C.A. NO. 04E0017PP1
v. )
)
JEAN F. O’MEARA, )
DAVID R. AMOS )
MAX X. AMOS )
GRACE E. AMOS )
defendants )
MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, JEAN F. O’MEARA, FOR THE COURT TO SUPPORT OR REPORT THE MALICIOUS ACTIONS WITHIN THE ESTATES OF
FRANCIS X. O’MEARA AND JANE E. O’MEARA BY THE PURPORTED DULY COMMISSIONER, NEIL M. KERSTEIN
Now comes the defendant, Jean F. O’Meara and motions the Norfolk Probate Court to clarify the standing of the lawyer, Neil M. Kerstein in the above stated matter and in the estate of Francis X. O’Meara, Norfolk Probate Court docket no.76F3087-A1 To the best of the defendant’s knowledge the aforesaid estate has yet to be closed because of some sort of unresolved action in Norfolk Superior Court docket no. 93370. Please view attachments. In support thereof the Defendant states as follows.
- On July 11th, 2005 an action was brought against the defendant and her family by Gregg A. Chandler (Chandler) of Quincy, MA in an effort to evict the family from their home based on his transactions with the lawyer Neil M. Kerstein (Kerstein) who clearly has no understanding of his purported obligations under M.G.L. 241. On February 7th, 2005 Kerstein lamented to this court about his need for a lawyer to defend him in possible future litigation. The court apparently ignored his concerns without a record of any hearing and yet affirmed by court order the fact that the court has no authority to evict anyone or invade the privacy of their home.
- The defendant further states that on June 16th, 2005 during the course of the third home invasion by police and many others without warrants or due process of law, Kerstein advised Chandler not to speak to the defendant’s husband on the phone and challenged David R. Amos again to sue him in federal court. This time the statements of Kerstein and others were recorded with their complete knowledge and assent in front of the Milton Police Dept while they stood inside the defendant’s home without a warrant. That is the reason for this motion. The defendants must know the names of all people willingly assisting Kerstein in his malicious and criminal actions.
- The defendant further states that on January 27th, 2005 Kerstein challenged the defendant’s husband to sue him and he was served in hand much material that is evidence to prove the many crimes practiced against their family. The aforesaid material included a CD copy of a police surveillance tape that District Attorneys, US Attorneys and all law enforcement officials either ignore or destroy or falsely claim that it is evidence in the defendant’s probate matters.
- The defendant further states that one such CD of wiretap tape # 139 was filed in this court on September 21st, 2004 to prove once and for all that the wiretap tapes in the defendants husband’s possession have nothing to do with probate matters whatsoever. The CD was attached to the defendant’s second pretrial memorandum hopefully to remain sealed until trial and out of the public view. At the end of June this year the defendant saw the CD within the docket of this matter and the seal on the envelope had been broken and the CD left in the public record for anyone to listen to without her permission.
- The defendant further states that on May 16th, 2002, I homesteaded my principle residence at 153 Alvin Ave Milton, MA for the benefit of my family which includes my minor children Max X.Amos and Grace E. Amos, my husband David R. Amos. It was necessary for me to do so because of the strange actions of the Norfolk Probate Court and many of my family members against me. There is no logical reason for these malicious actions other than the willful assistance of the Commonwealth and many others to cover up the apparent fraud practiced against me by the Kickham Law Offices and this court.
- The defendant further states that as of September 21st, 2004 the defendants had proven the fraud and perjury of the lawyer, Angel Troccoli (Troccoli) to the probate courts and two District Attorneys of this Commonwealth many times. On Sept. 21st at the end of the second Pre Trial Conference, Judge Langlois ordered Troccoli to begin again and serve all interested parties a copy of her Petition to Partition, give the defendants copies of her title search and the information on an unnamed bank that she claimed had held a mortgage on the property. Within ten days of that event the defendant, David R. Amos was falsely imprisoned by the Dorchester District Court in order to support Troccoli’s false allegations against him. Immediately thereafter on or about October 8th, 2004 Troccoli filed in this court an application for an interlocutory decree that was never served upon anyone. This court did not docket the aforesaid decree and yet Kerstein was purportedly appointed on its basis. It appears that the Commonwealth wishes to deny that Pre Trail Conferences in this matter had ever happened, ignore the crimes practiced against the defendant’s family in order to bankrupt them and throw them into the street before the truth of their matters is revealed. .
- In further support of the forgoing statements the defendant states that after reviewing many very questionable filings on behalf of my interests by my cousins, the lawyers within the Kickham Law Offices, I had petitioned the court to reopen four matters affecting my interests including this estate of my mother, Jane E. O’ Meara. On May 16th, 2002, I argued Pro Se two law firms billing their fees to my interests as best I could in a Pre-Trial Conference about three of my petitions because no lawyer was willing to assist me even though the trust of Elaine G. Kickham would pay their fees to assist me. I succeeded that day in having William J. Kickham removed as trustee of the trust of Elaine G. Kickham. However the court ignored the fact that his attorney, James M. Kickham withdrew from the matter after having admitted that he had falsely stated in a prior filing that I had assented to the closing of the estate of Elaine G. Kickham and clearly stated it was because my husband David R. Amos had proven his lack of integrity to the Board of Bar Overseers. The Norfolk Probate Court even when confronted with the admitted perjury of a lawyer refused to reopen the estates of Lawrence and Elaine Kickham in order that all assets could be properly inventoried and agreed upon. One year later the Register of this court allowed the Kickham Law Offices to file court ordered revised accountings without any interested party assenting and the Tax Fraud within the estate of Elaine G. Kickham in open view on the very first line of their fraudulent accountings. At the very same point in time a court without jurisdiction had ordered judgements by default in two lawsuits against the Kickhams and the court appointed trustee and his law firm.
- The defendant further states that on September 12th, 2002 Judge Langlois of this court who was a litigant against me in federal court at the time allowed a Motion to Dismiss my petition to reopen my mother’s estate because of his interest in the outcome. The Motion to Dismiss of Robert F. O’Meara was served upon my husband who had yet to file an appearance in the matter under my Durable Power of Attorney. The service was not proper. Two years later on September 21st, 2004. Judge Langlois struck my husband’s Appearance and Motion to Dismiss this matter on his own accord without a Motion to Strike in order to continue to protect his own interests once again. The court should not have acted without a motion from the opposing parties.
- The defendant further states that all matters must begin with a petition properly served and filed according to law. On September 21st, 2004 the defendants forever proved the perjury of Troccoli in this matter to the Norfolk Probate and Family Court and the Norfolk County Register of Deeds. On March 8th, 2004 Troccoli swore under penalties of perjury that she had complied with M.G.L. 241 Section 7 and filed a notice of the Petition to Partition in this matter within the records of the Norfolk County Register of Deeds. However she did not do so until weeks after she filed her application for a Interlocutory Decree and the defendant’s husband David R. Amos had been released from jail on bail. Judge Boorstein of this court who has acted and given orders on all actions in this matter since September 21st, 2004 also sits as chairperson on the Massachusetts Supreme Court Mental Health Advisors Committee. The aforesaid committee has ignored in writing David R. Amos’ pleas for assistance while its chairperson ignores the proof within the dockets before her that he is not crazy. Please view Exhibit A.
- In conclusion the defendant states that she has not talked to the purported Court Appointed Commissioner Kerstein because of his unwillingness to do so. By his own admission in filings within this court he was not allowed into her home on May 12th, 2005 prior to his malicious public auction. It was because he failed to produce evidence of a bond or a warrant and Assistant Register John B. Jenney Jr. affirmed that he did not within a voicemail to the defendant within two hours of Chandler signing a contract with Kerstein in front of her home. On June 1st, during the course of the first home invasion by Kerstein and the Milton Police without a warrant Kerstein viewed the latest evidence of Securities Fraud on the kitchen table of the defendants’ home and merely asked who the executor of the estate was. Kerstein claimed that he did not care about any crimes because he worked for the court and not the interested parties in the real estate he was attempting to sell. The action of Gregg A. Chandler in Quincy District Court to evict the defendants from their home should not go forward until their matters have been resolved in federal courts with the proper jurisdiction and venue. Please view Exhibit B, it contains true copies of the answers of the defendants Jean F. O’Meara and David R. Amos to Gregg A. Chandler’s complaint.
Wherefore for the above stated reasons the defendant demands as follows:
a. The Norfolk Probate Probate and Family Court closely review all filings and hearings in this matter and see that the criminals acting against the defendants are properly prosecuted.
Submitted by
Dated July 27th, 2005 Jean F. Meara, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER SS DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v. )
DAVID R. AMOS )
AFFIDAVIT OF JEAN F. O’MEARA
Now comes, Jean F. O’Meara a US Citizen and wife of David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA and freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the following statements are true and to the best of her knowledge.
- I am a very important witness to testify in defense of my husband’s freedom during the course of his pending trial.
- I have read what the Assistant District Attorney Alicia S. McDonnell has said about my family’s affairs in the email exchange in June with my husband’s attorney, Barry Bachrach. I am greatly offended. Mr. Bachrach is the lawyer who tried to protect my interests in the probate courts of the Commonwealth while my husband ran for Parliament Canada in a sincere effort to expose the public corruption we have become very aware of. I am grateful Mr. Bachrach replaced my husband to stand at my side yesterday in Quincy District Court and Norfolk Probate Court. Today I will witness what is said as he speaks on my husband’s behalf in a status hearing while my husband awaits his appeal in this matter that I witnessed him file on May 31st, 2005.
- I am well aware that the Assistant District Attorney Alicia S. McDonnell wishes to file some sort of affidavit to support more false allegations of hers. It appears that she wishes to claim that my husband has violated the terms of his bail and has continued to harass the lawyer, Angela Troccoli (Troccoli) when actually the reverse is true.
- On May 12th, 2005 Angel Troccoli and two of her client’s visited our home to support the malicious actions of her associate, Neil M. Kerstein (Kerstein) and to laugh at us and our plight.
- On June 1st, 2005 immediately after a home invasion by Kerstein and the Milton Police Dept. without warrants or due process of law, Troccoli sent the Norfolk County Sheriff Dept. with a notice to my husband that she was evicting him. My husband never contacted Angel Troccoli other than to call the Ellis law firm and Barry Bachrach and then fax supporting documents after determining if her associate Kerstein’s information was correct about Troccoli’s latest address. It was in order for Barry Bachrach to respond to Troccoli about the very malicious eviction notice. I have no understanding what gives the District Attorney the right to order Mr. Bachrach not to confer with Troccoli about her notice of eviction to us.
- I certainly do not understand why the Police and the Attorney General maintain that it is ok for Troccoli to order her clients, William and Robert O’Meara to break into and enter my home while my husband is inside awaiting a trial based on Troccoli’s false allegations.
- It was I who mailed my husband’s letter with all the supporting material to the Suffolk County District Attorney on or about July 20th, 2005 in order to prove whatever the law office of Dane M. Shulman and Troccoli were saying about my husband was false.
- On June 1st, 2004 it was I not my husband who had visited the law offices of Dane M. Shulman in order to serve the lawyer, Angela Troccoli (Troccoli) documents in answer to her complaint that she had marked to be heard that day and then failed to appear. It was impossible and ridiculous for the lawyer Angela Troccoli to claim that my husband was stalking her. He was not even the USA from the first week of June 2004 until he was summoned before this court on September 3rd and he immediately returned to Canada afterwards until September 13th to argue Troccoli in two events on Sept 13th and Sept 21st in Norfolk Probate Court dispite the fact that she had falsely claimed that he is not a litigant against her. Troccoli’s own eviction notice proves her statements false.
- I have witnessed all that has occurred and heard all that has been said in Dorchester District Court by and against my husband beginning September 3rd, 2004 after he had returned to the USA and stood before the court in response to a summons served upon our home in Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004. The only exception was on April 21st, 2005 when there was apparently some sort of hearing in this court held behind locked doors that my husband was not notified of. The clerk’s office of this court made me aware of the of hearing on April 21st after I had visited the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office in order to have the police surveillance wiretap tapes retuned to us and to provide the DA with more evidence of crimes against my family before the lawyer Angela Troccoli and her associates including the Milton Police Dept. began their illegal invasions of our home and our privacy on May 12th, 2005. .
- On September 3rd, 2004, I along with two others, one a Canadian Citizen and another a US Citizen witnessed my husband, David R. Amos give many original wiretap tapes to the Assistant District Attorney Alicia S. McDonnell in her office before he spoke to Judge Coffey and tried to provide the court with many documents to prove that Troccoli was a lair one month before the court and the DA supported the Clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens’ illegal and malicious actions. The tapes have since disappeared just like my husband predicted they would.
Signed before the court and
under the Pains and
Penalties of Perjury by
Dated July 28th, 2005 Jean F. O’Meara
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
"Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com> wrote:
What happened Friday? Sorry I got sick again from flying, this is getting ridiculous, and I got busy and forgot to ask if there is a new date? I am going to see leonard tomorrow so expect me to get sick again. This is a fun life.
Communications from our firm may contain or incorporate federal tax advice. Under recently promulgated US Internal Revenue Service standards (Circular 230), we are required to inform you that only formal, written tax opinions meeting the requirements of Circular 230 may be relied upon by taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties. Accordingly, this communication is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
This e-mail message is generated from the law firm of Bowditch & Dewey, LLP and contains information that is confidential and may be privileged as an attorney/client communication or as attorney work product. The information is intended to be disclosed solely to the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this email information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete it from your computer system. For more information about Bowditch & Dewey, please visit our web site at www.bowditch.com
Fwd: The Feds are at it again
- PreviewTIF272kBobvious perjury.tifDownload
From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: failure notice
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message
to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry
it didn't work out.
198.103.213.5 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 Error: content rejected
The remarkable new Governor-General personifies the free and open country Canada wants to be
Wednesday, September 28, 2005, Page A1
OTTAWA -- Her promise is the promise of what we almost are, of what we want to be. She is the becoming Canada.
There is a reason for the extraordinary attention paid yesterday to the investiture of Michaëlle Jean as Governor-General, and for the extraordinary controversy -- from accusations of separatist sympathies to the indiscretions of a dress designer -- that preceded it.
Carleton Place
P. O. Box 5100
520 King Street
Fredericton, NB
E3B 5G8 Canada
----- Original Message -----
From:Bachrach, Barry A.
My ire is about up here. Trocoli may find herself the subject of bbo matters. She lied to the court about serving me docs while I was representing jean omeara which lead to the sale of a house. I was never served. One of the so called harrassing docs was a package of pleadings given to trocolli by jean omeara not david amos. It was then sent to me unopened. When the facts come out here, I believe the charges will be proven frivolous and ms. Trocolli may find herself in hot water. Barry.
From: McDonnell, Alicia (SUF) [mailto:Alicia.Mcdonnell@state.ma.us]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:52 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE:
-----Original Message-----
From: Bachrach, Barry A. [mailto:BBACHRACH@bowditch.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:56 PM
To:'McDonnell, Alicia (SUF)'
Subject: RE:so we're all set for tomorrow. thanks. i think the presence of an atty will help this case.-----Original Message-----
From: McDonnell, Alicia (SUF) [mailto:Alicia.Mcdonnell@state.ma.us]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:42 AM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE:Attorney Bachrach-I am standing in for ADA McDonnell this week in her absence. I am reading her e-mails to assist her and saw this. If you advance and continuance the case, we would just ask that the time be excluded under R. 36.Kate McIntyre-----Original Message-----
From: Bachrach, Barry A. [mailto:BBACHRACH@bowditch.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 11:25 PM
To:'Alicia McDonnell (alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us)'
Cc:'David Amos'; 'David Amos'
Subject:Alicia, since we have not been able to talk, I feel it important that Mr. Amos have representation in the criminal matter. Hence I will enter an appearance Monday.however, I need to reschedule the status hearing scheduled for 6/14 because I will be travelling to a major hearing I have in fargo, nd, for leonard peltier. Could you please give me the name of the da taking your place Tuesday so I can reschedule. Thanks, barry.
Barry this is a draft of one of many emails going out very soon. It should prove you why Hanlon and McDonnell hate me.The time is now. This email should prove to you all that at least I am an ethical political animal. I sent this email to the following people on November 19th. I argued in it court after I had served the ADA and the court hard copy in hand. The conversation was largely between the second Spanish speaking judge and I that my attorney, Barry Bachrach and my wife met again in Dorchester District Court last week after they crossed paths with Judge Coffey.On Nov 19th the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell mostly just stood before the court beaming beet red and struck dumb as usual. The only day McDonnell ever had much to say was on Oct 1st, 2004. That was when she read to the court Troccoli's Bullshit statement that apparently had just been faxed to her. She then quite frankly astounded me by adding a great deal more of her own Bullshit by falsely accusing me of threatening Judge Coffey. Her charges were not only false but insanely ridiculous. She is the one who needs her head examined not I. I could not be stalking anyone in the USA while I was in Canada the whole summer long. Then there is the simple fact that if I had threatened a judge he would have taken care of me immediately. He would not wait for an ADA and another judge to decide to protect him from possible harm. That aside McDonnell was not even present during the hearings I had before Judge Coffey. She had witnessed nothing that had transpired between he and I. She and Judge Hanlon were content to let their underlings handle me until I had thoroughly embarrassed their help and the court with the overwhelming truth of the matter out of the gate. After that their mission has always been to label me as some sort of madman and file me away forever to protect a bunch of crooks from their necessary and proper prosecution.Rather than act within the scope of their employment and uphold the law the Clerk Magistrate Owens, Judge Hanlon, the ADA McDonnell and all others involved in the Dorchester District Court matter willfully practiced crimes against me as early as September 3rd if not before. The clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens admitted within his own signed documents that he knew of the FBI tapes. How could he not have known I had given the Suffolk County District Attorney a copy of one tape the month before the Clerk Magistrate broke the law and filed an unsigned criminal complaint against a man not only not in jail but who was not even in the USA. The Suffolk County District Attorney had even answered my letter attempting to explain the clerk Magistrate's illegal actions. Honestly I think they were all shocked that I had made it across the border without the DHS taking me away. Dorchester District Court has never had jurisdiction over me but the Suffolk county District Attorney has always has jurisdiction over the wiretap tapes. The tapes were found in the trash less than a mile from his head office in the mid nineties. I tried to give them to the FBI on October 15th, 2002 but they they told me they did not care about my concerns because they were to busy preparing to go to war with Iraq. I swear upon my seed that is true. I made certain I recorded a statement of that fact in the public record of Norfolk Probate Court as soon as the Secret Service woke me up in April of 2003 investigating false allegations of a presdential threat made against me by the Quincy District Court. The very court that has just ordered my wife and children out of their home based on the fraudulent actions of Trocccoli and her cohorts. Yankees are crazy not me.On November 19th I served an Assistant District Attorney, a fairly young dude who always wears glasses with copy of the following email in hand after the court has first sent me to see Judge Coffey just like they did with Barry and my wife last week. As soon as I was called I asked the Spanish judge why I was ordered to the court that day. He looked at the largely empty docket and said had he had no idea and that it was a good question. So he sent for Alicia S. McDonnell to see if she could tell us why I was ordered to stand before the court that day. After a while McDonnell appeared and read every single word of the following email. She said nothing to argue the fact that the charges were illegal and malicious. In fact McDonnell hardly said anything at all except to claim that the hearing that day was supposed to be a pre trial conference.Months later on January 21st McDonnell gave me documents claiming that we had had a pre trial conference way back on October 19th, 2004 which was an outright lie as well. That was the day I raised only Hell in Dorchester District Court after I got out of jail and tried hard to remove the matter to federal court. At least my indignation last October finally caused the Probate Court to force Angela Troccoli to file her documents with the Register of Deeds that she had sworn under penalties of perjury that she had done way back in March of 2004. The perjury of Angela Troccoli within the Records of the Register of Deeds can never be erased by any clerk. The book has already been printed and her malice was recorded years after my wife homesteaded our home still deeded in her father's name until late June of this year. Her father's estate has yet to be closed and he has been dead since 1973. Troccoli's associate Neil M. Kerstein had no right to interfere in our privacy whatsoever. Small wonder to me that Hanlon, McDonnell and oh so many others want me in the nuthouse. It is for their benefit not justice.
Hey Ron, Byron, Kathyrn and Mr. Conley,
I figure that today may go three ways. The District Attorney will drop the charges now that the federal election is over or he will go forward and attempt to prosecute me or he and the court will come up with some new charges in an attempt to put me away again. This email should off set all three actions. Feel free to surprise me Mr. Conley with a sudden fit of ethical behavior. However I ain’t betting on it.
Whereas you, Mr. Conley have chosen to not only ignore my legitimate concerns for months but have maliciously prosecuted me and have even had me sent to jail over false allegations of threatening a judge, I look forward to arguing you about just one email with this email alone. However since you and the clerks office have a very bad habit of making documents disappear, I have decided to record this contact with you electronically but give it to your Assistant in hand. I ask my friends to send it around the world so that it is never lost. I have also sent the other emails mentioned by the Boston Police Dept. and your Assistants in their complaint against me. I will print hard copy and present this and the following emails Cynthia A. Robinson as the legal counsel to the Chief Justice of the Boston Municipal Court. She has some serious thinking to do after she had chosen to ignore my call about my concerns with the court that she speaks for. I knew she knew a lot the instant she called me David rather than Mr. Amos as most other lawyers do.
On November 19th I will demand that Judge Hanlon recuse herself and ask the First Justice Charles R. Johnson to review the matter. I sincerely hope that he practices brevity, common sense, practicality accepts the court's limitations as well as his own. I do not think it wise for him to support Judge Hanlon's actions against me She had no right whatsoever to declare that I very likely have a prior history of mental illness and deny the fact that I had ran for Parliament and have very valid concerns about the Public Trust being upheld.
I will file a personal injury lawsuit against Judge Hanlon and anyone who stands with her. I already have the documents proving her maliceWhy the wiretap tapes were denied as evidence by Judge Hanlon and your office without examination by any law enforcement authority will forever prove my point about corruption in Canada and the USA. Chief Justice Mulligan, the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the Solicitor General of Canada, Governor General of Canada and a great many others suggested that I give the god damned tapes to you and return I am called mental ill and dangerous? I am not the one that needs his head examined in fact you Mr. Conley are in great need of having your Professional Conduct examined. You are not crazy. You are corrupt.
I will be demanding that the matter be sent to Congress and Parliament in order to be properly investigated and that counter charges be laid against you and many other employees of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the City of Boston, the federal government and other States that failed to uphold the law and act within the scope of their employment. The fact that I as a Canadian Citizen was summoned out of Canada by an unsigned complaint by a Clerk Magistrate who had no authority to do so anyway forever makes this a federal matter. That it was done under the warrant of the Boston Police Dept whose very own Police Commissioner Kathleen O'Toole had been made aware of many crimes before even the first email was ever sent to Angela Troccoli's boss, Mr. Schulman makes this matter particularly offensive. The fact that I was sent to jail on unnamed charges that were labeled "other" should cause me to seek a great amount of relief in punitive damages so this does not happen again to others. The fact that I was sent into the custody of the very Sheriff that had practiced Fraud and Perjury against me for the benefit of the US Attorney Michael Sullivan two years ago just served to further piss me off. Clearly Judge Hanlon has no understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the Clerk Owens has done his best to try to cover his malicious tracks and destroy the Public Record in a effort to stop me from properly removing the matter to federal court. I watch you malicious Assistant District Attorney laugh as she over heard me saying that I would be suing her six ways to Sunday. Not only does she not understand me she does not understand how to uphold the law. Now she should suffer the pains and penalties for her malice. Following are a few law and prior matters we will be arguing in the near future.
CHAPTER 265. CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
Chapter 265: Section 43A Criminal harassment; punishment
Section 43A. (a) Whoever willfully and maliciously engages in a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, shall be guilty of the crime of criminal harassment and shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not more than $1,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Such conduct or acts described in this paragraph shall include, but not be limited to, conduct or acts conducted by mail or by use of a telephonic or telecommunication device including, but not limited to, electronic mail, internet communications or facsimile communications.
Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court
439 Mass. 352(2003)
** Important case regarding clerk-magistrate hearings **
A clerk-magistrate has no authority to conduct a show cause hearing prior to acting on an application for the issuance of a felony complaint where the person charged is not under arrest.
The Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury District Court scheduled show cause hearings on two separate felony complaint applications. In both instances, the person charged had not been arrested for the alleged offenses. The Commonwealth filed a c. 211, § 3 petition, requesting that the single justice vacate the show cause hearing and issue an order directing the clerk-magistrate to halt such hearings in the future. The Commonwealth's petition was granted and the Clerk-Magistrate appealed.
In reviewing the opinion of the single justice, the SJC looked to the statutes that both define and limit the clerk-magistrate's authority - G.L. c.218, §§33 and 35A. The SJC found no authority for a clerk magistrate to hold a show cause hearing with respect to felony complaints - in fact, §35 specifically limits such hearings to misdemeanors for which there is no arrest. Additionally, §33 contains no provision for an adversary hearing with regard to the issuance of a felony complaint. Finding no statutory authority for such a hearing, the SJC affirmed the decision of the single justice, vacating the hearing and ordering all future hearings to cease. "To the extent that a clerk-magistrate declines to act on an application for the issuance of process on a felony complaint until a show cause hearing is held, the clerk-magistrate improperly interferes with the prosecutorial discretion of the executive branch."
Commonwealth v. Clemens
Appeals Court
September 2, 2004
In a rescript opinion, the Appeals Court addressed for the first time the criminal harassment statute (c. 265, § 43A) enacted in 2000. The Court suggested that, similar to the stalking statute, criminal harassment will require a showing of at least three separate incidents of willful and malicious conduct to support a conviction.
Jurisdiction:
Criminal jurisdiction of the Boston Municipal Court includes most criminal offenses which do not require the imposition of a state prison sentence. If a prison sentence is mandated, the Court may conduct probable cause hearings to determine whether offenses will be bound over to the Superior Court. The Court has original jurisdiction over a number of serious felonies, concurrent with the Superior Court. The Court's civil jurisdiction includes contract and tort actions; cases remanded from the Superior Court; small claims, small claims jury appeals; mental health commitments; summary process; supplementary proceedings; unemployment compensation appeals; paternity and support actions; and domestic abuse actions. The Court also has jurisdiction for review of findings of the State Police Trial Board and equitable jurisdiction in lead poisoning prevention; landlord interference with quiet enjoyment or failure to provide utilities; family abuse prevention; sanitary code; and residential nuisances.
Wagenmann v. Pozzi, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30752, District of Massachusetts, 1986 decision, upheld the potential liability of prosecutors who convey false information to the bail magistrate which resulted in the setting of excessively high bail which precluded the plaintiff from obtaining release from jail, and further that such prosecutorial statements to the judge significantly contributed to the judge's decision to commit the plaintiff to a mental hospital, citing the next case below
Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23482 (9th Cir. 1985)(en banc), in which a unanimous 9th Circuit upheld a Section 1983 civil rights claim for similar prosecutorial misconduct (alleged perjury, threatening and coercing witnesses, concealing and falsifying evidence), citing Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 68 L. Ed. 420, 101 S. Ct. 1908 (1981)
Richards v. City of New York, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13675, Southern District of New York, Judge Michael B. Mukasey, opinion dated September 2, 1998, explaining how prosecuting attorneys can be liable (i.e., lose their full or partial immunity) when getting involved in the investigative area
Mr. Conley I am well aware that you have many political friends that you are protecting from my very valid allegations of crimes. After I had properly disclosed to you many crimes practiced against me, you attacked me with great malice, You should inform your fellow District Attorneys William Keating, Paul F. Walsh, Jr. Timothy J. Cruz, John J. Conte and many other elected officials that I am going to sue you all after I done arguing Alicia S. McDonnell in Dorchester District Court.
I am just a layman. It was not my job to inform the Clerk Magistrate, Mr. Owens of the law but I truly did try to byway of his clerks F. Dennis Sullivan and Robert Sullivan beginning in June while I was running for Parliament. I also fully disclosed everything to you in July in enough time to impeach George W. Bush while all the other Democrats were in Beantown. Hell you even answered me. In return you attack Me? Then when I prove your malice Owens and his assistants like Mr. Buckley and all the other clerks practice fraud etc. against me. I am also aware of the federal political connection of the Dorchester District Court byway of Judge Sidney Hanlon and the former Attorney General Janet Reno and federal funding sent to that court to support the torture of men in malicious actions such as this. I suspect it was to support the actions of the political far left in their endeavors to make inroads in the justice system to suit their own ends. Feel free to argue me.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
December 30th 2004
Legal Advisor Mary Jo Harris Legal Counsel Cynthia A Robinson
Boston Police Department Boston Municipal Court
One Schroeder Plaza 90 Devonshire Street, 16th Floor
Boston MA 02120 Boston MA 02109
Phone 617 343-4550 Phone 617-788-8733
RE: My pending personal injury lawsuit in federal court related to a pending matter
in Dorchester District Court Docket # 0407CR004623
Hey ladies,
Beginning in June of this year as soon as I was made aware of the Boston PD investigation of the very fraudulent allegations of Angela Troccoli, I diligently to discuss this matter with everyone involved including you two ladies. I have waited six months for someone to act ethically and uphold the law. Now I quit talking and must sue everyone including you. I must do so promptly in order to regain the lost assets within the malicious bail ordered by the corrupt, Judge Hanlon and the lost assets stolen by Troccoli and her clients while I was in jail. I was never arrested, never read my rights and illegally held in the very crooked Sheriff Cabral’s jail under the charges of "other" in order to have my head examined because I exercised my right to refute the false statements made by the wicked Assistant District Attorney to support a malevolent Clerk Magistrate’s blatantly illegal complaint. What would you do if you were I?
Thus far this was all done with the support of three judges, Coffey, Hanlon and some Spanish speaking judge no one will give me the name of. On Nov 19th the latter unnamed judge had no idea what the matter was about because the clerk had destroyed most of the Public Record. At least he ordered that the matter proceed swiftly to trial as I demanded. I must sue him too because he refused to return or reduce the bail. He also refused to keep the attached email that I served upon him and the District Attorney during the course of the hearing. He did study it but he called me back after the hearing was over and ordered me to take the document because both he and the clerk did not want it in the public record. I took it after promising to give it to his lawyer, which is you, Ms. Robinson. As you can see you are mentioned within the email dated Nov 19th hereto attached. Clearly it was composed and sent weeks after you had refused to discuss this matter with me when I still had time to remove it to federal court. I did tell you that I would send hard copy. I will never understand why you put me on hold and then were to busy to talk to me yet never called me back. I thought you would surely call once I had served this email upon the court and the DA. This matter does involve my freedom. Two months is long enough for any man to wait in order to be assured that a lawyer is delaying him for lucre or malice. Ms. Harris, the same is true for you. I called you before I called the Mayor’s office in July. If you ladies have questions now, ask your cohorts in the Police Dept, the Mayor’s Office, the DA’s office, the Clerks office, the Sheriff’s Dept, or listen to me on Jan 21st in Dorchester District Court as I argue a couple of interesting motions with whatever judge I meet next.
Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon the legal counsel for the House of Representatives two days ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Whereas Judge Hanlon refused to order the District Attorney to notify the FBI of the existence of the nine original tapes served upon them on September 3rd, perhaps you ladies should consider calling the FBI yourselves. Next year I will quit trying to reason with unethical lawyers etc. From now on I argue with them on the public record.
I made my last calls today to some of my future adversaries. Ms. Harris the last call was to you while you were purportedly out to lunch. I was directed to your voicemail. I declined but it was one step further than the last time I called your office in July. Whoever answered then refused to speak to me because I was a so-called defendant. It did not matter her that I had yet to be charged or that I would be defending myself Pro Se if I were to be charged. After month or so I did manage to talk to Det. Wayne Williams but only briefly because he told me he had an ongoing investigation of me and refused to discuss anything with me. I told him that since he had already pressed false charges against me, I would be suing him. Maybe during the process of discovery of a civil lawsuit I will find out what other crime he is attempting to accuse me of.
If the cops had studied the emails Troccoli claimed were harassing, they would have seen the last one was sent to other Police Depts and to Canada’s Minister of Justice. It was mere days before I returned to Canada to run for Parliament. If the emails were in fact harassment, ask yourself why Irwin Cotler didn’t charge me while I was under the Crown’s jurisdiction. If you doubt me then ask the District Attorney to show you the emails within the huge exhibits that were attached to the Affidavit filed on Oct 1st. Those same exhibits and a great deal more will reappear in federal court next year.
I have no idea what is recorded on the wiretap tapes I gave the District Attorney on Sept 3rd in my criminal matter nor do I care. It is not my job to investigate crimes. I will be filing other wiretap tapes in federal court under seal in a civil complaint so that I cannot be accused of violating other people’s Fourth Amendment Rights. As you listen in confidence to the CD of tape # 139 please understand that either I or my estate will give the original tape only to the fella that calls himself "Al" so that he may sue the government himself if I fail to in my efforts to see justice served.
A Happy New-Year for me would bring shame on all lawyers. Please feel free to impress me with ethical behavior as per the Rules of Professional Conduct. If the USPS does what they are paid to do this time around, you should receive this material first thing in the morning of the last day of this year. Perhaps you should call the FBI ASAP. Say hey to Mr. Kaiser for me. Tell him I am taking a vacation before going back to court on the 21st. He can forget trying to talk to me off the record next year. If he wants to hassle me let him know I sent the text of this letter to Irwin Cotler and many others.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
September 1st, 2004
Howard Rubin, Lyn Crompton Andy Scott
and Greg Delbigio Minister of Indian Affairs
c/o Terry LaLiberte, 61 Carleton Street
Barrister and Solicitor Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2
1190-605 Robson Street
Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5J3
RE: Corruption
Hoka Hey,
Please find enclosed a copy of most of the material sent to two Lieutenant Governors and the Governor General. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court and a Minister in our government in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also enclosed a copy of a letter I composed months ago but never sent and some other information you may find interesting about the political scene in South Dakota.
Leonard has been a political prisoner for far too long with Canadian assistance let us not allow history to repeat itself with John Graham.
May I suggest that you all give my friend Barry Bachrach a call, drop my name and then look to the best interests of the people that you are employed to speak for. There is a strong possibility that my actions may embarrass you in the near future if you choose to ignore this letter. You are looking at just the tip of a very malevolent iceberg that we all know exists. No government is beyond reproach once the electorate has been properly informed. Conrad Black just proved to us all how bad things realy are if anyone was paying attention.
Cya’ll in CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos, of 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. on Sept 2nd, 2004, I delivered the enclosed material to the office of Andy Scott at 61 Carleton Street Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2 and by mail to Terry LaLiberte.
David R, Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:33 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?This really pissed me off. I have long email exchanges with him and when he and Paul Saba spoke in Milton (I had served Saba the same stuff you got at the same time.) I gave the same stuff to Noam's help without a CD recording. The old bugger don't mind running off to Canada to rub elbows with other Canadians he finds newsworthy but won't even pick up the phone to call me. He sure can talk a good talk though. I even had a long talk with Graham's buddies. I guess it is time to write his lawyers a letter do you wish for me to mention you?
----- Original Message -----From:David AmosSent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:05 PMSubject: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?It seems that CSIS is messing with my mailSent by last Thursday by Canada Post to RCMP General Counsel Liliana Longo
c/o Ast. Commissioner Gerry Lynch in NFLD. I have now called NFLD and gave Gerry the tracking number and told him if he wants to read his mail he should send someoneto find it. afterall he is one of the second in Command of the RCMP and Longo is his lawyer.Canada Post won't say dick to me about it.
To track and confirm delivery of your item, enter the Item number, Reference number, or Delivery Notification Card number in the corresponding field provided below, then click the Submit button.
Track & Confirm
Shipment Details
You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 5717
Your item was forwarded to a different address at 2:22 pm on September 21, 2004 in BOSTON, MA 02108. This was because of forwarding instructions or because the address or ZIP Code on the label was incorrect. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.
Here is what happened earlier:
- ACCEPTANCE, September 17, 2004, 10:30 pm, BOSTON, MA 02205
Anyway it ain't no matter to me now Their mail is filed in court for the public to view. If they want to piss and moan about it they can argue me later in court.They are public servants they should read their god damned mail. The Postal Service has a little explaining to do anyway over the Attorney General Robb Quinan and his Mail fraud anyway. I will just and this shit to it. I knew old man Ronald Irwin would duck and run but arguing Longo should be fun,What I did in Norfolk Probate Court today was way beyond fun it went way better than I dreamed it could. October 1st should prove to be quite a hoot after meeting Angie in court today. I wonder if Longo is a pretty as she is. She looks good in her picture anyway I am certain that she is a damn sight smarter than Angie. Angie is so stupid I almost feel ashamed for making her show me her ass. (Not really I am an ass man)Now it appears all the Canadian Boobs have shown me their ass a well. Time to talk to the right Yankees just before the November Election and then head out as planned. i finally got the tape from the New Brunswick Police Commission and I will send a copy of it your way someday Byron. I made sure I mentioned you several times and showed them the documents but I didn't speak of what it was about but everybody will know they got something really kinda big. I did to protect ya buddy. I also mentioned Barry once. I hope Barry called you today. I know the FEDS are likely listening and reading our emails so I recorded it here to protect the both of you and Collen Rowley as well. I cannot afford the timeto wait for her to retire she is more valuable to me as an honest lawyer within the FBI before the Yankee federal election, not afterwards.I also hear Jean and Joyse on the tape so it should protect their butts as well. I will order a copy of the Probate Court tape as soon as we can afford it. But it will likely be edited anyway
To: 'moto maniac'<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:49:51 -0400
-----Original Message-----
From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:47 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: ByronBe careful Byron and I both think this lady is a FED in BC. He just spilled some beans to her on purpose.So that they will make a play against me on Oct 1st. You know what they say about keeping your friends close and your enemies closer. There is nothing wrong with my emails she just said that so that others won't read them.
Note: forwarded message attached.
Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
Gotcha POGO I saved the proof of my postings. T fact that you left one of Depoty Dog's postings and yet removed many others before and afterwards makes your malice towards me and the simple truth of our matter undeniable. Your peoplr have proven to me that your organization is fake and no better than any other corporate controled Blog such as Laughing at Liberals and Free Republic etc etc. Sooner or later I will hope to sue your organization in the same complaint with Superman and Deputy Dog. i will be calling your offices tomorrow to prove my sincerity to you. Once i have identified a lawyer in your midst. i will send them hard copy of Deputy Dog and Superman's malice to stress test his ethics to the mmax. Thanks at least for proving for me that even the World Wide web is corporate controled. Freedom even in cyberspace must be defended proptly or all is lost in the real world. I find it interesting that you let my Blogs last so long and yet erased them on the very day the Homeland Security Act was blessed once more by a very corrupt Congress.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Dec 08, 2005 at 10:59 PM
All you had to do to prevent your family from being "thrown" out on the street, was to buy everyone elses share. Didn't that ever occur to you? It is what most normal people would do who only own 25% of something. Buy the other 75%. You two think you can just claim both houses as your own. Thats right, Jean "homesteaded" Milton. Try looking up what the homestead act is. When you thought I was breaking into my own house in Mano, did you ever look at the back door? Always unlocked. I wish it was me destroying the beach house, but I'm sorry to say it was the new owners. All that equipment you saw belonged to them. All the property that was left in the house or on the property was moved or disposed of by the new owner. Thats what happens when you refuse to move yor crap. It is moved for you and at your expense, not ours.Try looking at your own wifes signatures. Which one does she claim is forged now. Seems she can't make up her mind. Oh thats right, she was suffering a nervous breakdown. How long did this breakdown last for? Seems to me she was still working during most of it. First it was over 911, then over the Kickhams, then it was the three of us. You guys should pick one story and stick to it. I think it was over you and the countless times you left to go on another scumbag tour. We all remember them. One of your best was summer of 1990. Remember Jeans delicate condition. You were gone for four and a half to five months while she sat around pissing and moaning about you. Why, I don't know since she does fine without you. Getting back to her signatures, I have about twenty copies of her signature dating as far back as 1980. They all look the same. Maybe thats why no one pays any attention to your bs about forgeries. You have accused a few people of this forgery. Have you made up your mind who you are going to "sue" for that. You must be up in the thousands of people who you are going to sue. I guess that's your full time job. There must be some correct paperwork on file in all these courts. It looks like both houses sold, while you kept yelling that we can't do it. You never did tell anyone why we could not, other than you saying we couldn't. You see where that went. I remember you saying in one of your many documents that you two were willing to match the first offer on the house. What ever happened to that? You and I both know. On Ole Tom, it's a kilt,,,,,,,on you,it's one of your wifes old skirts. You seem to dump on P-town. Seems to me that many of your friends,or former friends, and family go to P-town.Coming from a man in a skirt, I would not put too much credibility in what you say. You keep shitting on Yankees,,,,,,,,, both your children and your wife are Yankees. Thank God you will never be one. In case you are wondering, we are each enjoying our share of the sales, as we should be and so could you. Hopefully those storage fees are not getting too high. Maybe Triple M has alreadt auctioned of your junk. I was able to get my tools back before everything was packed up. You do remember the things you borrowed many years ago and failed to return them. I know that was just an oversight, being the honest man that you are. You should also look into how a deed works. We did not need a deed in our name to sell either property. I'm sure you being such a smart fellow, you looked into that and found a "Dave" loophole. Again,,,,nice try. You're suing the Queen? I didn't think the Queen had anything to do with Canada anymore. But I could be wrong. Don't really care. More useless info. I'm sure she responds to all your correspondence. She better if she knows what is good for her. Don't want her on the Dave list. Weren't you still married when you were messing around with jean and her friend. I really need a smart lawyer to argue with you. You still haven't seen through Barry yet. First he represents you, or Jean, or whoever. Then he Quits because you two don't pay him. Then he represents you because why, you're a political prisoner. That's cute. How much did you have to give him up front? I'm sure a nice chunk. The Mano money came in handy. Now he represents Jean. Thats good too. Same as with Mano, hire a lawyer after everything is done. Kind of like locking the barndoor after the horse is stolen. But this is how you two work, againest everyone and you achieve nothing. This pre-trial has nothing to do withus. It's Greg Chandler verses Jean O'Meara, no one else. Not you either. You need your own country, Daveland, where you can make up all the rules and laws. You don't seem to like any in the States or in Canada anymore. What's up with that. King Dave,,,,,,has a nice ring to it, don't you think. Lets go vacation in Daveland,,, there are no laws there. None that anyone has to obey, anyway. Does your new friend and lawyer know how you feel about lawyers? Or is he the second one that you like? This must all be good for you,,,,your latest excuse to stay away from your family and play with your friends. Thats what a husband and proud papa does. Do you have that in your book? I haven't seen in the stores. What ever happened to the millions you were getting from it? What ever happened to the millions you were awarded in court? Maybe that was another day the US Postal Service was screwing with your mail. With all this money you should be sitting pretty fat about now. Oh well, wish I was as well off as you.
Posted by: Bob "Deputy Dog" O'Meara | Oct 07, 2005 at 02:23 PM
A Freemason Speaks
Author Stephen Knight wrote one of the seminal books on freemasonry called 'The Brotherhood' in 1983. During the course of his research for this book he was introduced to a man known as 'Christopher', a mason of the highest 33rd degree ranking. In the Cafe Royal, London, Christopher showed him the papers demonstrating the authenticity of his masonic rank and told Knight that he was keen to "stop the rot" in freemasonry. Stephen Knight asked him what a person might have to fear from a group of influential freemasons if circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they were using masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "It is not difficult to ruin a man and I will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy and power attract such people, and when they come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen per cent now."
Stephen Knight: "Christopher explained that masonry's nationwide organization of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of masonic contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers. Post Office staff, doctors, government employees. Bosses of firms. A dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were indisposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with access to his bank manager. The 'good' mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow mason, especially a fellow lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the craft. Sometimes this information gathering process - often involving a long chain of masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be necessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him.
'Christopher', the 33rd degree mason: "Solicitors are very good at it. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him."
Stephen Knight: "Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because masonic DHSS and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly."
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "Employers, if they are freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of masonry. At worst he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion. Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of an individual getting a particular job which I know about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.
"Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work against them. Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It's.... you see, I... you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of person's life. If they give in they go under. If they don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them. "There is no defense against an evil which only the victims and perpetrators know exists."
Stalkers/terrorist break down:
Legends
Ordinary people have legitimate family, friends that can account for their existance.
Stalkers live on false legends, and have many other stalkers back up their claim to live an ordinary existence
Strength: is anyone can be decieved due to the fact that we tend to believe references.
weakness:Deeper investigation would show the phony legends and references these people depend on.
Conclusion: The stalkers would have to avoid deep investigations. Stalkers will leave a trail of victims as careers are seldom left to one target.
Targeting victims Jobs
Ordinary citizens are motivated to do the job in trade for money
Stalkers have to be able to do the job plus harm the target and seam motivated for the money. This is made easier under phony investigations. The stalkers can approach the target's work with an official police badge and ask the company for assistance. The company will decide to terminate the employee at the earliest convenience.
Strength: The stalkers can create competition against the target. Companies can be enticed to hire someone of more experience. Stalkers can inform companies of false investigations.
Weakness: Victims can inform the Companies of the truth and reveal the deception if the job is snafued anyway. If the Stalkers are exposed the trail will light up instantly as the events will probably be remembered by the employer. Especially if he sees the target on television telling the truth.
Conclusion: Eventually there should be an adequate pattern to follow that a deep investigation could uncover. Police involvement in the investigations could implicate the players involve working within the R.C.M.P.
Street Theatre
Ordinary Citizens behave in a manner they wish to be treated themselves
Stalkers do not care and have only one agenda, to disrupt the targets everyday schedual.
Strength: The stalkers can create a feelling of hopelessness, create hardships as more and more stalkers become involved. Create uncertainty that would make the victim disoriented and phocused on minor things.
weakness: Pictures and recordings can expose the harrassment and pave the way to a deeper investigation.
Conclusion : Exposure tell family and friends show the recordings, sell them the truth gently. Ask them to storm the police station and demand a deep investigation. upload to the net all evidense so if anything did happen it could not be covered up.
Noisy neighbours
Ordinary neighbours can be nasty depending on who lives beside you. Partiers can keep you up all night and that might be perfectly normal.
Stalkers often never get caught when you call the police. Stalkers know when to be noisy and when to deny you proof. When the ceiling seems like the person is going to stomp right through and you call the authorities. Just before police arrive the place goes silent this is a definate yes that they are Stalkers. When the stalkers surround a target they tend to take up space. Possibly many innocent neighbours are targeted so they can get close to you. Notify neighbours with a letter about multistalking and try not to reveal you are the source unless absolutely neccesary.
Strength: Sleep deprivation is a powerful tool. Stalkers can break the target much easier if the target is not coherent.
Weakness: The property can be linked to somebody that can be investigated. Deeper investigation would either reveal a false name or a stalker that has stalked before. Stalkers have to have an excuse why they are home all day, try to find out what the excuse is. If you know the name of the stalker do a internet background check. Look up case files and see if they show up stalking other Targets and were taken to court.
Conclusion: Always be able to tell the difference between noisy neighbours and stalkers. If you falsely accuse you help the stalkers prove you are incompetant.
Internet resources to search for:
http://www.abika.com/Reports/Satellitephotos.htm
http://www.backgroundcheckgateway.com/
http://www.canlii.org/
WHY?
Deep investigations would require the aquivalent of a murder investigation. Suicides are self explanatory and do not require scrutiny. This is why the stalkers stalk but have good restraint to avoid hurting the target To break the target, and even ask them to give up is just a tip of the iceburg of methods used.
You are the total sum thoughts you think everyday which means if everyday you live in fear of the stalkers you become the rabbit that they mock and chase easily. Reading can empower you and bring you to a level of understanding how the stalking works.
Excellent Books to read:
"BiBle" study it thourough and you will have faith and enlightenment in these troubled times.
"How to win friends and influence people" by andrew Carnagy this book will allow you to build a stronghold of friends and allow you more power to tell the difference between friend and foe.
"criminology" can be found in the library it is good to study how the laws are made and manipulated.
"university of success" by og mandino learn to become a salesman this will help you sell your story to the public and help look for work.
"road less traveled" by scott peck this book can reveal the real issues behind your reactions
"psycocybernetics" this books helps to discover how the self esteem works and can give you a shield against stalkers.
"thinking big" this book will train you to look at the big picture instead of swimming in the small details that can hold you down.
"48 laws of power" by Robert Greene This book will show you what true ruthlessness is and make you more aware of the stalkers way of thinking.
"Art of war" by suntzu Learn how to create decoys tell them one thing and do another. Know your enemy, research your objectives never reveal your true plans.
Sometimes stalkers can be spotted in several ways:
Familiar face in the crowd always there just as you head around the corner. In public places if someone goes to the bathrooms looks in and then walks in view to count heads then sits back in the shadows. These are trained watchers. They most likely will not interact but most likely the stalkers are nearby and ready for their performance.
After a street performance take pictures of every car in the lot even if you are in the biggest mall in your town. These pictures will allow an investigator to help find the perpetrators and maybe weed out some of the silent players that are more valuable to know about than the stalkers. The stalkers are most likely just individuals who are approached and want to work for cash or the fantasy of being james bond.
Handy tools for fighting back
computer note book
Digital recorder capable of recording up to seven hours
digital camera
upload everything to a stalker website set up by you, try not to jeapardize other sites when revealing names and places. My personal favorite is msn groups
There just might be an enemy of the stalkers out there and providing this information would help expose their network and make them very nervous. Applying the pressure back at them, creating the uncertainty that they desire you to have.
Yours Truly
Dean Ray
NO R.C.M.P will investigate my claims
Break in report updated...
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed a Icecream pail lid with a chain sitting on it in her room near the door . noon December 12 2004. picture has been taken with disposable camera.
(anything happens use event number 04300763. A file has been made when trying to find out what happened to the satelite Bell expressview.)
Dean Ray
- noticed two finishing nails in bedroom closest to kitchen. Nails located on Eastern wall towards elevator. A hook was screwed into the ceiling very close to Eastern wall and the wall which has the window. December 13 2004
Note that apartment was painted and it is impossible for the nails to be left behind. Landlord specifically noted we are only allowed to use one wall and Lois Sheplawy chose the living room eastern wall.
Dean Ray
-noticed more holes peppered throughout the apartment. Extreme amounts of nail damage in the bedroom nearest the kitchen. 2004 DEC 14
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed religious tapes erased, broken door on closet, roll of quarters stolen
2005 may 04
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed dish washing soap drained faster than usual 2005 may 4
Posted by: Dean R Ray | May 08, 2005 at 12:48 PM
Sent by fax November 1, 2003
J. Michael Wiggins, Acting Assistant
Attorney General for Civil Rights and
William H. Jordan his counsel
C/O Steven H. Rosenbaum, Chief
Mellie H. Nelson, Deputy Chief
Andrew J. Barrick, Attorney
Special Litigation Section
Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66400
Washington, D.C. 20035-6400
Phone (202) 514-6249
Fax (202) 514-6273
Hey,
Lets just say that I know a little about you Federalists and you know a lot about Mr. Ashcroft and his BUDDYS. Both Mr. Wiggins and Mr. Gordon would have a hard time convincing me that they don’t know Bob Barr or Alan Dershowitz. I find you good old boys from Atlanta just as interesting as the bluebloods and the Irish Catholics from Beantown. I am more than willing to argrue in court with y’all Y’all of you should start acting within the scope of your employment and enforce the federal civil rights statutes, in particular the area you label as number two. Perhaps you should remind Mr. Kunicich of the past doings in his home State before he attempts to oversee the bad acting federal law enforcement teams. I am forwarding a copy of this letter to his lady-friend/lawyer and to the Judiciary Committee.
I will also present to the Judiciary Committee some of the actual wiretap tapes that are mentioned throughout the documents. First I must inform the people recorded on the tapes that their civil rights have been violated and that I did everything I could to protect their rights while trying to bring the truth into view. Some of the tapes were actually filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire for a period of three days. Everybody knows that the U.S. District court clerk is a liar. The answer was filed in a timely fashion and on a different date than the clerk claimed. The filing that was returned will be used as evidence in litigation against the USA within a very righteous complaint even if I do say so myself.
As you can see, within the attached documents I did everything I could to make the many law enforcement authorities do their job. Now I will simply take it to the people. Maybe they can fix the problem with the jury box and the ballot box. For what it is worth, I sincerely believe that every representative should run as an independent and vote only in the side of the best interests of their own constituents. All members of congress should only be allowed to have that seat for one term.
It appears that one term in congress has the potential to corrupt even the best of us. To me, speaking for the people should be an honourable duty and not a vocation. Politicians should be allowed to make their point then go back to living in the real world and allow others to speak. Why have someone such as evil old J. Strom Thruman or drunken Ted Kennedy represent us forever when there are so many other decent folks without blood on their hands who could do the job much more diligently? As for the jury box I will speak plainly to them in order to prove my own point. I cannot vote nor do I want to. I would never wish to be a politician I am a private person that will not hesitate to defend my kin from anyone who attacks them or their interests. I speak for myself and my Clan Pro Se. That is my duty. Your duty is to protect the federal civil rights of all the people including me. I have the same rights as anyone else under Tittle 42. Government lawyers are not above the law nor are they immune from prosecution if they do not act within the scope of their employment. If you disagree say so. I will not hesitate to argue it with you in front of a jury.
The following I have gleaned from your website. May I suggest you start asking the various law enforcement agencies some hard questions on my behalf.
“The Special Litigation Section enforces federal civil rights statutes in four major areas: (1) conditions of institutional confinement; (2) law enforcement misconduct; (3) access to reproductive health facilities and places of religious worship; and (4) protection of institutionalized persons' religious exercise rights.”
“Law Enforcement Misconduct. The Special Litigation Section enforces the police misconduct provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which authorizes the Attorney General to seek equitable and declaratory relief to redress a pattern or practice of illegal conduct by law enforcement agencies or agencies responsible for the administration of juvenile justice.
The Section also enforces the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, which authorizes the Attorney General to initiate civil litigation to remedy a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, color national origin, gender or religion involving services by law enforcement agencies receiving financial assistance from the Department of Justice.
The Section has successfully engaged in resolving and investigating allegations against police departments by taking a cooperative approach. Under 42 U.S.C. § 14141, the Attorney General is authorized to file lawsuits seeking court orders to reform police departments engaging in a pattern or practice of violating citizens' federal rights. The Section is continuing investigations and negotiations with a number of cities. The Cincinnati Police investigation recently reached a settlement and investigations were opened into several other departments.
The Cincinnati settlement agreement is an example of the success of the Section's approach to investigations of police departments. In April 2001, the City of Cincinnati was literally and figuratively smoldering in the wake of riots touched off by community reaction to a number of controversial police shootings.
One year later, Attorney General Ashcroft presided over the signing ceremony for an agreement between the Department of Justice and the City of Cincinnati that implemented significant reforms with respect to uses of force by the Cincinnati Police Department. Moreover, by engaging in a collaborative negotiation process with the City, the police, and community groups, the Department of Justice agreement will be jointly monitored and enforced along with a separate agreement among the community groups and the City. This unique and historic arrangement achieved real reform without the need for protracted litigation or a consent decree. It reflected the Section's desire to help fix the problems in Cincinnati.
In addition to these agreements, the Section continues to ensure implementation of consent decrees with the police departments of Steubenville, Ohio and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In United States v. City of Steubenville (S.D. Ohio), the Section filed its complaint and a consent decree resolving our claims of excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, and related management failures in 1997.
The Section continues to monitor compliance with the decree. The city attorney and others have noted the improvements in the police department since entry of the decree in press reports. The Section continues to review the regular reports filed by the local monitor. In United States v. City of Pittsburgh (W.D. Penn.), the court entered a consent decree resolving the Section's claims of excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, and related management failures in 1997. The Section is monitoring compliance with the consent decree. This includes a regular review of the auditor's report on compliance with the consent decree.”
Methinks it high time the Feds start taking a serious look at Massachusetts. The window dressing of the present Judiciary Committee investigations is merely a mask of virtue over the face of evil. Doesn’t anybody realize that Senator Kerry and Bill Delahunt were both State District Attorneys when a lot of this shit went down? They both should have asked many questions of the State and Federal Authorities a very long time ago. If you do not think that there is a cover up then you should have your youngest child read real slow to you the U.S Attorney’s, Michael J. Sullivan, “Ex Parte” statement about it and then Judge Carey’s judgments the following month. Trust me you are already mentioned in my true story about these matters. You choose how you wish to be remembered. The tale is far more interesting than Michael Fredrickson’s fictional renditions of the facts. I do bear Witness for the Dead and I do possess a Cinderella Affidavit that implicates the Secret Service in the conspiracy to cover-up crimes.
One way or another, I will
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA 02186
P.S. I would prefer you stood with me. After all I am just an Alien Biker acting as a Court Jester when my much neglected real job is Mr. Mom. I just went under cover.
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 at 10:39 AM
Clark Kent Ervin November 12, 2003
Acting Inspector General of
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528
Sir,
Need I remind you of Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached. May I strongly suggest that you waltz around the various departments of the DHS, drop my name and ask a few questions. W. Ralph Basham , Director, United States Secret Service, would be a good place to start. After all it was he who sent the Secret Service to see me to investigate false allegations but I bet that it was Mr. Webster who had an influence on their not investigating Bank Fraud. The recent developments in Boston with regards to the SEC and Putnam Investments must be great concern to the FEDS. Why else would they be calling me now after ignoring me for so long? Perhaps you should go talk to Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. about his fellas investigating me. I would like to know why the General Counsel of the DHS has not responded to my letter. Is he waiting the full six months like H. Marshall Jarrett did? November the 20th is the last day for your boss Attorney General Ashcroft to respond to me. After that date I can complain of him as an individual. Trust that I shall. I also suggest that you read the enclosed documents and listen to the tape, then apply your ethics while you ask yourself what you would do if you were me. Please surprise me and become the first Inspector General and in fact the first civil servant that acted within the scope of his employment.
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 at 10:33 AM
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.org ; pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.org ; peter. reiling@aspeninstitute.org ; clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ; INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ; Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman
Hey Fellas
I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot from his job right after the last Yankee election.
Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say you?
Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
David R. Amos
"Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars, including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership. He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards, especially in the arts."
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.spiegelman@aspeninstitute.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: backtalk@motherjones.com
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: tpalmer@cato.org
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 6:32 PM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dante17678@hotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:18 AM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rjvattuone@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
Subject: This is going to get interesting
Hey Richard
Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston 617 698-6549. I will be hitting the road shortly and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP. I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you. Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work better and are free.
From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he plays chess so very well.
I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the courts to act properly in the public interest.
Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming very soon. I will have lots to say.
It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts. Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made. However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune. I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA. It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I could happen to you next. Get it?
If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments. I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear. Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach his attorney a trick or two of mine.
If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379 Feel free to argue me and stress test my ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their masks of virtue.
Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous. Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public servants?"
Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is now out of the job.
David Raymond Amos
Posted by: Davir R. Amos | Mar 30, 2005 at 10:21 AM