Surprise Surprise Surprise
Methinks a couple of dudes are disappointed that they won't be cabinet ministers N'esy Pas?



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/possible-election-covid-19-pandemic-1.5689049

Blaine Higgs calls New Brunswick election despite pandemic

3 other party leaders say holding an election during a pandemic isn't smart

Jacques Poitras· CBC News· Posted: Aug 17, 2020 11:48 AM AT



Premier Blaine Higgs gives election update after meeting with New Brunswick's lieutenant-governor.   0:00

Premier Blaine Higgs has called a provincial election, the first that will be held in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic, for Sept. 14.

Higgs visited Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy at Government House in Fredericton on Monday afternoon and asked her to dissolve the legislature. She agreed.

The decision came three days after the Liberal opposition pulled out of four-party negotiations on a proposal from Higgs that would have allowed his government to stay in power until October 2022 or until the end of the pandemic.

The Liberals said that would hand too much power to Higgs and urged him not to go to the polls until the pandemic is over.
 

Premier Blaine Higgs met with Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy at Government House in Fredericton on Monday afternoon to ask her to dissolve the legislature. (Jacques Poitras/CBC News)

Higgs is seeking to become the first premier of New Brunswick to win re-election since Bernard Lord in 2003.

He took office in 2018 after Liberal premier Brian Gallant's government failed to win the confidence of the legislature in the wake of an inconclusive election.

Standings in the legislature when it was dissolved Monday were 20 PCs, 20 Liberals, three Green MLAs, three People's Alliance MLAs and one independent. Two seats were vacant.


More to come  

 





1009 Comments 






David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise












David Amos
Methinks folks should give the devil his due Weeks ago a conservative insider told Fat Fred City's infamous blogger what the exact date of the election would be. Chucky immediately went to his buddy the Green Leader and told him then published a video about the encounter. Clearly nobody but Higgy believed him N'esy Pas?



























Ben Haroldson
Any conservative librarians?




























Roy Kirk
"Standings . . . were 20 PCs, 20 Liberals, three Green MLAs, three People's Alliance MLAs and one independent. Two seats were vacant."
===
So even if the Libs won both by-elections seats, they wouldn't have been able to defeat the govt without the support of the PANB or Greens. Such support was unlikely in the extreme. Mr. Higgs called this general election prematurely. It's an insult to the voters that he refused to live with the results of the last general election until his term was up or his hand was forced by loss of confidence in the house.
This is all about the backroom boys running the elected representative over hurdles for the benefit of those backroom boys, not the public.


David Amos

Billy Buckner
Reply to @Roy Kirk: the Greens have been just as consistent in voting against the gov't. Coon even came out and said he would not cooperate hours after Higgs had talked about cooperation when this all began a couple of weeks back. With both the Greens and Liberals saying they would not support the gov't it left them no choice. I would rather go to the polls now when the weather is better then wait until the Throne Speech, have the gov't defeated through a non confidence vote and then have to do this a few months down the road. This election was caused by the Liberals and Greens, end of story.
























valmond landry
I am not against a vote however it's the way it was put in down the people's throat, like you do it my way or else like some people threats a child you eat all your plate or no dessert ,or time out .
it’s funny how one person can decide the faith of over 700 thousand people what would happen if nobody would play his game and not show up at the polls what would happen there is no law that I'm aware off that can force a person to vote in canada.


David Amos 

Ian Scott
























Michel Pelletier
People's Alliance Leader Kris Austin urged voters to support his party to ensure no party wins a majority for the second straight election. "Minority government is good government," he said. Sure KA want a minority government he's an absolute no good to this province. I hope that people will see that he is an hypocrite, he support what he want only which is further divide this province. We need a majority government with the amount of debt that this province is in now. Anything less will hurt more down the road. I am not a red , green yellow or blue by nature but this time I will be in the blue camp.


David Amos 


























David Peters
Imo, gov't has no business in languages, but the reality is in NB, to try to get rid of official bilingualism would lead to a splitting of NB into two. It would be better for the PA to recognize this obvious fact and, instead, focus on what would really help...ending all forms of corporate welfare and special tax breaks. Get rid of all forms of price controls too.

Let's level the playing field in the NB business world. Stop the clear-cutting and spraying of the forests as well.


David Amos 

Michel Forgeron
I’ve read pretty well everything about the killing of Zehaf-Bibeau. Vickers and Barrett were firing at him at the same time. Once the murderer was down, Vickers ran to the MPs and declared something like “I got him”. I don’t think he repeated this ever again. But he must know the terrible effect the incident is has had on Barrett and he should make it clear to the public that the OPP investigation concluded it was a bullet from Barrett’s gun that killed Zehaf-Bibeau. Until he does that, I seriously doubt he will receive much support in an election.


David Amos


























Bruce Sanders
Whichever Party says they will restore freedom of movement within Canada receives my vote.


Ben Haroldson 

























Buford Wilson
At a time like this, we need a strong, stable, majority government.
Vote for New Brunswick, vote Conservative.


Terry Tibbs 







https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-liberals-reject-higgs-election-proposal-1.5687062

Liberals reject Higgs proposal to delay early election

Premier promises no election call before Monday

Jacques Poitras· CBC News· Posted: Aug 14, 2020 6:05 PM AT





Premier Blaine Higgs said he will not call an election this weekend but instead will take some time to consider next moves. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

New Brunswick appeared to be headed for a snap election Friday after the opposition Liberals pulled out of negotiations to delay a vote until October 2022.

But Premier Blaine Higgs said he would not trigger a campaign before Monday at the earliest.
"I don't plan to call an election over the next 48 hours," he told reporters.

"I am going to be thinking about this now over the weekend, about what the next steps should be. But this has made the path forward -- one could say clearer, one could say more difficult.


Liberal leader Kevin Vickers and the Liberal caucus have rejected Premier Blaine Higgs proposal to avoid an early election call. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Earlier in the afternoon, Liberal Leader Kevin Vickers said he was walking away from four-party negotiations to avert an election because Higgs wanted unlimited powers for two years while insisting that other parties sign on for major reforms.

He said if New Brunswickers are sent to the polls now, it will be the premier's fault.
"It is totally irresponsible to consider having an election during an international pandemic. It makes no sense. This is not a time for elections. This is a time to be focused on New Brunswick."

Higgs said he accepted that an election would be his decision and he would have to justify it to voters.

"I do, yes. I will, yes."

The premier sent a letter to the three opposition parties Monday asking them to agree to avoid forcing an early election until the scheduled date in October 2022 or until the COVID-19 pandemic is over.





Higgs has been hinting for weeks that he would trigger a campaign, justifying the threat by saying the province needs stability to manage the pandemic and continue restarting the economy.

The agreement would include a promise by the other parties to not defeat the Progressive Conservative minority government on confidence and supply votes such as the budget and trigger a campaign.

In return, Higgs, whose approval ratings in polls have been at record highs, would also not call an election until 2022.

The premier said he wanted a deal by Friday because the coming weeks are the best "window" for an election if one has to happen, because the province is in a relative lull with COVID-19 ahead of a possible second wave.

Mathematically, Higgs doesn't need the Liberals to be part of a deal for him to stay in power for two more years. The votes of the Greens and the Alliance would be enough.

But he repeated Friday that would not be enough because "you're going to have one party spending its whole waking time trying to defeat all of us."

He acknowledged the Liberals "don't have the votes today" to do that but could get there eventually, an apparent reference to three by-elections expected this fall and the possibility of others in the future.


People's Alliance Leader Kris Austin said he was willing to work with any party that’s willing to work with him. (Gary Moore/CBC)

Green Leader David Coon and People's Alliance Leader Kris Austin both said they were open to finding a way to work with Higgs without the Liberals.

"I'm willing to work with any party that's willing to work with me," Austin said.

The Alliance leader was already practising his campaign lines Friday, condemning what he called the two "mainstream" political parties -- even though he's been cooperating in the legislature with one of them, the PCs, since 2018.

"The Liberals did not have to walk out of that meeting … and the premier does not have to call an election," he said.

Coon said he regretted the turn of events because, while he went into the talks sceptical, "to my surprise I found that the premier was quite sincere about trying to do something quite unprecedented" with a four-party deal.


Green Party Leader David Coon said he regretted the turn of events. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Vickers told reporters he walked away from the talks, which began Wednesday, because Higgs wasn't answering basic questions about how a four-party deal would work.

He said the premier wanted a de facto majority with other parties signing on for major initiatives like municipal government reforms and controversial changes to binding arbitration for police officers and firefighters.

He said he was being forced to negotiate "with a gun to the head."



But Higgs said the gun at Vickers's head was his own caucus, pointing to signs earlier Friday of resistance to any deal with the premier.

"I think Mr. Vickers was in a difficult spot," he said.

Bathurst East-Nepisiguit-St. Isidore MLA Denis Landry, who is the leader of the Official Opposition in the legislature because Vickers doesn't have a seat, told reporters Friday morning he was in favour of a campaign, contradicting the party's official line.

"Our caucus is not representing the whole province, but in an election everybody will have a say: yes or no," he said.

And Caraquet MLA Isabelle Thériault wouldn't say whether she was willing to put her signature on an agreement involving Higgs and Austin, who is critical of official bilingualism. Instead she merely waved an Acadian flag.

Vickers acknowledged Thursday there were "reservations and concerns" within his caucus and said he would take "direction" from them on whether to continue the talks. He announced his pullout after a meeting with them at a Fredericton hotel.
 




Commenting is now closed for this story.




David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise

Methinks a couple of dudes are disappointed that they won't be cabinet ministers N'esy Pas?

"Green Leader David Coon and People's Alliance Leader Kris Austin both said they were open to a three-party deal if Higgs was willing to try for one." 














David Amos
Methinks Northrup ain't quit yet N'esy Pas?












David Amos
Methinks Higgy will want Kevin Haché to challenge Isabelle Thériault again N'esy Pas?


David Amos 




























Lou Bell
And Isabelle Theriault waves the party flag ! So telling !


Dianne MacPherson 



























Matt Steele
Higgs has done a very good job managing the province to date , and with a minority govt. , and with three by-elections on the way , it is best to have a general election , and let N.B.ers have their say . The Covid-19 rates are extremely low , and we will still be having good weather through Sept. , and early Oct. ; so there is no reason not to have an election . Some MLAs will certainly lose their seats , while some new MLAs will gain a seat ; it just comes with the territory ; so lets stop with the backroom deals , and let N.B.ers make their choice please 


Claude DeRoche

valmond landry
Yesterday i was call dumb because i was calling for a by election by one of the regular however the news is coming very soon two steps ahead and one step back is going to come out of his hole hope it's going to be cloudy, so he won't see his shadow .





























valmond landry
Theirs is a lot of people against having a by- election or an election during this pandemic
what is the difference between shopping , working, going to restaurants ,driving in the four Atlantic provinces tell me. a lot of people are making a mountain out of this situation .
all you have to do is the usual that we've been doing for the last 5 months keep your distance wear your mask when necessary and wash your hands game over


Randy McNally 



























Claude DeRoche
Vickers clearly stated that his party will not force an election in 2020;
it's up to the Irving Boy to decide if he wants an election in the middle of a pandemic!

  

Matt Steele
......valmond landry: ...Truer words have never been spoken . There is absolutely no risk associated with having an election this fall . Covid-19 is nearly non existent , and people are out and about everywhere . The only people who fear an election are those MLAs who are going to lose their place at the taxpayer funded trough , and their supporters . N.B. is facing a major financial problem over the next few years , and we need an experienced Premier with management experience who is up to the job .


























Buford Wilson
Kevin buckled under the pressure.
I’m seeing a massive majority for Blaine.
Let’s get it on.


David Amos






























Terry Tibbs
Good news! Now we get to see if Mr Higgs was bluffing.


David Amos

























Emery Hyslop-Margison
Higgs is ahead in the polls. Expect an election in September and a majority conservative government.


Claude DeRoche 



























Matt Steele
An election may not be necessary . Vickers Liberals have refused the Higgs deal ; but the Greens and the Peoples Alliance appear to be ready to bend to Higgs demands in order to save themselves , and keep those big MLA pay cheques flowing into their pockets . With the six seats from the Greens and PA , Premier Higgs will have enough seats to maintain his control of the govt . regardless of the by-elections . The Greens and the Peoples Alliance will probably be offered some Cabinet seats this weekend , and it will be a done deal 


Terry Tibbs
























Jos Allaire
Higgs will not get a vote north of the Petitcodiac River. He may lose Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins, Vickers will get every seat in the vicinity of the Miramichi all the way up north and no seats in Moncton. Go ahead Higgs, make my day!


Jos Allaire 



























Claude DeRoche
To be honest Higg's offer wasn't that bad
Putin got until 2036 why wouldn't the COR Party Boy get until 2022
Only fair!




























Matthew Smith
No Funswick; yer earning your keep as the laughingstock of Canada...elect a leader for a change will ya?


David Amos 






























Robert Langue
The picture with all the Liberals reminds me of a cult. An evil one.




























Douglas James
Higgs is at the Rubicon. One step over the line and he will go down in history as the closest we've had to a dictator in Canadian history. This is a man I met in his early days of campaigning when he was helping some tenants at a mobile home park in Quispamsis. I thought he was a decent man, a man of principles and dedicated to helping people. I hope I wasn't wrong but when he listens to aides who tell him he must move now to grab power because of his Covid "popularity", he risks losing his reputation as a decent person who believes in democratic principles. It is something he should care about before the name Higgs becomes the Canadian equivalent of the name Mudd.


David Amos 



























Ben Haroldson
Let's make glyphosate spraying a top election issue this time. It's time for NB to get out of the dark ages before we become the subject of class action.


Peter C. Shearer 








---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Axiotis-Perez, Alex"<Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:14:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,
Please note that I am currently away from the office.
For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Brooke
Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca)
Thank you!
*****
Bonjour,
Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
Pour toute question urgente pendent mon absence, veuillez contacter
Brooke Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca)
Merci !





---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca
>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:14:56 -0300
Subject: Re: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything
a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas Cleveland Allaby?
To: Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, rick.lafrance@pcnb.org,
bobhatheway@gmail.com, cleveland.allaby@me.com, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@pcnb.org, claude.williams@pcnb.org,
duncan@dlmca.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
francineqs@gmail.com, stephan.richard1@gmail.com,
awlebrun@hotmail.com, charlesdoucet850@gmail.com, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca,
Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca, Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
ssducks@xplornet.ca, shawn_morrison_1974@icloud.com,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, premier.ministre@gnb.ca, Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Premier@ontario.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.com


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:41:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyers Joël Etienne and
Christian Michaud, the RCMP, the CBC and Higgy et al must be well
aware of my emails and the blog I created on July 8th and updated
today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com


** Message blocked **

Your message to blaine.higgs@pcnb.org has been blocked. See technical
details below for more information.

The response from the remote server was:
550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. AS(201806281)
[TO1CAN01FT012.eop-CAN01.prod.protection.outlook.com]



On 8/12/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:28:26 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
> Cleveland Allaby?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca
>


On 8/7/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whereas the RCMP, thier lawyers and their political bosses don't like
> to read things perhaps they may enjoy reviewing some videos I made
> after the Feds falsely arrested me and assaulted me  the DECH in Fat
> Fred City 2008
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjonbmIti-o
>
> The RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
> 326 views
> Oct 15, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IXzuc4QFLY
>
> RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
> 73 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nq9WozWEyAI
>
> Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
> 372 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9tFll72Wcs
>
> A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this CD
> 44 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>
> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
> Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.caAlex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>
> ***
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>
> Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
> Alex Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.caAlex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.compubliceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in
> CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:08 -0300
> Subject: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
> To: irwinlampert@gmail.com, glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect"<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Friday.Joe"<Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
> <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-management-reviews-police-investigations-1.5670446
>
>
> Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
>
> Management reviews give previously hidden look at quality of RCMP
> investigations
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>
> "Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said he would be surprised if some of the issues found in the
> older reports continued to this day.
>
> "I saw very very few examples of police officers who would obviously
> violate an accused's rights under the charter," Lampert said of his
> time on the bench, referring to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>
> "Some were through inadvertence rather than malfeasance. In some cases
> they just didn't realize that they were doing something wrong and it
> would be pointed out to them and you would hope that it wouldn't
> happen again."
>
> New Brunswick is among three provinces where Crown prosecutors must
> approve charges before they are laid in court.
> Court issues
>
> A 2017 review of the Hampton detachment is generally favourable, but
> describes prosecutions abandoned or dropped.
>
> In three of 45 cases brought to the Crown by police, the evidence
> didn't support the charges. Issues with arrests in two of the 45 cases
> led to the Crown not prosecuting. The report pointed to a lack of
> supervision as a contributing factor.
>
> "When supervision is not taking place, solvable, prosecutable cases
> could result in acquittals or charges forwarded when not warranted,
> bringing liability to the organization and members," the report says."
>
>
>
>
>  30 Comments
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Henry
> I cannot think of a worse job than being a police officer. Working
> nights, deaths, domestic violence, distrust in law enforcement, and
> while trying to do your job the best you can, the very real
> possibility you make a split second mistake, and you yourself end up
> in jail the rest of your life!
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Paperwork, and the lack of the proper paperwork,
> could hardly be lumped in with split second mistaken decisions.
>
> Dan Moore
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Yes, policing is a difficult job, if it is your
> worst job don't become a police officer. We should demand only the
> best suited become police officers and you clearly don't fit the bill.
> Also be aware that in that 'split second' mistake that could end you
> up in jail could also take the life of an innocent person as we have
> seen happen in the US time and again though less so in Canada, it
> still occurs. Being a police officer should not put you above the law
> rather place you under greater scrutiny as it is their job to enforce
> it. All aspects of it including presumed innocence and other
> constitutional rights.
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The RCMP are still playing dumb about falsely
> arresting me even after I sued the Crown and are inviting me to do so
> again Go Figure
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said..... "Some were through inadvertence rather than
> malfeasance. In some cases they just didn't realize that they were
> doing something wrong and it would be pointed out to them and you
> would hope that it wouldn't happen again."
> That pretty much sums the problem up right there where police are not
> held accountable for their actions , and the people in the position of
> over seeing the Justice System let it slide , and hope that the police
> will do better . That combined with the militarization of the police
> is rapidly eroding the public's trust in the police and Justice System
> . You need to look no further than what is currently happening in the
> U.S. to see where things are eventually heading .When the only tool
> that the police have is a hammer , then every problem starts to look
> like a nail .
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Matt Steele:
> Imo, you picked out the most important sentence in that article, but I
> have a completely different take on it.
>
> To me it shows there are checks and balances in place, in the system,
> that are working.
>
> However, I feel that the law & order bureaucracy in Canada is too
> insulated and lacks real transparency and accountability. Elections
> and short term limits for Judges, Crown Prosecutors and police chiefs
> would help solve the problem.
>
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you Irwin Lampert should check my work
> N;esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> https://nbweddings.ca/about-me/
>
>
> :"For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges."
>
> J. Gilles Lemieux
> Called to the bar: 1990 (NB)
> Lemieux Ménard & Co
> Lawyer
> 4405 Route 115
> Saint-Antoine Sud, New Brunswick E4V 2Z5
> Phone: 506-525-9717
> Fax: 506-525-9509
> Email: glemieux@lemcolaw.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
>  sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:03:53 +0000
> Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn Daniel Gosselin why I have not
> recieved any response from you or your lawyers to my phone calls and
> emails about the questionable fax and emails your people have sent me
> recently?
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez prendre note que le bureau sera fermé jusqu'au  janvier 2019.
> Nous vous souhaitons de très Joyeuses Fêtes!
>
> The offiice will be closed until January 7th, 2019.
> Best wishes for the Holiday Season!
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Drouin, Nathalie (BRQ)"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:03:43 +0000
> Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn Daniel Gosselin why I have not
> recieved any response from you or your lawyers to my phone calls and
> emails about the questionable fax and emails your people have sent me
> recently?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> Veuillez noter que je suis absente jusqu'au 7 janvier 2019, sans accès
> à mes courriels.   Pour toute question qui ne peut attendre mon
> retour, je vous invite à communiquer avec mon adjointe Irène Ghobril
> au 514-283-5687. Merci.
>
> Please note that I am away until January 7, 2019, with no access to my
> e-mails. For assistance, please contact Irène Ghobril at 514-283-5687.
> Thank you.
>
> NOTIFICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE: NotificationPGC-AGC.Civil@justice.gc.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:25:43 -0300
> Subject: Well Michael Kram must admit that Ralph Goodale can't play
> dumb before the writ is dropped
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, athunder@manitobachiefs.com
> Cc: info@michaelkram.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Jane.Philpott"<Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
> <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, "charles.murray"<charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
> Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Jolene.harvey@nrcmp-grc.gc.ca, Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Roger.Brown"<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:02:08 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Michael Kram I just called and talked
> Colleen about about Ralph Goodale et al I also talked to Mario
> Milanovski's wife but I will not bother her again
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
> message sera examin? avec attention.
> Merci!
> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
> S?curit? publique Canada
> *********
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
> Thank you!
> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
> Public Safety Canada
>
>
>
>
> On 8/21/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:32:10 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Well Michael Kram must admit that Ralph
> Goodale can't play dumb before the writ is dropped
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
> message sera examin? avec attention.
> Merci!
> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
> S?curit? publique Canada
> *********
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
> Thank you!
> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
> Public Safety Canada
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:54:21 -0300
> Subject: Attn Michael Kram I just called and talked Colleen about
> about Ralph Goodale et al I also talked to Mario Milanovski's wife but
> I will not bother her again
> To: info@michaelkram.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Jane.Philpott"<Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
> <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, "charles.murray"<charles.murray@gnb.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
> Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Jolene.harvey@nrcmp-grc.gc.ca, Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Roger.Brown"<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/pg/MichaelKramSK/about/?ref=page_internal
>
> Call 306-737-4145
> m.me/MichaelKramSK
> info@michaelkram.ca
> http://www.michaelkram.ca
> @MichaelKramSK
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/mario-milanovski-a1123548/?originalSubdomain=ca
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/maxime-bernier-people-s-party-canada-saskatchewan-1.5231098
>
> PPC Leader Maxime Bernier announces Sask. federal candidates during
> visit to Regina
> Social Sharing
>
>
> 'I like to have people who are new in politics, that’s what we need'
> CBC News · Posted: Jul 30, 2019 7:04 PM CT
>
>
> Maxime Bernier, the leader of the People's Party of Canada, speaks
> with reporters outside the Legislative Building in Regina on Tuesday.
> (Tyler Pidlubny/CBC News)
>
> Immigration, free speech and equalization reform were talking points
> for People's Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier and the
> Saskatchewan federal candidates he announced during a visit to Regina
> on Tuesday.
>
> Bernier told reporters at an event outside the Legislative Building he
> was pleased that some of the candidates are new to politics and their
> platforms were varied.
>
> "Because actually they are not traditional politicians and they are
> regular people that want to help their citizens in working for their
> country," said Bernier.
>
> "I like to have people who are new in politics, that's what we need,
> we need more people like that."
> Roster of candidates growing
>
> Nine candidates were announced at the event in Regina, and more will
> be introduced in Saskatoon on Wednesday.
>
>     Mark Friesen (Saskatoon-Grasswood).
>     Phillip Michael Zajac (Souris-Moose Mountain).
>     Mario Milanovski (Regina-Wascana).
>     Lee Harding (Cypress Hills-Grasslands).
>     Chey Craik (Moose Jaw-Lake Centre-Lanigan).
>     Trevor Wowk (Regina-Lewvan).
>     Tracey Sparrowhawk (Regina-Qu'Appelle).
>     Cody Payant (Carlton Trail-Eagle Creek).
>     Kelly Day (Prince Albert).
>
> 'I'm appealing to their intelligence'
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:16:32 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want
>> to litigate N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>> Merci!
>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>> S?curit? publique Canada
>> *********
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>> Thank you!
>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>> Public Safety Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:16:30 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want
>> to litigate N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham?
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please kindly note that I am out of office from August 12th to 18th,
>> inclusively.
>>
>> If you need any assitance, please contact our constituency office
>> Director, Nicole Picher at : david.lametti.c1@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you!
>> _______________________
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Veuillez noter que je sui  absent du bureau du 12 au 18 ao?t,
>> inclusivement.
>>
>> Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, je vous invite ? communiquer avec
>> notre Directrice de bureau de circonscription, Nicole Picher, ? :
>> david.lametti.c1@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Merci!
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 21:16:36 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want to litigate
>> N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham? (Out of
>> Office )
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be away from the office until August 19, 2019.  In my absence,
>> you may contact:
>> August 2 and August 12-16 incl. – Jolene Harvey 613 843 4892;
>> Jolene.harvey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> August 6-9 incl. – Jennifer Duggan 613 825 2981;
>> Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> or my Exec. Asst. – Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540;
>> Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Je serai absente du bureau jusqu’au 19 août, 2019.  Pendant mon
>> absence, vous pouvez communiquer avec :
>> le 2 août et du 12 au 16 août incl. - Jolene Harvey 613 843 4892;
>> Jolene.harvey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> du 6 au 9 août incl. - Jennifer Duggan 613 825 2981;
>> Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> ou mon adj. exec. - Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540;
>> Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>>>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> 08/11/19 21:16 >>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:05:38 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Dr. Mohamed LACHEMI I just called
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>> comments.
>>
>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>> commentaires.
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/07/latest-sisson-mine-approval-leaves.html
>>
>> Wednesday, 24 July 2019
>>
>> Latest Sisson Mine approval leaves First Nations, conservation groups
>> uneasy
>>
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>>
>> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 5
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>> Methinks these people must have read their emails by now N'esy Pas?
>>
>> Entire email is at bottom of this blog
>>
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/07/latest-sisson-mine-approval-leaves.html
>>
>>
>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/afn-aga-opening-ceremony-fredericton-1.5221890
>>
>>
>> Assembly of First Nations opens annual general assembly in Fredericton
>>
>>
>>  3 Comments
>>
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Methinks these people must have read their emails by now N'esy Pas?
>>
>> Entire email is at bottom of this blog
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:44:31 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Carolyn Bennett can never
>> claim that she did not know N'esy Chucky Leblanc>
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______­­
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel
>>
>>
>>
>>  --------- Original message ----------
>> From: carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:39:49 +0000
>> Subject: Thank you for contacting our office
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you very much for contacting our office.  Your message has been
>> received and will be reviewed as soon as possible.
>>
>> Please note that, due to the high volume of correspondence that we
>> receive, priority is given to inquiries from constituents of
>> Toronto-St. Paul's.  If you have not done so already, please include
>> your full name, address, and postal code in your message.
>>
>> If you are a constituent and this is a time-sensitive matter, please
>> also do not hesitate to contact our constituency office by phone at
>> 416-952-3990.  We are more than happy to assist!
>>
>> If your message is regarding Crown-Indigenous Relations, it will be
>> forwarded to the department office.  For all future correspondence
>> pertaining to Crown-Indigenous Relations, we request that you please
>> write directly to
>> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
>> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
>>>
>> or call 819-997-0002.
>>
>> Thank you once again for taking the time to contact our office.  We
>> hope this information has been helpful, and look forward to connecting
>> with you again soon!
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Hon. Carolyn Bennett
>> Member of Parliament for Toronto-St. Paul's
>>
>> --
>>
>> Merci beaucoup d'avoir communiqué avec notre bureau. Votre message a
>> bien été reçu et il sera traité dès que possible.
>>
>> Veuillez noter qu'en raison du volume élevé de correspondance que nous
>> recevons, la priorité est accordée aux demandes provenant d'habitants
>> de Toronto-St. Paul's. Si ce n'est pas encore fait, nous vous prions
>> d'inclure votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal dans
>> votre message.
>>
>> S'il s'agit d'une question urgente et que vous êtes un électeur de la
>> circonscription susmentionnée, n'hésitez pas à communiquer avec notre
>> bureau de circonscription au 416-952-3990. Nous nous ferons un plaisir
>> de vous aider!
>>
>> Si votre message porte sur les relations Couronne-Autochtones, il sera
>> acheminé au bureau du ministère approprié. Pour toute autre question
>> au sujet des relations Couronne-Autochtones, nous vous saurions gré
>> d'écrire directement au ministère à l'adresse
>> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.caaadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca>,
>> ou de l'appeler au 819-997-0002.
>>
>> Merci encore une fois d'avoir pris le temps de communiquer avec notre
>> bureau. Nous espérons que ces informations vous sont utiles, et nous
>> nous réjouissons à la perspective d'échanger avec vous de nouveau!
>>
>> Cordialement,
>>
>> L'honorable Carolyn Bennett
>> Députée de Toronto-St. Paul's
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Media (RCAANC/CIRNAC)"<RCAANC.Media.CIRNAC@canada.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:39:54 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File No T-1557-15 I called
>> Office of the Honourable Carolyn Bennett before she gives her big
>> speech in Fat Fred City today
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email. You have contacted the Media Centre for
>> Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada.
>>
>> This is an automatic reply to confirm receipt of your e-mail. We will
>> respond as soon as possible.
>>
>> Please note that this inbox and the Media Centre telephone line
>> (819-934-2302) are monitored Monday through Friday, from 9:00AM to
>> 5:00PM EST, with the exception of holidays.
>>
>> Media Enquiries
>> If you have submitted a media enquiry, we will aim to respond as
>> quickly as possible.
>>
>> For media enquiries requiring an urgent response outside of regular
>> work hours, please contact Michelle Perron
>> (michelle.perron@canada.ca).
>>
>> General Public Enquiries
>> Members of the public may direct their questions to our Public
>> Enquiries service:
>>
>> Email: aadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.caaadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.ca
>>>
>> Phone: 1-800-567-9604
>> Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-866-553-0554
>> Fax: 1-866-817-3977
>>
>> Mailing address:
>> Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada
>> Public Enquiries Contact Centre
>> 10 rue Wellington
>> Gatineau QC  K1A 0H4
>>
>> ***
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Vous avez contact? le Centre des m?dias de
>> Relations Couronne-Autochtones et Affaires du Nord Canada.
>>
>> Ceci est une r?ponse automatique pour confirmer r?ception de votre
>> courriel. Nous vous r?pondrons le plus t?t possible.
>>
>> Veuillez noter que cette bo?te de r?ception et la ligne t?l?phonique
>> du Centre des m?dias (819-934-2302) sont surveill?es du lundi au
>> vendredi, de 9h00 ? 17h00 HNE, sauf les jours f?ri?s.
>>
>> Requ?tes des m?dias
>> Si vous avez soumis une requ?te, nous tenterons d'y r?pondre le plus
>> rapidement possible.
>>
>> Pour des requ?tes urgentes n?cessitant une r?ponse en dehors des
>> heures r?guli?res de travail, veuillez svp contacter Michelle Perron
>> (michelle.perron@canada.ca).
>>
>> Requ?tes g?n?rales du public
>> Les membres du public peuvent adresser leurs questions ? notre service
>> de requ?tes g?n?rales :
>>
>> Courriel : aadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.caaadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.ca>
>> T?l?phone : 1-800-567-9604
>> T?l?imprimeur (ATS) : 1-866-553-0554
>> T?l?copieur : 1-866-817-3977
>>
>> Adresse postale :
>> Affaires autochtones et du Nord Canada
>> Centre de contacts de renseignements du public
>> 10, rue Wellington
>> Gatineau QC  K1A 0H4
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>>> andre@jafaust.com>
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,  mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>>>> years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>>>> productive use of either of our time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>>>> given due consideration.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Charles Murray
>>>>
>>>> Ombud NB
>>>>
>>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "LSD / DSJ (JUS/JUS)"<BPIB-DGPAA@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:25:31 +0000
>> Subject: RE: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason
>> with David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
>> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> This confirms receipt of the message that you recently sent to the
>> Legal Systems Division or to the Justipedia Team of the Legal
>> Practices Branch. We will review your message and reply within
>> forty-eight (48) hours. Please do not reply to this email.
>>
>> ***
>>
>> La présente confirme réception du message que vous avez fait parvenir
>> à la Division des systèmes juridiques ou à l’équipe de Justipédia de
>> la Direction générale des pratiques juridiques. Nous réviserons votre
>> message et vous répondrons dans les quarante-huit (48) heures.  Prière
>> de ne pas répondre au présent courriel.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:25:26 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason
>> with David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
>> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
>> To: Support@viafoura.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
>> carrie@viafoura.com, allison@viafoura.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, LPMD-DGPD@justice.gc.ca,
>> Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:00:58 -0400
>> Subject: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason with
>> David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
>> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
>> To: pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca,
>> David.Lametti.a1@parl.gc.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
>> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca,
>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, scott.bardsley@canada.ca,
>> scott.brison@parl.gc.ca, scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Official Languages Directorate
>>
>> Telephone: 613-957-4967
>> Fax: 613-948-6924
>> Email: olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca
>> Address: Official Languages Directorate
>> Department of Justice Canada
>> 350 Albert Street, 3rd floor
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:58:23 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: C'yall in Court
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
>> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
>> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:45 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
>> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
>> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
>> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
>> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>
>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>> Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>
>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>
>>
>>
>> Merci
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
>> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
>>
>> This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
>> know that every incoming email is read and reviewed.  A member of my
>> Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
>> follow-up is required.
>> Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
>> responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
>> non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
>>
>> In your email, if you:
>>
>> *         have verified that you are a constituent by including your
>> complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
>> will be provided in a timely manner.
>> *         have not included your residential postal mailing address,
>> please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
>> and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
>>
>> If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
>> contact your Member of Parliament.  If you are unsure who your MP is,
>> you can find them by searching your postal code at
>> http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
>>
>> Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
>> attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
>> 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
>> voicemails will be returned promptly.
>>
>> Once again, thank you for your email.
>>
>> The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
>> Wellington-Halton Hills
>> toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
>> Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
>> E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.camichael.chong@parl.gc.ca>
>> Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://www.michaelchong.ca>
>>
>> THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
>> AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
>> CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
>> copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
>> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
>> received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
>> delete this message from your system.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:18:40 -0400
>> Subject: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law school too N'esy
>> Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
>> pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>> Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:44:16 -0400
>> Subject: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to law
>> school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler
>> Thompson?
>> To: info@jayshin.ca, jay@lonsdalelaw.ca, karenwang@liberal.ca,
>> lauralynnlive@gmail.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com, kgawley@burnabynow.com
>>
>> Jagmeet Singh on Tory opponent: 'Maybe he should go back to law school'
>> Conservative candidate Jay Shin said Singh was 'keeping criminals out
>> of jail' during his days as a criminal defence lawyer
>> Kelvin Gawley Burnaby Now January 13, 2019 10:27 AM
>>
>> Julie MacLellan
>> Assistant editor, and newsroom tip line
>> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com
>> Phone: 604 444 3020
>> Kelvin Gawley
>> kgawley@burnabynow.com
>> Phone: 604 444 3024
>>
>> Jay Shin
>> Direct: 604-980-5089
>> Email: jay@lonsdalelaw.ca
>> By phone: 604-628-0508
>> By e-mail: info@jayshin.ca
>>
>> Karen Wang
>> 604.531.1178
>> karenwang@liberal.ca
>>
>> Now if Mr Shin scrolls down he will know some of what the fancy NDP
>> lawyer has known for quite sometime
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Singh - QP, Jagmeet"<JSingh-QP@ndp.on.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:39:35 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
>> upcoming hearing on May 24th I called a lot of your people before High
>> Noon today Correct Ralph Goodale and Deputy Minister Malcolm Brown?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> For immediate assistance please contact our Brampton office at
>> 905-799-3939 or jsingh-co@ndp.on.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:18:35 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Minister Ralph Goodale and Pierre
>> Paul-Hus Trust that I look forward to arguing the fact that fhe Crown
>> filed my Sept 4th email to you and your buddies
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If
>> your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please
>> forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or
>> burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored.
>>
>> The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of
>> services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has
>> become vacant.  The party Whip supervises the staff retained under
>> these circumstances.
>>
>> Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of
>> Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will
>> continue to provide services to constituents.
>>
>> You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at
>> (604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway,
>> Burnaby BC.
>>
>> Office Hours:
>>
>> Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm
>> Friday 10am - 12pm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
>> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
>> of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
>> Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>> ________________________________
>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
>> Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
>> signature under applicable law.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
>> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
>> did she take all four copies?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
>> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>>
>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>>  Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I.                    Introduction
>>
>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III.               Issue
>>
>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV.              Analysis
>>
>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>
>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V.                 Conclusion
>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irwin-lampert-former-moncton-judge-codiac-regional-policing-authority-1.5175053
>
> Former Moncton judge takes on new role with the law
> Social Sharing
>
> Irwin Lampert retired after he spent 30 years as a Moncton provincial
> court judge
> Kate Letterick · CBC News · Posted: Jun 14, 2019 7:27 AM AT
>
>
> Irwin Lampert, a former provincial court judge, says he's excited to
> take on his new role as a member of the Codiac Regional Policing
> Authority. (Kate Letterick/CBC News )
>
> Irwin Lampert hung up his judicial robe and retired in February. But
> the former Moncton provincial court judge doesn't plan on taking it
> easy.
>
> Lampert was recently appointed to the Codiac Regional Policing
> Authority. He attended his first meeting Thursday evening.
>
> "I like to keep busy and I think it's a recipe for disaster to be
> idle, especially for a person like me." Lampert said.
>
>     Panhandling complaints in Moncton provoke joint RCMP-city project
>     Codiac RCMP to add Mounties as calls rise, shifts fail to meet
> minimum staffing
>
> The Authority's responsibility is to ensure adequate policing in the
> municipalities of Dieppe, Moncton and Riverview.
>
> "They do very interesting work, very important work and I'm very happy
> to have the opportunity to contribute," he said. "With my background,
> I probably can contribute a bit and I hope to do so."
> Making a difference
>
> Lampert spent 30 years on the bench. Although he misses his
> colleagues, he wanted to do something different.
>
> "I feel that I really did have an opportunity to make a difference
> with some people, and not many people can say that in their career —
> that they can make a difference."
> Lampert spent 30 years on the bench as a provincial court judge in
> Moncton. (CBC News )
>
> And he wanted to continue to make a difference.
>
> After he retired, the former judge started to explore the City of
> Moncton website, scrolling through different committees that might
> interest him. Then he sent in his application.
>
> Lampert was later contacted by Charles Leger, chair of the Codiac
> Regional Policing Authority and met with others on the committee.
>
> Eventually, he was appointed.
> 'A matter of prioritizing'
>
> Whether it's an increase in cybercrime or opioid use, Lampert says
> police officers face a number of challenges in today's society.
>
> "All these different things are coming to the forefront and the police
> have to deal with them and the resources are tight." he said.
>
> "It's a matter of prioritizing and I'm sure that's very difficult to
> do at times."
> Lampert attended his first meeting of the Codiac Regional Policing
> Authority Thursday evening in Dieppe. (Kate Letterick/CBC News)
>
> At the committee meeting, Lampert was welcomed by Leger and Codiac
> RCMP Superintendent Tom Critchlow.
>
> During various discussions, the former judge jumped right in,
> questioning Critchlow about the 154 traffic tickets handed out in May.
>
> He said that works out to about four tickets each day and was
> surprised by the low number.
>
> "At the end of the day this is about trying to balance our resources
> in line with the priorities that we have," Critchlow responded.
>
> Lampert says he'll be there to ask questions when necessary, joking
> he's not one to hold back.
>
> "The whole object is to do good for the city of Moncton. To make sure
> they get a bang for their buck. To make sure they get excellent police
> protection," he said.
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
> https://crpa-aprc.ca/crpa/the-board/
>
>
> The Board
>
> Board members of the CRPA are appointed by the municipalities of
> Dieppe, Moncton and Riverview for a three year renewable term. The
> appointments are as follows: two Board Members from the City of
> Dieppe, seven Board Members from the City of Moncton, two Board
> Members from the Town of Riverview and one Board Member from the
> Province of New Brunswick. The CRPA Board members possess a variety of
> backgrounds including community, business, accounting, legal, human
> resources, law enforcement and public relations experience.
> Members:
> Charles R. Léger
>
> Chair
> Appointed by: Moncton
> avatar female
> Vicki L. Squires
>
> Vice Chair
> Appointed by: Moncton
> Nagesh Jammula
>
> Treasurer
> Appointed by: Moncton
> Ross MacKay
>
> Secretary
> Appointed by: Riverview
> avatar female
> Danie Roy
>
> Board Member
> Appointed by: Moncton
> Daniel Allain
>
> Board Member
> Appointed by: Dieppe
> Irwin Lampert
>
> Board Member
> Appointed by: Moncton
> James Graves
>
> Board Member
> Appointed by: the Province of New Brunswick
> John Coughlan
>
> Board Member
> Appointed by: Riverview
> Robert J. Arsenault
>
> Board Member
> Appointed by: Dieppe
> Véronique Chadillon-Farinacci
>
> Board Member
> Appointed by: Moncton
> Yassine Bouslimani
>
> Board Member
> Appointed by: Moncton
> RCMP Representatives:
> Tom Critchlow, Supt.
>
> Officer in Charge, Codiac Regional RCMP
> Benoit Jolette, Insp.
>
> Officer in Charge of Operations, Codiac Regional RCMP
> avatar female
> Debbie Hathaway
>
> Financial Administrator
> Charles Savoie
>
> Strategic Planning and Policing Support Services
> avatar female
> Tania Gould
>
> Recording Secretary
>
>
> https://nbweddings.ca/
>
>
> About Me
> I was born in Montreal , moved to Moncton at a very young age and have
> lived and worked here ever since, except during my years away at
> university.
> I am a graduate of Moncton High School, Dalhousie University (Science
> degree) and the University of New Brunswick Law School. I practised
> law in Moncton for many years with a large practice in Family Law,
> before being appointed a provincial court judge. I presided in courts
> across New Brunswick hearing mainly criminal matters, including Youth
> Court.
> For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges.
> Annually since 2005, I have lectured in China. As well, I have given
> presentations to judges, high school students, parole officers,
> service clubs and community college students.
> I have been active in many different organizations including Moncton
> Headstart, the Canadian Cancer Society, volunteering at the Moncton
> City Hospital and as General Counsel for the Canadian Jewish Congress.
> In addition, I am the proud recipient of the City of Moncton
> Commemorative Medal.
> In 2019, I retired from the court and began a schedule of volunteering
> which now occupies much of my time. Furthermore, I preside over
> hearings for inmates charged with offences committed within the
> institution at the federal women’s prison in Truro, N.S.  Also, I am a
> member of the Codiac Regional Policing Authority, the body which
> oversees the work of the RCMP in our area.
> I first officiated at a wedding in 2000. As well, I have acted as
> Master of Ceremonies at many wedding receptions and other public
> events.
> My wife, Audrey, was a school teacher and administrator for many
> years. We are proud parents of 3 adult children and have 6
> grandchildren.
> Get in Touch
>
> logo-1
>
> Phone: 506-377-4994
> Email: irwinlampert@gmail.com
>