https://twitter.com/
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks minions within CBC and Viafoura acted way above their paygrade and made another faux pas for the benefit of Trudeau The Younger and his feminist cohorts N'esy Pas?
After fraught history on abortion access, Liberals not budging from shift on clinic
McKenna Liberals fought to shut Morgentaler clinic, restrict abortion access
· CBC News· Posted: Oct 05, 2020 6:00 AM AT
Clinic 554 closed this week after the Progressive Conservative government did not reverse its stance on refusing to fund abortions at the Fredericton clinic. (CBC)
The New Brunswick Liberals appear to have passed the point of no return on abortion policy, committing to medicare funding for the procedure in a clinic that the party once wanted to shut down.
It's a major shift at odds with the stance taken three decades ago by Frank McKenna, the last Liberal premier to win consecutive majorities. He used a range of laws and regulations to try to choke off access to Fredericton's first private abortion clinic.
"Over time, we learn, and we grow as people and as MLAs," said Moncton Centre Liberal MLA Rob McKee, whose father was a minister in the McKenna government that tried to stop a private abortion clinic from opening in the first place.
"I feel like it's only normal that views on certain topics can evolve as well over the years when we have new voices joining the table and joining the Liberal Party."
The shift was first articulated just weeks ago when then-leader Kevin Vickers promised a Liberal government would fund abortions at Clinic 554.
He was accused of trying to halt the loss of votes to the Green Party.
Interim Liberal Leader Roger Melanson says he would be surprised if the next leader reverses the party's pro-choice stance. (CBC)
With Vickers gone, interim Liberal Leader Roger Melanson says the statement remains party policy and it will be difficult for a future permanent leader to roll it back.
"I'd be very surprised if we go backwards," Melanson said. "Society changes, society evolves, and people's way of seeing things changes for sure, and it's changing in a way that society today is more and more inclined to respect individual rights."
Even Liberals who would have called themselves pro-life a few years ago support the stance.
"As much as I would love to never see an abortion happen because of my personal view, I understand, more so now, that women do have that right to decide what they want or do not want to have happen to their bodies," said Miramichi Bay-Neguac Liberal MLA Lisa Harris.
"It's still something that I wish never had to happen. It's still deep within me for many different reasons, but at the same time I don't believe that I have the power to force a woman to make the choice that I'd prefer she make."
Bipartisan consensus
A decade ago, the Liberals and the Progressive Conservatives had a bipartisan consensus on the clinic and abortion policy overall. Both opposed public funding for the procedure at the clinic and both supported restrictions on access to it in hospitals.
Those restrictions dated back to the McKenna era. In 1989, the then-premier promised to give Dr. Henry Morgentaler "the fight of his life" after he said he would open a clinic in New Brunswick.
Former premier Frank McKenna fought to restrict abortion access, the opposite of where the Liberal party finds itself today. (Gerald Herbert/Associated Press)
Despite a Supreme Court of Canada decision decriminalizing the procedure, "We believe that Dr. Morgentaler has no right to come in and establish his own clinics," McKenna said then.
The clinic opened in 1994 and Russ King, the health minister, immediately filed a misconduct complaint against Morgentaler with the College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Legislation passed by the Hatfield government allowed a misconduct finding against any doctor performing an abortion outside a hospital.
But Morgentaler challenged the section in court and had it struck down.
King said last year that Clinic 554, which took the place of the Morgentaler clinic, now has a role to play.
"Times have changed. … If we need it and the public [system] doesn't provide it, I think as long as it comes up to a certain standard, they should be supported."
The McKenna Liberals also amended Regulation 84-20 to restrict medicare coverage of abortions to those performed in hospitals by specialists, and to require two doctors to approve the procedure.
Those restrictions became part of a bipartisan consensus, with subsequent Progressive Conservative and Liberal governments standing by them and resisting Morgentaler's court challenges to win medicare funding for his clinic.
Gallant bucks trends
Brian Gallant broke the logjam, declaring himself pro-choice when he ran for the Liberal leadership in 2012. Two years later, delegates to a party policy convention passed a resolution in favour of repealing the two-doctor rule.
Other McKenna-era Liberals said they opposed the policy, but Gallant won the election and made the change.
In the legislature, PC MLA Blaine Higgs pointed out that Gallant was the first premier to suggest the rule was an unconstitutional restriction on access.
"I would say that the last six premiers of New Brunswick did not believe so," Higgs said.
Former premier Brian Gallant declared himself pro-choice while running for the Liberal leadership in 2012. (Gabrielle Fahmy/CBC)
Even so, when Higgs became PC leader two years later, he promised not to reverse Gallant's change, and today no one in the political mainstream even talks about it.
Gallant also extended medicare coverage to the abortion pill Mifegymiso, but like his predecessors would not heed demands that he cover abortions at Clinic 554, the successor to the Morgentaler clinic.
That position held until the mid-campaign commitment by Vickers.
Melanson could not say exactly why Liberal arguments against funding the clinic under Gallant have now given way to the party's new position, other than to say "things are moving step by step" and Clinic 554's closure deprives a whole area of the province of its services.
Meanwhile, Higgs continues to insist that the only expansion to abortion access should be within hospitals, and the province is on firm legal ground refusing to fund it at a private clinic.
"We offer abortions in public facilities, and if there's an access concern we could do that in additional public facilities," he said last month.
McKee says he heard little criticism of the new Liberal stance during the campaign. "It was mostly positive feedback that it's the right thing to do," he said.
And Harris says politicians have to respond to younger New Brunswickers who she says favour more access, not less.
"We can all learn from those coming up behind us. The world is moving fast and it's exciting."
103 Comments
David Amos
Methinks some minor little minions acted way above their pay grade and just made a huge faux Pas N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Methinks everybody knows I am pro life and the liberals know that I finally got to speak personally with McKee their only lawyer/MLA before the writ was dropped.
Methinks Higgy et al understand why I would not believe anything that McKee has to say about anything involving politics nor anything else for that matter N'esy Pas?
"McKee says he heard little criticism of the new Liberal stance during the campaign. "It was mostly positive feedback that it's the right thing to do," he said."
Methinks Higgy et al understand why I would not believe anything that McKee has to say about anything involving politics nor anything else for that matter N'esy Pas?
"McKee says he heard little criticism of the new Liberal stance during the campaign. "It was mostly positive feedback that it's the right thing to do," he said."
Steve Ryan
No one, especially a bunch of old men, has a right to tell a woman what she must do with her body.
Dan Short
Reply to @Steve Ryan:
However those old men being taxpayers do have a say in what is funded and where.
However those old men being taxpayers do have a say in what is funded and where.
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Steve Ryan: Methinks you and Rogers TV have no right to try to stop old men from ignoring their right to Free Speech and speaking their mind particularly while running for public office N'esy Pas?
John Grail
Just more evidence that our society devalues life at all levels.
David Amos
Reply to @John Grail: Oh So True
Cindy Cooper
Many have been watching the Lila Rose interview on The Rubin Report.
David Amos
Reply to @Cindy Cooper: Methinks the screening of the movie "Unplanned " upset a lot of your cohortsl ast year N'esy Pas?
Saint John residents angered by rental of high school to screen anti-abortion film
Community protest planned to coincide with screening of the American film Unplanned
Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Aug 22, 2019 8:40 PM AT
"The movie, based on Abby Johnson’s 2011 memoir of the same title, chronicles the conversion of a former director of a Planned Parenthood clinic in Bryan, Texas, from feminist pro-choice champion to zealous anti-choice advocate; Johnson is now a bestselling author, speaker and celebrity in the conservative Christian movement."
Saint John residents angered by rental of high school to screen anti-abortion film
Community protest planned to coincide with screening of the American film Unplanned
Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Aug 22, 2019 8:40 PM AT
"The movie, based on Abby Johnson’s 2011 memoir of the same title, chronicles the conversion of a former director of a Planned Parenthood clinic in Bryan, Texas, from feminist pro-choice champion to zealous anti-choice advocate; Johnson is now a bestselling author, speaker and celebrity in the conservative Christian movement."
James Reed
We tend to muddle two issues together in this debate – access to abortions and the province paying for procedures in private clinics. These are two separate issues – Gallant was pro-choice, backed up by his actions, but he also recognized that doesn’t mean the province has to pay for abortions at ever private clinic that wants to offer them – Higgs is even on record as saying, if it’s a matter of access he’s willing to look at offering the procedure at other hospitals, beyond the three that do it now. I’m not sure if everyone realizes not all procedures are offered at every hospital. I have family who travel to another city every few months for treatments not available in their city. People in Fredericton travel to Saint John for chemo – if you have a complicated cataract case, that’s a trip to Moncton.
Abortions do have a special status as a won constitutional right, but I think it would be an interesting battle in front of the Supermen Court – If the province were obligated to provide coverage for this procedure outside of the hospital setting, why wouldn’t you have the same right to a publicly funded MRI at a private clinic or a private dialysis center.
Abortions do have a special status as a won constitutional right, but I think it would be an interesting battle in front of the Supermen Court – If the province were obligated to provide coverage for this procedure outside of the hospital setting, why wouldn’t you have the same right to a publicly funded MRI at a private clinic or a private dialysis center.
David Amos
Reply to @James Reed: Methinks its rather obvious that folks know exactly what they are disputing while the politician try to pacify both sides of the argument for their own benefit N'esy Pas?
Kelvin Bosch
I welcome you to the 1990s New Brunswick! Maybe in another 30 years you’ll make it into the same millennium as the rest of Canada. (Except Alberta).
Women’s reproductive rights are non-negotiable and not subject to someone’s backward morality.
Women’s reproductive rights are non-negotiable and not subject to someone’s backward morality.
David Amos
Reply to @Kelvin Bosch: What say you speak for the ladies and I will defend the rights of the Fathers and their unborn children Deal???
John Grail
Reply to @Kelvin Bosch: I would say life isn't negotiable but nobody values it.
Kelvin Bosch
Reply to @David Amos:
It doesn’t matter what I, you or another woman thinks should happen with a woman’s body. It is individual bodily autonomy that matters. That person gets to decide.
It doesn’t matter what I, you or another woman thinks should happen with a woman’s body. It is individual bodily autonomy that matters. That person gets to decide.
Steve Ryan
Reply to @Kelvin Bosch:
While I support your statement I'm puzzled on you referring to Alberta.
While I support your statement I'm puzzled on you referring to Alberta.
Matt Steele
Another day , and another story about the same clinic . The CBC has done so many stories on the same clinic , I have actually lost count . Must be a slow news days , and the same story just keeps getting reported over and over . It reminds me of that movie " Groundhogs Day ".....lol
David Amos
Reply to @Matt Steele: To be fair to CBC I must confess that I enjoy this malicious nonsense. I believe that most of us are all being a little redundant. However in my own defense I must clearly state I know for a fact that Public Corruption does go on and on around the world. Although the worldwide state of affairs is far from boring I must find some fun in this madness or i truly would go crazy. Hence I think globally but act locally at treat this a divine comedy in the Queen's court just like the court-jesters of old used to do. In the not too distant future I plan to grin from my grave just like the old Bard's Yorick no doubt still does.
With that in mind methinks one of the funniest part of the wicked circuses in various parliamentary and congressional assemblies is when the clowns change costumes and join their other side or better yet Its truly hilarious when they argue their own words N'esy Pas?
With that in mind methinks one of the funniest part of the wicked circuses in various parliamentary and congressional assemblies is when the clowns change costumes and join their other side or better yet Its truly hilarious when they argue their own words N'esy Pas?
Dan Short
Reply to @David Amos:
There is no public corruption. There is individual corruption. Which exists everywhere, and not just in public officials...
There is no public corruption. There is individual corruption. Which exists everywhere, and not just in public officials...
David Amos
Reply to @Dan Short: Methinks you just spoke volumes its not hard to tell who you work for N'esy Pas?Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: At least he works and isn't a leech
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver Methinks your friends in the RCMP should have informed your buddy that I was arguing lawyers in NB about public corruption years before he was a twinkle in his daddy's eye. Perhaps you and your hero Cardy should ask Dr. Dena Churchill and her lawyer Rocco Galati or all the protesters at the Freedom Rally in Fat Fred City on October 3rd if there is such a thing as public corruption N'esy Pas?
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: That isn't a job dummy
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Methinks Higgy et al know that your RCMP buddies used to hire me to do jobs for them because I was ethical and fearless and MY business was successful I was always the boss of it N'esy Pas Mr Shill?
Liberals are now so desperate they'll throw anything and everything at the wall to see if it syicks ! If it does , it's party policy . Although there's no middle ground when it comes to SANB Liberal language policy . One language and one language only when it comes to catering to language ! It has become obvious that MLA's such as Lisa Harris have been muzzled and as Mckenna did , have sold out their constituents to the SANB Liberal leadership in the hope for votes regardless of morality !!
David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Cry me a river
eddy watts
Sad that Trudeau cannot even stand up to someone of Blaine Higg's lowly stature: Not providing access for abortion should mean a stripping of medical $$$$ from Ottawa. Canada looks like a banana republic as those in charge don't bother following laws.
Dan Short
Reply to @eddy watts:
Abortions in hospitals are funded by the province. They just aren't funded st the local convenience store.
Abortions in hospitals are funded by the province. They just aren't funded st the local convenience store.
Lou Bell
Reply to @eddy watts: It is provided ,just not by anyone / anything ! Trudeau doesn't run NB .
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks everybody knows the Irving and McCain Clans run NB with the malicious assistance of legions of he political lawyers of all stripes N'esy Pas?
Mary Smith
Reply to @Dan Short: Abortions are only provided in three hospitals, in two locations: Moncton and Bathurst. Women in NB have a legal right to access abortions without significant barriers in place. They're not asking for abortions to be available everywhere, but there are large areas of the population that do not have appropriate access to services they have the legal right to access. Abortion is a timely issue, and travel and financial expenses are significant barriers.
Kelvin Bosch
Reply to @Lou Bell:
Last time I checked, NB is in Canada and subject to its laws.
Last time I checked, NB is in Canada and subject to its laws.
Dan Short
Reply to @Mary Smith:
There are large areas of the province, one can't get life saving operations as well.
There are large areas of the province, one can't get life saving operations as well.
Dan Short
We get it,. People aren't happy, Are we really going to have a news story every day for the next year on it?
David Amos
Reply to @Dan Short: Methinks Higgy et al know why it makes my day when Frank Boy McKenna and his cohorts are having a bad day N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Reply to @Dan Short: A minority isn't happy . Liberals are so desperate for voters they'll do anything now for votes . Much like McKenna did when he sold out the Liberal Party to the Parti Acadienne , solely for votes . They're losing credibility and votes to the Green Party and it isn't coming back !
Dan Short
Reply to @Lou Bell:
oh brother..........
oh brother..........
David Amos
Reply to @Dan Lee: Methinks Higggy et all and everybody else but you knows your buddy little Lou is a woman N'esy Pas?
Paul Bourgoin
Abortion is like an execution , the termination of life of a NewBorn. This is not a political decision, nor a Religious decision. A mother who decides if her new-born comes home or the cemetery is her nightmare. This is what I believe . One can label it an abortion but in essence it finishes tobe a life termination. I hope I don't offend anybody with my beliefs!
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Paul Bourgoin: You don't offend me with your beliefs as long as you don't attempt to impose those beliefs on others, specifically on women. You can make your own choices, but let women make theirs.
David Amos
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks if you believe that Fathers have no rights I have the right to believe that all feminist Yankees should go home and oppose Trump's appointment to the Supreme Court N'esy Pes?
Dan Short
Gee, I wish the CBC worked this hard, daily articles, to save every business.
David Amos
Reply to @Dan Short: It appears to me that you don't work at all
Dan Short
Reply to @David Amos:
There's this thing called vacation. I took last week and this week off leading up to Thanksgiving. Good time to get work done around the house when it's not 30 degrees. With no travel, seemed as good of a time as any to take it.
There's this thing called vacation. I took last week and this week off leading up to Thanksgiving. Good time to get work done around the house when it's not 30 degrees. With no travel, seemed as good of a time as any to take it.
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: You discussing someone's work? Awesome!!!
Dan Short
Reply to @Ray Oliver:
He does seem to like to criticize others and be all in their business.
He does seem to like to criticize others and be all in their business.
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: @Dan Short: Methinks Mr Know It All Spellchecker and his fellow RCMP shill know that I am not alone in that regard N'esy Pas?
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: You don't work. Never have.
Reply to @Ray Oliver:
Ow he had a "job".
Ow he had a "job".
Harvey York:
Reply to @Ray Oliver: except for that one time, when he made license plates....
Dan Short
Reply to @Harvey York:
Now there's a reason to end parole...
Now there's a reason to end parole...
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Dan Short: Methinks its amazing that you tr o lls are permitted to post such malice The RCMP or anyone else you wackos are libeling me by falsely accusing me of being a criminal then there is all ther nasty things you pals have posted about my family and I for so long N'esy Pas?
Joseph Vacher
Liberals will pander to anyone. That being said, i am glad to see that they will support the access to abortion - but lets not pretend its anything other then pandering
David Amos
Reply to @Joseph Vacher: Methinks many would agree that they are far worse than mere panderers N'esy Pas?
SarahRose Werner
Still wondering why Horizon doesn't offer this procedure at more of its hospitals, especially its hospitals in Fredericton and Saint John. If the government can negotiate with Horizon to shut down hospitals - as we've already seen it do - why can't it negotiate with Horizon to offer this procedure more widely? If Higgs doesn't want to pay a private clinic, why doesn't *he* start these negotiations? Or is the entire private clinic question just a red herring?
Dan Short
Reply to @SarahRose Werner:
Offering services carries a cost. I'm sure they have done plenty of studies in regards to demand. Like any other surgery, it's just not available everywhere,
Offering services carries a cost. I'm sure they have done plenty of studies in regards to demand. Like any other surgery, it's just not available everywhere,
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @SarahRose Werner:
There may be a shortage of doctors willing to do the thing. It does, in some situations, go against the Hippocratic Oath. Personally I am against abortions, but as clearly I am not in charge, nor do I wish to be in charge, I find that the most reasonable position is pro-choice.
There may be a shortage of doctors willing to do the thing. It does, in some situations, go against the Hippocratic Oath. Personally I am against abortions, but as clearly I am not in charge, nor do I wish to be in charge, I find that the most reasonable position is pro-choice.
Dan Short
Reply to @Terry Tibbs:
Ironically that's what we need more of (people in charge) Those that see the grey in an issue. The world has sadly become yes (all in) or no ( all out). A negative comment means you are our. A positive means you are all in and must worship everything about the issue.
Ironically that's what we need more of (people in charge) Those that see the grey in an issue. The world has sadly become yes (all in) or no ( all out). A negative comment means you are our. A positive means you are all in and must worship everything about the issue.
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Any reasonably competent gynecologist ought to be able to do a first-trimester abortion. In all of Saint John, in all of Fredericton, Horizon can't find at least *one* gynecologist in each place who's willing to do this procedure? I'm not buying that. 2nd and 3rd trimester abortions are more complicated, so yeah, women might have to travel to get those.
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Obviously we disagree
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @SarahRose Werner:
It could very well be an availability issue. Those doctors have pretty full schedules as is.
There's a,so an issue of operating time. Maybe say SJ just can't squeeze in any more different types of procedures on their full schedule.
I'm not saying there aren't solutions. Simply pointing out, I don't think it's quite as simple as you suggest.
It could very well be an availability issue. Those doctors have pretty full schedules as is.
There's a,so an issue of operating time. Maybe say SJ just can't squeeze in any more different types of procedures on their full schedule.
I'm not saying there aren't solutions. Simply pointing out, I don't think it's quite as simple as you suggest.
JOhn D Bond
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The Hippocratic Oath was changed in 2017, from 1948 to 2017 it read, I will maintain the utmost respect for human life from the time of conception. from 2017 it now reads; I will maintain the utmost respect for human life. Based on the revisions to The Revised Declaration of Geneva: A Modern-Day Physician’s Pledge
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @JOhn D Bond: Methinks that is one of the many reasons I call it the Oath of Hypocrites particularly after the a doctor in the DECH in Fat Fred City ordered the RCMP and the hospital staff to assault me, inject me with drugs and falsely imprison me in 2008 not long after the FBI arrested my former political lawyer buddy Eliot Spitzer in Washington in 2008 N'esy Pas?
Harvey York
Reply to @David Amos: bad things happen to bad people.......
David Amos
Reply to @Harvey York: Methinks if that were true then I should look forward to you suffering from your own malice N'esy Pas?
Harvey York
Reply to @David Amos: probably not, I plan on keeping my medicare card and motorcycle by staying on the right side of the lawDavid Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Harvey York: Methinks you are libeling me by falsely accusing me of being a criminal It should be a small wonder to the RCMP or anyone else why you don't have enough integrity to use your real name N"esy Pas?
Thomas Imber
So the Liberals want to give public funding to a private clinic? I guess the Liberals are now in favour of two-tiered healthcare.
Kate LeBlanc
Reply to @Thomas Imber: You mean like the ones the Conservatives push?
Larry Larson
Reply to @Thomas Imber: No, they want proper access to a medical procedure. There is nothing in the Health Canada act that says two doctors must sign for an abortion. It is time NB came into the 21st century!
Dan Short
Reply to @Larry Larson:
You mean the health Canada act thst is made up by the ruling party and easily changed by the ruling party? I hardly think rhat should be a de facto document,
You mean the health Canada act thst is made up by the ruling party and easily changed by the ruling party? I hardly think rhat should be a de facto document,
David Amos
Reply to @Thomas Imber: BINGO
Mary Smith
Reply to @Larry Larson: "There is nothing in the Health Canada act that says two doctors must sign for an abortion. It is time NB came into the 21st century!"
The rule requiring two doctors to sign for an abortion was removed in recent years. Still, NB is far behind and is very slowly playing catch up to where it should be. Under the law women have the legal right to proper access to abortions without significant barriers. There are still significant barriers in place for women seeking abortions in NB.
The rule requiring two doctors to sign for an abortion was removed in recent years. Still, NB is far behind and is very slowly playing catch up to where it should be. Under the law women have the legal right to proper access to abortions without significant barriers. There are still significant barriers in place for women seeking abortions in NB.
Larry Larson
Reply to @Dan Short: Nonsense!
Larry Larson
Reply to @Mary Smith: CONS never know how to do the right thing. It took decades for Liberals to learn how and will take even more for the CONS. I cannot believe the people of NB just gave Higgs a majority!
David Amos
Reply to @Larry Larson: Methinks many of the folks such as I who don't bother to vote would agree that when its comes to politicking nothing surprises us and never did N'esy Pas?
Dan Short
Just more political gibbergobble. Political, parties in opposition always say the opposite of the ruling party, until they are the ruling party.
David Amos
Reply to @Dan Short: Methinks you 4 years of milking the rest of us byway of CERB while living within Higgy's Police State in order to ponder my lawsuits and all the political gibbergobble N'esy Pas?
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: Youd be pulling the CERB if you qualified I'm sure, but maybe its been withheld like a certain card youre longing for!!
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Say hey to Higgy and the RCMP for me will ya?
JOhn D Bond
Provided hospital access for the procedures are available in hospitals there is no need for private clinics.
The LGTBQ specialty aspect should similarly not require a private clinic. The services that are covered by the Health system are available in the hospitals, services that are not covered are available through a variety of other providers.
All residents have the same options for access to medical care, regardless of gender, culture or religion.
The LGTBQ specialty aspect should similarly not require a private clinic. The services that are covered by the Health system are available in the hospitals, services that are not covered are available through a variety of other providers.
All residents have the same options for access to medical care, regardless of gender, culture or religion.
Kate LeBlanc
Reply to @JOhn D Bond: Ah but not west of Miramichi as the Federal funding for the hospital access has never been applied to any hospitals in those areas so these RESIDENTS who want or need to have an abortion have no choice but to either go out of their MEDICAL zone or pay for a one and only non-hospital clinic and THAT"S THE ISSUE.
JOhn D Bond
Reply to @Kate LeBlanc: That is an issue for Higgs to address. He has claimed that if more facilities are needed they can be offered if the health officials recommend it. So I am thinking that people need to make a point of it to the MLA's in the different regions. But the point is that it should be available across the province where numbers warrant it. Would also say like many other procedures a reasonable drive to get to a hospital should not be a huge issue if it is umm say less than an hour.
David Amos
Reply to @JOhn D Bond: I concur but what of the right to free health care? Do the poor folks such a I whom Higgy et al deny providing a medicare card to have any rights at all?
FYI Recently i noticed Higgy et al must has a new plan in dealing with me and my health care. The hospital I frequently use refused to accept my bank card and demanded that i use a credit card (I have none )in order to pay for their emergency room services. even though they had welcomed its use since I first used their services while I ran for a seat in the 43rd Parliament in Higgy's riding.
Methinks everybody should understand why I told the questionable hospital beancounters that if they want paid then they will have to sue me but I bet I sue Higgy et al first N'esy Pas?
FYI Recently i noticed Higgy et al must has a new plan in dealing with me and my health care. The hospital I frequently use refused to accept my bank card and demanded that i use a credit card (I have none )in order to pay for their emergency room services. even though they had welcomed its use since I first used their services while I ran for a seat in the 43rd Parliament in Higgy's riding.
Methinks everybody should understand why I told the questionable hospital beancounters that if they want paid then they will have to sue me but I bet I sue Higgy et al first N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Reply to @David Amos: You must have millions after all the lawsuits you claim you've had in the past ! Boy I'm sure no one would wanna go up against you !! HA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tristin Time
M_r_d_r under another name is still m_r_d_r. Seeing the same patient time and again warrants the current process of two physician signatures!
Winston Gray
Reply to @Tristin Time: all you people screamin “m_r_d_r” are really just saying that you want The Handmaids Tale, the mothers are just vessels to you, so you really aren’t “pro-life” at all because the mother’s body and freedom mean nothing to you
Buddy Best
Content disabled
Reply to @Winston Gray: I care nothing for anyone who would ki ll a child.
Winston Gray
Reply to @Buddy Best: I care nothing for people who feel entitled to controlling the lives and bodies of others. If you don’t agree with abortions then don’t have one.
Dan Short
Reply to @Winston Gray:
Call it what it is, we kill animals to eat them. We kill bugs because they enjoy us, we kill eggs to eat them. We kill flowers to give them to people.
The issue is not pro life or pro choice, the issue is refusing to just call it what it is and move on and do whatever you are going to do, as we do with everything else,
But this denying what it is so one can sleep at night, needs to stop.
Call it what it is, we kill animals to eat them. We kill bugs because they enjoy us, we kill eggs to eat them. We kill flowers to give them to people.
The issue is not pro life or pro choice, the issue is refusing to just call it what it is and move on and do whatever you are going to do, as we do with everything else,
But this denying what it is so one can sleep at night, needs to stop.
David Amos
Reply to @Buddy Best: Me Too
Dan Lee
Reply to @Dan Short:
i agree for survival.....i dont agree for conveniance
i agree for survival.....i dont agree for conveniance
john smith
i have no problem helping those women that need that help but if the gov decides to provide this clinic with funing on any level then it must be in the agreement the clinic must list what it made from selling teh remainsjohn smith
Reply to @john smith: they sell each bundle of cells the bigger the bundl and more formed it becomes the more they get if they are willing to show those numbers publicly then maybe we could have this discussion
Dan Short
Reply to @john smith:
I don't think it needs to be every hospital. There are many life saving procedures people need to travel to Halifax, Montreal Toronto or even Boston for.
I don't think it needs to be every hospital. There are many life saving procedures people need to travel to Halifax, Montreal Toronto or even Boston for.
David Amos
Reply to @john smith: Look who makes the vaccines and you can begin to make your own list
Jeff Smith
I thought Liberals hated the idea of clinics too - I thought it was a slippery slope to the American system. Seems some clinics are more equal than others.
Winston Gray
Reply to @Jeff Smith: some SERVICES are more equal
David Amos
Reply to @Jeff Smith: Go Figure
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Jeff Smith: Higgy et al must recall Trudeau The Younger following Dizzy May into Fat Fred City during their campaign tours in order to support Morgentaler's old" cliinc" Methinks its a small wonder why Trudeau and Franky Boy McKenna's lawyer buddy Gallant never got along too well N'esy Pas?
Bill Henry
Shouldn’t need clinics. Every woman should have this right at every hospital.Winston Gray
Reply to @Bill Henry: agreed. The expensive but “corrrect” solution is to offer abortions at all major hospitals, the cheaper solution is to fund 554.
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Bill Henry:
Yes, provided an agreeable doctor is handy. You have to respect too, the rights of the person doing the deed..
Yes, provided an agreeable doctor is handy. You have to respect too, the rights of the person doing the deed..
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: I kinda sorta concur
Larry Larson
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Doctor have no right to refuse a medical procedure because they don't agree with it.
David Amos
Reply to @Larry Larson: I disagree
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Larry Larson:
You might have a bit of trouble selling that. Unless an emergency situation exists any quack can refuse virtually anything.
You might have a bit of trouble selling that. Unless an emergency situation exists any quack can refuse virtually anything.
Sarah Brown
This clinic never should have closed. It is not just a clinic that provides abortions which are legal medical procedures under the Canada Health Act, but it is also a clinic that provides medical care to the LGBTQ community that they are entitled to have as citizens of this country and province. It’s a travesty that this current provincial government continues to maintain its archaic and misguided stance that it will not fund this clinic.
Tristin Time
Reply to @Sarah Brown: If you're this passionare about it why don't you fund it. My tax dollars are not for private organizations. Just like private schools, it is to be paid out of pocket!
Buddy Best
Reply to @Sarah Brown: These services are still provided at hospitals. Perhaps more training on birth control methods that don't require the taking of a human life
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Tristin Time:
Just a FYI: private schools get public funding. They get a set amount from the government per student if their school is fully up to government standard. It is then up to parents of the attendees to top up that amount, with their own money, to cover the real operating costs.
Just a FYI: private schools get public funding. They get a set amount from the government per student if their school is fully up to government standard. It is then up to parents of the attendees to top up that amount, with their own money, to cover the real operating costs.
Winston Gray
Reply to @Tristin Time: my doctor has a PRIVATE PEACTICE that is funded by my tax dollars because he bills the government when I visit his PRIVATE offices.
Your logic is not sound, we already have privatization.
Your logic is not sound, we already have privatization.
Dan Short
Reply to @Sarah Brown:
They are no different than any other private business. It's up to them to make their own finances work. If they want to continue to give away free or losing cost services, it's up to them to find a solution to generate cash to stay open.
The ONLY reason the clinic is closing is because they give away services. That's on them, not the taxpayers.
They are no different than any other private business. It's up to them to make their own finances work. If they want to continue to give away free or losing cost services, it's up to them to find a solution to generate cash to stay open.
The ONLY reason the clinic is closing is because they give away services. That's on them, not the taxpayers.
Dan Short
Reply to @Winston Gray:
Yes and thst private practice can only Bill for certain services, they can't bill the government because they for example, want to give you a hip replacement in the office.
Yes and thst private practice can only Bill for certain services, they can't bill the government because they for example, want to give you a hip replacement in the office.
Sammy Kofax
Reply to @Sarah Brown: If they want one - then they pay for it. Simple. Otherwise have the baby and give it for adoption.
Mary Smith
Reply to @Sammy Kofax: If someone cannot afford to pay for an abortion, you want them to have a child they can't afford? Or force them to give their child away?
It would be a better world if: "Every Mother A Willing Mother, Every Child A Wanted Child".
The moment a woman is pregnant there's a fixed cost associated with it (unless she miscarriages at home). Your tax dollars are going to be spent either way.
It would be a better world if: "Every Mother A Willing Mother, Every Child A Wanted Child".
The moment a woman is pregnant there's a fixed cost associated with it (unless she miscarriages at home). Your tax dollars are going to be spent either way.
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: True
Methinks Catholic Schools should be a glaring example of that fact because I have no doubt whatsoever that they teach Pro Life N'esy Pas?
Methinks Catholic Schools should be a glaring example of that fact because I have no doubt whatsoever that they teach Pro Life N'esy Pas?
Matt Steele
CBC is really pushing this issue as they have done " several " stories about the same clinic . It seems either it is a very slow news day , or someone at the CBC has a very strong bias and agenda ; not sure which .Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Matt Steele:
It looks like a very slow news day.
It looks like a very slow news day.
Winston Gray
Reply to @Matt Steele: or maybe, just maybe... people care about this.
You can’t bury news just because you dont agree with it.
What ever happened to people “thinking of others”?
Nowadays people are like “this doesn’t interest me, it must be news because someone has an agenda, it couldn’t POSSIBLY matter to people because it doesn’t matter to ME”.
You can’t bury news just because you dont agree with it.
What ever happened to people “thinking of others”?
Nowadays people are like “this doesn’t interest me, it must be news because someone has an agenda, it couldn’t POSSIBLY matter to people because it doesn’t matter to ME”.
Dan Short
Reply to @Winston Gray:
The irony in your post of thinking of others is astounding! Nothing more all about "me" than an abortion.
The irony in your post of thinking of others is astounding! Nothing more all about "me" than an abortion.
David Amos
Reply to @Matt Steele: its not rocket science Who oversees them?
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Watch whats up with Trump Methinks i will will perk you up N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: BTW did you know that Franky Boy McKenna's family wanted him to become a priest when he was growing up and his former cabinet minister and later a judge Mikey Baby McKee was once a priest?
Methinks those lawyers liked the ladies too much to abide with such wicked dogma for long. Now their sons are obviously following in their footsteps within the SANB's beloved political party N'esy Pas?
Methinks those lawyers liked the ladies too much to abide with such wicked dogma for long. Now their sons are obviously following in their footsteps within the SANB's beloved political party N'esy Pas?
John Grail
Reply to @Sarah Brown: Legality =/= morality.
--------- Original message ----------
From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 06:04:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete
my emails N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting me.
A provincial election was called on August 17th and will be held on
September 14th. During that time, my constituency office is required
to be closed. The phone and email will not be monitored during this
period.
Thank you!
Megan Mitton
---
Merci de m'avoir contacté. Des élections provinciales ont été
déclenchées le 17 août et auront lieu le 14 septembre. Pendant cette
période, mon bureau de circonscription doit être fermé. Le téléphone
et le courriel ne seront pas surveillés pendant cette période.
Merci !
Megan Mitton
---
COVID : Une ligne d’information sans frais et une adresse courriel ont
été mises sur pied afin d’aider à répondre aux questions sur la
COVID-19 qui ne sont pas reliées à la santé, y compris les questions
relatives à la conformité à l’état d’urgence et sur les voyages. Le
service est offert dans les deux langues officielles. Les gens peuvent
téléphoner au 1-844-462-8387 sept jours par semaine. Ou envoyez un
courriel à : helpaide@gnb.ca.
Vous trouverez également des informations relatives au plan de relance
de la province à l'adresse suivante :
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
---
COVID: A toll-free information line and email address has been set up
to help answer non-health related COVID-19 questions, including
questions about travel and compliance with the state of emergency. The
number, 1-844-462-8387, is operational seven days a week. The email
address is helpaide@gnb.ca.
Also information related to the province’s recovery plan can be found
here: https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 02:58:32 -0300
Subject: Re: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the LIEbrano Shadow
Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete my emails N'esy
Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Cc: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"
<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, "michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>,
BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "Cathy.Rogers"<Cathy.Rogers@gnb.ca>,
"robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:04:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a
snap-election was flawed bigtime N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:04:18 -0300
Subject: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a snap-election was flawed
bigtime N'esy Pas?
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, chris@duffie.ca,
ron.tremblay2@gmail.com, aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
jake.stewart@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "dan.
bussieres"<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@gnb.ca>,
bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com, jjatwin@gmail.com, markandcaroline
<markandcaroline@gmail.com>, sheppardmargo@gmail.com,
jordan.gill@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"David.Lametti"<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Fowler"
<Shane.Fowler@cbc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
<postur@fjr.stjr.is>
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks I should not have been surprised to see the VERY CORRUPT CBC
block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter and in the very
domain we all pay for with our tax dollars N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
CBC's Facebook Live answers questions about provincial election
Do you have questions about the election on Sept. 14? We have answers
CBC News · Posted: Aug 19, 2020 10:44 AM AT
46 Comments
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks they will block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter N'esy Pas?
BINGO
Your account has been banned until September 3, 2020. Reason: We have
banned this account for 15 days because we believe it is in violation
of our Terms of Use. For more information, please visit:
http://cbc.ca/submissions.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Higgs's rationale for no-snap-election deal is flawed, says political expert
Three byelections must be held this fall
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 13, 2020 2:50 PM AT
99 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Methinks "political experts" make some of the best clowns in Higgy's
circus but the Green Meanies take the cake N'esy Pas?
David Amos
A false dilemma??? Too Too Funny
"One thing that is very important to realize is that there's not two
options here," Green MLA Kevin Arseneau said on his way in to the
meeting. "It's not an election or a deal. That's like a false dilemma
that's been invented."
Lou Bell
Reply to @David Amos: Dilemma alright ! Does Arsenault reveal he's an
back door SANB Liberal or continue running as an uncommitted Green ?
We know what Gauvins true colours always were ! Same as Arsenault !
David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you must have enough clues between your
ears to understand that a dilemma is a dilemma for the former SANB
boss and that is no such thing as a false one N'esy Pas?
Jos Allaire
Reply to @Lou Bell: I see that you are obsessed with the SANB, grosse bee got!
Jos Allaire
Reply to @David Amos: I think you are giving Lou Dumbell too much credit.
David Amos
Reply to @Jos Allaire: Welcome back to the circus Maggie
Lou Bell
Reply to @David Amos: Ah yes , the reincarnation of poor Maggie ! And
we also know who Marc is now . With an Anglophone name to boot !
Jason Inness
I think Higgs has done a pretty good job. However, this is a
disturbing trend that he is always looking for more power. He doesn't
seem to consult his caucus on important decisions (i.e. the ER
Closures), he wanted more power legislated into the EM Act (and backed
down when he couldn't get the votes to pass it), and now he wants the
opposition to declare two years of support for his government. If this
is how he acts with a minority, can he really be trusted with a
majority government?
Jos Allaire
Reply to @Jason Inness: I agree with you on everything except the
first sentence.
David Amos
Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks Maggie by any other name is like moth
to flame N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Reply to @Jason Inness: Can the SANB Liberals be trusted any at all ?
See their UNDISCLOSED 130 million dollar giveaway of taxpayers money
!!! Obviously they can't !!!!!!!!
Al Borland
If Higgs were to send Cardy packing back to the N D P , Greens, or
Liberals where he belongs then he'd gain my vote. Otherwise, let's
hope the P A N B do well.
David Amos
Reply to @Al Borland: Now thats funny. Methinks you PANB people should
Google Cardy Higgs and butter tarts ASAP N'esy Pas?
Peter Baxter
Inconceivable.....
Very much against tradition....
Like Brian Gallant refusing to step aside when he did not have the most seats!
So ... we know......inconceivable and very much against tradition
...are trade marks of the Liberals !
"It would be very much against how custom and convention typically
operate in Canada" ,...yep...that describes what Brian did....only two
years ago...in a nutshell
David Amos
Reply to @Peter Baxter: You understand that it is just a circus?
Fred Brewer
I smell desperation coming from the PC camp.
David Amos
Reply to @Fred Brewer: Me Too
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Former PC cabinet minister runs for Liberals in Shediac Bay-Dieppe
Robert Gauvin was deputy premier and minister of tourism in Blaine
Higgs's cabinet until quitting
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 18, 2020 11:47 AM AT
233 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks Higgy et al are well aware that I am overjoyed by the fact
that Mr Gauvin donned a red coat and opted to remain in the circus
N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise
Josef Blow
Reply to @David Amos: Just when you thought you were having a good
day, along comes the Beard.
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks you are just jealous that you can't
grow one worth talking about N'esy Pas?
Jim Cyr
He's an opportunistic disgrace to all Acadians.
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks many Acadians appreciate his skills as a
comedian so they should keep the clown in the circus N'esy Pas?
David Stairs
these guys will do anything to guarantee the golden pension....say one
thing to get votes and then follow whatever party line there is...it's
disgusting...
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Stairs: Methinks it par for the course that all
politicians and public employees play N'esy Pas?
Johnny Almar
This is enough reason to ditch the Liberal party.
Vickers will probably lose in Miramichi because the PA has a well
liked and respected MLA there already.
Insiders have balked at Vickers’ poor social skills and overall snobiness.
Al Borland
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Let's hope the People's Alliance replace the
Liberals as the official opposition. I see good things in the future
for New Brunswick. A level of unity and pride that we haven't had for
a long time.
Janice small
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Thie is nothing exciting about Vickers, poor
people skills,, no experience in gouvernment reminds of my grandfather
when he talks, little no no charisma and really knows nothing about
being Premier.. Just like Gallant,, but that's what the party wants a
soft gumby who they can twist and bend and make him tow the party
line.. God forsaken if they had somebody with a voice and an opinion..
David Amos
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
things never cease N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @Al Borland: Dream on
Luke Armstrong
Shediac Bay - Dieppe...do you they ever elect anyone but Liberals?
val harris
Reply to @Luke Armstrong: No and it shows they know what they are
doin. Well done Shediac
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Luke Armstrong: French name, the vote is yours. Doesn't
matter what kind of human garbage it is
Josef Blow
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Pretty nasty language there, Mr. Oliver ! I'm
surprised CBC would, in this very situation, allow "human garage" such
as that to which you so gingerly refer, to publish such offensive
gibberish.
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: Did I hurt your feelings? Awww
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: Whats a human garage? I'm confused. If you're
gonna go all moral police on someone get the nasty bits right at
least, precious Mr blow
Greg Windsor
Reply to @val harris: well that is certainly where the money is being
pumped into....
Josef Blow
Reply to @Ray Oliver: A gallant effort Ray, but you'"ll need to eat a
few more Wheaties to get up to speed. I'll sip my Red Rose waiting for
your arrival … ah, I'll make a pot. Lots of time … And, my feelings
are damaged … but I'll make it. Ne pas worry.
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: A "Gallant" effort. Perfect candidate for
Shediac. Maybe prop one up like weekend at Bernies, he/she would win
every time. Be about as useful too
Jeff Leblanc
Reply to @Ray Oliver: just mute this new guy who seems to be a
condescending jerk. Thats what I'm doing. Then him and David Amos and
Marc Martin can all play together in the sandbox with nobody' to
bother them
David Amos
Reply to @Josef Blow: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
things never cease N'esy Pas?
Brian Robertson
It's always been us and them.
The French always vote Liberal, so we either concede to them of vote
Conservative.
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Brian Robertson: or...and here me out, you could vote
purple. Then one day, not this election cycle or even next, but one
day they might get enough seats to be a viable alternative. We will
never know unless we give it a shot.
Dan Lee
Reply to @Brian Robertson:
What is it with you quys ..the french this ....the french that.......
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Dan Lee: well I mean come on. In NB the French are quite
vocal and tend to be catered to by the main 2 parties who need the
votes. And that rubs the great silent majority the wrong way. Used to
bother me too but I've come to accept it will never change. Your food
will taste better and the air will be fresher when you realize that
sad fact.
Dan Lee
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: bahahahaha.......yea...... bahahaha...........
Josef Blow
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: So, you appear to equate "Purple" (such a
noble colour for such a petty party) with "Green", (as in the
expression, "The grass is always greener on the other side".
Someone once told me that the reason why the grass is likely "greener
on the other side", is because that is where the septic tank is … . I
think the idea fits the bill here.
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Josef Blow: the only way the grass would be greener near the
septic tank would be it it was leaking
Natalie Pugh
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: We need to, now more than ever, force the
change! Our children and grandchildren have been placed second best
simply for not being able to speak a language that is fading away.
After all what are the true stats of those who are unilingual french
in NB....3%?? It's not about culture and never was. It's control over
the job market and nothing else.
David Amos
Reply to @Brian Robertson: Methinks you should explain to folks real
slow why lots of French folks voted for Mr Gauvin in the last election
or all the other Conservatives they have elected in the past
particularly under the mandates of Hatfield, Lord and even Alward
N'esy Pas?
Brian Robertson
Reply to @David Amos:
I think you should explain this bizarre idiom you have adopted as some
kind a signature preamble and postscript to all your comments.
But, in the fullness of time and the plethora of my posts, you will
find the answers to your query.
It would be redundant of me to repeat it merely at your request.
Eric Plexe
Robert Gauvin would not be the only political opportunist to change
parties as Dominic Cardy was formerly the leader of the NB NDP.
Mack Leigh
Reply to @Eric Plexe:
It is not about political conviction, ethics or strength of character
but all about what Gauvin can benefit from this move..
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Mack Leigh:
Much the same as Mr Cardy then..............
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks Minister Cardy won't miss having to
share his butter tarts with the former Deputy Premier as his former
conservative cohort Mr Duffie challenges him for his seat N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Now all we need is for Arsenault to admit his also being another SANB Liberal .
David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you forgot that when the liberals didn't
want him to run for them last time he snubbed Higgy et al and ran for
the Green Meanies instead N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:46 -0300
Subject: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything a
cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas?
To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"Barbara.Whitenect"<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee"<Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca
Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
Alexander.Quon@globalnews.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Axiotis-Perez, Alex"<Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:14:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Please note that I am currently away from the office.
For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Brooke
Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.
Thank you!
*****
Bonjour,
Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
Pour toute question urgente pendent mon absence, veuillez contacter
Brooke Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.
Merci !
---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.
Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.
Best,
MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.
En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.
En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.
Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
Cordialement,
Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:14:56 -0300
Subject: Re: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything
a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas Cleveland Allaby?
To: Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, rick.lafrance@pcnb.org,
bobhatheway@gmail.com, cleveland.allaby@me.com, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@pcnb.org, claude.williams@pcnb.org,
duncan@dlmca.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
francineqs@gmail.com, stephan.richard1@gmail.com,
awlebrun@hotmail.com, charlesdoucet850@gmail.com, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca,
Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca, Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
ssducks@xplornet.ca, shawn_morrison_1974@icloud.com
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, premier.ministre@gnb.ca, Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.
Premier@ontario.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:41:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyers Joël Etienne and
Christian Michaud, the RCMP, the CBC and Higgy et al must be well
aware of my emails and the blog I created on July 8th and updated
today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
** Message blocked **
Your message to blaine.higgs@pcnb.org has been blocked. See technical
details below for more information.
The response from the remote server was:
550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. AS(201806281)
[TO1CAN01FT012.eop-CAN01.prod.
On 8/12/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:28:26 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
> Cleveland Allaby?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
>
On 8/7/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Whereas the RCMP, thier lawyers and their political bosses don't like
> to read things perhaps they may enjoy reviewing some videos I made
> after the Feds falsely arrested me and assaulted me the DECH in Fat
> Fred City 2008
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> The RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
> 326 views
> Oct 15, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
> 73 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
> 372 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this CD
> 44 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>
> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
> Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>
> ***
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>
> Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
> Alex Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in
> CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:08 -0300
> Subject: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
> To: irwinlampert@gmail.com, glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect"<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@
> "Friday.Joe"<Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
> <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
>
> Management reviews give previously hidden look at quality of RCMP
> investigations
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>
> "Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said he would be surprised if some of the issues found in the
> older reports continued to this day.
>
> "I saw very very few examples of police officers who would obviously
> violate an accused's rights under the charter," Lampert said of his
> time on the bench, referring to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>
> "Some were through inadvertence rather than malfeasance. In some cases
> they just didn't realize that they were doing something wrong and it
> would be pointed out to them and you would hope that it wouldn't
> happen again."
>
> New Brunswick is among three provinces where Crown prosecutors must
> approve charges before they are laid in court.
> Court issues
>
> A 2017 review of the Hampton detachment is generally favourable, but
> describes prosecutions abandoned or dropped.
>
> In three of 45 cases brought to the Crown by police, the evidence
> didn't support the charges. Issues with arrests in two of the 45 cases
> led to the Crown not prosecuting. The report pointed to a lack of
> supervision as a contributing factor.
>
> "When supervision is not taking place, solvable, prosecutable cases
> could result in acquittals or charges forwarded when not warranted,
> bringing liability to the organization and members," the report says."
>
>
>
>
> 30 Comments
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Henry
> I cannot think of a worse job than being a police officer. Working
> nights, deaths, domestic violence, distrust in law enforcement, and
> while trying to do your job the best you can, the very real
> possibility you make a split second mistake, and you yourself end up
> in jail the rest of your life!
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Paperwork, and the lack of the proper paperwork,
> could hardly be lumped in with split second mistaken decisions.
>
> Dan Moore
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Yes, policing is a difficult job, if it is your
> worst job don't become a police officer. We should demand only the
> best suited become police officers and you clearly don't fit the bill.
> Also be aware that in that 'split second' mistake that could end you
> up in jail could also take the life of an innocent person as we have
> seen happen in the US time and again though less so in Canada, it
> still occurs. Being a police officer should not put you above the law
> rather place you under greater scrutiny as it is their job to enforce
> it. All aspects of it including presumed innocence and other
> constitutional rights.
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The RCMP are still playing dumb about falsely
> arresting me even after I sued the Crown and are inviting me to do so
> again Go Figure
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said..... "Some were through inadvertence rather than
> malfeasance. In some cases they just didn't realize that they were
> doing something wrong and it would be pointed out to them and you
> would hope that it wouldn't happen again."
> That pretty much sums the problem up right there where police are not
> held accountable for their actions , and the people in the position of
> over seeing the Justice System let it slide , and hope that the police
> will do better . That combined with the militarization of the police
> is rapidly eroding the public's trust in the police and Justice System
> . You need to look no further than what is currently happening in the
> U.S. to see where things are eventually heading .When the only tool
> that the police have is a hammer , then every problem starts to look
> like a nail .
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Matt Steele:
> Imo, you picked out the most important sentence in that article, but I
> have a completely different take on it.
>
> To me it shows there are checks and balances in place, in the system,
> that are working.
>
> However, I feel that the law & order bureaucracy in Canada is too
> insulated and lacks real transparency and accountability. Elections
> and short term limits for Judges, Crown Prosecutors and police chiefs
> would help solve the problem.
>
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you Irwin Lampert should check my work
> N;esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> https://nbweddings.ca/about-
>
>
> :"For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges."
>
> J. Gilles Lemieux
> Called to the bar: 1990 (NB)
> Lemieux Ménard & Co
> Lawyer
> 4405 Route 115
> Saint-Antoine Sud, New Brunswick E4V 2Z5
> Phone: 506-525-9717
> Fax: 506-525-9509
> Email: glemieux@lemcolaw.ca
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
> sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
> suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 06:04:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete
my emails N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting me.
A provincial election was called on August 17th and will be held on
September 14th. During that time, my constituency office is required
to be closed. The phone and email will not be monitored during this
period.
Thank you!
Megan Mitton
---
Merci de m'avoir contacté. Des élections provinciales ont été
déclenchées le 17 août et auront lieu le 14 septembre. Pendant cette
période, mon bureau de circonscription doit être fermé. Le téléphone
et le courriel ne seront pas surveillés pendant cette période.
Merci !
Megan Mitton
---
COVID : Une ligne d’information sans frais et une adresse courriel ont
été mises sur pied afin d’aider à répondre aux questions sur la
COVID-19 qui ne sont pas reliées à la santé, y compris les questions
relatives à la conformité à l’état d’urgence et sur les voyages. Le
service est offert dans les deux langues officielles. Les gens peuvent
téléphoner au 1-844-462-8387 sept jours par semaine. Ou envoyez un
courriel à : helpaide@gnb.ca.
Vous trouverez également des informations relatives au plan de relance
de la province à l'adresse suivante :
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
---
COVID: A toll-free information line and email address has been set up
to help answer non-health related COVID-19 questions, including
questions about travel and compliance with the state of emergency. The
number, 1-844-462-8387, is operational seven days a week. The email
address is helpaide@gnb.ca.
Also information related to the province’s recovery plan can be found
here: https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 02:58:32 -0300
Subject: Re: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the LIEbrano Shadow
Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete my emails N'esy
Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Cc: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"
<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, "michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>,
BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "Cathy.Rogers"<Cathy.Rogers@gnb.ca>,
"robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"
<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"carl. davies"<carl.davies@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
bruce grandy <bruce.grandy@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "mike.obrien"<mike.obrien@fredericton.ca>,
"bruce.fitch"<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "Brian.kenny"
<Brian.kenny@gnb.ca>, "Stephane.vaillancourt"
<Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
<warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Fred.Wyshak"<Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>,
"frederic.loiseau"<frederic.loiseau@fredericton.
<lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca>, Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of
the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
"brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"
<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Lynn.Chaplin"<Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>,
"serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"
<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"
<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"carl. davies"<carl.davies@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
bruce grandy <bruce.grandy@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "mike.obrien"<mike.obrien@fredericton.ca>,
"bruce.fitch"<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "Brian.kenny"
<Brian.kenny@gnb.ca>, "Stephane.vaillancourt"
<Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
<warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Fred.Wyshak"<Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>,
"frederic.loiseau"<frederic.loiseau@fredericton.
<lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca>, Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of
the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
"brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"
<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Lynn.Chaplin"<Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>,
"serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"
<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 01:13:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the LIEbrano Shadow
Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete my emails N'esy
Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
< megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>,
"michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald
< BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
< jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "Cathy.Rogers"<Cathy.Rogers@gnb.ca>,
"robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
< Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
< martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
< Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
< Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"
< Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"carl. davies"<carl.davies@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
< tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
bruce grandy <bruce.grandy@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
< mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "mike.obrien"<mike.obrien@fredericton.ca>,
"bruce.fitch"<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "Brian.kenny"
< Brian.kenny@gnb.ca>, "Stephane.vaillancourt"
< Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
< warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail"
< Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Fred.Wyshak"<Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>,
"frederic.loiseau"<frederic.loiseau@fredericton.
< lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca>
Cc: Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
< premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier
< premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, briangallant10
< briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
< Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
< andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
< David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"Lynn.Chaplin"<Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
< serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau,
Kevin (LEG)"<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"
< Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Chaplin, Lynn (NBPC/CPNB)"<Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 04:58:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete
my emails N'esy Pas/ Andrea Anderson-Mason.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Please be advised this account is not monitored.
veuillez noter que ce compte n"est pas surveillé
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 04:58:44 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete
my emails N'esy Pas/ Andrea Anderson-Mason.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
On 6/29/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)"<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:59:37 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Lynn Chaplin needa a lawyer who
> knows how to read emails better than the ex Fat Fred City Finest LIARS
> Carl Urquhart and Stephen Horsman N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are
> greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are
> carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
> If your issue is Constituency related, please contact Lisa Bourque at
> my constituency office at
> Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca<mailto:Lis
> Thank you.
>
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous
> tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
> Si c’est au sujet du bureau de circonscription, veuillez contacter
> Lisa Bourque à Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca<mailto:Lis
> (506)755-2810.
> Merci.
>
> Andrea Anderson-Mason, Q.C. / c.r.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
> sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
> suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 01:13:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the LIEbrano Shadow
Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete my emails N'esy
Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
< megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>,
"michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald
< BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
< jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "Cathy.Rogers"<Cathy.Rogers@gnb.ca>,
"robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
< Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
< martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
< Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
< Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"
< Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"carl. davies"<carl.davies@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
< tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
bruce grandy <bruce.grandy@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
< mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "mike.obrien"<mike.obrien@fredericton.ca>,
"bruce.fitch"<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "Brian.kenny"
< Brian.kenny@gnb.ca>, "Stephane.vaillancourt"
< Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
< warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail"
< Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Fred.Wyshak"<Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>,
"frederic.loiseau"<frederic.loiseau@fredericton.
< lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca>
Cc: Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
< premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier
< premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, briangallant10
< briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
< Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
< andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
< David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"Lynn.Chaplin"<Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
< serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau,
Kevin (LEG)"<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"
< Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Chaplin, Lynn (NBPC/CPNB)"<Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 04:58:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete
my emails N'esy Pas/ Andrea Anderson-Mason.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Please be advised this account is not monitored.
veuillez noter que ce compte n"est pas surveillé
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 04:58:44 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete
my emails N'esy Pas/ Andrea Anderson-Mason.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
On 6/29/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)"<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:59:37 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Lynn Chaplin needa a lawyer who
> knows how to read emails better than the ex Fat Fred City Finest LIARS
> Carl Urquhart and Stephen Horsman N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are
> greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are
> carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
> If your issue is Constituency related, please contact Lisa Bourque at
> my constituency office at
> Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca<mailto:Lis
> Thank you.
>
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous
> tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
> Si c’est au sujet du bureau de circonscription, veuillez contacter
> Lisa Bourque à Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca<mailto:Lis
> (506)755-2810.
> Merci.
>
> Andrea Anderson-Mason, Q.C. / c.r.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
> sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
> suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:17:31 -0700
Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for
the third time The pdf files hereto attached are for real
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
(Français à suivre)
If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Thank you.
Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Merci.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:17:25 -0400
Subject: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for the third time The pdf
files hereto attached are for real
To: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "chris.collins"<chris.collins@gnb.ca>, tj
<tj@burkelaw.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>
Robert K. Mckee
Called to the bar: 2012 (NB)
Fowler Law P.C. Inc.
69 Waterloo St.
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 0E1
Phone: 506-857-8811
Fax: 506-857-9297
Email: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Robert McKee to run for the Liberals in Moncton Centre
Lawyer won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, a spokesperson for
the party says
CBC News · Posted: Jun 03, 2018 4:50 PM AT
Robert McKee, a 32-year-old lawyer and first-term Moncton city
councillor, declared his candidacy for the Moncton Centre Liberal
nomination on May 17. (Submitted)
Robert McKee has won the Moncton Centre Liberal nomination and will
run for the party in the upcoming provincial election this fall.
The 32-year-old lawyer was elected to Moncton city council in May,
2016, representing Ward 3, and declared his candidacy for the Moncton
Centre Liberal nomination on May 17.
He won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, according to Duncan
Gallant, a spokesperson for the party.
The availability to run in Moncton Centre for the Liberals opened up
after Speaker Chris Collins said he wouldn't reoffer for the party.
Speaker Chris Collins won't reoffer for Liberals, plans to sue
premier for libel
8 Liberals quit over premier's 'humiliating' treatment of Chris Collins
Premier Brian Gallant suspended Collins from the Liberal caucus on the
basis of allegations of harassment made by a former employee of the
legislature.
Collins described Premier Gallant's handling of the allegations as
"atrocious" and will finish his term as an independent.
The election is scheduled for Sept. 24.
From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:17:31 -0700
Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for
the third time The pdf files hereto attached are for real
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
(Français à suivre)
If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Thank you.
Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
Merci.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:17:25 -0400
Subject: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for the third time The pdf
files hereto attached are for real
To: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "chris.collins"<chris.collins@gnb.ca>, tj
<tj@burkelaw.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>
Robert K. Mckee
Called to the bar: 2012 (NB)
Fowler Law P.C. Inc.
69 Waterloo St.
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 0E1
Phone: 506-857-8811
Fax: 506-857-9297
Email: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Robert McKee to run for the Liberals in Moncton Centre
Lawyer won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, a spokesperson for
the party says
CBC News · Posted: Jun 03, 2018 4:50 PM AT
Robert McKee, a 32-year-old lawyer and first-term Moncton city
councillor, declared his candidacy for the Moncton Centre Liberal
nomination on May 17. (Submitted)
Robert McKee has won the Moncton Centre Liberal nomination and will
run for the party in the upcoming provincial election this fall.
The 32-year-old lawyer was elected to Moncton city council in May,
2016, representing Ward 3, and declared his candidacy for the Moncton
Centre Liberal nomination on May 17.
He won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, according to Duncan
Gallant, a spokesperson for the party.
The availability to run in Moncton Centre for the Liberals opened up
after Speaker Chris Collins said he wouldn't reoffer for the party.
Speaker Chris Collins won't reoffer for Liberals, plans to sue
premier for libel
8 Liberals quit over premier's 'humiliating' treatment of Chris Collins
Premier Brian Gallant suspended Collins from the Liberal caucus on the
basis of allegations of harassment made by a former employee of the
legislature.
Collins described Premier Gallant's handling of the allegations as
"atrocious" and will finish his term as an independent.
The election is scheduled for Sept. 24.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:04:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a
snap-election was flawed bigtime N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:04:18 -0300
Subject: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a snap-election was flawed
bigtime N'esy Pas?
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, chris@duffie.ca,
ron.tremblay2@gmail.com, aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
jake.stewart@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "dan.
bussieres"<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@gnb.ca>,
bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com, jjatwin@gmail.com, markandcaroline
<markandcaroline@gmail.com>, sheppardmargo@gmail.com,
jordan.gill@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"David.Lametti"<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Fowler"
<Shane.Fowler@cbc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
<postur@fjr.stjr.is>
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks I should not have been surprised to see the VERY CORRUPT CBC
block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter and in the very
domain we all pay for with our tax dollars N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
CBC's Facebook Live answers questions about provincial election
Do you have questions about the election on Sept. 14? We have answers
CBC News · Posted: Aug 19, 2020 10:44 AM AT
46 Comments
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks they will block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter N'esy Pas?
BINGO
Your account has been banned until September 3, 2020. Reason: We have
banned this account for 15 days because we believe it is in violation
of our Terms of Use. For more information, please visit:
http://cbc.ca/submissions.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Higgs's rationale for no-snap-election deal is flawed, says political expert
Three byelections must be held this fall
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 13, 2020 2:50 PM AT
99 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Methinks "political experts" make some of the best clowns in Higgy's
circus but the Green Meanies take the cake N'esy Pas?
David Amos
A false dilemma??? Too Too Funny
"One thing that is very important to realize is that there's not two
options here," Green MLA Kevin Arseneau said on his way in to the
meeting. "It's not an election or a deal. That's like a false dilemma
that's been invented."
Lou Bell
Reply to @David Amos: Dilemma alright ! Does Arsenault reveal he's an
back door SANB Liberal or continue running as an uncommitted Green ?
We know what Gauvins true colours always were ! Same as Arsenault !
David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you must have enough clues between your
ears to understand that a dilemma is a dilemma for the former SANB
boss and that is no such thing as a false one N'esy Pas?
Jos Allaire
Reply to @Lou Bell: I see that you are obsessed with the SANB, grosse bee got!
Jos Allaire
Reply to @David Amos: I think you are giving Lou Dumbell too much credit.
David Amos
Reply to @Jos Allaire: Welcome back to the circus Maggie
Lou Bell
Reply to @David Amos: Ah yes , the reincarnation of poor Maggie ! And
we also know who Marc is now . With an Anglophone name to boot !
Jason Inness
I think Higgs has done a pretty good job. However, this is a
disturbing trend that he is always looking for more power. He doesn't
seem to consult his caucus on important decisions (i.e. the ER
Closures), he wanted more power legislated into the EM Act (and backed
down when he couldn't get the votes to pass it), and now he wants the
opposition to declare two years of support for his government. If this
is how he acts with a minority, can he really be trusted with a
majority government?
Jos Allaire
Reply to @Jason Inness: I agree with you on everything except the
first sentence.
David Amos
Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks Maggie by any other name is like moth
to flame N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Reply to @Jason Inness: Can the SANB Liberals be trusted any at all ?
See their UNDISCLOSED 130 million dollar giveaway of taxpayers money
!!! Obviously they can't !!!!!!!!
Al Borland
If Higgs were to send Cardy packing back to the N D P , Greens, or
Liberals where he belongs then he'd gain my vote. Otherwise, let's
hope the P A N B do well.
David Amos
Reply to @Al Borland: Now thats funny. Methinks you PANB people should
Google Cardy Higgs and butter tarts ASAP N'esy Pas?
Peter Baxter
Inconceivable.....
Very much against tradition....
Like Brian Gallant refusing to step aside when he did not have the most seats!
So ... we know......inconceivable and very much against tradition
...are trade marks of the Liberals !
"It would be very much against how custom and convention typically
operate in Canada" ,...yep...that describes what Brian did....only two
years ago...in a nutshell
David Amos
Reply to @Peter Baxter: You understand that it is just a circus?
Fred Brewer
I smell desperation coming from the PC camp.
David Amos
Reply to @Fred Brewer: Me Too
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Former PC cabinet minister runs for Liberals in Shediac Bay-Dieppe
Robert Gauvin was deputy premier and minister of tourism in Blaine
Higgs's cabinet until quitting
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 18, 2020 11:47 AM AT
233 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks Higgy et al are well aware that I am overjoyed by the fact
that Mr Gauvin donned a red coat and opted to remain in the circus
N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise
Josef Blow
Reply to @David Amos: Just when you thought you were having a good
day, along comes the Beard.
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks you are just jealous that you can't
grow one worth talking about N'esy Pas?
Jim Cyr
He's an opportunistic disgrace to all Acadians.
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks many Acadians appreciate his skills as a
comedian so they should keep the clown in the circus N'esy Pas?
David Stairs
these guys will do anything to guarantee the golden pension....say one
thing to get votes and then follow whatever party line there is...it's
disgusting...
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Stairs: Methinks it par for the course that all
politicians and public employees play N'esy Pas?
Johnny Almar
This is enough reason to ditch the Liberal party.
Vickers will probably lose in Miramichi because the PA has a well
liked and respected MLA there already.
Insiders have balked at Vickers’ poor social skills and overall snobiness.
Al Borland
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Let's hope the People's Alliance replace the
Liberals as the official opposition. I see good things in the future
for New Brunswick. A level of unity and pride that we haven't had for
a long time.
Janice small
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Thie is nothing exciting about Vickers, poor
people skills,, no experience in gouvernment reminds of my grandfather
when he talks, little no no charisma and really knows nothing about
being Premier.. Just like Gallant,, but that's what the party wants a
soft gumby who they can twist and bend and make him tow the party
line.. God forsaken if they had somebody with a voice and an opinion..
David Amos
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
things never cease N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @Al Borland: Dream on
Luke Armstrong
Shediac Bay - Dieppe...do you they ever elect anyone but Liberals?
val harris
Reply to @Luke Armstrong: No and it shows they know what they are
doin. Well done Shediac
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Luke Armstrong: French name, the vote is yours. Doesn't
matter what kind of human garbage it is
Josef Blow
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Pretty nasty language there, Mr. Oliver ! I'm
surprised CBC would, in this very situation, allow "human garage" such
as that to which you so gingerly refer, to publish such offensive
gibberish.
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: Did I hurt your feelings? Awww
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: Whats a human garage? I'm confused. If you're
gonna go all moral police on someone get the nasty bits right at
least, precious Mr blow
Greg Windsor
Reply to @val harris: well that is certainly where the money is being
pumped into....
Josef Blow
Reply to @Ray Oliver: A gallant effort Ray, but you'"ll need to eat a
few more Wheaties to get up to speed. I'll sip my Red Rose waiting for
your arrival … ah, I'll make a pot. Lots of time … And, my feelings
are damaged … but I'll make it. Ne pas worry.
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: A "Gallant" effort. Perfect candidate for
Shediac. Maybe prop one up like weekend at Bernies, he/she would win
every time. Be about as useful too
Jeff Leblanc
Reply to @Ray Oliver: just mute this new guy who seems to be a
condescending jerk. Thats what I'm doing. Then him and David Amos and
Marc Martin can all play together in the sandbox with nobody' to
bother them
David Amos
Reply to @Josef Blow: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
things never cease N'esy Pas?
Brian Robertson
It's always been us and them.
The French always vote Liberal, so we either concede to them of vote
Conservative.
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Brian Robertson: or...and here me out, you could vote
purple. Then one day, not this election cycle or even next, but one
day they might get enough seats to be a viable alternative. We will
never know unless we give it a shot.
Dan Lee
Reply to @Brian Robertson:
What is it with you quys ..the french this ....the french that.......
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Dan Lee: well I mean come on. In NB the French are quite
vocal and tend to be catered to by the main 2 parties who need the
votes. And that rubs the great silent majority the wrong way. Used to
bother me too but I've come to accept it will never change. Your food
will taste better and the air will be fresher when you realize that
sad fact.
Dan Lee
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: bahahahaha.......yea...... bahahaha...........
Josef Blow
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: So, you appear to equate "Purple" (such a
noble colour for such a petty party) with "Green", (as in the
expression, "The grass is always greener on the other side".
Someone once told me that the reason why the grass is likely "greener
on the other side", is because that is where the septic tank is … . I
think the idea fits the bill here.
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Josef Blow: the only way the grass would be greener near the
septic tank would be it it was leaking
Natalie Pugh
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: We need to, now more than ever, force the
change! Our children and grandchildren have been placed second best
simply for not being able to speak a language that is fading away.
After all what are the true stats of those who are unilingual french
in NB....3%?? It's not about culture and never was. It's control over
the job market and nothing else.
David Amos
Reply to @Brian Robertson: Methinks you should explain to folks real
slow why lots of French folks voted for Mr Gauvin in the last election
or all the other Conservatives they have elected in the past
particularly under the mandates of Hatfield, Lord and even Alward
N'esy Pas?
Brian Robertson
Reply to @David Amos:
I think you should explain this bizarre idiom you have adopted as some
kind a signature preamble and postscript to all your comments.
But, in the fullness of time and the plethora of my posts, you will
find the answers to your query.
It would be redundant of me to repeat it merely at your request.
Eric Plexe
Robert Gauvin would not be the only political opportunist to change
parties as Dominic Cardy was formerly the leader of the NB NDP.
Mack Leigh
Reply to @Eric Plexe:
It is not about political conviction, ethics or strength of character
but all about what Gauvin can benefit from this move..
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Mack Leigh:
Much the same as Mr Cardy then..............
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks Minister Cardy won't miss having to
share his butter tarts with the former Deputy Premier as his former
conservative cohort Mr Duffie challenges him for his seat N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Now all we need is for Arsenault to admit his also being another SANB Liberal .
David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you forgot that when the liberals didn't
want him to run for them last time he snubbed Higgy et al and ran for
the Green Meanies instead N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:46 -0300
Subject: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything a
cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas?
To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"Barbara.Whitenect"<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee"<Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca
Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
Alexander.Quon@globalnews.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Axiotis-Perez, Alex"<Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:14:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Please note that I am currently away from the office.
For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Brooke
Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.
Thank you!
*****
Bonjour,
Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
Pour toute question urgente pendent mon absence, veuillez contacter
Brooke Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.
Merci !
---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.
Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.
Best,
MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.
En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.
En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.
Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
Cordialement,
Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:14:56 -0300
Subject: Re: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything
a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas Cleveland Allaby?
To: Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, rick.lafrance@pcnb.org,
bobhatheway@gmail.com, cleveland.allaby@me.com, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@pcnb.org, claude.williams@pcnb.org,
duncan@dlmca.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
francineqs@gmail.com, stephan.richard1@gmail.com,
awlebrun@hotmail.com, charlesdoucet850@gmail.com, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca,
Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca, Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
ssducks@xplornet.ca, shawn_morrison_1974@icloud.com
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, premier.ministre@gnb.ca, Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.
Premier@ontario.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.com
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:41:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyers Joël Etienne and
Christian Michaud, the RCMP, the CBC and Higgy et al must be well
aware of my emails and the blog I created on July 8th and updated
today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
** Message blocked **
Your message to blaine.higgs@pcnb.org has been blocked. See technical
details below for more information.
The response from the remote server was:
550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. AS(201806281)
[TO1CAN01FT012.eop-CAN01.prod.
On 8/12/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:28:26 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
> Cleveland Allaby?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.
>
On 8/7/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Whereas the RCMP, thier lawyers and their political bosses don't like
> to read things perhaps they may enjoy reviewing some videos I made
> after the Feds falsely arrested me and assaulted me the DECH in Fat
> Fred City 2008
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> The RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
> 326 views
> Oct 15, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
> 73 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
> 372 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this CD
> 44 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>
> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
> Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>
> ***
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>
> Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
> Alex Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in
> CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:b
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:08 -0300
> Subject: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
> To: irwinlampert@gmail.com, glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect"<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@
> "Friday.Joe"<Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
> <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
>
> Management reviews give previously hidden look at quality of RCMP
> investigations
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>
> "Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said he would be surprised if some of the issues found in the
> older reports continued to this day.
>
> "I saw very very few examples of police officers who would obviously
> violate an accused's rights under the charter," Lampert said of his
> time on the bench, referring to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>
> "Some were through inadvertence rather than malfeasance. In some cases
> they just didn't realize that they were doing something wrong and it
> would be pointed out to them and you would hope that it wouldn't
> happen again."
>
> New Brunswick is among three provinces where Crown prosecutors must
> approve charges before they are laid in court.
> Court issues
>
> A 2017 review of the Hampton detachment is generally favourable, but
> describes prosecutions abandoned or dropped.
>
> In three of 45 cases brought to the Crown by police, the evidence
> didn't support the charges. Issues with arrests in two of the 45 cases
> led to the Crown not prosecuting. The report pointed to a lack of
> supervision as a contributing factor.
>
> "When supervision is not taking place, solvable, prosecutable cases
> could result in acquittals or charges forwarded when not warranted,
> bringing liability to the organization and members," the report says."
>
>
>
>
> 30 Comments
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Henry
> I cannot think of a worse job than being a police officer. Working
> nights, deaths, domestic violence, distrust in law enforcement, and
> while trying to do your job the best you can, the very real
> possibility you make a split second mistake, and you yourself end up
> in jail the rest of your life!
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Paperwork, and the lack of the proper paperwork,
> could hardly be lumped in with split second mistaken decisions.
>
> Dan Moore
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Yes, policing is a difficult job, if it is your
> worst job don't become a police officer. We should demand only the
> best suited become police officers and you clearly don't fit the bill.
> Also be aware that in that 'split second' mistake that could end you
> up in jail could also take the life of an innocent person as we have
> seen happen in the US time and again though less so in Canada, it
> still occurs. Being a police officer should not put you above the law
> rather place you under greater scrutiny as it is their job to enforce
> it. All aspects of it including presumed innocence and other
> constitutional rights.
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The RCMP are still playing dumb about falsely
> arresting me even after I sued the Crown and are inviting me to do so
> again Go Figure
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said..... "Some were through inadvertence rather than
> malfeasance. In some cases they just didn't realize that they were
> doing something wrong and it would be pointed out to them and you
> would hope that it wouldn't happen again."
> That pretty much sums the problem up right there where police are not
> held accountable for their actions , and the people in the position of
> over seeing the Justice System let it slide , and hope that the police
> will do better . That combined with the militarization of the police
> is rapidly eroding the public's trust in the police and Justice System
> . You need to look no further than what is currently happening in the
> U.S. to see where things are eventually heading .When the only tool
> that the police have is a hammer , then every problem starts to look
> like a nail .
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Matt Steele:
> Imo, you picked out the most important sentence in that article, but I
> have a completely different take on it.
>
> To me it shows there are checks and balances in place, in the system,
> that are working.
>
> However, I feel that the law & order bureaucracy in Canada is too
> insulated and lacks real transparency and accountability. Elections
> and short term limits for Judges, Crown Prosecutors and police chiefs
> would help solve the problem.
>
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you Irwin Lampert should check my work
> N;esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> https://nbweddings.ca/about-
>
>
> :"For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges."
>
> J. Gilles Lemieux
> Called to the bar: 1990 (NB)
> Lemieux Ménard & Co
> Lawyer
> 4405 Route 115
> Saint-Antoine Sud, New Brunswick E4V 2Z5
> Phone: 506-525-9717
> Fax: 506-525-9509
> Email: glemieux@lemcolaw.ca
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
> sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
> suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX"<Premier@gov.bc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:40 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write. I appreciate hearing feedback
> and suggestions from the people of British Columbia as we work
> together to build a better BC.
>
> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
> at the earliest opportunity.
>
> In the event that your inquiry more appropriately falls within the
> mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer
> your email for review and consideration.
>
> Again, thank you for writing.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John Horgan
> Premier
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> < Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:32 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> internalaffairs@pd.boston.gov, mediarelations@pd.boston.gov,
> Robert.Ridge@pd.boston.gov, N.Decosta-Klipa@boston.com,
> John.Conroy@pd.boston.gov, "Dale.Morgan"<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, news-tips
> < news-tips@nytimes.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
> Cc: richard.dahill@pd.boston.gov, "Larry.Tremblay"
> < Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> < Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> < Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
> < Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> < martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> < Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
> "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
> < robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
> "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, PREMIER
> < PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
> < premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
> < premier@gov.nl.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
> premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
> < premier@gov.ab.ca>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
>
> 'If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue'
>
> By Teresa Hanafin, Globe Staff
>
> Good morning! It's Friday, June 28, the 179th day of the year. Sunrise
> in Boston was at 5:09 a.m.; sunset will be at 8:25 p.m. for 15 hours
> and 16 minutes of sunlight. The waning moon is 17 percent full.
>
>
> US Senator Kamala Harris's challenge to former VP Joe Biden's comments
> about working with segregationists in Congress and his opposition to
> federal court-ordered busing got the most attention after the
> Democratic debate last night. And Biden seemed unprepared in his
> rather rambling answer.
>
> By the way, it will be interesting to see how Biden tries to clean
> things up when he speaks this afternoon at Jesse Jackson's Rainbow
> PUSH Coalition Convention in Chicago.
>
> And predictably, conservatives almost immediately began attacking
> Harris, including by launching a coordinated campaign on Twitter in
> which accounts pretended to be black people offended that she would
> claim to be black (and all used the exact same wording):
>
> "Kamala Harris is *not* an American black. She is half Indian and half
> Jamaican. I'm so sick of people robbing American Blacks (like myself)
> of our history. It's disgusting ... These are my people not her
> people. Freaking disgusting."
>
> Because, you know, racists would look at Harris throughout her life
> and say, "Oh, she has black skin, but she's actually half Jamaican, so
> we won't discriminate against her."
>
> For the record, Harris was born in Oakland. Her mother, Shyamala
> Gopalan Harris, was a Tamil Indian, a breast cancer scientist who
> immigrated to the US from Madras (present-day Chennai) in 1960. Her
> father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University economics professor
> who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at
> the University of California at Berkeley.
>
> Progressives in the US House are still fuming today over Speaker Nancy
> Pelosi's decision to accept the Senate version of the border funding
> bill instead of the House version that had more protections for
> migrant kids held in detention and restricted how the Trump
> administration could spend the money.
>
> Pelosi tried to add those elements to the Senate bill, but House
> moderates threatened to withhold their support if she did. So it's the
> Senate bill, with money for the Pentagon to send more soldiers to the
> border and no health and care standards for the detention centers,
> that goes to Trump for his signature. Vox has a good rundown of the
> differences between the bills.
>
> Trump is scheduled to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Osaka
> about their ongoing trade war.
>
> I missed this for yesterday's newsletter: The two friends whom writer
> E. Jean Carroll told about her alleged rape by Trump immediately after
> it happened in the mid-90s have identified themselves and publicly
> corroborated her account.
>
> Here's a New York Times podcast interview with the women.
>
> One friend, Lisa Birnbach, an author best known for co-authoring "The
> Official Preppy Handbook" in 1980, urged Carroll to go to the police.
> The other, Carol Martin, a longtime news anchor for WCBS-TV in New
> York, advised Carroll not to tell anyone because she believed that
> Trump would use his army of lawyers to make her life hell.
>
> Carroll, who blamed herself for the assault -- as far too many women
> do -- stayed silent. Until now.
>
> Mass. Governor Charlie Baker, still in London, meets with US
> Ambassador Woody Johnson. Boston Mayor Marty Walsh is at the US
> Conference of Mayors annual meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii. I wonder if
> they've ever met in say, Albany.
>
> Finally, let's end with Rudyard Kipling's most famous poem, "If—".
> Pretty good use of the English language, I'd say.
>
> If you can keep your head when all about you
> Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
> If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
> But make allowance for their doubting too;
> If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
> Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
> Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
> And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
>
> If you can dream — and not make dreams your master;
> If you can think — and not make thoughts your aim;
> If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
> And treat those two impostors just the same;
> If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
> Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
> And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:
>
> If you can make one heap of all your winnings
> And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
> And lose, and start again at your beginnings
> And never breathe a word about your loss;
> If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
> To serve your turn long after they are gone,
> And so hold on when there is nothing in you
> Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'
>
> If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
> Or walk with Kings — nor lose the common touch,
> If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
> If all men count with you, but none too much;
> If you can fill the unforgiving minute
> With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
> Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
> And — which is more — you'll be a Man, my son!
>
>
>
> On 6/27/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:14:34 -0400
>> Subject: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083)
>> on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
>> To: internalaffairs@pd.boston.gov, mediarelations@pd.boston.gov,
>> Robert.Ridge@pd.boston.gov, N.Decosta-Klipa@boston.com,
>> John.Conroy@pd.boston.gov
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> < Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, Newsroom
>> < Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "darrow.macintyre"
>> < darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
>>
>> https://www.boston.com/news/
>>
>> How a policy dispute between Charlie Baker and Rachael Rollins
>> suddenly turned personal
>> "We are allowed to disagree with each other, but what you are not
>> going to do is disrespect this office."
>>
>>
>> "Gov. Charlie Baker and Rachael Rollins have purportedly hit the
>> “reset button,” but the Suffolk Country district attorney still thinks
>> there’s something “funny” about the way she — the first woman to hold
>> the Boston-area prosecutor job — has been treated.
>>
>> The two elected officials clashed over the weekend, after Baker’s top
>> public safety official sent Rollins a letter last week asking her to
>> revise some of her new policies — including not prosecuting certain
>> misdemeanor crimes. In a press conference Friday, the Democratic
>> district attorney shot back at the Republican administration,
>> suggesting that “not everyone gets the benefit of the Baker family,”
>> alluding to groping allegations against the governor’s son last year."
>>
>> https://bpdnews.com/news/2019/
>>
>> The men and women of the BPD would like to congratulate John Conroy on
>> his promotion from Sergeant Detective to Lieutenant and Robert Ridge
>> on his rating of Sergeant Detective. We wish them the best of luck in
>> their new chapters with the BPD.
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>
>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>
>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>>> ilian.html
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>>> cards?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:09:31 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Perhpas your buddy Ralph Goodale should
>> cantact the Yankee Governor Charlie Baker and finally have the
>> warrants for my arrest erased EH Franky Boy McKenna?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:09:12 -0400
>> Subject: Perhpas your buddy Ralph Goodale should cantact the Yankee
>> Governor Charlie Baker and finally have the warrants for my arrest
>> erased EH Franky Boy McKenna?
>> To: "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
>> barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington field
>> < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
>> < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, gov.press@state.ma.us,
>> bob.ross@state.ma.us, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>, jfetzer
>> < jfetzer@d.umn.edu>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine
>> < sfine@globeandmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
>> "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"
>> < David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
>> < Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>> < news@dailygleaner.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jbosnitch
>> < jbosnitch@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> < wharrison@nbpower.com>, "David.Lametti"<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>,
>> mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
>> < Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>> < hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>>
>> Brendan Moss, Press Secretary, Governor's Office
>> (617) 725-4025
>> gov.press@state.ma.us
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:03:41 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Barbara Massey I just called AGAIN
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>> Merci!
>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>> S?curit? publique Canada
>> *********
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>> Thank you!
>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>> Public Safety Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/26/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.goc411.ca/en/95200/
>>>
>>> Barbara Massey
>>> Barbara Massey works as Executive Director and Senior General Counsel
>>> for Justice Canada.
>>> Barbara can be reached at 613-843-6394
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Liliana (Legal Services) Longo"<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:36 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Suzelle Bazinet.(613-995-5117) I just earlier
>>> Whereas I was not allowed to speak to you today its best that we
>>> confer in writng anyway (Away from the office/absente du bureau)
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be away from the office June 26 to 28, 2017. In my absence,
>>> Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at (613) 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Je serai absente du bureau du 26 au 28 juin 2017. En mon absence,
>>> Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613) 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Thank you / Merci
>>> Liliana
>>>
>>>
>>> Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
>>> Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
>>> RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
>>> 73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
>>> M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
>>> Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
>>> Ottawa, Ontario
>>> K1A 0R2
>>> Tel: (613) 843-4451
>>> Fax: (613) 825-7489
>>> liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Sandra Lofaro
>>> Executive Assistant /
>>> Adjointe exécutive
>>> (613)843-3540
>>> sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 06/27/17 11:28 >>>
>>>
>>> Good Day
>>>
>>> Please view attachments
>>>
>>> Before I file my next lawsuit please explain why my documents which
>>> included a letter to you and an unsigned draft of a motion that you
>>> did not want me to file that I sent you in confidence as per your
>>> request were filed in the Public Record then argued by the Crown and
>>> even quoted from by Judges of the Federal Court of Appeal?
>>>
>>> Whereas the clerks of Federal Court are reluctant to file my brief
>>> and its exhibits Jan Jensen should at very least give his copy to his
>>> associate Paul Adams ASAP.EH?
>>>
>>> This is Canada Post's tracking history of my documents
>>>
>>> Tracking Number PG399580893CA
>>>
>>> FREDERICTON, NB
>>> HALIFAX, NS
>>> Accepted
>>>
>>> Out for delivery
>>> Date received 2017/06/26
>>> Current date 2017/06/27
>>> Expected delivery 2017/06/27
>>> Delivery details
>>> ServiceXpresspost
>>>
>>> Expected delivery is 2017/06/27
>>>
>>> Perhaps somebody should start acting ethically before the lawyers Bill
>>> Pentney and John Laskin take a seat on the bench N'esy Pas Mr Prime
>>> Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???? Better yet have your lawyers even
>>> bothered to read paragraph 83 of my first lawsuit yet?
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> Elizabeth Caverly Director:
>>> Courts Administration Service
>>> 1720-1801 Hollis St.
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3N4
>>> Phone: 902-426-9619
>>> Fax: 902-426-5514
>>> Email: elizabeth.caverly@cas-satj.gc.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> PROCEEDINGS QUERIES
>>> Recorded entry(ies) for A-48-16
>>>
>>> Court number information Court Number : A-48-16
>>> Style of Cause : DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Proceeding Category : Appeals Nature : Appeal (S.27 - Interloc.) -
>>> Others
>>> Type of Action : Non-Action
>>>
>>>
>>> 70 records found for court number A-48-16 Doc Date Filed Office
>>> Recorded Entry Summary
>>>
>>> - 2017-06-26 Fredericton Memorandum to file from Catharine M. Wilson
>>> dated 26-JUN-2017 On June 26, 2017, the Appellant/Respondent on
>>> Cross-Appeal submitted a post hearing brief per the direction of Webb,
>>> J.A., dated 08-JUN-2017, which is being sent to the FCA for direction
>>> as the document was submitted late and exceeds the number of pages.
>>> placed on file.
>>>
>>> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from both
>>> parties by email with respect to the Directions dated June 8, 2017
>>> placed on file on 08-JUN-2017
>>>
>>> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Written directions of the Court: The Honourable
>>> Mr. Justice Webb dated 08-JUN-2017 directing "Please advise the
>>> parties that Mr. Amos has the right to submit a brief summary (not to
>>> exceed 5 pages) to explain the exact conflict that, in his view,
>>> arises in this matter with any of the judges assigned to this appeal
>>> and to submit any additional documents that are relevant to this
>>> issue. This summary and documents are to be submitted on or before
>>> June 23, 2017. [...]" received on 08-JUN-2017 Confirmed in writing to
>>> the party(ies)
>>>
>>> - 2017-05-26 Fredericton Letter from the respondent to Appellant,
>>> provided by Appellant (copy of the letter) dated 26-MAY-2017 The
>>> Respondent mentions they want communication from Appellant in written
>>> letters by mail only, from now on. received on 26-MAY-2017
>>>
>>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton Request received from MR
>>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton Request received from Appellant for CD audio
>>> of the hearing on 24-MAY-2017 for transcript. Tarriff: $15 paid placed
>>> on file on 24-MAY-2017
>>>
>>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton This matter comes on for hearing on
>>> 24-MAY-2017 at Fredericton before The Honourable Mr. Justice Webb The
>>> Honourable Mr. Justice Near The Honourable Madam Justice Gleason
>>> Appearances: David Raymond Amos (self-litigant) 902-800-0369 for the
>>> appellant Jan Jensen 902-426-8177 for the respondent Language of
>>> Hearing: E Court Usher: Jason Kennedy Duration: on 24-MAY-2017 from
>>> 14:03 to 15:58 Courtroom : Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court
>>> Registrar Michel Morneault Total duration: 1h55min Before the Court:
>>> Cross-appeal Result: reserved Comments: DARS Z005130 was used for the
>>> recording of the hearing Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 222
>>> page(s) 411 - 413 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
>>>
>>> 33 2017-04-24 Fredericton Affidavit of David Raymond Amos on behalf of
>>> Appellant/Respondent on cross-appeal sworn on 24-APR-2017 confirming
>>> service of doc.32 on Respondent/Appellant on cross-appeal by
>>> Xpresspost on 24-APR-2017 filed on 24-APR-2017
>>>
>>> 32 2017-04-24 Fredericton Book of Authorities with copy on DVD
>>> consisting of 1 volume(s) on behalf of Appellant/Respondent on
>>> cross-appeal Filed on 24-APR-2017 3 copy(ies) for the Court stored in
>>> Ottawa One copy placed in Annex
>>>
>>> 31 2017-04-20 Halifax Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
>>> Jan Jensen confirming service of doc #30 upon Appellant by courier on
>>> 20-APR-2017 filed on 20-APR-2017
>>>
>>> 30 2017-04-20 Halifax Book of Authorities consisting of 1 volume(s) on
>>> behalf of HMQ (cross-appeal) Filed on 20-APR-2017 3 copy(ies) for the
>>> Court stored in Ottawa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Liliana (Legal Services) Longo"<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:44:06 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: Yo Mr Jensen see attached file I see that you corrupt
>>> FEDS are on the attack bigtime as of May 24th N'esy Pas? (Away from
>>> the office/absente du bureau)
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be away from the office until June 2, 2017. In my absence,
>>> Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at (613)
>>> 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Je serai absente du bureau jusqu'au 2 juin 2017. En mon absence,
>>> Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613)
>>> 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Thank you / Merci
>>> Liliana
>>>
>>>
>>> Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
>>> Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
>>> RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
>>> 73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
>>> M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
>>> Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
>>> Ottawa, Ontario
>>> K1A 0R2
>>> Tel: (613) 843-4451
>>> Fax: (613) 825-7489
>>> liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Sharon Dickson
>>> Executive Assistant /
>>> Adjointe exécutive
>>> (613)843-3540
>>> Sharon.Dickson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>> years.
>>
>>
>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> productive use of either of our time.
>>
>>
>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>> given due consideration.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Charles Murray
>>
>> Ombud NB
>>
>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:48:58 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> From: "David Raymond Amos"davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>>>> Subject: I already know that you are as crooked as Hell Mr Leger. I am
>>>>> fishing for an honest cop not another corrupt bureaucrat. i am just
>>>>> proving that you know the truth Get it?
>>>>> To: Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> CC: Day.S@parl.gc.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca,
>>>>> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
>>>>> infomorning@moncton.cbc.ca, infomorning@halifax.cbc.ca,
>>>>> webo@xplornet.com, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
>>>>> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, samperrier@hotmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>>>> Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, amerrino@gmail.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com,
>>>>> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, rfowlo@comcast.net, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, pcollin@cpa-acp.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Mr. Amos
>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:41:22 -0300
>>>>> From: "Leger, Marc (DPS/MSP)"Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: "David Raymond Amos"davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>>>> David Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not able to address your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your calls and emails are not welcome and I would like you to stop
>>>>> communicating with me by phone and email
>>>>>
>>>>> Marc Léger
>>>>> Deputy Minister / Sous-ministre
>>>>> Public Safety / Sécurité publique
>>>>> (506) 453-7412 marc.leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> Working together to build a safer New Brunswick / Travaillons ensemble
>>>>> pour bâtir un Nouveau-Brunswick plus sûr
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
>>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
>>>> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
>>>> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
>>>> as usual
>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>>
>>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Merci.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
>>>> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
>>>> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
>>>> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
>>>> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
>>>> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>>
>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>>
>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>>
>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>>
>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>>
>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>>
>>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>>
>>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>>
>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>>
>>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>>
>>>>> Defendant
>>>>>
>>>>> ORDER
>>>>>
>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>>
>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>>>> he stated:
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>>> Police.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>>
>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>> Judge
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>>
>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>>> most
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Merci ,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject:
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>>
>>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>>
>>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>>
>>>>> CM/cb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>>> The Supreme Court
>>>>
>>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>>
>>>> Amos v. Canada
>>>> Court (s) Database
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>> Date
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-30
>>>> Neutral citation
>>>>
>>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>>> File numbers
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>>
>>>> THE COURT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>>
>>>> I. Introduction
>>>>
>>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>>
>>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>>>
>>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>>
>>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>>> c. F-7:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal.
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>>> […]
>>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>>
>>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>>> section.
>>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>>> that:
>>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>>> appeal book.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias:
>>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>>
>>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>>> (4th) 193).
>>>>
>>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>>> (emphasis added)
>>>>
>>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>>
>>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>>
>>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>>
>>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>>
>>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>>> to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> III. Issue
>>>>
>>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>>
>>>> IV. Analysis
>>>>
>>>> A. Standard of Review
>>>>
>>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>>
>>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>>> interfere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>>
>>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>>
>>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>>> (…)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>>> para. 27).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>>
>>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>>
>>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>>
>>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>>
>>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>>
>>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>>
>>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>>> of process…
>>>>
>>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>>
>>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>>
>>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>>
>>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>>
>>>> V. Conclusion
>>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>>> without leave to amend.
>>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "David G. Near"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>>> J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>>
>>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>>> DOCKET:
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton,
>>>> New Brunswick
>>>>
>>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> May 24, 2017
>>>>
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>> DATED:
>>>>
>>>> October 30, 2017
>>>>
>>>> APPEARANCES:
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>>
>>>> Jan Jensen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX"<Premier@gov.bc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:40 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write. I appreciate hearing feedback
> and suggestions from the people of British Columbia as we work
> together to build a better BC.
>
> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
> at the earliest opportunity.
>
> In the event that your inquiry more appropriately falls within the
> mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer
> your email for review and consideration.
>
> Again, thank you for writing.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John Horgan
> Premier
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> < Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:32 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> internalaffairs@pd.boston.gov, mediarelations@pd.boston.gov,
> Robert.Ridge@pd.boston.gov, N.Decosta-Klipa@boston.com,
> John.Conroy@pd.boston.gov, "Dale.Morgan"<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, news-tips
> < news-tips@nytimes.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
> Cc: richard.dahill@pd.boston.gov, "Larry.Tremblay"
> < Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> < Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> < Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
> < Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> < martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> < Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
> "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
> < robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
> "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, PREMIER
> < PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
> < premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
> < premier@gov.nl.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
> premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
> < premier@gov.ab.ca>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
>
> 'If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue'
>
> By Teresa Hanafin, Globe Staff
>
> Good morning! It's Friday, June 28, the 179th day of the year. Sunrise
> in Boston was at 5:09 a.m.; sunset will be at 8:25 p.m. for 15 hours
> and 16 minutes of sunlight. The waning moon is 17 percent full.
>
>
> US Senator Kamala Harris's challenge to former VP Joe Biden's comments
> about working with segregationists in Congress and his opposition to
> federal court-ordered busing got the most attention after the
> Democratic debate last night. And Biden seemed unprepared in his
> rather rambling answer.
>
> By the way, it will be interesting to see how Biden tries to clean
> things up when he speaks this afternoon at Jesse Jackson's Rainbow
> PUSH Coalition Convention in Chicago.
>
> And predictably, conservatives almost immediately began attacking
> Harris, including by launching a coordinated campaign on Twitter in
> which accounts pretended to be black people offended that she would
> claim to be black (and all used the exact same wording):
>
> "Kamala Harris is *not* an American black. She is half Indian and half
> Jamaican. I'm so sick of people robbing American Blacks (like myself)
> of our history. It's disgusting ... These are my people not her
> people. Freaking disgusting."
>
> Because, you know, racists would look at Harris throughout her life
> and say, "Oh, she has black skin, but she's actually half Jamaican, so
> we won't discriminate against her."
>
> For the record, Harris was born in Oakland. Her mother, Shyamala
> Gopalan Harris, was a Tamil Indian, a breast cancer scientist who
> immigrated to the US from Madras (present-day Chennai) in 1960. Her
> father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University economics professor
> who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at
> the University of California at Berkeley.
>
> Progressives in the US House are still fuming today over Speaker Nancy
> Pelosi's decision to accept the Senate version of the border funding
> bill instead of the House version that had more protections for
> migrant kids held in detention and restricted how the Trump
> administration could spend the money.
>
> Pelosi tried to add those elements to the Senate bill, but House
> moderates threatened to withhold their support if she did. So it's the
> Senate bill, with money for the Pentagon to send more soldiers to the
> border and no health and care standards for the detention centers,
> that goes to Trump for his signature. Vox has a good rundown of the
> differences between the bills.
>
> Trump is scheduled to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Osaka
> about their ongoing trade war.
>
> I missed this for yesterday's newsletter: The two friends whom writer
> E. Jean Carroll told about her alleged rape by Trump immediately after
> it happened in the mid-90s have identified themselves and publicly
> corroborated her account.
>
> Here's a New York Times podcast interview with the women.
>
> One friend, Lisa Birnbach, an author best known for co-authoring "The
> Official Preppy Handbook" in 1980, urged Carroll to go to the police.
> The other, Carol Martin, a longtime news anchor for WCBS-TV in New
> York, advised Carroll not to tell anyone because she believed that
> Trump would use his army of lawyers to make her life hell.
>
> Carroll, who blamed herself for the assault -- as far too many women
> do -- stayed silent. Until now.
>
> Mass. Governor Charlie Baker, still in London, meets with US
> Ambassador Woody Johnson. Boston Mayor Marty Walsh is at the US
> Conference of Mayors annual meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii. I wonder if
> they've ever met in say, Albany.
>
> Finally, let's end with Rudyard Kipling's most famous poem, "If—".
> Pretty good use of the English language, I'd say.
>
> If you can keep your head when all about you
> Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
> If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
> But make allowance for their doubting too;
> If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
> Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
> Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
> And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
>
> If you can dream — and not make dreams your master;
> If you can think — and not make thoughts your aim;
> If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
> And treat those two impostors just the same;
> If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
> Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
> And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:
>
> If you can make one heap of all your winnings
> And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
> And lose, and start again at your beginnings
> And never breathe a word about your loss;
> If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
> To serve your turn long after they are gone,
> And so hold on when there is nothing in you
> Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'
>
> If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
> Or walk with Kings — nor lose the common touch,
> If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
> If all men count with you, but none too much;
> If you can fill the unforgiving minute
> With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
> Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
> And — which is more — you'll be a Man, my son!
>
>
>
> On 6/27/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:14:34 -0400
>> Subject: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083)
>> on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
>> To: internalaffairs@pd.boston.gov, mediarelations@pd.boston.gov,
>> Robert.Ridge@pd.boston.gov, N.Decosta-Klipa@boston.com,
>> John.Conroy@pd.boston.gov
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> < Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, Newsroom
>> < Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "darrow.macintyre"
>> < darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
>>
>> https://www.boston.com/news/
>>
>> How a policy dispute between Charlie Baker and Rachael Rollins
>> suddenly turned personal
>> "We are allowed to disagree with each other, but what you are not
>> going to do is disrespect this office."
>>
>>
>> "Gov. Charlie Baker and Rachael Rollins have purportedly hit the
>> “reset button,” but the Suffolk Country district attorney still thinks
>> there’s something “funny” about the way she — the first woman to hold
>> the Boston-area prosecutor job — has been treated.
>>
>> The two elected officials clashed over the weekend, after Baker’s top
>> public safety official sent Rollins a letter last week asking her to
>> revise some of her new policies — including not prosecuting certain
>> misdemeanor crimes. In a press conference Friday, the Democratic
>> district attorney shot back at the Republican administration,
>> suggesting that “not everyone gets the benefit of the Baker family,”
>> alluding to groping allegations against the governor’s son last year."
>>
>> https://bpdnews.com/news/2019/
>>
>> The men and women of the BPD would like to congratulate John Conroy on
>> his promotion from Sergeant Detective to Lieutenant and Robert Ridge
>> on his rating of Sergeant Detective. We wish them the best of luck in
>> their new chapters with the BPD.
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>
>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>
>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>>> ilian.html
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>>> cards?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:09:31 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Perhpas your buddy Ralph Goodale should
>> cantact the Yankee Governor Charlie Baker and finally have the
>> warrants for my arrest erased EH Franky Boy McKenna?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:09:12 -0400
>> Subject: Perhpas your buddy Ralph Goodale should cantact the Yankee
>> Governor Charlie Baker and finally have the warrants for my arrest
>> erased EH Franky Boy McKenna?
>> To: "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
>> barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington field
>> < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
>> < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, gov.press@state.ma.us,
>> bob.ross@state.ma.us, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>, jfetzer
>> < jfetzer@d.umn.edu>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine
>> < sfine@globeandmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
>> "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"
>> < David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
>> < Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>> < news@dailygleaner.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jbosnitch
>> < jbosnitch@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> < wharrison@nbpower.com>, "David.Lametti"<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>,
>> mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
>> < Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>> < hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>>
>> Brendan Moss, Press Secretary, Governor's Office
>> (617) 725-4025
>> gov.press@state.ma.us
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:03:41 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Barbara Massey I just called AGAIN
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>> Merci!
>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>> S?curit? publique Canada
>> *********
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>> Thank you!
>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>> Public Safety Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/26/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.goc411.ca/en/95200/
>>>
>>> Barbara Massey
>>> Barbara Massey works as Executive Director and Senior General Counsel
>>> for Justice Canada.
>>> Barbara can be reached at 613-843-6394
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Liliana (Legal Services) Longo"<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:36 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Suzelle Bazinet.(613-995-5117) I just earlier
>>> Whereas I was not allowed to speak to you today its best that we
>>> confer in writng anyway (Away from the office/absente du bureau)
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be away from the office June 26 to 28, 2017. In my absence,
>>> Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at (613) 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Je serai absente du bureau du 26 au 28 juin 2017. En mon absence,
>>> Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613) 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Thank you / Merci
>>> Liliana
>>>
>>>
>>> Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
>>> Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
>>> RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
>>> 73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
>>> M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
>>> Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
>>> Ottawa, Ontario
>>> K1A 0R2
>>> Tel: (613) 843-4451
>>> Fax: (613) 825-7489
>>> liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Sandra Lofaro
>>> Executive Assistant /
>>> Adjointe exécutive
>>> (613)843-3540
>>> sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 06/27/17 11:28 >>>
>>>
>>> Good Day
>>>
>>> Please view attachments
>>>
>>> Before I file my next lawsuit please explain why my documents which
>>> included a letter to you and an unsigned draft of a motion that you
>>> did not want me to file that I sent you in confidence as per your
>>> request were filed in the Public Record then argued by the Crown and
>>> even quoted from by Judges of the Federal Court of Appeal?
>>>
>>> Whereas the clerks of Federal Court are reluctant to file my brief
>>> and its exhibits Jan Jensen should at very least give his copy to his
>>> associate Paul Adams ASAP.EH?
>>>
>>> This is Canada Post's tracking history of my documents
>>>
>>> Tracking Number PG399580893CA
>>>
>>> FREDERICTON, NB
>>> HALIFAX, NS
>>> Accepted
>>>
>>> Out for delivery
>>> Date received 2017/06/26
>>> Current date 2017/06/27
>>> Expected delivery 2017/06/27
>>> Delivery details
>>> ServiceXpresspost
>>>
>>> Expected delivery is 2017/06/27
>>>
>>> Perhaps somebody should start acting ethically before the lawyers Bill
>>> Pentney and John Laskin take a seat on the bench N'esy Pas Mr Prime
>>> Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???? Better yet have your lawyers even
>>> bothered to read paragraph 83 of my first lawsuit yet?
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> Elizabeth Caverly Director:
>>> Courts Administration Service
>>> 1720-1801 Hollis St.
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3N4
>>> Phone: 902-426-9619
>>> Fax: 902-426-5514
>>> Email: elizabeth.caverly@cas-satj.gc.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> PROCEEDINGS QUERIES
>>> Recorded entry(ies) for A-48-16
>>>
>>> Court number information Court Number : A-48-16
>>> Style of Cause : DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Proceeding Category : Appeals Nature : Appeal (S.27 - Interloc.) -
>>> Others
>>> Type of Action : Non-Action
>>>
>>>
>>> 70 records found for court number A-48-16 Doc Date Filed Office
>>> Recorded Entry Summary
>>>
>>> - 2017-06-26 Fredericton Memorandum to file from Catharine M. Wilson
>>> dated 26-JUN-2017 On June 26, 2017, the Appellant/Respondent on
>>> Cross-Appeal submitted a post hearing brief per the direction of Webb,
>>> J.A., dated 08-JUN-2017, which is being sent to the FCA for direction
>>> as the document was submitted late and exceeds the number of pages.
>>> placed on file.
>>>
>>> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from both
>>> parties by email with respect to the Directions dated June 8, 2017
>>> placed on file on 08-JUN-2017
>>>
>>> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Written directions of the Court: The Honourable
>>> Mr. Justice Webb dated 08-JUN-2017 directing "Please advise the
>>> parties that Mr. Amos has the right to submit a brief summary (not to
>>> exceed 5 pages) to explain the exact conflict that, in his view,
>>> arises in this matter with any of the judges assigned to this appeal
>>> and to submit any additional documents that are relevant to this
>>> issue. This summary and documents are to be submitted on or before
>>> June 23, 2017. [...]" received on 08-JUN-2017 Confirmed in writing to
>>> the party(ies)
>>>
>>> - 2017-05-26 Fredericton Letter from the respondent to Appellant,
>>> provided by Appellant (copy of the letter) dated 26-MAY-2017 The
>>> Respondent mentions they want communication from Appellant in written
>>> letters by mail only, from now on. received on 26-MAY-2017
>>>
>>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton Request received from MR
>>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton Request received from Appellant for CD audio
>>> of the hearing on 24-MAY-2017 for transcript. Tarriff: $15 paid placed
>>> on file on 24-MAY-2017
>>>
>>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton This matter comes on for hearing on
>>> 24-MAY-2017 at Fredericton before The Honourable Mr. Justice Webb The
>>> Honourable Mr. Justice Near The Honourable Madam Justice Gleason
>>> Appearances: David Raymond Amos (self-litigant) 902-800-0369 for the
>>> appellant Jan Jensen 902-426-8177 for the respondent Language of
>>> Hearing: E Court Usher: Jason Kennedy Duration: on 24-MAY-2017 from
>>> 14:03 to 15:58 Courtroom : Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court
>>> Registrar Michel Morneault Total duration: 1h55min Before the Court:
>>> Cross-appeal Result: reserved Comments: DARS Z005130 was used for the
>>> recording of the hearing Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 222
>>> page(s) 411 - 413 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
>>>
>>> 33 2017-04-24 Fredericton Affidavit of David Raymond Amos on behalf of
>>> Appellant/Respondent on cross-appeal sworn on 24-APR-2017 confirming
>>> service of doc.32 on Respondent/Appellant on cross-appeal by
>>> Xpresspost on 24-APR-2017 filed on 24-APR-2017
>>>
>>> 32 2017-04-24 Fredericton Book of Authorities with copy on DVD
>>> consisting of 1 volume(s) on behalf of Appellant/Respondent on
>>> cross-appeal Filed on 24-APR-2017 3 copy(ies) for the Court stored in
>>> Ottawa One copy placed in Annex
>>>
>>> 31 2017-04-20 Halifax Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
>>> Jan Jensen confirming service of doc #30 upon Appellant by courier on
>>> 20-APR-2017 filed on 20-APR-2017
>>>
>>> 30 2017-04-20 Halifax Book of Authorities consisting of 1 volume(s) on
>>> behalf of HMQ (cross-appeal) Filed on 20-APR-2017 3 copy(ies) for the
>>> Court stored in Ottawa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Liliana (Legal Services) Longo"<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:44:06 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: Yo Mr Jensen see attached file I see that you corrupt
>>> FEDS are on the attack bigtime as of May 24th N'esy Pas? (Away from
>>> the office/absente du bureau)
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be away from the office until June 2, 2017. In my absence,
>>> Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at (613)
>>> 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Je serai absente du bureau jusqu'au 2 juin 2017. En mon absence,
>>> Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613)
>>> 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Thank you / Merci
>>> Liliana
>>>
>>>
>>> Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
>>> Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
>>> RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
>>> 73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
>>> M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
>>> Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
>>> Ottawa, Ontario
>>> K1A 0R2
>>> Tel: (613) 843-4451
>>> Fax: (613) 825-7489
>>> liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Sharon Dickson
>>> Executive Assistant /
>>> Adjointe exécutive
>>> (613)843-3540
>>> Sharon.Dickson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>> years.
>>
>>
>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> productive use of either of our time.
>>
>>
>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>> given due consideration.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Charles Murray
>>
>> Ombud NB
>>
>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:48:58 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> From: "David Raymond Amos"davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>>>> Subject: I already know that you are as crooked as Hell Mr Leger. I am
>>>>> fishing for an honest cop not another corrupt bureaucrat. i am just
>>>>> proving that you know the truth Get it?
>>>>> To: Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> CC: Day.S@parl.gc.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca,
>>>>> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
>>>>> infomorning@moncton.cbc.ca, infomorning@halifax.cbc.ca,
>>>>> webo@xplornet.com, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
>>>>> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, samperrier@hotmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>>>> Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, amerrino@gmail.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com,
>>>>> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, rfowlo@comcast.net, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, pcollin@cpa-acp.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Mr. Amos
>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:41:22 -0300
>>>>> From: "Leger, Marc (DPS/MSP)"Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: "David Raymond Amos"davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>>>> David Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not able to address your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your calls and emails are not welcome and I would like you to stop
>>>>> communicating with me by phone and email
>>>>>
>>>>> Marc Léger
>>>>> Deputy Minister / Sous-ministre
>>>>> Public Safety / Sécurité publique
>>>>> (506) 453-7412 marc.leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> Working together to build a safer New Brunswick / Travaillons ensemble
>>>>> pour bâtir un Nouveau-Brunswick plus sûr
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
>>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
>>>> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
>>>> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
>>>> as usual
>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>>
>>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Merci.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
>>>> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
>>>> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
>>>> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
>>>> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
>>>> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>>
>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>>
>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>>
>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>>
>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>>
>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>>
>>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>>
>>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>>
>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>>
>>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>>
>>>>> Defendant
>>>>>
>>>>> ORDER
>>>>>
>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>>
>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>>>> he stated:
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>>> Police.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>>
>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>> Judge
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>>
>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>>> most
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Merci ,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject:
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>>
>>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>>
>>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>>
>>>>> CM/cb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>>> The Supreme Court
>>>>
>>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>>
>>>> Amos v. Canada
>>>> Court (s) Database
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>> Date
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-30
>>>> Neutral citation
>>>>
>>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>>> File numbers
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>>
>>>> THE COURT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>>
>>>> I. Introduction
>>>>
>>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>>
>>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>>>
>>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>>
>>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>>> c. F-7:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal.
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>>> […]
>>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>>
>>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>>> section.
>>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>>> that:
>>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>>> appeal book.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias:
>>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>>
>>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>>> (4th) 193).
>>>>
>>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>>> (emphasis added)
>>>>
>>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>>
>>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>>
>>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>>
>>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>>
>>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>>> to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> III. Issue
>>>>
>>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>>
>>>> IV. Analysis
>>>>
>>>> A. Standard of Review
>>>>
>>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>>
>>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>>> interfere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>>
>>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>>
>>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>>> (…)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>>> para. 27).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>>
>>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>>
>>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>>
>>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>>
>>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>>
>>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>>
>>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>>> of process…
>>>>
>>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>>
>>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>>
>>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>>
>>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>>
>>>> V. Conclusion
>>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>>> without leave to amend.
>>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "David G. Near"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>>> J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>>
>>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>>> DOCKET:
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton,
>>>> New Brunswick
>>>>
>>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> May 24, 2017
>>>>
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>> DATED:
>>>>
>>>> October 30, 2017
>>>>
>>>> APPEARANCES:
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>>
>>>> Jan Jensen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>