https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
![]()
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks the Fat Fred City Finest, the RCMP and Higgy et al must have noticed their evil blogger buddy Chucky Leblanc yapping about Sgt Stephane Vaillancourt's wife and kid again N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/chucky-leblanc-yapping-about-sgt.html
#nbpoli#cdnpoli
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjkU1V6i0GA
Here is a little Deja Vu for all the sneaky dudes to enjoy
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Hell everyone in your University knows that I was illegally evicted from the polling station at the Student Union Building on January 23rd. Tell me what would Stevey Boy Harper do if that had happened to him? Sue? Am I any less of a man than the Prime Minister.or the French man you and your students support? Now Computer WCIE should search the Blogs Chucky. Live by the sword. Die by the sword so to speak EH?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:23:59 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess at his email address
To: write4u@consultant.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:57:07 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess at his email address
To: Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, imc-maritimes@riseup.net,oldmaison@yahoo.com, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca, mary.schryer@gnb.ca,rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca, Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca,Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, claude.landry@gnb.ca,mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,Allen.M@parl.gc.ca, Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca,info@pco-bcp.gc.ca
I warned him that I was a very fierce political animal. I also made it clear to Sgt. Vaillancourt that I have many very justifiable reasons not to trust any cop anymore. I will do as I said and sue the Crown Corp known as the RCMP in the Court of the Queen's Bench in Fredericton unless somebody doesn't act with the scope of their employment ASAP. However I must do as I promised and file my first complaint against the Crown in Federal Court first.
I do not have to do anything any cop or lawyer may wish to suggest anymore. Not all Maritimers are dumb defeatists as Stevey Boy Harper has suggested in the past. At least I am one dumb pigheaded Maritimer who knows the differnce between my rights under the Charter and the government's wrongs practiced against them. I also know when somebody has falied their oath to uphold the law and protect the public interests and I certainly know how to hold them accountable in a legal and ethical fashion. To say you will sue someone is not a threat. It is merely a promise. Most lawyers employ such words everyday and they practice law for a fee.
I have taken no oath to obey other then one to my wife and an unspoken one to my seed.. Thus I obey only my own consience and I stress test my own integrity every day in the best interests of my Clan. It is them whom I serve and protect without a fee because it is my duty to do so just as cops and other public servants etc are gainfully employed to protect us all under oath and rule of law. My family has suffered enough over the past five years. Tis high time I sought monetary relief from our bad acting governemnts in order to bring them home to Canada to live in peace and escape further Yankee malice.
Anyone can check my work. Much of it still remains on file in the public record of many Yankee courts and one Canadian one. I am certain that anyone would agree that my Clan has had amazing patience thus far. I say nay never no more. I have been a student of enough Canadian law to get a good grip on the scene. It is time to put what I learned to good use for the benefit of my Clan. EH?
I am sending three emails to Sgt Vaillancourt and his bosses to protect my own dumb arse from more false allegations I will also use hard copy as evidence against the RCMP in court. Clearly I have introduced him to a few local witnesses EH? Sending these emails to most of them is truly redundant but it is to serve my own ends in the blogs. Charles Leblanc should know by now where to find this particular email posted within a blog. It is easy for anyone call me a liar or crazy as a loon or even to make the false claim that I am some kind of a criminal threat to them. But putting the claim in writing and signng one's name to the document is another kettle of fish. N'est Pas? Try it sometime soon. In fact I Double Dog Dare Ya to.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Stéphane Vaillancourt
506-452-3431
506-470-2300 (cell)
506- 558-1270 (pager)
I know for a fact it was my calls to Parliament etc in response to the following words that made the RCMP start to do their job and call me back.
OTTAWA - Wayne Easter, the former solicitor-general who presided during the Arar ordeal, appeared to contradict earlier testimony from RCMP head Giuliano Zacardelli today when he answered questions at a commons committee.
Responding to Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar case at the public safety and national security committee, Easter said he was never told the RCMP had passed on false information to the United States and was never told the RCMP tried to correct it, as claimed by Zacardelli.
“I was not informed that the RCMP had provided inaccurate information to the U.S.,” Easter told the MPs.
When Zacardelli met with the committee in September he was asked when he informed his minister about the RCMP’s error, and he replied that he could not recall specifically but that “briefings and timelines started to be prepared for him as the matter came up, and we started providing that information.”
But Easter emphatically told the committee that that information never reached him. In preparation for today’s appearance Easter said he reviewed documents, briefing notes and material he had received during his tenure on the Arar case and met with his staff in order to have a clear timeline of what he knew and when.
In two briefing notes from October and November of 2002, Easter said, “There was no reference to errors in information, no reference to false information, nor was there any reference to any corrective efforts having been made by the RCMP with respect to any of the information which may have been shared.”
The same was true in briefings given in June and July of the following year, Easter testified.
Giving further evidence he was in the dark abut the erroneous information passed on to the U.S., Easter said the issue was never raised with him by his American counterpart Attorney General John Ashcroft. Presumably when American investigators learned they had false information on Arar, Ashcroft would have been briefed on that information, Easter said, and he believes Ashcroft would have shared that with him.
“Attorney General Ashcroft…would have undoubtedly raised that point with me,” Easter said.Asked whether he would have acted differently had he known earlier that Arar had no terrorist links, Easter said he didn’t want to answer hypothetical questions.
Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen, was arrested in the United States in 2002, and sent to his native Syria where he was imprisoned for a year and endured torture before being released without charge.
The committee is planning to recall Zacardelli to clarify his initial testimony and he will likely be asked about the contradictions provided today by his former political boss.
© CanWest News Service 2006
Here is a little proof of how much I study my political opponents. Cya'll in Court :(.
http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?SourceId=96766
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:12:58 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Say hey to Wayne Easter and the equally dumb Newfy lawyers Rob Moore and Andrew House for me will ya?
To: Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:27:30 -0800 (PST)
From: "Sam Perrier"samperrier@hotmail.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.comSubject:
RE: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame onyou. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:36:35 -0230
HOLY SHIT DAVID, THE SCUMBAGS MUST BE CHEWING ON THEIR BOOT STRAPS.
I SENT YOU ANOTHER FAX, ITS VERY INTERESTING, I KNOW YOU WILL GET A CHUCKEL OUT OF IT.
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, MAYBE SOMEDAY SOMEONE WITH A BIT OF DECENCY WILL INVESTIGATE BYRON'S SITUATION AND TAKE ACTION, ITWILL ONLY TAKE ONE RAT TO LEAVE THE BURNING BARN SQUEALING AND THE OTHERS WILL FOLLOW TO SAVE THEIR ASSES.
SAM.
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
To: Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca, Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca, kquigg@nb.aibn.com,rjbasque@forbesrothbasque.nb.ca, dlw@barryspalding.com, cbanb@cbanb.com,albertmf@umoncton.ca, dean@law.ualberta.ca, bobinski@law.ubc.ca,lawdean@ucalgary.ca, comments@michaelignatieff.ca, info@bobrae.ca,lawdean@osgoode.yorku.ca, lawdean@dal.ca, daniel.gervais@uottawa.ca
CC: pswan@ccs.carleton.ca, andre.lareau@fd.ulaval.ca, harvey_secter@umanitoba.ca,dean.law@mcgill.ca, anne-marie.boisvert@umontreal.ca, mockle.daniel@uqam.ca,w.flanagan@queensu.ca, brent.cotter@usask.ca, daniel.b.proulx@usherbrooke.ca,mayo.moran@utoronto.ca, dean@law.uvic.ca, cbrown3@uwo.ca,belman@uwindsor.ca
Subject: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
To: greg@currentmag.ca, locke@straylight.ca, ed_hollett@hotmail.com, mgeist@uottawa.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca, tommarshall@gov.nl.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Simms.S@parl.gc.ca, Russell.T@parl.gc.ca, Manning.F@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca
CC: oldmaison@yahoo.com, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, dchafe@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca, news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, davies.carl@nbpub.com, urquhart.mia@telegraphjournal.com
Hey Greg
As you scroll down to the both of the email you see that Stevey Boy Harper byway of the Privy Council’s reply to me can never deny that he don’t know all about Byron Prior and I now. As if he ever could EH? As I told you on the phone this morning, methinks if anyone truly wishes to know the truth of all that you ask you should Google the name of Byron Prior and that of mine as well it is as I said David Raymond Amos. Better yet pick up the phone and call my cell # anytime after 8 pm in the Maritimes and I will take you down the path through the Garden of Good and Evil that will leave you staggering under the weight of the awful truth. As you could tell I am not a shy man. What you may not know is that I am never reckless with the awful truth. My number is 506 434 1379.
I must say I found it rather hard to believe that a journalist in St John’s Newfoundland has not heard of the name Byron Prior by now. I will allow you the license to claim that you have never heard of me and that federal politics is not your forte. However no Newfy who claims to be a journalist is that dumb or out of touch of the local political scene to not know of the lawsuit between the MP Billy Matthews and Byron Prior on file in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland. You write books. Perhaps you should find Martha Jette’s book about Byron and write one of your own. Rest assured I will mention both of you in mine.
I am a law professor at the University of Ottawa where I hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. My current contact information is included below:
University of Ottawa
Faculty of LawCommon Law Section
57 Louis Pasteur
Box 450, Stn. A
Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
Canada
(613) 562-5800 extension 3319
mgeist@uottawa.ca
It appears by way of CBC reporting of Paul Perrier and the following comment by the Current and others has caused Byron Prior to finally break the ice of his matters in the corporate controlled media. Hooray for Paul Perrier. He did what needed to be done. I wish I had thought of it first. As you shall see he clearly told the truth of what he was doing and why. The fact that I understood his game and supported his efforts out of the gate must have Danny williams panties in quite a knot EH?. Ask yourself why nobody mentions me. Paul Perrier is one man with sand and lots of integrity whom I will stand behind until hell freezes over. Look for these words in my own blog Greg.
I hope that Paul Perrier does not trust lawyers and the corrupt the Justice System in Newfoundland to protect his rights and interests. Clearly Danny Williams and his cohorts ignore the law all day long. Here is a couple Danny Boy should review before he supports the false imprisonment of another man from the Maritimes. I am going to sue Danny Boy anyway ask his attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall why if you don’t already know.
Criminal Code PART IV: OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE Corruption and Disobedience
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Duties Tending to Preservation of Life
217.1 Every one who undertakes, or has the authority, to direct how another person does work or performs a task is under a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any other person, arising from that work or task.
2003, c. 21, s. 3
Methinks it is the spoken word of honest common men not VOCM in Newfoundland as they gossip about Danny Williams and his cohorts that will save Paul Perrier from malicious prosecution. I say that Paul Perrier did the right thing and that his only offence is to be a minor nuisance to some very major crooks. Canada needs more men like the man the Current has labeled a hero.
Greg this comment on your post within the Current is emailed to you not posted because I am not a member of your blog nor do I wish to be, You have explained to me that the posting was written by someone else but you are the only contact person.. I find that the post is an interesting stress test of the Ethics of the CBC and the Justice System in Newfoundland as a whole by what appears to be an Independent News organization.. I truly did think by your outfit’s name that your were associated with CBC. Please feel free to post my comment to your post and ask me anything you wish in the hope that I can force CBC to obey its mandate. but computers never do. It seems that only machines are capable of acting within the scope of their employment eh? I will forward the two emails that were spoofed about Danny Williams and the NTV as well.
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks the Fat Fred City Finest, the RCMP and Higgy et al must have noticed their evil blogger buddy Chucky Leblanc yapping about Sgt Stephane Vaillancourt's wife and kid again N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/chucky-leblanc-yapping-about-sgt.html
#nbpoli#cdnpoli
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjkU1V6i0GA
Here is a little Deja Vu for all the sneaky dudes to enjoy
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Amos"
Subject:Fwd: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess
From: "David Amos"
Subject:Fwd: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess
at his email address
To:mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca, carleton@stu.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca
http://www.charlesinthehouse.com/
To:mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca, carleton@stu.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca
http://www.charlesinthehouse.com/
Everybody knows that Chucky Leblanc wasn't the only dude covertly banished from the Legislative Buildling. How come he get all the press I must ask? Perhaps you should ask his old pal and your cohort Kelly Lamrock what gives with this shit sometime N'est Pas?
Hell everyone in your University knows that I was illegally evicted from the polling station at the Student Union Building on January 23rd. Tell me what would Stevey Boy Harper do if that had happened to him? Sue? Am I any less of a man than the Prime Minister.or the French man you and your students support? Now Computer WCIE should search the Blogs Chucky. Live by the sword. Die by the sword so to speak EH?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
http://www1.gnb.ca/legis/bios1/bio-e.asp?idNo=102&versionfiltered=e
David Amos wrote:
David Raymond Amos
http://www1.gnb.ca/legis/bios1/bio-e.asp?idNo=102&versionfiltered=e
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:23:59 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess at his email address
To: write4u@consultant.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:57:07 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will take a guess at his email address
To: Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, imc-maritimes@riseup.net,oldmaison@yahoo.com, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca, mary.schryer@gnb.ca,rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca, Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca,Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, claude.landry@gnb.ca,mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,Allen.M@parl.gc.ca, Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca,info@pco-bcp.gc.ca
I warned him that I was a very fierce political animal. I also made it clear to Sgt. Vaillancourt that I have many very justifiable reasons not to trust any cop anymore. I will do as I said and sue the Crown Corp known as the RCMP in the Court of the Queen's Bench in Fredericton unless somebody doesn't act with the scope of their employment ASAP. However I must do as I promised and file my first complaint against the Crown in Federal Court first.
In the "mean" time perhaps some local cop in New Brunswick should simply do his job and investigate all the material I have given to them over the years. They really stop their bullshit about jusridiction and mandate in order to protect their personal interests. Do they not understand that I can sue them as individuals? There is nothing wrong with exposing the truth about my allegations of criminal conduct in support of public corruption for the benefit of all Canadians. Just act non paritsan and let the politcal card fall where they may. Lawyers and politicains are infinitely replacable and all falsly claim to be ethical as they pick our pockets. I would love to hear my name mentioned in a very public forum even if it was slandered. Before the Yankee elections on November 7th would be nice EH? Politicians cops and lawyers should look to their own personal interests and then uphold the law and the public trust placed in their positions. After all that is their job not mine N'est Pas?
I do not have to do anything any cop or lawyer may wish to suggest anymore. Not all Maritimers are dumb defeatists as Stevey Boy Harper has suggested in the past. At least I am one dumb pigheaded Maritimer who knows the differnce between my rights under the Charter and the government's wrongs practiced against them. I also know when somebody has falied their oath to uphold the law and protect the public interests and I certainly know how to hold them accountable in a legal and ethical fashion. To say you will sue someone is not a threat. It is merely a promise. Most lawyers employ such words everyday and they practice law for a fee.
I have taken no oath to obey other then one to my wife and an unspoken one to my seed.. Thus I obey only my own consience and I stress test my own integrity every day in the best interests of my Clan. It is them whom I serve and protect without a fee because it is my duty to do so just as cops and other public servants etc are gainfully employed to protect us all under oath and rule of law. My family has suffered enough over the past five years. Tis high time I sought monetary relief from our bad acting governemnts in order to bring them home to Canada to live in peace and escape further Yankee malice.
Anyone can check my work. Much of it still remains on file in the public record of many Yankee courts and one Canadian one. I am certain that anyone would agree that my Clan has had amazing patience thus far. I say nay never no more. I have been a student of enough Canadian law to get a good grip on the scene. It is time to put what I learned to good use for the benefit of my Clan. EH?
I am sending three emails to Sgt Vaillancourt and his bosses to protect my own dumb arse from more false allegations I will also use hard copy as evidence against the RCMP in court. Clearly I have introduced him to a few local witnesses EH? Sending these emails to most of them is truly redundant but it is to serve my own ends in the blogs. Charles Leblanc should know by now where to find this particular email posted within a blog. It is easy for anyone call me a liar or crazy as a loon or even to make the false claim that I am some kind of a criminal threat to them. But putting the claim in writing and signng one's name to the document is another kettle of fish. N'est Pas? Try it sometime soon. In fact I Double Dog Dare Ya to.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Stéphane Vaillancourt
506-452-3431
506-470-2300 (cell)
506- 558-1270 (pager)
I know for a fact it was my calls to Parliament etc in response to the following words that made the RCMP start to do their job and call me back.
OTTAWA - Wayne Easter, the former solicitor-general who presided during the Arar ordeal, appeared to contradict earlier testimony from RCMP head Giuliano Zacardelli today when he answered questions at a commons committee.
Responding to Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar case at the public safety and national security committee, Easter said he was never told the RCMP had passed on false information to the United States and was never told the RCMP tried to correct it, as claimed by Zacardelli.
“I was not informed that the RCMP had provided inaccurate information to the U.S.,” Easter told the MPs.
When Zacardelli met with the committee in September he was asked when he informed his minister about the RCMP’s error, and he replied that he could not recall specifically but that “briefings and timelines started to be prepared for him as the matter came up, and we started providing that information.”
But Easter emphatically told the committee that that information never reached him. In preparation for today’s appearance Easter said he reviewed documents, briefing notes and material he had received during his tenure on the Arar case and met with his staff in order to have a clear timeline of what he knew and when.
In two briefing notes from October and November of 2002, Easter said, “There was no reference to errors in information, no reference to false information, nor was there any reference to any corrective efforts having been made by the RCMP with respect to any of the information which may have been shared.”
The same was true in briefings given in June and July of the following year, Easter testified.
Giving further evidence he was in the dark abut the erroneous information passed on to the U.S., Easter said the issue was never raised with him by his American counterpart Attorney General John Ashcroft. Presumably when American investigators learned they had false information on Arar, Ashcroft would have been briefed on that information, Easter said, and he believes Ashcroft would have shared that with him.
“Attorney General Ashcroft…would have undoubtedly raised that point with me,” Easter said.Asked whether he would have acted differently had he known earlier that Arar had no terrorist links, Easter said he didn’t want to answer hypothetical questions.
Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen, was arrested in the United States in 2002, and sent to his native Syria where he was imprisoned for a year and endured torture before being released without charge.
The committee is planning to recall Zacardelli to clarify his initial testimony and he will likely be asked about the contradictions provided today by his former political boss.
© CanWest News Service 2006
Here is a little proof of how much I study my political opponents. Cya'll in Court :(.
http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?SourceId=96766
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:12:58 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Say hey to Wayne Easter and the equally dumb Newfy lawyers Rob Moore and Andrew House for me will ya?
To: Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:27:30 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Maybe old Zack will explain to the kids the Federal Criminal Code I quoted within this email
To: mccmar@nbnet.nb.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Maybe old Zack will explain to the kids the Federal Criminal Code I quoted within this email
To: handsofnothing@yahoo.ca, gcox@citizenspress.org, oldmaison@yahoo.com,ottawaresisters@yahoo.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Keep reading Ms. Roche
To: baldwij@psac.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Keep reading Ms. Roche
To: lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, samperrier@hotmail.com, oldehippiebc@hotmail.com,Mayor@ci.milford.ct.us, stevengerickson@yahoo.com, CityClerk@ci.milford.ct.us,jim.amann@cga.ct.gov, judicialreform@cga.ct.gov, kevin.kane@po.state.ct.us,letters@courant.com, carmen.espinosa@jud.state.ct.us,john.driscoll@jud.state.ct.us,mlevenson@globe.com
CC: info@nedlamont.com, Kathleen Dickson , info@joe2006.com,Knibbs4senate@juno.com, haroldford@fordfortennessee.com,staff@destefanoforct.com, info@votethornton.com, ralphferrucci@sbcglobal.net,comments@joecourtney.com, campaign@murphyforcongress.org, greens@ctgreens.org,melinda@bobfarr.com
Just so the Newfys and the Yankees all know, it was Jim Case of the Newfoundland Constabulary (Rarespade) who told me that he saw Whitey Bulger hanging around his town of St. John's when I was preparing to come home to run for a seat in Parliament in 2004 and do a little bounty hunting on the side. No shit ask Byron Prior or Premier Danny Williams etc..
Sam Perrier wrote:
Subject: Fwd: Maybe old Zack will explain to the kids the Federal Criminal Code I quoted within this email
To: mccmar@nbnet.nb.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Maybe old Zack will explain to the kids the Federal Criminal Code I quoted within this email
To: handsofnothing@yahoo.ca, gcox@citizenspress.org, oldmaison@yahoo.com,ottawaresisters@yahoo.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Keep reading Ms. Roche
To: baldwij@psac.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Keep reading Ms. Roche
To: lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, samperrier@hotmail.com, oldehippiebc@hotmail.com,Mayor@ci.milford.ct.us, stevengerickson@yahoo.com, CityClerk@ci.milford.ct.us,jim.amann@cga.ct.gov, judicialreform@cga.ct.gov, kevin.kane@po.state.ct.us,letters@courant.com, carmen.espinosa@jud.state.ct.us,john.driscoll@jud.state.ct.us,mlevenson@globe.com
CC: info@nedlamont.com, Kathleen Dickson , info@joe2006.com,Knibbs4senate@juno.com, haroldford@fordfortennessee.com,staff@destefanoforct.com, info@votethornton.com, ralphferrucci@sbcglobal.net,comments@joecourtney.com, campaign@murphyforcongress.org, greens@ctgreens.org,melinda@bobfarr.com
Just so the Newfys and the Yankees all know, it was Jim Case of the Newfoundland Constabulary (Rarespade) who told me that he saw Whitey Bulger hanging around his town of St. John's when I was preparing to come home to run for a seat in Parliament in 2004 and do a little bounty hunting on the side. No shit ask Byron Prior or Premier Danny Williams etc..
Sam Perrier wrote:
From: "Sam Perrier"samperrier@hotmail.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.comSubject:
RE: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame onyou. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:36:35 -0230
HOLY SHIT DAVID, THE SCUMBAGS MUST BE CHEWING ON THEIR BOOT STRAPS.
I SENT YOU ANOTHER FAX, ITS VERY INTERESTING, I KNOW YOU WILL GET A CHUCKEL OUT OF IT.
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, MAYBE SOMEDAY SOMEONE WITH A BIT OF DECENCY WILL INVESTIGATE BYRON'S SITUATION AND TAKE ACTION, ITWILL ONLY TAKE ONE RAT TO LEAVE THE BURNING BARN SQUEALING AND THE OTHERS WILL FOLLOW TO SAVE THEIR ASSES.
SAM.
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
To: Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca, Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca, kquigg@nb.aibn.com,rjbasque@forbesrothbasque.nb.ca, dlw@barryspalding.com, cbanb@cbanb.com,albertmf@umoncton.ca, dean@law.ualberta.ca, bobinski@law.ubc.ca,lawdean@ucalgary.ca, comments@michaelignatieff.ca, info@bobrae.ca,lawdean@osgoode.yorku.ca, lawdean@dal.ca, daniel.gervais@uottawa.ca
CC: pswan@ccs.carleton.ca, andre.lareau@fd.ulaval.ca, harvey_secter@umanitoba.ca,dean.law@mcgill.ca, anne-marie.boisvert@umontreal.ca, mockle.daniel@uqam.ca,w.flanagan@queensu.ca, brent.cotter@usask.ca, daniel.b.proulx@usherbrooke.ca,mayo.moran@utoronto.ca, dean@law.uvic.ca, cbrown3@uwo.ca,belman@uwindsor.ca
Subject: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
To: greg@currentmag.ca, locke@straylight.ca, ed_hollett@hotmail.com, mgeist@uottawa.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca, tommarshall@gov.nl.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Simms.S@parl.gc.ca, Russell.T@parl.gc.ca, Manning.F@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca
CC: oldmaison@yahoo.com, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, spinks08@hotmail.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca, mackay01@canada.com, PoliticsNB@hotmail.com, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, dchafe@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca, news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, davies.carl@nbpub.com, urquhart.mia@telegraphjournal.com
Hey Greg
As you scroll down to the both of the email you see that Stevey Boy Harper byway of the Privy Council’s reply to me can never deny that he don’t know all about Byron Prior and I now. As if he ever could EH? As I told you on the phone this morning, methinks if anyone truly wishes to know the truth of all that you ask you should Google the name of Byron Prior and that of mine as well it is as I said David Raymond Amos. Better yet pick up the phone and call my cell # anytime after 8 pm in the Maritimes and I will take you down the path through the Garden of Good and Evil that will leave you staggering under the weight of the awful truth. As you could tell I am not a shy man. What you may not know is that I am never reckless with the awful truth. My number is 506 434 1379.
I must say I found it rather hard to believe that a journalist in St John’s Newfoundland has not heard of the name Byron Prior by now. I will allow you the license to claim that you have never heard of me and that federal politics is not your forte. However no Newfy who claims to be a journalist is that dumb or out of touch of the local political scene to not know of the lawsuit between the MP Billy Matthews and Byron Prior on file in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland. You write books. Perhaps you should find Martha Jette’s book about Byron and write one of your own. Rest assured I will mention both of you in mine.
I ain’t shy about naming names and calling a spade a spade pursuant to the following federal code. One sort of spade I will name is Constable Jim Case of the Newfy Constabulary. He used the name rarespade for his email address as he tortured Byron Prior for years. Hell he even told me saw Whitey Bulger in downtown St. John’s back in 2004. You should know how to read as well as write EH? Check the law. Byron and his friend Paul Perrier have done nothing wrong. But the people acting against them certainly have. EH?
Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Defamatory Libel
315. No person shall be deemed to publish a defamatory libel by reason only that he publishes defamatory matter in good faith for the purpose of seeking remedy or redress for a private or public wrong or grievance from a person who has, or who on reasonable grounds he believes has, the right or is under an obligation to remedy or redress the wrong or grievance, if
(a) he believes that the defamatory matter is true;
(b) the defamatory matter is relevant to the remedy or redress that is sought; and
(c) the defamatory matter does not in any respect exceed what is reasonably sufficient in the circumstances.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 279.
You should also know as well as I that people often fail ethical stress tests when it concerns their own interests. It seemed to strange me that you claim on your own website that you know and write of many things but on the phone to you try hard to play dumb. As you could no doubt tell, I gave up on you rather promptly. I see no need to argue on my dime. I am accustomed to that kind of double talk from lawyers and journalists alike when they do not want to know anymore. Obviously the lawyer Michael Geist is both because of the fact he loves to blog about all that he knows. His silence speaks volumes to me.. I contacted him and the Newfy Constabulary etc as soon as I read his post and the words of Paul Perrier recorded by CBC..
Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Defamatory Libel
315. No person shall be deemed to publish a defamatory libel by reason only that he publishes defamatory matter in good faith for the purpose of seeking remedy or redress for a private or public wrong or grievance from a person who has, or who on reasonable grounds he believes has, the right or is under an obligation to remedy or redress the wrong or grievance, if
(a) he believes that the defamatory matter is true;
(b) the defamatory matter is relevant to the remedy or redress that is sought; and
(c) the defamatory matter does not in any respect exceed what is reasonably sufficient in the circumstances.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 279.
You should also know as well as I that people often fail ethical stress tests when it concerns their own interests. It seemed to strange me that you claim on your own website that you know and write of many things but on the phone to you try hard to play dumb. As you could no doubt tell, I gave up on you rather promptly. I see no need to argue on my dime. I am accustomed to that kind of double talk from lawyers and journalists alike when they do not want to know anymore. Obviously the lawyer Michael Geist is both because of the fact he loves to blog about all that he knows. His silence speaks volumes to me.. I contacted him and the Newfy Constabulary etc as soon as I read his post and the words of Paul Perrier recorded by CBC..
So much or for the ethics of professors who expound of the law EH? Clearly the cat or Stevey Boy Harper has got that Upper Canadian lawyer’s tongue. If Geist is so adept with the internet, he should know everything there is to know about Byron Prior and I by now. Clearly I have been studying him. Methinks the Dean of his Law School will have a shit fit in short order after I approach the kids they teach about ethical conduct etc. I think Byron Prior who is in Ottawa once again should go ask that lawyer/professor of Canada’s so called University some questions about publishing the truth on the internet face to face in front of his students. What say you?
. http://www.michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_tags/task,view/tag,email+spoof/
Geist says this of himself. And I inserted both of your Bios in this email in order to stress test your ethics as well
. http://www.michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_tags/task,view/tag,email+spoof/
Geist says this of himself. And I inserted both of your Bios in this email in order to stress test your ethics as well
I am a law professor at the University of Ottawa where I hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. My current contact information is included below:
University of Ottawa
Faculty of LawCommon Law Section
57 Louis Pasteur
Box 450, Stn. A
Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
Canada
(613) 562-5800 extension 3319
mgeist@uottawa.ca
It appears by way of CBC reporting of Paul Perrier and the following comment by the Current and others has caused Byron Prior to finally break the ice of his matters in the corporate controlled media. Hooray for Paul Perrier. He did what needed to be done. I wish I had thought of it first. As you shall see he clearly told the truth of what he was doing and why. The fact that I understood his game and supported his efforts out of the gate must have Danny williams panties in quite a knot EH?. Ask yourself why nobody mentions me. Paul Perrier is one man with sand and lots of integrity whom I will stand behind until hell freezes over. Look for these words in my own blog Greg.
I hope that Paul Perrier does not trust lawyers and the corrupt the Justice System in Newfoundland to protect his rights and interests. Clearly Danny Williams and his cohorts ignore the law all day long. Here is a couple Danny Boy should review before he supports the false imprisonment of another man from the Maritimes. I am going to sue Danny Boy anyway ask his attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall why if you don’t already know.
Criminal Code PART IV: OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE Corruption and Disobedience
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Duties Tending to Preservation of Life
217.1 Every one who undertakes, or has the authority, to direct how another person does work or performs a task is under a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any other person, arising from that work or task.
2003, c. 21, s. 3
Methinks it is the spoken word of honest common men not VOCM in Newfoundland as they gossip about Danny Williams and his cohorts that will save Paul Perrier from malicious prosecution. I say that Paul Perrier did the right thing and that his only offence is to be a minor nuisance to some very major crooks. Canada needs more men like the man the Current has labeled a hero.
Greg this comment on your post within the Current is emailed to you not posted because I am not a member of your blog nor do I wish to be, You have explained to me that the posting was written by someone else but you are the only contact person.. I find that the post is an interesting stress test of the Ethics of the CBC and the Justice System in Newfoundland as a whole by what appears to be an Independent News organization.. I truly did think by your outfit’s name that your were associated with CBC. Please feel free to post my comment to your post and ask me anything you wish in the hope that I can force CBC to obey its mandate. but computers never do. It seems that only machines are capable of acting within the scope of their employment eh? I will forward the two emails that were spoofed about Danny Williams and the NTV as well.
Obviously I forwarded this email and the two offending emails to Byron Prior Danny Boy and the NTV and that have made you a witness not only to malicious prosecution but to my own pending complaints as well. It is who that is in the Bcc box and those I forward this email to afterwards that only the Feds and me will know that should cause you the most concern as I stress test your ethics to the max.. Trust that some will respond to this email and bounce it back to me for my records because I am up to something most folks will not believe. Truth is stranger than fiction and I am about to prove it once more.
Many people consider me crazy or worse yet a criminal. However they can never deny that I ran for a Seat in Parliament twice and in two provincial elections thus far. The false allegations and the simple facts do not fit together very well. I must have been slandered EH?
Many people consider me crazy or worse yet a criminal. However they can never deny that I ran for a Seat in Parliament twice and in two provincial elections thus far. The false allegations and the simple facts do not fit together very well. I must have been slandered EH?
Many people know the reason that a man who has never voted in his life decided to become a very fierce political animal but nobody will say my name not even Byron Prior because it seems my affairs are very scary indeed. To date not one person other than my brother in law, Norfolk County Deputy Sheriff Robert F. O’Meara has been willing to call me a liar and put it in writing.
Many people joke and liken me to the Mel Gibson or some other character in a Hollywood movie and suggest I write a book. Well my life ain’t no movie and methinks I should continue living in order to finish the god damned book. Methinks a lot of lawyers and cops will regret that they did not pay better attention to the laws they swore to uphold once the truth of my matters become public knowledge. EH?
Everybody knows that there is no honour amongst thieves. Soon or later I will break the ice as well Won’t I Mr. Geist?
Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS — CONSPIRACIES — ACCESSORIES
465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:
(a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;
(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life or for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or
(ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years;
(c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable offence not provided for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the same punishment as that to which an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on conviction, be liable; and
(d) every one who conspires with any one to commit an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) [Repealed, 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61]
(3) Every one who, while in Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in a place outside Canada that is an offence under the laws of that place shall be deemed to have conspired to do that thing in Canada.
(4) Every one who, while in a place outside Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in Canada shall be deemed to have conspired in Canada to do that thing.
(5) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4), proceedings in respect of that offence may, whether or not that person is in Canada, be commenced in any territorial division in Canada, and the accused may be tried and punished in respect of that offence in the same manner as if the offence had been committed in that territorial division.
(6) For greater certainty, the provisions of this Act relating to
(a) requirements that an accused appear at and be present during proceedings, and
(b) the exceptions to those requirements,
apply to proceedings commenced in any territorial division pursuant to subsection (5).
(7) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4) and that person has been tried and dealt with outside Canada in respect of the offence in such a manner that, if the person had been tried and dealt with in Canada, he would be able to plead autrefois acquit, autrefois convict or pardon, the person shall be deemed to have been so tried and dealt with in Canada.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 465; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61; 1998, c. 35, s. 121.
Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS — CONSPIRACIES — ACCESSORIES
463. Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of persons who attempt to commit or are accessories after the fact to the commission of offences:
(a) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years;
(b) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years or less is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable;
(c) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction; and
(d) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence for which the offender may be prosecuted by indictment or for which he is punishable on summary conviction
(i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable, or
(ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 463; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 59; 1998, c. 35, s. 120.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. If the people at the Current were truly wise they would investigate a really big scoop that no other media has reported on. That said it would not behoove the Current to delete their comment within their own Blog. I already saved a digital copy of the webpage in my reliable little old computer. If they do so it is just another piece of evidence I will employ against the Crown and use to question the Current about why they questioned something one day then ignored the obvious answer a few days later.
Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS — CONSPIRACIES — ACCESSORIES
465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:
(a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;
(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life or for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or
(ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years;
(c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable offence not provided for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the same punishment as that to which an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on conviction, be liable; and
(d) every one who conspires with any one to commit an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) [Repealed, 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61]
(3) Every one who, while in Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in a place outside Canada that is an offence under the laws of that place shall be deemed to have conspired to do that thing in Canada.
(4) Every one who, while in a place outside Canada, conspires with any one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in Canada shall be deemed to have conspired in Canada to do that thing.
(5) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4), proceedings in respect of that offence may, whether or not that person is in Canada, be commenced in any territorial division in Canada, and the accused may be tried and punished in respect of that offence in the same manner as if the offence had been committed in that territorial division.
(6) For greater certainty, the provisions of this Act relating to
(a) requirements that an accused appear at and be present during proceedings, and
(b) the exceptions to those requirements,
apply to proceedings commenced in any territorial division pursuant to subsection (5).
(7) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4) and that person has been tried and dealt with outside Canada in respect of the offence in such a manner that, if the person had been tried and dealt with in Canada, he would be able to plead autrefois acquit, autrefois convict or pardon, the person shall be deemed to have been so tried and dealt with in Canada.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 465; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61; 1998, c. 35, s. 121.
Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS — CONSPIRACIES — ACCESSORIES
463. Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of persons who attempt to commit or are accessories after the fact to the commission of offences:
(a) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years;
(b) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an accused is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years or less is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable;
(c) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction; and
(d) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact to the commission of an offence for which the offender may be prosecuted by indictment or for which he is punishable on summary conviction
(i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding a term that is one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that offence is liable, or
(ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 463; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 59; 1998, c. 35, s. 120.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. If the people at the Current were truly wise they would investigate a really big scoop that no other media has reported on. That said it would not behoove the Current to delete their comment within their own Blog. I already saved a digital copy of the webpage in my reliable little old computer. If they do so it is just another piece of evidence I will employ against the Crown and use to question the Current about why they questioned something one day then ignored the obvious answer a few days later.